2. How did the animal fall? רב כהנא אמר : It slipped on its urine רבא אמר : Another animal pushed it What would each opinion hold about the other one’s? He is פטור for the animal slipping, BUT NOT for an animal being pushed in, because he should have led the animals one by one If he is פטור when another animal pushed it, then he is FOR SURE פטור for the animal that slipped on its urine
5. אמר רב כהנא : The owner of the animal is only פטור from paying for what the animal ate in the row that it fell onto. But if it went to another row and ate there, he has to pay for the full damage ורבי יוחנן אמר : Even if it was there all day eating, the owner of the animal only has to pay for what he benefited. This applies until the animal gets out and returns again due to some new negligence
6. אמר רב כהנא : The owner of the animal is only פטור from paying for what the animal ate in the row that it fell onto. But if it went to another row and ate there, he has to pay for the full damage אמר רב פפא : רבי יוחנן really means that as long as it left with the owner’s knowledge, he becomes חייב if it goes back again, even if he guarded it properly What is the reason? Because the owner of the garden can say: “Once it knows about my garden, it will come there every time it escapes. Now you have an extra responsibility to guard it from coming.” ורבי יוחנן אמר : Even if it was there all day eating, the owner of the animal only has to pay for what he benefited. This applies until the animal gets out and returns again due to some new negligence מאי טעמא
7. What is the reason? Because the owner of the garden can say: “Once it knows about my garden, it will come there every time it escapes. Now you have an extra responsibility to guard it from coming.” מאי טעמא
