1. Web 2.0 Core Concepts, Applications, and Implications Tomáš Pitner Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics Brno, Czech Republic

5. The “Web 2.0 Cloud ˝̋

8. What is typically considered a Web 2.0 service/application? Communication Asynchronous Synchronous Communication

9. Coordination Coordination

10. Community Support Community

11. Content Creation Content Creation

12. Content Sharing Content Sharing

13. Content Contextualization Content Contextualization

14. What for new qualities they bring? ↗ Identified in Hampel, Pitner, Steinbring: Qualität des Neuen Webs , Proc. of GeNeMe Conference, Dresden 2007 How to classify the services according to functionality? ↗ Classified and Analyzed in Drasil, Hampel, Pitner, Steinbring: Get Ready for Mashability! , Proc. of ICEIS Intl. Conference, Barcelona 2008 Web 2.0 Services - Summary

15. Web 2.0 Services - Summary Content-oriented Functionality Classical CSCW Functionality Mashing Aspects New Qualities

19. Functionality /2 Users add the value Contextualized data

21. Functionality /3 Google Maps + AP News Amazon + Last.fm

22. Functionality /4 Cross-linking-based integration

23. Functionality – Workflow 1. Original resource: an article

24. Functionality – Workflow 2. Resource is clipped & shared

25. Functionality – Workflow 3. The clip is blogged

26. Functionality – Workflow 4. The blog entry is bookmarked

27. Functionality – Workflow 5. The bookmarks are syndicated

33. Web 2.0 is user-centric, so what do the users think about it? Are they aware of all the potentials and shortcomings? How would they describe it? That were our characteristics but...

36. We were describing the current state-of-the-art till now... What's likely to happen in the next few years? ...and how we try to contribute to it Trends & Vision

56. Technological Aspects – Level of Integration

58. Licensing of the Content

63. Thank you for your attention! Tomáš Pitner [email_address] Questions