SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  17
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Marriage:
New Jersey’s No. 1 Weapon
         Against
   Childhood Poverty
 How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children
   and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage
             A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • 2012

     Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society
Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in New Jersey, 1929–2010
   Throughout most of New                  PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
Jersey’s history, out-of-wedlock
childbearing was rare.                     40%

  When the federal government’s                                                                           35.0%
War on Poverty began in 1964,              35%
only 5.4 percent of children in
New Jersey were born out of                30%
wedlock. However, over the next
four decades, the number rose
                                           25%
rapidly. By 2010, 35 percent of
births in New Jersey occurred
outside of marriage.                       20%


                                           15%
Note: Initiated by President Lyndon
Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty        10%
led to the creation of more than three
dozen welfare programs to aid poor
persons. Government has spent $16.7         5%
trillion on means-tested aid to the poor
since 1964.
                                            0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health       1930   1940   1950   1960   1970   1980    1990   2000   2010
Statistics.

                                                           Chart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey      heritage.org
Death of Marriage in New Jersey, 1929–2010
  The marital birth rate — the            PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLES
percentage of all births that occur
to married parents — is the flip           100%
side of the out-of-wedlock birth
rate.
  Through most of the 20th cen-           90%
tury, marital births were the norm
in New Jersey. In 1964, nearly 95
percent of births occurred to
married couples.                          80%
  However, in the mid-1960s,
the marital birth rate began to fall
steadily. By 2010, only 65 percent
                                          70%
of births in New Jersey occurred
to married couples.
                                                                                                          65.0%

                                          60%
Note: In any given year, the sum of the
out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1)
and the marital birth rate (Chart 2)
equals 100 percent of all births.
                                          50%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health       1930   1940   1950   1960   1970   1980    1990   2000   2010
Statistics.

                                                           Chart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey      heritage.org
In New Jersey, Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty
by 87 Percent
  The rapid rise in out-of-wedlock     PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR
childbearing is a major cause of        35%
high levels of child poverty in New
Jersey.
                                        30%          28.7%
  Some 28.7 percent of single
mothers with children are poor
compared to 3.7 percent of              25%
married couples with children.
  Single-parent families with           20%
children are nearly eight times
more likely to be poor than
families in which the parents are       15%
married.
  The higher poverty rate among         10%
single-mother families is due both
to the lower education levels of                                                     3.7%
                                         5%
the mothers and the lower income
due to the absence of the father.
                                         0%
                                                  Single-Parent,             Married,Two-Parent
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American             Female-Headed                     Families
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.                    Families

                                                    Chart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey   heritage.org
In New Jersey, Three in Ten Families with Children Are Not Married

  Overall, married couples head
about 70 percent of families with
children in New Jersey. About 30
percent are single-parent families.

                                           Unmarried
                                            Families
                                             29.4%
                                                                    Married
                                                                    Families
                                                                     70.6%




Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                       Chart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey   heritage.org
In New Jersey, 74 Percent of Poor Families with Children
Are Not Married
   Among poor families with
children in New Jersey, about
three-quarters are not married. By
contrast, one-quarter of poor
families with children are headed
by married couples.                                              Married
                                                                 Families
                                                                  25.9%

                                            Unmarried
                                             Families
                                              74.1%




Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                       Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey   heritage.org
In New Jersey, Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers
  Out-of-wedlock births are often       PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS
confused erroneously with teen          BY AGE OF MOTHER
births, but only 5.4 percent of
out-of-wedlock births in New                                            Under
                                                                        Age 18:
Jersey occur to girls under age 18.                                      5.4%
  By contrast, some 70 percent of
out-of-wedlock births occur to
young adult women between the                                                    Age
ages of 18 and 29.                                       Age                    18–19:
                                                        30–54:                  11.2%
                                                        24.5%



                                                                                 Age
                                                                                20–24:
                                                          Age                   33.0%
                                                         25–29:
                                                         25.9%

Note: Figures have been rounded.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS
data.

                                                    Chart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey   heritage.org
Less-Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth
Outside of Marriage
   Unwed childbearing occurs most           PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL
frequently among the women who              OR OUT OF WEDLOCK
will have the greatest difficulty
                                            100%                                                            Unmarried
supporting children by themselves:                                                              8.1%
those with low levels of education.          90%
                                                                                                            Mothers
  In the U.S., among women who                                                   42.0%
are high school dropouts, about              80%
65.2 percent of all births occur                                  54.5%
outside marriage. Among women                70%
who have only a high school                          65.2%
diploma, well over half of all births        60%                                                            Married
                                                                                               91.9%        Mothers
occur outside marriage. By contrast,
                                             50%
among women with at least a
college degree, only 8.1 percent of          40%
births are out of wedlock.                                                       58.0%
                                             30%
                                                                  45.5%
Note: Specific data on out-of-wedlock        20%
births and maternal education are not                34.8%
available in New Jersey. However, the        10%
pattern varies little between states. New
Jersey data will be very similar to the       0%
national data presented in this chart.             High School High School       Some        College        Mother’s
                                                    Dropout     Graduate        College      Graduate       education
Source: U.S. Department of Health and                 (0–11        (12          (13–15         (16+         level
Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. 
                                                      Years)      Years)         Years)       Years)

                                                             Chart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey    heritage.org
Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective
in Reducing Child Poverty in New Jersey
  The poverty rate of married          PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES                  Poverty Rate of Families by
couples with children is dramati-      WITH CHILDREN THAT                                                          Single
                                                                              Education and Marital Status
cally lower than the rate for house-   ARE POOR                                                                    Married
                                                                               of the Head of Household
holds headed by single parents.          60%
This is true even when the married
couple is compared to single par-               51.7%
ents with the same education level.      50%

  For example, in New Jersey, the
poverty rate for a single mother         40%
who has only a high school                                         32.0%
diploma is 32 percent, but the           30%
poverty rate for a married couple
family headed by an individual                                                        20.7%
                                         20%
who, similarly, has only a high                         14.9%
school degree is far lower at 5.3
percent.                                 10%                                                             8.4%
                                                                           5.3%
  On average, marriage drops the                                                              3.1%               1.4%
poverty rate by about 81 percent          0%
among families with the same                    High School        High School           Some             College
education level.                                 Dropout            Graduate            College           Graduate

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American   Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school
Community Survey, 2005–2009 data.      dropouts are minor teenagers.

                                                            Chart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey         heritage.org
Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in New Jersey
  Out-of-wedlock childbearing           PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK
varies considerably by race.
                                        80%
  In 2008, 35 percent of births in
New Jersey occurred outside                                                                8.3%
marriage. The rate was lowest           70%                                                       68.2%
among non-Hispanic whites at
about one in six births (17.7 per-                                               59.4%
                                        60%
cent). Among Hispanics, about six
in ten births were out-of-wedlock.
                                        50%
Among blacks, over two-thirds of
the births were to unmarried
women (68.2 percent).                   40%
                                               35.0%

                                        30%

                                        20%                     17.7%

                                        10%


Source: U.S. Department of Health and    0%
Human Services, Centers for Disease           All Races         White           Hispanic           Black
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS                                Non-                               Non-
data.                                                          Hispanic                           Hispanic

                                                       Chart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey    heritage.org
Growth of Unwed Childbearing by Race in New Jersey, 1929–2008
  Historically, out-of-wedlock           PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK
childbearing has been somewhat
more frequent among blacks than          80%
among whites. However, prior to                                                                          Black Non-
                                                                                                         Hispanic
the onset of the federal                 70%
                                                                                                         68.2%
government’s War on Poverty in
1964, the rates for both whites and                                                                       Hispanic
                                         60%
blacks were comparatively low.                                                                            59.4%
  In 1964, about one in forty (2.6
                                         50%
percent) white children were born
outside marriage. By 2008, the
number had risen to one in six           40%
(17.7 percent).
  In 1964, about one in five black        30%
children (21 percent) were born
outside marriage. By 2008, the
                                         20%                                                             White Non-
number had risen to nearly seven
in ten (68.2 percent).                                                                                   Hispanic
                                         10%                                                             17.7%


                                          0%
Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census
Bureau, and National Center for Health     1930   1940   1950    1960   1970    1980   1990   2000 2008
Statistics.

                                                         Chart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey    heritage.org
Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births
in New Jersey
                                                  ALL BIRTHS                           OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS
    In New Jersey in 2008, some
47.5 percent of all births occurred
to non-Hispanic whites, 26 per-
cent occurred to Hispanics, and
15.5 percent occurred to non-                                              White Non-            24.0%
Hispanic blacks.                                                            Hispanic
   Because blacks and Hispanics                        47.5%
are more likely to have children
without being married, they
account for a disproportionately
larger share of all out-of-wedlock                                                               44.1%
births.
   In New Jersey in 2008, 44.1
percent of all non-marital births                      26.0%                Hispanic
were to Hispanic women, 30.1
percent were to black non-
Hispanic women, and 24 percent
were to non-Hispanic whites.                           15.5%               Black Non-            30.1%
                                                                             Hispanic
                                                       11.0%
Source: U.S. Department of Health and                                      Asian/Other                      1.8%
Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS
data.                                   Note: Figures have been rounded.

                                                          Chart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey   heritage.org
Non-Married White Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor
in New Jersey
  Marriage leads to lower poverty      PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
rates for whites, blacks, and His-
panics.
                                        14%
  For example, in 2009, the pov-
erty rate for married white families                                                 11.6%
in New Jersey was 1.8 percent.          12%
But the poverty rate for non-
married white families was six          10%
times higher at 11.6 percent.
                                         8%


                                         6%


                                         4%

                                                     1.8%
                                         2%


                                         0%
                                                Married Families             Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                                   Chart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey    heritage.org
Non-Married Black Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor
in New Jersey
  In 2009, the poverty rate for        PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
married black couples in New
Jersey was 4.5 percent, while the
                                        30%
poverty rate for non-married black
families was about six times                                                         26.4%
higher at 26.4 percent.                 25%


                                        20%


                                        15%


                                        10%


                                                     4.5%
                                         5%


                                         0%
                                                Married Families             Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                                   Chart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey    heritage.org
Non-Married Hispanic Families Are Four Times More Likely to Be Poor
in New Jersey
  In 2009, the poverty rate for        PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR
Hispanic married families in New
Jersey was 7.6 percent, while the
                                        35%
poverty rate among non-married
                                                                                     31.4%
families was over four times
higher at 31.4 percent.                 30%


                                        25%


                                        20%


                                        15%


                                        10%
                                                     7.6%

                                         5%


                                         0%
                                                Married Families             Non-Married Families
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey, 2007–2009 data.

                                                   Chart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey    heritage.org
Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage

1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty
   and improving child well-being.

    Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child
  poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of
  marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers.
    Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income
  communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner:

     • Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high
       proportion of at-risk youth;
     • Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the
       benefits of marriage; and,
     • Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the
       benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to
       interested low-income clients.

2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs.

3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction
   programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.
The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage
Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative
or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org.




  The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to
formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov-
ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense.
  Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As
conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving.
As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values.




                                     214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Marriage & Poverty: District of Columbia
Marriage & Poverty: District of ColumbiaMarriage & Poverty: District of Columbia
Marriage & Poverty: District of ColumbiaThe Heritage Foundation
 

Tendances (20)

Marriage & Poverty: North Carolina
Marriage & Poverty: North CarolinaMarriage & Poverty: North Carolina
Marriage & Poverty: North Carolina
 
Marriage & Poverty: District of Columbia
Marriage & Poverty: District of ColumbiaMarriage & Poverty: District of Columbia
Marriage & Poverty: District of Columbia
 
Marriage Poverty - New Mexico
Marriage Poverty - New MexicoMarriage Poverty - New Mexico
Marriage Poverty - New Mexico
 
Marriage & Poverty: Minnesota
Marriage & Poverty: MinnesotaMarriage & Poverty: Minnesota
Marriage & Poverty: Minnesota
 
Marriage Poverty - Virginia
Marriage Poverty - VirginiaMarriage Poverty - Virginia
Marriage Poverty - Virginia
 
Marriage & Poverty: Louisiana
Marriage & Poverty: LouisianaMarriage & Poverty: Louisiana
Marriage & Poverty: Louisiana
 
Marriage & Poverty: Kansas
Marriage & Poverty: KansasMarriage & Poverty: Kansas
Marriage & Poverty: Kansas
 
Marriage Poverty - Illinois
Marriage Poverty - IllinoisMarriage Poverty - Illinois
Marriage Poverty - Illinois
 
Marriage & Poverty: Wyoming
Marriage & Poverty: WyomingMarriage & Poverty: Wyoming
Marriage & Poverty: Wyoming
 
Marriage & Poverty: Oregon
Marriage & Poverty: OregonMarriage & Poverty: Oregon
Marriage & Poverty: Oregon
 
Marriage Poverty - South Carolina
Marriage Poverty - South CarolinaMarriage Poverty - South Carolina
Marriage Poverty - South Carolina
 
Marriage Poverty - Indiana
Marriage Poverty - IndianaMarriage Poverty - Indiana
Marriage Poverty - Indiana
 
Marriage & Poverty: Mississippi
Marriage & Poverty: MississippiMarriage & Poverty: Mississippi
Marriage & Poverty: Mississippi
 
Marriage Poverty - Mississippi
Marriage Poverty - MississippiMarriage Poverty - Mississippi
Marriage Poverty - Mississippi
 
Marriage & Poverty: Alaska
Marriage & Poverty: AlaskaMarriage & Poverty: Alaska
Marriage & Poverty: Alaska
 
Marriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
Marriage & Poverty: PennsylvaniaMarriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
Marriage & Poverty: Pennsylvania
 
Marriage & Poverty: Kentucky
Marriage & Poverty: KentuckyMarriage & Poverty: Kentucky
Marriage & Poverty: Kentucky
 
Marriage and Poverty - West Virginia
Marriage and Poverty - West VirginiaMarriage and Poverty - West Virginia
Marriage and Poverty - West Virginia
 
Marriage Poverty - Utah
Marriage Poverty - UtahMarriage Poverty - Utah
Marriage Poverty - Utah
 
Marriage Poverty - Oklahoma
Marriage Poverty - OklahomaMarriage Poverty - Oklahoma
Marriage Poverty - Oklahoma
 

Similaire à Marriage Reduces Child Poverty by 87% in NJ

Marriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty
Marriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood PovertyMarriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty
Marriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood PovertyThe Heritage Foundation
 

Similaire à Marriage Reduces Child Poverty by 87% in NJ (20)

Marriage & Poverty: Missouri
Marriage & Poverty: MissouriMarriage & Poverty: Missouri
Marriage & Poverty: Missouri
 
Marriage Poverty - Missouri
Marriage Poverty - MissouriMarriage Poverty - Missouri
Marriage Poverty - Missouri
 
Marriage Poverty - New York
Marriage Poverty - New YorkMarriage Poverty - New York
Marriage Poverty - New York
 
Marriage & Poverty: New York
Marriage & Poverty: New YorkMarriage & Poverty: New York
Marriage & Poverty: New York
 
Marriage & Poverty: Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: VirginiaMarriage & Poverty: Virginia
Marriage & Poverty: Virginia
 
Marriage & Poverty: Illinois
Marriage & Poverty: IllinoisMarriage & Poverty: Illinois
Marriage & Poverty: Illinois
 
Marriage Poverty - Minnesota
Marriage Poverty - MinnesotaMarriage Poverty - Minnesota
Marriage Poverty - Minnesota
 
Marriage Poverty - Oregon
Marriage Poverty - OregonMarriage Poverty - Oregon
Marriage Poverty - Oregon
 
Marriage Poverty - District of Columbia
Marriage Poverty - District of ColumbiaMarriage Poverty - District of Columbia
Marriage Poverty - District of Columbia
 
Marriage & Poverty: Connecticut
Marriage & Poverty: ConnecticutMarriage & Poverty: Connecticut
Marriage & Poverty: Connecticut
 
Marriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty
Marriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood PovertyMarriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty
Marriage: Minnesota's No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty
 
Marriage Poverty - Connecticut
Marriage Poverty - ConnecticutMarriage Poverty - Connecticut
Marriage Poverty - Connecticut
 
Marriage & Poverty: North Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: North DakotaMarriage & Poverty: North Dakota
Marriage & Poverty: North Dakota
 
Marriage Poverty - North Dakota
Marriage Poverty - North DakotaMarriage Poverty - North Dakota
Marriage Poverty - North Dakota
 
Marriage & Poverty: Rhode Island
Marriage & Poverty: Rhode IslandMarriage & Poverty: Rhode Island
Marriage & Poverty: Rhode Island
 
Marriage & Poverty: New Hampshire
Marriage & Poverty: New HampshireMarriage & Poverty: New Hampshire
Marriage & Poverty: New Hampshire
 
Marriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
Marriage and Poverty - WisconsinMarriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
Marriage and Poverty - Wisconsin
 
Marriage & Poverty: Nevada
Marriage & Poverty: NevadaMarriage & Poverty: Nevada
Marriage & Poverty: Nevada
 
Marriage & Poverty: Massachusetts
Marriage & Poverty: MassachusettsMarriage & Poverty: Massachusetts
Marriage & Poverty: Massachusetts
 
Marriage Poverty - New Hampshire
Marriage Poverty - New HampshireMarriage Poverty - New Hampshire
Marriage Poverty - New Hampshire
 

Plus de The Heritage Foundation (13)

Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to ObamacareTracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
Tracking the States' Responses to Obamacare
 
Marriage Poverty - Vermont
Marriage Poverty - VermontMarriage Poverty - Vermont
Marriage Poverty - Vermont
 
Marriage Poverty - Texas
Marriage Poverty - TexasMarriage Poverty - Texas
Marriage Poverty - Texas
 
Marriage Poverty - Tennessee
Marriage Poverty - TennesseeMarriage Poverty - Tennessee
Marriage Poverty - Tennessee
 
Marriage Poverty - South Dakota
Marriage Poverty - South DakotaMarriage Poverty - South Dakota
Marriage Poverty - South Dakota
 
Marriage Poverty - Rhode Island
Marriage Poverty - Rhode IslandMarriage Poverty - Rhode Island
Marriage Poverty - Rhode Island
 
Marriage Poverty - Ohio
Marriage Poverty - OhioMarriage Poverty - Ohio
Marriage Poverty - Ohio
 
Marriage poverty - North Carolina
Marriage poverty - North CarolinaMarriage poverty - North Carolina
Marriage poverty - North Carolina
 
Marriage Poverty - Nevada
Marriage Poverty - NevadaMarriage Poverty - Nevada
Marriage Poverty - Nevada
 
Marriage Poverty - Nebraska
Marriage Poverty - NebraskaMarriage Poverty - Nebraska
Marriage Poverty - Nebraska
 
Marriage Poverty - Montana
Marriage Poverty - MontanaMarriage Poverty - Montana
Marriage Poverty - Montana
 
Marriage Poverty - Michigan
Marriage Poverty - MichiganMarriage Poverty - Michigan
Marriage Poverty - Michigan
 
Marriage Poverty - Massachusetts
Marriage Poverty - MassachusettsMarriage Poverty - Massachusetts
Marriage Poverty - Massachusetts
 

Dernier

Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office EnvironmentCyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office Environmentelijahj01012
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMVoces Mineras
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03DallasHaselhorst
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyotictsugar
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Kirill Klimov
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?Olivia Kresic
 
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!Doge Mining Website
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfrichard876048
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptxFinancial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptxsaniyaimamuddin
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaoncallgirls2057
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal auditChapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal auditNhtLNguyn9
 

Dernier (20)

Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office EnvironmentCyber Security Training in Office Environment
Cyber Security Training in Office Environment
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
 
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
Unlocking the Future: Explore Web 3.0 Workshop to Start Earning Today!
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
 
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptxFinancial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
Financial-Statement-Analysis-of-Coca-cola-Company.pptx
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi NCR
 
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
FULL ENJOY Call girls in Paharganj Delhi | 8377087607
 
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal auditChapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
Chapter 9 PPT 4th edition.pdf internal audit
 

Marriage Reduces Child Poverty by 87% in NJ

  • 1. Marriage: New Jersey’s No. 1 Weapon Against Childhood Poverty How the Collapse of Marriage Hurts Children and Three Steps to Reverse the Damage A Heritage Foundation Book of Charts • 2012 Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society
  • 2. Growth of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in New Jersey, 1929–2010 Throughout most of New PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK Jersey’s history, out-of-wedlock childbearing was rare. 40% When the federal government’s 35.0% War on Poverty began in 1964, 35% only 5.4 percent of children in New Jersey were born out of 30% wedlock. However, over the next four decades, the number rose 25% rapidly. By 2010, 35 percent of births in New Jersey occurred outside of marriage. 20% 15% Note: Initiated by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964, the War on Poverty 10% led to the creation of more than three dozen welfare programs to aid poor persons. Government has spent $16.7 5% trillion on means-tested aid to the poor since 1964. 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Statistics. Chart 1 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 3. Death of Marriage in New Jersey, 1929–2010 The marital birth rate — the PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN TO MARRIED COUPLES percentage of all births that occur to married parents — is the flip 100% side of the out-of-wedlock birth rate. Through most of the 20th cen- 90% tury, marital births were the norm in New Jersey. In 1964, nearly 95 percent of births occurred to married couples. 80% However, in the mid-1960s, the marital birth rate began to fall steadily. By 2010, only 65 percent 70% of births in New Jersey occurred to married couples. 65.0% 60% Note: In any given year, the sum of the out-of-wedlock birth rate (Chart 1) and the marital birth rate (Chart 2) equals 100 percent of all births. 50% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Statistics. Chart 2 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 4. In New Jersey, Marriage Drops the Probability of Child Poverty by 87 Percent The rapid rise in out-of-wedlock PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN THAT ARE POOR childbearing is a major cause of 35% high levels of child poverty in New Jersey. 30% 28.7% Some 28.7 percent of single mothers with children are poor compared to 3.7 percent of 25% married couples with children. Single-parent families with 20% children are nearly eight times more likely to be poor than families in which the parents are 15% married. The higher poverty rate among 10% single-mother families is due both to the lower education levels of 3.7% 5% the mothers and the lower income due to the absence of the father. 0% Single-Parent, Married,Two-Parent Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Female-Headed Families Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Families Chart 3 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 5. In New Jersey, Three in Ten Families with Children Are Not Married Overall, married couples head about 70 percent of families with children in New Jersey. About 30 percent are single-parent families. Unmarried Families 29.4% Married Families 70.6% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 4 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 6. In New Jersey, 74 Percent of Poor Families with Children Are Not Married Among poor families with children in New Jersey, about three-quarters are not married. By contrast, one-quarter of poor families with children are headed by married couples. Married Families 25.9% Unmarried Families 74.1% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 5 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 7. In New Jersey, Few Unwed Births Occur to Teenagers Out-of-wedlock births are often PERCENTAGE OF OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS confused erroneously with teen BY AGE OF MOTHER births, but only 5.4 percent of out-of-wedlock births in New Under Age 18: Jersey occur to girls under age 18. 5.4% By contrast, some 70 percent of out-of-wedlock births occur to young adult women between the Age ages of 18 and 29. Age 18–19: 30–54: 11.2% 24.5% Age 20–24: Age 33.0% 25–29: 25.9% Note: Figures have been rounded. Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Chart 6 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 8. Less-Educated Women Are More Likely to Give Birth Outside of Marriage Unwed childbearing occurs most PERCENTAGE OF BIRTHS THAT ARE MARITAL frequently among the women who OR OUT OF WEDLOCK will have the greatest difficulty 100% Unmarried supporting children by themselves: 8.1% those with low levels of education. 90% Mothers In the U.S., among women who 42.0% are high school dropouts, about 80% 65.2 percent of all births occur 54.5% outside marriage. Among women 70% who have only a high school 65.2% diploma, well over half of all births 60% Married 91.9% Mothers occur outside marriage. By contrast, 50% among women with at least a college degree, only 8.1 percent of 40% births are out of wedlock. 58.0% 30% 45.5% Note: Specific data on out-of-wedlock 20% births and maternal education are not 34.8% available in New Jersey. However, the 10% pattern varies little between states. New Jersey data will be very similar to the 0% national data presented in this chart. High School High School Some College Mother’s Dropout Graduate College Graduate education Source: U.S. Department of Health and (0–11 (12 (13–15 (16+ level Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data.  Years) Years) Years) Years) Chart 7 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 9. Both Marriage and Education Are Highly Effective in Reducing Child Poverty in New Jersey The poverty rate of married PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES Poverty Rate of Families by couples with children is dramati- WITH CHILDREN THAT Single Education and Marital Status cally lower than the rate for house- ARE POOR Married of the Head of Household holds headed by single parents. 60% This is true even when the married couple is compared to single par- 51.7% ents with the same education level. 50% For example, in New Jersey, the poverty rate for a single mother 40% who has only a high school 32.0% diploma is 32 percent, but the 30% poverty rate for a married couple family headed by an individual 20.7% 20% who, similarly, has only a high 14.9% school degree is far lower at 5.3 percent. 10% 8.4% 5.3% On average, marriage drops the 3.1% 1.4% poverty rate by about 81 percent 0% among families with the same High School High School Some College education level. Dropout Graduate College Graduate Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Note: Virtually none of the heads of families in the chart who are high school Community Survey, 2005–2009 data. dropouts are minor teenagers. Chart 8 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 10. Unwed Birth Rates Vary Strongly by Race in New Jersey Out-of-wedlock childbearing PERCENT OF BIRTHS THAT ARE OUT OF WEDLOCK varies considerably by race. 80% In 2008, 35 percent of births in New Jersey occurred outside 8.3% marriage. The rate was lowest 70% 68.2% among non-Hispanic whites at about one in six births (17.7 per- 59.4% 60% cent). Among Hispanics, about six in ten births were out-of-wedlock. 50% Among blacks, over two-thirds of the births were to unmarried women (68.2 percent). 40% 35.0% 30% 20% 17.7% 10% Source: U.S. Department of Health and 0% Human Services, Centers for Disease All Races White Hispanic Black Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS Non- Non- data. Hispanic Hispanic Chart 9 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 11. Growth of Unwed Childbearing by Race in New Jersey, 1929–2008 Historically, out-of-wedlock PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK childbearing has been somewhat more frequent among blacks than 80% among whites. However, prior to Black Non- Hispanic the onset of the federal 70% 68.2% government’s War on Poverty in 1964, the rates for both whites and Hispanic 60% blacks were comparatively low. 59.4% In 1964, about one in forty (2.6 50% percent) white children were born outside marriage. By 2008, the number had risen to one in six 40% (17.7 percent). In 1964, about one in five black 30% children (21 percent) were born outside marriage. By 2008, the 20% White Non- number had risen to nearly seven in ten (68.2 percent). Hispanic 10% 17.7% 0% Sources: U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureau, and National Center for Health 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 Statistics. Chart 10 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 12. Racial Composition of All Births and Out-of-Wedlock Births in New Jersey ALL BIRTHS OUT-OF-WEDLOCK BIRTHS In New Jersey in 2008, some 47.5 percent of all births occurred to non-Hispanic whites, 26 per- cent occurred to Hispanics, and 15.5 percent occurred to non- White Non- 24.0% Hispanic blacks. Hispanic Because blacks and Hispanics 47.5% are more likely to have children without being married, they account for a disproportionately larger share of all out-of-wedlock 44.1% births. In New Jersey in 2008, 44.1 percent of all non-marital births 26.0% Hispanic were to Hispanic women, 30.1 percent were to black non- Hispanic women, and 24 percent were to non-Hispanic whites. 15.5% Black Non- 30.1% Hispanic 11.0% Source: U.S. Department of Health and Asian/Other 1.8% Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008 NHS data. Note: Figures have been rounded. Chart 11 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 13. Non-Married White Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor in New Jersey Marriage leads to lower poverty PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR rates for whites, blacks, and His- panics. 14% For example, in 2009, the pov- erty rate for married white families 11.6% in New Jersey was 1.8 percent. 12% But the poverty rate for non- married white families was six 10% times higher at 11.6 percent. 8% 6% 4% 1.8% 2% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 12 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 14. Non-Married Black Families Are Six Times More Likely to Be Poor in New Jersey In 2009, the poverty rate for PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR married black couples in New Jersey was 4.5 percent, while the 30% poverty rate for non-married black families was about six times 26.4% higher at 26.4 percent. 25% 20% 15% 10% 4.5% 5% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 13 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 15. Non-Married Hispanic Families Are Four Times More Likely to Be Poor in New Jersey In 2009, the poverty rate for PERCENTAGE OF FAMILIES THAT ARE POOR Hispanic married families in New Jersey was 7.6 percent, while the 35% poverty rate among non-married 31.4% families was over four times higher at 31.4 percent. 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 7.6% 5% 0% Married Families Non-Married Families Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2007–2009 data. Chart 14 • Marriage and Poverty in New Jersey heritage.org
  • 16. Three Steps to Reduce Child Poverty through Marriage 1) Provide information on the benefits of marriage in reducing child poverty and improving child well-being. Marriage is a highly effective institution which greatly decreases parental and child poverty while improving long-term outcomes for children. Conversely, the absence of marriage greatly increases welfare costs and imposes added burdens on taxpayers. Unfortunately, almost no information on these topics is available in low-income communities. This information deficit should be corrected in the following manner: • Explain the benefits of marriage in middle and high schools with a high proportion of at-risk youth; • Create public education campaigns in low-income communities on the benefits of marriage; and, • Require federally funded birth control clinics to provide information on the benefits of marriage and the skills needed to develop stable families to interested low-income clients. 2) Reduce anti-marriage penalties in means-tested welfare programs. 3) Promote life-goal-planning, marriage-strengthening, and divorce-reduction programs to increase healthy marriages and reduce divorce and separation.
  • 17. The Family & Religion Initiative is one of 10 Transformational Initiatives making up The Heritage Foundation’s Leadership for America campaign. For more products and information related to this initiative or to learn more about the Leadership for America campaign, please visit heritage.org. The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited gov- ernment, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. Our vision is to build an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish. As conservatives, we believe the values and ideas that motivated our Founding Fathers are worth conserving. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and values. 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE • Washington, D.C. 20002 • (202) 546-4400 • heritage.org