SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  25
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Funding for
excellent IDEAS!


       Andreja Zulim de Swarte,
                     EG-Liaison



 ERC starting Grant information day
        1 Sep 2010, VU Amsterdam
IDEAS programme
     EU (FP7) funding for excellent ‘frontier research’
     •centered around an excellent Principal Investigator- investigator-driven
     •no need for transnational partners


     ERCEA( European Research Council Executive Agency) funding agency
     •Scientific Council designes the strategy
     •Agency implements the programme



         ERC STARTING grants                                 ERC ADVANCED grants


            2-12 years post-doc                                  research leaders
           Calls in summer (july)                              Calls in autumn(oct)
            deadlines in autumn                                 deadlines in spring
             1/2 annual budget                                  1/2 annual budget
          50% of time on project                              30% of time on project

 2
Guiding principles of the ERC Grant

Scientific excellence is the sole selection criterion

Projects in all fields of research are eligible for funding       PI

Individual research teams led by a single PI are supported
•   Any nationality or age

Significant funding is provided to attract exceptional research
     leaders
•    up to StG- 1,5 (2,0) or AdG-2,5 (3,5) M€ per project/5
     years

Grants are awarded to the host institution that engages the PI

The host institution guarantees the PI’s independence and
     provides the research environment




  3
STARTING grant


Who is a Starting Grant PI?
•    Future research leader
•    shows the potential for research independence and evidence of
     maturity with:

        independently produced at least one important publication without
        the participation of their PhD supervisor

        promising track-record of early achievements appropriate to the
        field and career stage
          •    Significant publications (as main author) in major
               international peer-reviewed multi/disciplinary scientific
               journals
          •    invited presentations in well-established international
               conferences
          •    granted patents, awards, prizes etc.

•    50% of his/her time spend on ERC funded activity


 4
STARTING grant


2 streams: starter or consolidator?

"starters" (award of PhD 2 - 7 years prior to the Starting Grant call publication)

"consolidators" (award of PhD over 7 - 12 years prior to the Starting Grant call publication)




Extensions to eligibility window:
                                                                      before/after PhD
         Maternity leave: 18 months per child;
         Paternity leave: accumulation of actual time taken off

         Long-term illness, unavoidable statutory leave, obligatory national service   after PhD

Extensions possible only up to a max. of 16.5 yrs after PhD award




 5
ADVANCED GRANT


Who is an Advanced Grant PI?
 •30% of her/his working time spends on ERC funded activity

Track record CV of the last 10 years (active scientists!) *:

     •10 publications as senior author in major international peer-reviewed multidisciplinary
     journals and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals of their respective field
     •3 major research monographs, of which at least 1 translated into another language (if
     relevant for the field)
     •5 patents
     •10 invited presentations in well-established internationally organised conferences and
     advanced schools
     •3 research expeditions led by the applicant
     •3 well-established international conferences or congresses where the applicant was
     involved in their organisation as a member of the steering and/or organising committee
     •International recognition through scientific prizes/awards or membership in well-regarded
     Academies



 6
        •*) not necessarily all is required. Depends on the research field
ADVANCED GRANT


Leadership profile of the PI
A list of career achievements

• content and impact of the major scientific/scholarly contributions to the research
fields and, if applicable, their wider societal impact

• the international recognition and diffusion that these major contributions have
received from others
     publications, citations, funding, students, international prizes, institution-building…

• evidence of efforts and ability to inspire younger researchers towards high quality
research
     research mentoring record, information on the careers of supervised graduate and
     postdoctoral students
  proven ability to productively change research fields, to establish new
  interdisciplinary approaches




7
Only FRONTIER RESEARCH
         projects are funded…..in other words…


…the pursuit of questions at or beyond the FRONTIERS of knowledge, without
regard for established disciplinary boundaries…

... proposals of an INTERDISCIPLINARY nature which cross the boundaries between
different fields of research…

……PIONEERING proposals addressing NEW and emerging fields ….… and
…introducing unconventional, innovative approaches and scientific inventions is
encouraged…

…expected IMPACT on science, scholarship or engineering is significant..

…HIGH-GAIN/HIGH-RISK profile (the payoffs will be very significant)




8
MONEY
HOW MUCH AND WHAT



StG-1,5 M€ (2) or AdG- 2,5 (3,5)
    Purchase of equipment
    Start up costs when moving from
    third country
    Co-Investigator (AdG ONLY)


GRANT: 100% direct costs
     + 20% indirect costs                  Personnel Costs;

                                           Equipment Costs;

level of the grant = need of the project   Consumables;

peer reviewers make a final decision on    Travel and Subsistence Costs;
the level (may apply budget cut)
                                           Publication Costs (page charges and related
                                           fees for publication of results)



9
Funding rules
•    100% of direct eligible costs, up to the maximum granted per project
•    Plus 20% flat-rate for general costs (overheads)


      •    N.B.
      •    equipment: depreciation rules apply
      •    personnel costs: include increase in pay level
      •    subcontractors: no 20% overheads


•    portability




10
STARTING GRANT

  CALL for proposals                ERC-2011-StG – 20 Jul 2010

                                     CALL
3 deadlines, 3 domains, 660 M€


PE: Physical Sciences and Engineering 14 Oct 2010
 • LS: Life Sciences 9 Nov 2010
 • SH: Social Sciences and Humanities 24 Nov 2010


      • Single submission – two-step evaluation
      • Electronic submission only! (cordis.europa.eu)


RESUBMISSION
Eligible applicant to previous call may apply to this call if proposal has
met the quality threshold at the end of step 1 of evaluation

 11
ADVANCED GRANT

 CALL for proposals                ERC-2011-AdG – 2 Nov 2010*

                                     CALL
3 deadlines, 3 domains, ~660 M€


 • PE: Physical Sciences and Engineering 9 Feb 2011*
 • LS: Life Sciences 10 Mar 2011*
 • SH: Social Sciences and Humanities 6 Apr 2011*


      • Single submission – two-step evaluation
      • Electronic submission only! (cordis.europa.eu)


RESUBMISSION
Eligible applicant to previous call may apply to this call if proposal has
met the quality threshold at the end of step 1 of evaluation

 12
                                                             * expected
Info pack:
Work programme
Guide for Applicants


         EPSS

      Pick a panel




                       Cordis.europa.eu
 13
3 domains - 25 panels

Physical Sciences and Engineering   40%
Life Sciences                       35%
Social Sciences and Humanities      15%


Cross-panel proposals               10%



Budget division within domains based on No. of applications
received per panel within domain


14
Examples of (interdisciplinary) PANEL
Choose the right panel details in
    the Guide for Applicants               SH4: the human mind and its
                                           complexity:
                                           cognition, psychology, linguistics,
     PE10: Earth system science
                                           philosophy and education
     Physical geography, geology,
     geophysiscs, atmospheric sciences,
     oceanography, climatology, ecology,
     global environmental change,          LS8: Evolutionary, population and
     biogeochemical cycles, natural        environmental biology:
     resources management
                                           evolution, ecology, animal
                                           behaviour, population biology,
                                           biodiversiy, biogeography, marine
                                           biology, ecotoxicology, prokaryotic
                                           biology


15
EVALUATION – what is evaluated
EXCELLENCE is the only criterion
Peer review                        *
2 step evaluation




 4: outstanding
 3: excellent
 2: very good
 1: non-fundable

16
Evaluating the PROPOSAL

 PART A
web forms
          ANNEXES –
  A1-A3                  PART B1 –as .pdf
          as .pdf
  forms
                         Section 1 Track Record of PI           PART B2 –as .pdf

         Letter of                                              Section 2
                         1.Scientific Leadership Potential
         support by                                             Scientific proposal
         host                                                   15 p
                         2.CV (including “funding ID”)
         institution!!
         PhD             3.Early achievements track record      + Ethical issues table and
         certificate                                            description
         (StG ONLY)
                         4.Extended synopsis 5 p.
         (+ supporting
         documents –
         extension)
         (StG)




 Eligibility check        step 1                             step 2      interview grant
  17
The evaluation
PROCESS


         Proposals submitted           Step 2 evaluation

         Allocation to Panels
                 (25)             Reading by Remote Referees


      Reading and Assessment by     Interviews of applicants
        Panel members (12-15)

                                        Panel meetings
           Panel meetings
                                     Panel chairs meetings

          Proposals retained
              for step 2              Proposals selected


 18
THE PROCESS-
        from proposal to project
                                                     Remote+Panel evaluation

                                3X                                     Interview (StG)


      Proposal writing

                              9 -12 months



                         Preparing the grant agreement



                                                         Ranking

 19
Overview
 funded
projects




20
Collaborating with others?
             ‘traditional networks or research consortia
                   should not be submitted to ERC’

•    ‘additional participant’ – receives and spends share of the budget. Justify
     scientific need and limit number.
•    ‘team member’ – may be located at different organisation. HI can cover
     research expenses and in certain situations salary expenses
     (‘secondment’). Check HI internal rules.
•    ‘subcontractor’ – only for well defined and limited share of the work. Not
     expected to co-author publications.
•    Non-remunerated collaborations

•    N.B. ‘participant’ refers to organisation not to individual



21
                                          HI = host institution
RESULTS   1st CALL   Submitted   Funded    Success
            290M€                             rate

             All        9167        299      3%
             NL          542        27       5%
StG
            share       5.9%        9%

           2nd CALL   Submitted   Funded    Success
            290M€                             rate

             All        2503        244      10%
             NL          134        19       14%
            share       5.4%       7.8%


           3rd CALL   Submitted   Funded   Success
            530M€                            rate

              All       2873        ?      12-15%??
              NL          ?
            share         ?



 22
RESULTS   1st CALL   Submitted   Funded   Success
            517M€                            rate

             All        2167        282     13%
             NL          108        20      18%
AdG
            share        5%         7%

           2nd CALL   Submitted   Funded   Success
            490M€                            rate

             All        1584        243     15%
             NL          80         17      21%
            share        5%         7%


           3rd CALL   Submitted   Funded   Success
            590M€                            rate

              All       2009        ?
              NL          ?         ?
            share



 23
More INFORMATION..

CORDIS website http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html


ERC website: http://erc.europa.eu


ERC News Alert: http://erc.europa.eu/?fuseaction=reg.edit#01


ERC helpdesk (link HELP on ERC website)


EPSS helpdesk
technical support on electronic proposal submission support@epss-fp7.org


ERC National Contact Point www.egl.nl

24
Don’t know how to do it? ASK NCP
 EG-Liaison /Agentschap NL
 Information                                       www.egl.nl
 Advice (technical, legal, financial)       @: egl.erc@agentschapnl.nl
 Training session and courses




Andreja Zulim de Swarte
088 602 5070
Andreja.ZulimdeSwarte@agentschapnl.nl   Daphne van de Sande
                                        088 602 5959

                                        Daphne.vandeSande@agentschapnl.nl


 25

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Andreja Zulim - ERC Starting Grant and Advanced Grant 2011/2011 call

FP7 Specific Programme Ideas (March 2007)
FP7 Specific  Programme  Ideas (March 2007)FP7 Specific  Programme  Ideas (March 2007)
FP7 Specific Programme Ideas (March 2007)CPN_Africa
 
Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst
Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst
Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst vrijeuniversiteit
 
12_David_Krasa.pdf
12_David_Krasa.pdf12_David_Krasa.pdf
12_David_Krasa.pdfssuser34655a
 
1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)
1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)
1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)RIILP
 
Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...
Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...
Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...Dillard University Library
 
ERC Project - Martin Schroder
ERC Project - Martin SchroderERC Project - Martin Schroder
ERC Project - Martin SchroderDavid Young
 
Sb baekeland 2012 eng
Sb baekeland 2012 engSb baekeland 2012 eng
Sb baekeland 2012 engFwijns
 
ABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for Tanzania
ABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for TanzaniaABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for Tanzania
ABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for TanzaniaEnrico DeAngelis
 
Information meeting veni - 2
Information meeting veni - 2Information meeting veni - 2
Information meeting veni - 2vrijeuniversiteit
 
Zylicz 12 12-11
Zylicz 12 12-11Zylicz 12 12-11
Zylicz 12 12-11EUintheUS
 
Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013
Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013
Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013AREA Science Park
 
"Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A...
"Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A..."Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A...
"Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A...Agencia Andaluza del Conocimiento
 
ERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don Dingwell
ERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don DingwellERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don Dingwell
ERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don DingwellThe Royal Irish Academy
 

Similaire à Andreja Zulim - ERC Starting Grant and Advanced Grant 2011/2011 call (20)

FP7 Specific Programme Ideas (March 2007)
FP7 Specific  Programme  Ideas (March 2007)FP7 Specific  Programme  Ideas (March 2007)
FP7 Specific Programme Ideas (March 2007)
 
Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst
Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst
Presentatie ERC informatiebijeenkomst
 
European Research Council (ERC)
European Research Council (ERC)European Research Council (ERC)
European Research Council (ERC)
 
ERC-StG_CoG-_2021.ppt
ERC-StG_CoG-_2021.pptERC-StG_CoG-_2021.ppt
ERC-StG_CoG-_2021.ppt
 
12_David_Krasa.pdf
12_David_Krasa.pdf12_David_Krasa.pdf
12_David_Krasa.pdf
 
ERC Grants Explained
ERC Grants ExplainedERC Grants Explained
ERC Grants Explained
 
1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)
1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)
1. Grant Proposal Writing & Research Policy - Maren Pannemann (UvA)
 
Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...
Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...
Dillard University CTLAT Tenure-Track Faculty Mini-Grant Application Revised ...
 
HERA Cultural Encounters Information Sessions – Application Process
HERA Cultural Encounters Information Sessions – Application ProcessHERA Cultural Encounters Information Sessions – Application Process
HERA Cultural Encounters Information Sessions – Application Process
 
ERC Project - Martin Schroder
ERC Project - Martin SchroderERC Project - Martin Schroder
ERC Project - Martin Schroder
 
Sb baekeland 2012 eng
Sb baekeland 2012 engSb baekeland 2012 eng
Sb baekeland 2012 eng
 
ABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for Tanzania
ABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for TanzaniaABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for Tanzania
ABC-PhD program-Politecnico di Milano - an update for Tanzania
 
Information meeting veni - 2
Information meeting veni - 2Information meeting veni - 2
Information meeting veni - 2
 
Zylicz 12 12-11
Zylicz 12 12-11Zylicz 12 12-11
Zylicz 12 12-11
 
Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013
Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013
Talents up tomad mia_20_05_2013
 
"Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A...
"Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A..."Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A...
"Individual Fellowships. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions. MSCA IF 2017 Call. A...
 
Research Regulatory Bodies in UP Manila
Research Regulatory Bodies in UP ManilaResearch Regulatory Bodies in UP Manila
Research Regulatory Bodies in UP Manila
 
HERA JRP UP Application Presentation Feb 2015
HERA JRP UP Application Presentation Feb 2015HERA JRP UP Application Presentation Feb 2015
HERA JRP UP Application Presentation Feb 2015
 
ERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don Dingwell
ERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don DingwellERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don Dingwell
ERC - Preparing for the Unexpected - Don Dingwell
 
Dingwell
DingwellDingwell
Dingwell
 

Andreja Zulim - ERC Starting Grant and Advanced Grant 2011/2011 call

  • 1. Funding for excellent IDEAS! Andreja Zulim de Swarte, EG-Liaison ERC starting Grant information day 1 Sep 2010, VU Amsterdam
  • 2. IDEAS programme EU (FP7) funding for excellent ‘frontier research’ •centered around an excellent Principal Investigator- investigator-driven •no need for transnational partners ERCEA( European Research Council Executive Agency) funding agency •Scientific Council designes the strategy •Agency implements the programme ERC STARTING grants ERC ADVANCED grants 2-12 years post-doc research leaders Calls in summer (july) Calls in autumn(oct) deadlines in autumn deadlines in spring 1/2 annual budget 1/2 annual budget 50% of time on project 30% of time on project 2
  • 3. Guiding principles of the ERC Grant Scientific excellence is the sole selection criterion Projects in all fields of research are eligible for funding PI Individual research teams led by a single PI are supported • Any nationality or age Significant funding is provided to attract exceptional research leaders • up to StG- 1,5 (2,0) or AdG-2,5 (3,5) M€ per project/5 years Grants are awarded to the host institution that engages the PI The host institution guarantees the PI’s independence and provides the research environment 3
  • 4. STARTING grant Who is a Starting Grant PI? • Future research leader • shows the potential for research independence and evidence of maturity with: independently produced at least one important publication without the participation of their PhD supervisor promising track-record of early achievements appropriate to the field and career stage • Significant publications (as main author) in major international peer-reviewed multi/disciplinary scientific journals • invited presentations in well-established international conferences • granted patents, awards, prizes etc. • 50% of his/her time spend on ERC funded activity 4
  • 5. STARTING grant 2 streams: starter or consolidator? "starters" (award of PhD 2 - 7 years prior to the Starting Grant call publication) "consolidators" (award of PhD over 7 - 12 years prior to the Starting Grant call publication) Extensions to eligibility window: before/after PhD Maternity leave: 18 months per child; Paternity leave: accumulation of actual time taken off Long-term illness, unavoidable statutory leave, obligatory national service after PhD Extensions possible only up to a max. of 16.5 yrs after PhD award 5
  • 6. ADVANCED GRANT Who is an Advanced Grant PI? •30% of her/his working time spends on ERC funded activity Track record CV of the last 10 years (active scientists!) *: •10 publications as senior author in major international peer-reviewed multidisciplinary journals and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals of their respective field •3 major research monographs, of which at least 1 translated into another language (if relevant for the field) •5 patents •10 invited presentations in well-established internationally organised conferences and advanced schools •3 research expeditions led by the applicant •3 well-established international conferences or congresses where the applicant was involved in their organisation as a member of the steering and/or organising committee •International recognition through scientific prizes/awards or membership in well-regarded Academies 6 •*) not necessarily all is required. Depends on the research field
  • 7. ADVANCED GRANT Leadership profile of the PI A list of career achievements • content and impact of the major scientific/scholarly contributions to the research fields and, if applicable, their wider societal impact • the international recognition and diffusion that these major contributions have received from others publications, citations, funding, students, international prizes, institution-building… • evidence of efforts and ability to inspire younger researchers towards high quality research research mentoring record, information on the careers of supervised graduate and postdoctoral students proven ability to productively change research fields, to establish new interdisciplinary approaches 7
  • 8. Only FRONTIER RESEARCH projects are funded…..in other words… …the pursuit of questions at or beyond the FRONTIERS of knowledge, without regard for established disciplinary boundaries… ... proposals of an INTERDISCIPLINARY nature which cross the boundaries between different fields of research… ……PIONEERING proposals addressing NEW and emerging fields ….… and …introducing unconventional, innovative approaches and scientific inventions is encouraged… …expected IMPACT on science, scholarship or engineering is significant.. …HIGH-GAIN/HIGH-RISK profile (the payoffs will be very significant) 8
  • 9. MONEY HOW MUCH AND WHAT StG-1,5 M€ (2) or AdG- 2,5 (3,5) Purchase of equipment Start up costs when moving from third country Co-Investigator (AdG ONLY) GRANT: 100% direct costs + 20% indirect costs Personnel Costs; Equipment Costs; level of the grant = need of the project Consumables; peer reviewers make a final decision on Travel and Subsistence Costs; the level (may apply budget cut) Publication Costs (page charges and related fees for publication of results) 9
  • 10. Funding rules • 100% of direct eligible costs, up to the maximum granted per project • Plus 20% flat-rate for general costs (overheads) • N.B. • equipment: depreciation rules apply • personnel costs: include increase in pay level • subcontractors: no 20% overheads • portability 10
  • 11. STARTING GRANT CALL for proposals  ERC-2011-StG – 20 Jul 2010 CALL 3 deadlines, 3 domains, 660 M€ PE: Physical Sciences and Engineering 14 Oct 2010 • LS: Life Sciences 9 Nov 2010 • SH: Social Sciences and Humanities 24 Nov 2010 • Single submission – two-step evaluation • Electronic submission only! (cordis.europa.eu) RESUBMISSION Eligible applicant to previous call may apply to this call if proposal has met the quality threshold at the end of step 1 of evaluation 11
  • 12. ADVANCED GRANT CALL for proposals  ERC-2011-AdG – 2 Nov 2010* CALL 3 deadlines, 3 domains, ~660 M€ • PE: Physical Sciences and Engineering 9 Feb 2011* • LS: Life Sciences 10 Mar 2011* • SH: Social Sciences and Humanities 6 Apr 2011* • Single submission – two-step evaluation • Electronic submission only! (cordis.europa.eu) RESUBMISSION Eligible applicant to previous call may apply to this call if proposal has met the quality threshold at the end of step 1 of evaluation 12 * expected
  • 13. Info pack: Work programme Guide for Applicants EPSS Pick a panel Cordis.europa.eu 13
  • 14. 3 domains - 25 panels Physical Sciences and Engineering 40% Life Sciences 35% Social Sciences and Humanities 15% Cross-panel proposals 10% Budget division within domains based on No. of applications received per panel within domain 14
  • 15. Examples of (interdisciplinary) PANEL Choose the right panel details in the Guide for Applicants SH4: the human mind and its complexity: cognition, psychology, linguistics, PE10: Earth system science philosophy and education Physical geography, geology, geophysiscs, atmospheric sciences, oceanography, climatology, ecology, global environmental change, LS8: Evolutionary, population and biogeochemical cycles, natural environmental biology: resources management evolution, ecology, animal behaviour, population biology, biodiversiy, biogeography, marine biology, ecotoxicology, prokaryotic biology 15
  • 16. EVALUATION – what is evaluated EXCELLENCE is the only criterion Peer review * 2 step evaluation 4: outstanding 3: excellent 2: very good 1: non-fundable 16
  • 17. Evaluating the PROPOSAL PART A web forms ANNEXES – A1-A3 PART B1 –as .pdf as .pdf forms Section 1 Track Record of PI PART B2 –as .pdf Letter of Section 2 1.Scientific Leadership Potential support by Scientific proposal host 15 p 2.CV (including “funding ID”) institution!! PhD 3.Early achievements track record + Ethical issues table and certificate description (StG ONLY) 4.Extended synopsis 5 p. (+ supporting documents – extension) (StG) Eligibility check step 1 step 2 interview grant 17
  • 18. The evaluation PROCESS Proposals submitted Step 2 evaluation Allocation to Panels (25) Reading by Remote Referees Reading and Assessment by Interviews of applicants Panel members (12-15) Panel meetings Panel meetings Panel chairs meetings Proposals retained for step 2 Proposals selected 18
  • 19. THE PROCESS- from proposal to project Remote+Panel evaluation 3X Interview (StG) Proposal writing 9 -12 months Preparing the grant agreement Ranking 19
  • 21. Collaborating with others? ‘traditional networks or research consortia should not be submitted to ERC’ • ‘additional participant’ – receives and spends share of the budget. Justify scientific need and limit number. • ‘team member’ – may be located at different organisation. HI can cover research expenses and in certain situations salary expenses (‘secondment’). Check HI internal rules. • ‘subcontractor’ – only for well defined and limited share of the work. Not expected to co-author publications. • Non-remunerated collaborations • N.B. ‘participant’ refers to organisation not to individual 21 HI = host institution
  • 22. RESULTS 1st CALL Submitted Funded Success 290M€ rate All 9167 299 3% NL 542 27 5% StG share 5.9% 9% 2nd CALL Submitted Funded Success 290M€ rate All 2503 244 10% NL 134 19 14% share 5.4% 7.8% 3rd CALL Submitted Funded Success 530M€ rate All 2873 ? 12-15%?? NL ? share ? 22
  • 23. RESULTS 1st CALL Submitted Funded Success 517M€ rate All 2167 282 13% NL 108 20 18% AdG share 5% 7% 2nd CALL Submitted Funded Success 490M€ rate All 1584 243 15% NL 80 17 21% share 5% 7% 3rd CALL Submitted Funded Success 590M€ rate All 2009 ? NL ? ? share 23
  • 24. More INFORMATION.. CORDIS website http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html ERC website: http://erc.europa.eu ERC News Alert: http://erc.europa.eu/?fuseaction=reg.edit#01 ERC helpdesk (link HELP on ERC website) EPSS helpdesk technical support on electronic proposal submission support@epss-fp7.org ERC National Contact Point www.egl.nl 24
  • 25. Don’t know how to do it? ASK NCP EG-Liaison /Agentschap NL Information www.egl.nl Advice (technical, legal, financial) @: egl.erc@agentschapnl.nl Training session and courses Andreja Zulim de Swarte 088 602 5070 Andreja.ZulimdeSwarte@agentschapnl.nl Daphne van de Sande 088 602 5959 Daphne.vandeSande@agentschapnl.nl 25