1. Double Loop Development
Decision-making styles
Followers (36%)
Risk-averse
Worried about making the wrong choice
Make decisions on the basis of how they made similar decisions in the
past or on how others they trust have made decisions.
Generally cautious
More aware of cost-effectiveness than some others.
Focus on proven methods.
Unlikely to decide in favour of something entirely untried but like idea
of innovation.
May repeatedly challenge your position
Only agree to something if seen it elsewhere first.
How to influence
Demonstrate where others have succeeded with similar decisions.
Provide the evidence.
Avoid selling yourself unless you have a proven track record
Look for previous decision the person has taken (or people they
trust) which support what you want and refer to those.
Focus on cases studies,
Use references & testimonials
Present more evidence in support of your favoured option than
alternatives
Responds best to:
Reason
Coalition
Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HT
e-mail: hilary.robertson@doubleloopdevelopment.co.uk
Tel: 0131 208 2701
2. Double Loop Development
Charismatics (25%)
Like new ideas
Enthusiastic & captivating
Talkative
Dominant
Short attention span
Methodical decision-makers
Can process large amounts of information quickly
Influenced by visual interpretations
Can get really enthusiastic about a new idea
Will not make a decision unless facts support
Make decisions on the basis of balanced information
Take responsibility for decisions
How to influence
Focus on results
Demonstrate evidence
Impress with your intelligence
Keep arguments simple and straightforward
Use visual aids
Be up-front about possible problems/risks
Responds best to:
Reason – but be sure to start with most critical info
Coalition or higher authority – influenced by other senior
people/people they respect
Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HT
e-mail: hilary.robertson@doubleloopdevelopment.co.uk
Tel: 0131 208 2701
3. Double Loop Development
Sceptics (19%)
Very strong personality
Suspicious of new data
Especially suspicious of anything that challenges their view
Trust people like themselves
Can seem aggressive and combative
Usually take charge
Can be rebellious
Demanding of both time & energy
Regularly disagree with espoused views or the status quo
Quite self-absorbed and act primarily on feelings
Almost always tell you what they think
How to influence
Credibility is vital.
If you don’t have enough find some
Enlist support of someone sceptic trusts
Responds best to:
Friendliness – building up a relationship so that they trust your
judgement
Coalition or higher authority – gaining an endorsement or enlisting
help/support from someone the sceptic trusts
Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HT
e-mail: hilary.robertson@doubleloopdevelopment.co.uk
Tel: 0131 208 2701
4. Double Loop Development
Thinkers (11%)
Can be the hardest group to influence.
Strongly risk-averse
Slow to reach a decision
Set considerable store by arguments backed up by firm data
Like quantitative & comparative data
Usually academic, intelligent, cerebral
Logical
Guard emotions
Voracious readers
Choose words carefully
Always try to anticipate change
Play to win
How to influence
Have as much information ready as possible eg
Cost-benefits
Surveys
Option appraisals
Explain position from all perspectives
Address counter arguments
Explain carefully how you arrive at your conclusions
Be open about any concerns/risks
Appeal to thinker’s intelligence
Responds best to
Reason
Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HT
e-mail: hilary.robertson@doubleloopdevelopment.co.uk
Tel: 0131 208 2701
5. Double Loop Development
Controllers (9%)
Usually strong personalities
Sometimes overbearing
Seen as logical, unemotional
Dislike ambiguity and uncertainty
Driven by own fears and insecurities
Only see things from own perspective
Given to snap judgements
May discuss decision with others but rarely listens
Focused on facts and analyse arguments carefully
Pay attention to the fine detail as a way of covering up their fears
Open to fact or evidence-based reasoning.
Controlling is more important that innovating
Try to avoid being held accountable
How to influence
Argument must be structured & linear
Credibility is vital
An expert should present info
Avoid pushing your point of view too hard
Provide all the information required and let the controller come to
their own decision
Be prepared to wait
Responds to
Reason
Friendliness
Tigh a’ Mhaide, Brig o’ Turk, Perthshire, FK17 8HT
e-mail: hilary.robertson@doubleloopdevelopment.co.uk
Tel: 0131 208 2701