SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  4
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                             IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                             OF FLORIDA

                                             SECOND DISTRICT

SPRING LAKE NC, LLC; SBK CAPITAL,            )
LLC; CLEAR CHOICE HEALTH CARE,               )
LLC; SAMUEL B. KELLETT; JEFFREY E.           )
CLEVELAND; DEBORAH P. KENNEDY;               )
GEOFFREY R. FRASER; and JASON                )
CANLAS (as to SPRING LAKE                    )
REHABILITATION CENTER),                      )
                                             )
             Appellants,                     )
                                             )
v.                                           )       Case No. 2D12-2140
                                             )
TONY HOLLOWAY, as Personal                   )
Representative of the Estate of Jessie V.    )
Holloway, Deceased,                          )
                                             )
             Appellee.                       )
                                             )

Opinion filed February 1, 2013.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk
County; Steven L. Selph, Judge.

James D. Moriarty, Melissa M. Burghardt,
Brian M. Bursa, and Kirsten K. Ullman of
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP,
Tampa, for Appellant.

Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus of Wilkes & McHugh,
P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.


ALTENBERND, Judge.

             The appellants, collectively referred to as "Spring Lake," appeal an order

denying their motion to compel arbitration in a wrongful death action arising from
Jessie V. Holloway's stay at Spring Lake's rehabilitation center. The trial court refused

to enforce the arbitration agreement that Ms. Holloway signed when she entered the

center. We must reverse this order.

              The facts involved in this case are not complex. Ms. Holloway was a

resident at the Spring Lake rehabilitation center from August 20, 2010, to January 4,

2011. When she entered the facility, she executed a standard resident admission and

financial agreement and a separate arbitration agreement. At the time, she was 92

years old and had a fourth-grade education. She could not spell well and often had to

sound out words while reading. She had memory problems and was increasingly

confused. There is no evidence that the admissions staff at Spring Lake used any

improper methods to obtain Ms. Holloway's signature or that she was misled in any

fashion.

              The trial court declined to find that Ms. Holloway was incompetent or

incapacitated to enter into a contract at the time of her admittance. It was persuaded,

however, that the contracts were so complex that she could not possibly have

understood what she was signing. Accordingly, it ruled that there was no meeting of the

minds between the parties and that the arbitration clause was unenforceable.

              We have little doubt that the trial court correctly assessed Ms. Holloway's

ability to understand these documents. For better or worse, her limited abilities are not

a basis to prevent the enforceability of this contract. In a very similar case, this court

explained:

                     As a general proposition, "[w]here one contracting
              party signs the contract, and the other party accepts and
              signs the contract, a binding contract results." D.L. Peoples
              Group, Inc. v. Hawley, 804 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA
              2002) (citing Skinner v. Haugseth, 426 So. 2d 1127, 1129

                                            -2-
(Fla. 2d DCA 1983)); see also Mandell v. Fortenberry, 290
             So. 2d 3, 7 (Fla. 1974) ("There is a presumption that the
             parties signing legal documents are competent, that they
             mean what they say, and that they should be bound by their
             covenants."); Dodge of Winter Park, Inc. v. Morley, 756 So.
             2d 1085, 1085-86 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) ("Generally, it is
             enough that the party against whom the contract is sought to
             be enforced signs it."). Thus, "[a] party normally is bound by
             a contract that the party signs unless the party can
             demonstrate that he or she was prevented from reading it or
             induced by the other party to refrain from reading it."
             Consol. Res. Healthcare Fund I, Ltd. v. Fenelus, 853 So. 2d
             500, 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); see also Allied Van Lines,
             Inc. v. Bratton, 351 So. 2d 344, 347-48 (Fla. 1977) ("It has
             long been held in Florida that one is bound by his contract.
             Unless one can show facts and circumstances to
             demonstrate that he was prevented from reading the
             contract, or that he was induced by statements of the other
             party to refrain from reading the contract, it is binding."
             Estate of Etting ex rel. Etting v. Regents Park at Aventura,
             Inc., 891 So. 2d 558, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (holding that
             the fact that the decedent was legally blind when she signed
             the arbitration agreement did not render the agreement
             invalid in the absence of evidence that she was coerced into
             signing it or prevented from knowing its contents). This is
             true whether a party is physically unable to read the
             agreement, see Estate of Etting, 891 So.2d at 558, or simply
             chooses not to read the agreement, see Fenelus, 853 So. 2d
             at 504.

Rocky Creek Ret. Props., Inc. v. Estate of Fox ex rel. Bank of Am., N.A., 19 So. 3d

1105, 1108 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); see also SA-PG Sun City Ctr., LLC v. Kennedy, 79 So.

3d 916, 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (reaffirming that a party's alleged inability to understand

an agreement does not vitiate her assent to that agreement in the absence of some

evidence that she was prevented from knowing its contents).

             As a practical matter, a significant percentage of the people who enter

nursing homes and rehabilitation centers have mental or physical limitations that make it

difficult for them to understand the agreements signed at admittance. The agreements

are sufficiently complex that many able-bodied adults would not fully understand the

                                          -3-
agreements. The same is probably true for most of the contracts that we sign for many

consumer services and even for the agreements clients sign when they hire attorneys.

              There was a time when most contracts were individually negotiated and

handwritten. In that period, perhaps the law could adequately describe a mutual

agreement as a "meeting of the minds" between the parties. But a literal "meeting of

the minds," requiring both parties to have a comparable, subjective understanding of

their agreement is clearly not what the courts intend by the use of this phrase. Our

modern economy simply could not function if a "meeting of the minds" required

individualized understanding of all aspects of the typical standardized contract that is

now signed without any expectation that the terms will actually be negotiated between

the parties.1 Without suggesting that the contract in this case is abusive in any fashion,

the law must address abuses in standardized contracts by rules other than the "meeting

of the minds."

              We note that the issue addressed in Spring Lake NC, LLC v. Figueroa, 37

Fla. L. Weekly D2842 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 14, 2012), has also been raised in this appeal.

That issue was not the basis of the trial court's ruling, and we do not reach the issue

today.

              Reversed and remanded.


NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


              1
               While case law still uses the phrase "meeting of the minds," especially
when the specific terms of an agreement are actually negotiated between the parties,
see, e.g., Lunas v. Cooperativa de Seguros Multiples de P.R., 100 So. 3d 239, 241 (Fla.
2d DCA 2012), criticism has prompted courts to analyze contracts as requiring a
"mutuality of assent," as a more objective concept. See 30 Williston on Contracts
§ 75:30 (4th ed. 2012) (noting that the expression, "meeting of the minds" has been
repeatedly criticized as obsolete and archaic).

                                           -4-

Contenu connexe

Plus de Umesh Heendeniya

Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NevadaJennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NevadaUmesh Heendeniya
 
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...Umesh Heendeniya
 
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.Umesh Heendeniya
 
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...Umesh Heendeniya
 
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.Umesh Heendeniya
 
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaintSteven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaintUmesh Heendeniya
 
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, EsqKnives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, EsqUmesh Heendeniya
 
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...Umesh Heendeniya
 
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...
Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...
Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...Umesh Heendeniya
 
U.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report 662-Pages
U.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report    662-PagesU.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report    662-Pages
U.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report 662-PagesUmesh Heendeniya
 
New York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - Lawsuit
New York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - LawsuitNew York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - Lawsuit
New York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - LawsuitUmesh Heendeniya
 

Plus de Umesh Heendeniya (20)

Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NevadaJennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
 
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
 
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
 
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
 
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
 
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
 
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
 
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
 
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaintSteven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
 
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, EsqKnives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
 
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
 
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
 
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
 
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
 
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
 
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
 
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
 
Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...
Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...
Wall Street and the Financial Crisis-Anatomy of a Financial Collapse, by US S...
 
U.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report 662-Pages
U.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report    662-PagesU.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report    662-Pages
U.S. Congress's Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Report 662-Pages
 
New York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - Lawsuit
New York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - LawsuitNew York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - Lawsuit
New York AG vs. JP Morgan Chase, Bear Stearns, EMC Mortgage - Lawsuit
 

Dernier

7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator
7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator
7 tips to help you become a SupercommunicatorAlex Clapson
 
Warp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdf
Warp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdfWarp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdf
Warp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdfmneves5
 
Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...
Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...
Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...Stu Hirst
 
TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--
TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--
TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--RvEscoro
 
Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024
Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024
Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024Jean-luc van Charante
 
Purposive Communication lesson8 application letter
Purposive Communication lesson8 application letterPurposive Communication lesson8 application letter
Purposive Communication lesson8 application letterrubycaquilala
 

Dernier (6)

7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator
7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator
7 tips to help you become a Supercommunicator
 
Warp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdf
Warp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdfWarp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdf
Warp Speed Habits: A Brain Based Roadmap to Create Habits.pdf
 
Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...
Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...
Stu Hirst - Imposter Syndrome 2024 - Presented at Cloud Expo Europe (Cyber Ke...
 
TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--
TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--
TC_Philosophy_Report_by_BSCrim.4-A2023--
 
Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024
Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024
Be Our Guest - Rotaract Club of Paramaribo 2024
 
Purposive Communication lesson8 application letter
Purposive Communication lesson8 application letterPurposive Communication lesson8 application letter
Purposive Communication lesson8 application letter
 

Spring Lake vs. Jessie Holloway - Court says 92 yo woman can sign pre-dispute mandatory binding arbitration agreement

  • 1. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SPRING LAKE NC, LLC; SBK CAPITAL, ) LLC; CLEAR CHOICE HEALTH CARE, ) LLC; SAMUEL B. KELLETT; JEFFREY E. ) CLEVELAND; DEBORAH P. KENNEDY; ) GEOFFREY R. FRASER; and JASON ) CANLAS (as to SPRING LAKE ) REHABILITATION CENTER), ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D12-2140 ) TONY HOLLOWAY, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of Jessie V. ) Holloway, Deceased, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 1, 2013. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Steven L. Selph, Judge. James D. Moriarty, Melissa M. Burghardt, Brian M. Bursa, and Kirsten K. Ullman of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, Tampa, for Appellant. Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. ALTENBERND, Judge. The appellants, collectively referred to as "Spring Lake," appeal an order denying their motion to compel arbitration in a wrongful death action arising from
  • 2. Jessie V. Holloway's stay at Spring Lake's rehabilitation center. The trial court refused to enforce the arbitration agreement that Ms. Holloway signed when she entered the center. We must reverse this order. The facts involved in this case are not complex. Ms. Holloway was a resident at the Spring Lake rehabilitation center from August 20, 2010, to January 4, 2011. When she entered the facility, she executed a standard resident admission and financial agreement and a separate arbitration agreement. At the time, she was 92 years old and had a fourth-grade education. She could not spell well and often had to sound out words while reading. She had memory problems and was increasingly confused. There is no evidence that the admissions staff at Spring Lake used any improper methods to obtain Ms. Holloway's signature or that she was misled in any fashion. The trial court declined to find that Ms. Holloway was incompetent or incapacitated to enter into a contract at the time of her admittance. It was persuaded, however, that the contracts were so complex that she could not possibly have understood what she was signing. Accordingly, it ruled that there was no meeting of the minds between the parties and that the arbitration clause was unenforceable. We have little doubt that the trial court correctly assessed Ms. Holloway's ability to understand these documents. For better or worse, her limited abilities are not a basis to prevent the enforceability of this contract. In a very similar case, this court explained: As a general proposition, "[w]here one contracting party signs the contract, and the other party accepts and signs the contract, a binding contract results." D.L. Peoples Group, Inc. v. Hawley, 804 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (citing Skinner v. Haugseth, 426 So. 2d 1127, 1129 -2-
  • 3. (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)); see also Mandell v. Fortenberry, 290 So. 2d 3, 7 (Fla. 1974) ("There is a presumption that the parties signing legal documents are competent, that they mean what they say, and that they should be bound by their covenants."); Dodge of Winter Park, Inc. v. Morley, 756 So. 2d 1085, 1085-86 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) ("Generally, it is enough that the party against whom the contract is sought to be enforced signs it."). Thus, "[a] party normally is bound by a contract that the party signs unless the party can demonstrate that he or she was prevented from reading it or induced by the other party to refrain from reading it." Consol. Res. Healthcare Fund I, Ltd. v. Fenelus, 853 So. 2d 500, 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); see also Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Bratton, 351 So. 2d 344, 347-48 (Fla. 1977) ("It has long been held in Florida that one is bound by his contract. Unless one can show facts and circumstances to demonstrate that he was prevented from reading the contract, or that he was induced by statements of the other party to refrain from reading the contract, it is binding." Estate of Etting ex rel. Etting v. Regents Park at Aventura, Inc., 891 So. 2d 558, 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (holding that the fact that the decedent was legally blind when she signed the arbitration agreement did not render the agreement invalid in the absence of evidence that she was coerced into signing it or prevented from knowing its contents). This is true whether a party is physically unable to read the agreement, see Estate of Etting, 891 So.2d at 558, or simply chooses not to read the agreement, see Fenelus, 853 So. 2d at 504. Rocky Creek Ret. Props., Inc. v. Estate of Fox ex rel. Bank of Am., N.A., 19 So. 3d 1105, 1108 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); see also SA-PG Sun City Ctr., LLC v. Kennedy, 79 So. 3d 916, 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (reaffirming that a party's alleged inability to understand an agreement does not vitiate her assent to that agreement in the absence of some evidence that she was prevented from knowing its contents). As a practical matter, a significant percentage of the people who enter nursing homes and rehabilitation centers have mental or physical limitations that make it difficult for them to understand the agreements signed at admittance. The agreements are sufficiently complex that many able-bodied adults would not fully understand the -3-
  • 4. agreements. The same is probably true for most of the contracts that we sign for many consumer services and even for the agreements clients sign when they hire attorneys. There was a time when most contracts were individually negotiated and handwritten. In that period, perhaps the law could adequately describe a mutual agreement as a "meeting of the minds" between the parties. But a literal "meeting of the minds," requiring both parties to have a comparable, subjective understanding of their agreement is clearly not what the courts intend by the use of this phrase. Our modern economy simply could not function if a "meeting of the minds" required individualized understanding of all aspects of the typical standardized contract that is now signed without any expectation that the terms will actually be negotiated between the parties.1 Without suggesting that the contract in this case is abusive in any fashion, the law must address abuses in standardized contracts by rules other than the "meeting of the minds." We note that the issue addressed in Spring Lake NC, LLC v. Figueroa, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D2842 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 14, 2012), has also been raised in this appeal. That issue was not the basis of the trial court's ruling, and we do not reach the issue today. Reversed and remanded. NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur. 1 While case law still uses the phrase "meeting of the minds," especially when the specific terms of an agreement are actually negotiated between the parties, see, e.g., Lunas v. Cooperativa de Seguros Multiples de P.R., 100 So. 3d 239, 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), criticism has prompted courts to analyze contracts as requiring a "mutuality of assent," as a more objective concept. See 30 Williston on Contracts § 75:30 (4th ed. 2012) (noting that the expression, "meeting of the minds" has been repeatedly criticized as obsolete and archaic). -4-