Midokura presents at OpenStack LA Meetup Talk August 28th, 2014 Hosted by Metacloud, Inc.

1. From
Nova-­‐Network
to
Neutron
and
Beyond:
A
Look
at
OpenStack
Networking
OpenStack
LA
MeetUp
August
2014

2. Agenda
▪ Network
VirtualizaFon
Requirements
▪ Brief
Overview
of
OpenStack
▪ EvoluFon
of
Neutron
Networking
▪ Midokura
Use
Cases
and
Futures
for
NV
1

3. 2
Network Virtualization
Requirements#

4. What is Network Virtualization (NV)?
3
Taking logical (virtual) networks
and services, and decoupling
them from the underlying network
hardware.
Well suited for highly virtualized
environments.
Any Application
Virtual Networks
Any Cloud Management Platform
MidoNet
VirtualizaFon
PlaMorm
Distributed
Firewall
Logical
L2
Existing Network Hardware
service
Distributed
Load
Balancer
ser
Distributed
VPN
Service
Logical
L3
KVM, ESXi, Xen LXC

5. Requirements for NV
4
Requirements
4
Tenant/Project A
Network A1
VM1 VM3
Network A2
VM5
Tenant/Project B
Network B1
VM2 VM4
uplink
Provider Virtual
Router (L3)
Tenant A
Virtual Router
Tenant B
Virtual Router
VM6
Virtual L2
Switch B1
Virtual L2
Switch A1
Virtual L2
Switch A2
TenantB office
Tenant B
VPN Router
Office
Network

6. Requirements for NV
5
Requirements
5
Tenant/Project A
Network A1
VM1 VM3
Network A2
VM5
Tenant/Project B
Network B1
VM2 VM4
uplink
Provider Virtual
Router (L3)
Tenant A
Virtual Router
Tenant B
Virtual Router
VM6
Virtual L2
Switch B1
Virtual L2
Switch A1
Virtual L2
Switch A2
TenantB office
Tenant B
VPN Router
Office
Network
Isolated tenant
networks
(virtual data center)

7. Requirements for NV
6
Requirements
6
Tenant/Project A
Network A1
VM1 VM3
Network A2
VM5
L3 Isolation
(similar to VPC and VRF)
Tenant/Project B
Network B1
VM2 VM4
uplink
Provider Virtual
Router (L3)
Tenant A
Virtual Router
Tenant B
Virtual Router
VM6
Virtual L2
Switch B1
Virtual L2
Switch A1
Virtual L2
Switch A2
TenantB office
Tenant B
VPN Router
Office
Network

8. Requirements for NV
Redundant, optimized, and
fault tolerant paths to to/
from external networks
(e.g. via eBGP)
7
Requirements
7
Tenant/Project A
Network A1
VM1 VM3
Network A2
VM5
Tenant/Project B
Network B1
VM2 VM4
uplink
Provider Virtual
Router (L3)
Tenant A
Virtual Router
Tenant B
Virtual Router
VM6
Virtual L2
Switch B1
Virtual L2
Switch A1
Virtual L2
Switch A2
TenantB office
Tenant B
VPN Router
Office
Network
Fault-tolerant devices and links

9. Requirements for NV
8
8
Tenant/Project A
Network A1
VM1 VM3
Network A2
VM5
Tenant/Project B
Network B1
VM2 VM4
uplink
Provider Virtual
Router (L3)
Tenant A
Virtual Router
Tenant B
Virtual Router
VM6
Virtual L2
Switch B1
Virtual L2
Switch A1
Virtual L2
Switch A2
TenantB office
Tenant B
VPN Router
Office
Network
Fault-tolerant devices and links
Fault tolerant
devices and links

10. Requirements for NV
9
Device-agnostic networking services:
• Load Balancing
• Firewalls
• Stateful NAT
• VPN
Networks and services must be fault
tolerant and scalable

11. Requirements for NV
10
Single pane of glass to manage it all.

12. Bonus Requirements for NV
11
Integration with cloud or
virtualization management
systems.
Optimize network by exploiting
management configuration.
Single virtual hop for networking
services
Fully distributed control plane
(ARP, DHCP, ICMP)

13. Checklist for Network Virtualization
12
q Multi-tenancy
q Scalable, fault-tolerant devices
(or device-agnostic network
services).
q L2 isolation
q L3 routing isolation
• VPC
• Like VRF (virtual routing
and fwd-ing)
q Scalable gateways
q Scalable control plane
• ARP, DHCP, ICMP
q Floating/Elastic Ips
q Stateful NAT
• Port masquerading
• DNAT
q ACLs
q Stateful (L4) Firewalls
• Security Groups
q Load Balancing with health checks
q Single Pane of Glass (API, CLI, GUI)
q Integration with management platforms
• OpenStack, CloudStack
• vSphere, RHEV, System Center
q Decoupled from Physical Network

14. Evolution of Network Virtualization
13
INNOVATION
IN
NETWORKING
AGILITY
VLAN
APPROACH
Manual End-to-End
VLAN configured
on physical switches
• Static
• Manual
• Complex
• Tenant state
maintained in
physical network
13

15. Using VLANs for NV
14
q Multi-tenancy
q Scalable, fault-tolerant devices
(or device-agnostic network
services).
ü L2 isolation
q L3 routing isolation
• VPC
• Like VRF (virtual routing
and fwd-ing)
q Scalable gateways
q Scalable control plane
• ARP, DHCP, ICMP
q Floating/Elastic IPs
q Stateful NAT
• Port masquerading
• DNAT
q ACLs
q Stateful (L4) Firewalls
• Security Groups
q Load Balancing with health checks
q Single Pane of Glass (API, CLI, GUI)
q Integration with management platforms
• OpenStack, CloudStack
• vSphere, RHEV, System Center
q Decoupled from Physical Network

16. Evolution of Network Virtualization
15
INNOVATION
IN
NETWORKING
AGILITY
OPENFLOW
REACTIVE
APPOACH
Reactive End-to-End
Requires programming
of flows
• Limited scalability
• Hard to manage
• Impact to
performance
• Still requires tenant
state in physical
network
VLAN
APPROACH
Manual End-to-End
VLAN configured
on physical switches
• Static
• Manual
• Complex
• Tenant state
maintained in
physical network
15

17. What is OpenFlow?
16
A communication protocol that gives access to the forwarding
plane of a network switch over the network.

18. What is OpenFlow?
17
A centralized remote controller
decides the path of packets
through the switches

19. Using OpenFlow for NV
18
ü Multi-tenancy
q Scalable, fault-tolerant devices
(or device-agnostic network
services).
ü L2 isolation
△ L3 routing isolation
• VPC
• Like VRF (virtual routing
and fwd-ing)
q Scalable gateways
q Scalable control plane
• ARP, DHCP, ICMP
q Floating/Elastic IPs
q Stateful NAT
• Port masquerading
• DNAT
q ACLs
q Stateful (L4) Firewalls
• Security Groups
q Load Balancing with health checks
△ Single Pane of Glass (API, CLI, GUI)
△ Integration with management platforms
• OpenStack, CloudStack
• vSphere, RHEV, System Center
q Decoupled from Physical Network

20. Evolution of Network Virtualization
19
PROACTIVE
INNOVATION
IN
NETWORKING
AGILITY
SOFTWARE OVERLAY
Virtual Network
Overlays
Decoupling hardware
and software
• Cloud-ready agility
• Unlimited scalability
• Open, standards-based
• No impact to physical
network
OPENFLOW
REACTIVE
APPOACH
Reactive End-to-End
Requires programming
of flows
• Limited scalability
• Hard to manage
• Impact to
performance
• Still requires tenant
state in physical
network
VLAN
APPROACH
Manual End-to-End
VLAN configured
on physical switches
• Static
• Manual
• Complex
• Tenant state
maintained in
physical network
19

21. 20
How do overlays achieve
real network
virtualization?

22. 21
Encapsulation and Tunneling
Provides isolation

23. 22
Stateless core. Stateful edge.

24. 23
Network processing at the edge
Decoupled from the physical network

25. 24
Virtual network changes don’t affect
the physical network

26. 25
Single virtual hop network services
avoid “traffic trombones”

27. 26
Centralized state and control for
maximum agility

28. 27
Scalable, fault tolerant gateways to
external networks

29. Using Overlays for NV
28
ü Multi-tenancy
ü Scalable, fault-tolerant devices
(or device-agnostic network
services).
ü L2 isolation
ü L3 routing isolation
• VPC
• Like VRF (virtual routing
and fwd-ing)
ü Scalable Gateways
ü Scalable control plane
• ARP, DHCP, ICMP
ü Floating/Elastic IPs
ü Stateful NAT
• Port masquerading
• DNAT
ü ACLs
ü Stateful (L4) Firewalls
• Security Groups
ü Load Balancing with health checks
ü Single Pane of Glass (API, CLI, GUI)
ü Integration with management platforms
• OpenStack, CloudStack
• vSphere, RHEV, System Center
ü Decoupled from Physical Network

30. 29
Sounds great, but when
will it be a reality?

31. Network Virtualization Overlays Today
30

32. OpenStack
31

33. What
is
OpenStack?
32

34. OpenStack
Releases
#
Release schedule: time-based scheme with major release ~ every 6 months#
Codenames are alphabetical: #
#
• Austin: The first design summit took place in Austin, TX#
• Bexar: The second design summit took place in San Antonio, TX (Bexar county).#
• Cactus: Cactus is a city in Texas#
• Diablo: Diablo is a city in the bay area near Santa Clara, CA#
• Essex: Essex is a city near Boston, MA#
• Folsom: Folsom is a city near San Francisco, CA#
• Grizzly: Grizzly is an element of the state flag of California (design summit takes
33
place in San Diego, CA)#
• Havana: Havana is an unincorporated community in Oregon#
• Icehouse: Ice House is a street in Hong Kong#
• Juno: Juno is a locality in Georgia#
• Kilo: Paris (Sèvres, actually, but that's close enough) is home to the Kilogram,
the only remaining SI unit tied to an artifact#

35. 34
Before
Neutron:
Nova
Networking
• Nova-Networking was the only option in OpenStack prior to Quantum/Neutron#
• Original method from A release
• No IPv6 in first release but eventually introduced#
• Still available today as an alternative to Neutron, but will be phased out#
#
Options Available within nova-networking initially:
• Only Flat
• Flat DHCP
#
Limitations
• No flexibility with topologies (no 3-tier)
• Tenants can’t create/manage L3 Routers
• Scaling limitations (L2 domain)#
• No 3rd party vendors supported
• Complex HA model#

36. 35
Nova-­‐network
slightly
evolves
Introduced VLAN DHCP mode
Improvements:
• L2 Isolation – each project gets a
VLAN assigned to it
#
Limitations
• Need to pre-configure VLANs on
physical network
• Scaling Limitations - VLANs
• No L3
• No 3-tier topologies
• No 3rd party vendors

37. 36
Nova-­‐network
slightly
evolves
C & D Releases had two general categories:
• Flat Networking#
• VLAN Networking#
#
Limitations
• Need to pre-configure VLANs on physical network
• Scaling Limitations - VLANs
• No L3#
• No 3-tier topologies
• No 3rd party vendors#

38. Quantum
37
OpenStack Networking branches out of the Nova project!
!
• Tech Preview of Quantum appeared in D release#
#
• Brought ability to have a multi-tiered network, with isolated network
segments for various applications or customers#
• Quantum-server allowed for Python daemon to expose the OpenStack
Networking API and passes requests to 3rd party plugins#
• Officially released in Folsom Release#

39. Introducing Neutron
38
• Name Change from Quantum to Neutron was announced in April 2013#
• Legal Agreement to phase out code name “Quantum” due to
trademark of Quantum Corporation#
OpenStack Networking as a First Class Service!
• Pluggable Architecture
• Standard API
• Many choices#
#
Plugins Available!
• MidoNet!
• OVS Plugin
• Linux Bridges
• Flat DHCP
• VLAN DHCP#
• ML2#
• More Services (LBaaS, VPNaaS)
• Flexible network topologies#
• NSX
• Plumgrid#
• Nuage#
• Contrail
• Ryu#

40. Evolution of Neutron
39
Release
Name
Release
Date
Included
Components
AusFn
21
October
2010
Nova,
SwiZ
Bexar
3
February
2011
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ
Cactus
15
April
2011
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ
Diablo
22
September
2011
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ
Essex
5
April
2012
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ,
Horizon,
Keystone
Folsom
27
September
2012
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ,
Horizon,
Keystone,
Quantum,
Cinder
Grizzly
4
April
2013
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ,
Horizon,
Keystone,
Quantum,
Cinder
Havana
17
October
2013
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ,
Horizon,
Keystone,
Neutron,
Cinder
Icehouse
April
2014
Nova,
Glance,
SwiZ,
Horizon,
Keystone,
Neutron,
Cinder

41. Latest
Neutron
Features
40
Havana Release Brought:!
• LBaaS: shipped an updated API and HAProxy driver support#
• VPNaaS: VPN API supports IPSec and L3 agent ships with an
OpenSwan driver#
• FWaaS: enables tenant to configure security at the edge via the
firewall API and on the VIF via the security group API#
• New plug-in Modular Layer 2 (ML2): ML2 plugin supports local, flat,
VLAN, GRE and VXLAN network types via a type drivers and different
mechanism drivers #
Icehouse Release:!
• New vendor plugins, LBaaS drivers and VPNaaS drivers#
• OVS plugin and Linux Bridge plugin are deprecated: The ML2 plugin
combines OVS and Linux Bridge support into one plugin#
• Neutron team has extended support for legacy Quantum configuration
file options for one more release#

42. Upcoming
Neutron
Features
41
Expectations for Juno:!
#
• Provide Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) functionality: Define API to
create and deploy DVRs to improve the performance#
• Group-based Policy Abstractions for Neutron: API extensions for easier
consumption of the networking resources by separate organizations and
management systems#
• IPv6 advancements: #
• Add RADVD to namespace to handle RAs, #
• Stateful and stateless DHCP for IPv6#
• LBaaS new API driver and object model improvement for complex cases#
• Quotas extension support in MidoNet plugin#
• Incubator system: #
• Instead of only using the summit for developing new features,
features can be developed and gestate over time#

43. 42
MidoNet Overview#

44. 43
MidoNet
Network
VirtualizaFon
PlaMorm
Logical
L2
Switching
-­‐
L2
isolaFon
and
path
opFmizaFon
with
distributed
virtual
switching
Interconnect
with
VLAN
enabled
network
via
L2
Gateway
Logical
L3
RouFng
–
L3
isolaFon
and
rouFng
between
virtual
networks
No
need
to
exit
the
soZware
container
-­‐
no
hardware
required
Distributed
Firewall
–
Provides
ACLs,
high
performance
kernel
integrated
firewall
via
a
flexible
rule
chain
system
Logical
Layer
4
Load
Balancer
–
Provides
applicaFon
load
balancing
in
soZware
form
-­‐
no
need
for
hardware
based
firewalls
VxLAN/GRE
–
Provides
VxLAN
and
GRE
tunneling
Provides
L2
connecFvity
across
L3
transport.
This
is
useful
when
L2
fabric
doesn’t
reach
all
the
way
from
the
racks
hosFng
the
VMs
to
the
physical
L2
segment
of
interest.
MidoNet/Neutron
API–
Alignment
with
OpenStack
Neutron’s
API
for
integraFon
into
compaFble
cloud
management
soZware
Any Application
OpenStack/Cloud Management System
MidoNet
Network
VirtualizaFon
PlaMorm
v
Distributed
Firewall
Layer
4
Load
Balancer
Logical
L2
Logical
L3
Any Network Hardware
VxLAN/GRE
Any Hypervisor
NAT
MidoNet
/
Neutron
API
NAT
–
Provides
Dynamic
NAT,
Port
masquerading

45. OpenStack
IntegraFon
5
Easy
integraFon
with
OpenStack:
MidoNet
provides
a
plugin
for
Neutron.
MidoNet Plugin

46. Architecture
Overview

47. Use
Cases
Automated
Provisioning
Isolated
Sandboxes
Enhanced
Security
Enable
Compliance
Scale
out
L3
Gateway
Bridge
legacy
VLANs
Do it Faster Do it Bigger
Val u e
Agility
Provide rapid
provisioning of isolated
network infrastructure for
labs and devops.
Logical
Network
Provisioning
Control
Network admins can
better secure, control &
view network traffic.
Single
Pane
of
Glass
OpsTools
Do it Better
IaaS
Cloud
Build multi-tenant
clouds with visibility
into usage.
Tenant
Control
Automated
Self Service
Metering
Performance
Improve network
performance using edge
overlay & complementary
technologies.
Single
Hop
Virtual
Networking
VXLAN
Hardware
Gateway
Massive
performance
with
40Gb
Support
Scale
Add virtual network infra
& services simply &
resiliently without
hardware & bottlenecks.
Distributed
Logical
Networking
FW,
LB,
L2/3,
NAT
Limitless
“VLANs”
IPv6
Solution for
OpenStack
Networking
Use MN to overcome
limitations of Neutron for
OpenStack users.
Replaces OVS
Plugin

48. 47
So what’s next for
Network Virtualization?

49. 48
Get more out of the physical network.

50. 49
Network Virtualization
decouples the logical
network from the physical
network.

51. NVOs can’t ignore the physical network
50
Dynamic changes to logical
network are not dependent on the
physical network configuration.
Sharing state to and from the
physical network can be
supplementary.
- Monitoring
- Traffic Engineering

52. 51
Get more intelligence out of your network

53. NVOs provide a wealth of information
52
NVOs centralize information on
your network
We can start taking advantage of
this information
- Security
- Compliance
- Optimizing Networks

54. 53
Bridge physical and virtual networks
more efficiently

55. Midokura VTEP Solution
54
IP Fabric
MidoNet MidoNet
Virtual
Any
Cloud
Management
PlaLorm
MidoNet
Network
State
Database
VM VM VM VM VM VM
OVSDBc
Server
Storage
Services
Physical
VM VM
VTEP
TCP/IP
OVSDB
VxLAN Tunnel
Physical Connection
Key
OVSDBs

56. 55
Break through performance barriers
of software networking

57. Performance
40Gb
VxLAN
Offloading:
virtualized
environments
require
high
throughput
infrastructure
• IntegraFon
with
Mellanox
provides
40
Gbps
saturaFon
• VxLAN
offloading
improves
CPU
uFlizaFon
levels
• Scale
with
performance
through
HW
interconnect
• Increase
throughput
with
offloading
where
no
offloading
would
otherwise
have
flat
results
• High
bandwidth
can
now
be
achieved
in
soZware

58. 57
Q&A

59. 58
MidoNet
Advantages
#
Check
out
our
blog:
hkp://blog.midokura.com/
Follow
us
on
Twiker:
@midokura

60. Thank You
Cynthia Thomas
@_techcet_
59