The document discusses how national museums in mainland China and Taiwan portray Japan and construct national identity. It analyzes exhibits at the National Museum of China in Beijing and the National Museum of Taiwan History in Tainan. Both museums emphasize narratives of national victimhood at the hands of Japan but differ in other ways. The Chinese museum focuses on high politics and modernization under the CCP, while the Taiwanese museum emphasizes social history during Japanese rule and a less overt narrative of victimization.
18. The narrative structure: national
victimhood and its transcendence
• Both the classic KMT and current CCP narratives of modern Chinese
history take as central themes victimhood/humiliation and its
transcendence – with Japan as the principal agent of this national
trauma;
– A similar narrative structure is evident in some recent ‘nativist’ accounts of
Taiwan’s past, but substituting the KMT/China for Japan
• The NMC exhibition features no mention of the Great Leap or Cultural
Revolution
– Vagueness surrounding the deficiencies of KMT governance on the
mainland (corruption, favouring the capitalist classes, repression of
dissent…) – in contrast to the old emphasis on these (reflecting a fear of
encouraging comparisons between the current CCP regime and the old
KMT one?)
– No coverage at all of KMT governance of Taiwan (Feb 28 incident, White
Terror…) – thus nothing to suggest why KMT rule might have contributed
to souring Taiwanese against the prospect of ‘reunification’ with the
mainland – or to a certain nostalgia for the period of Japanese colonial
rule
58. Diverging narratives
NMC
• The victimhood‐transcendence
narrative is strongly evident –
with the Japanese invasion
centre‐stage (while class struggle
is now absent as a major theme)
• The NMC narrative is linear and
overwhelmingly focused on high
politics (a repackaged version of
the old ‘revolutionary history’
narrative); it is explicitly and
unapologetically didactic
• The NMC narrative has a clearly
normative status within mainland
China (though there is diversity
within the museums sector)
NMTH
• The victimhood‐transcendence
narrative is evident, but less
obviously or stridently than (for
example) in Taipei’s ‘228 Peace
Memorial Museum’; Japan is not
portrayed as ‘victimizing’ Taiwanese
• More ‘themed’ and focused on social
than political history – extensive use
of walk‐through dioramas and
artifacts relating to everyday life
• The NMTH narrative has a less
clearly normative status – it caters
largely to a ‘native Taiwanese’
constituency within a museums
system that nowadays (unlike 30
years ago) offers something for
almost everyone
59. ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: national identity in a
Japanese mirror
NMC
• A clear, singular (politically, culturally,
racially?), central subject to the
narrative – ‘the Chinese people’,
represented by the CCP – with the
Japanese firmly in the category of
hostile ‘other’
• Acknowledges no positive role for
Japan in China’s modernization
(despite the huge impact of Meiji
Japan on late Qing / early Republican
reformists and revolutionaries)
• Taiwan and the Taiwanese are
unambiguously located with ‘us’ (‘the
Chinese’) against ‘them’ (the Japanese
and other foreign imperialists) –
Taiwan’s significance is primarily as a
lingering symptom of this Sino‐
Japanese confrontation
NMTH
• Taiwanese identity defined and
celebrated as hybrid (culturally
and ethnically) – embracing the
Japanese along with other
groups/influences arriving from
overseas
• Japanese influence on the
modernization of Taiwan’s
society, economy and culture is
represented in broadly positive
terms
• China’s status vis‐à‐vis Taiwan is
ambiguous – implicitly, Taiwanese
identity is depicted as owing as
much to the Japanese legacy as to
that of China