From User Studies to User Experience: User-Centered Design of Next-Generation Catalogs and other Emerging Library Services
1. From User Studies to User Experience User-Centered Design of Next-Generation Catalogs and other Emerging Library Services Anne Christensen State and University Library Hamburg, Germany Digital Libraries à la Carte 2010 Tilburg University, The Netherlands, July 30
2.
3. Additional „layers“ for discovery of catalog and other data. Integrated Library System Next generation catalog ACQ CAT OUS OPC
14. Anthropological Studies (examples) Foster, Nancy F, and Susan Gibbons. Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester . Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2007 Akselbo, Jeppe L. The Hybrid Library - from the Users' Perspective: A Report for the Deff Project "the Loaners' Expectations and Demands for the Hybrid Library" . Århus: Statsbiblioteket, 2006
15. Focus groups with both faculty and students, 35 participants, focus on reference management and social functionality students got paid 30 € for 2 hours Usability Tests for prototypes 0.5 and 0.7 15 students participated, got paid 20 € for 1 hour supported by Usability Lab at the Department of Information Science
16.
17. Results and conclusions from our and other research Good synopsis of various studies! Dickey, Timothy J, and Lynn S. Connaway. The Digital Information Seeker: Report of the Findings from Selected Oclc, Rin, and Jisc User Behaviour Projects . Bristol, England: HEFCE, 2010.
18. 1/10 Students expect ready bibliographies. „ What I would like to see are lists of books for my topic.“
23. 3/10 Users are sensitive to the neutrality of the catalog and the quality of its content.
24. Enrich carefully „ Please don‘t mash it up with Amazon book reviews and other information from commercial sites Studierende und Lehrende in beluga-Fokusgruppen „ Why pull all sorts of s**** into the catalog when you have a table of contents or a link to Google Book Search?“
37. Sharing lists „ My lists are pretty intimate.“ „ I don‘t want to do all the work for people.“ Student and teacher in focus group for beluga, January 2009
38. Also controversial: Recommendations „ Professors are scarcely up to date“ Students in focus group for beluga, January 2009 „ I would like to know what my professor thinks about this book“
39. Shared lists and recommendations would be a good starting point for unexperienced searchers.
40. „ How do I know if I picked the right term?“ 8/10 Expectations regarding the „search experience“ are very high. „ Who decides how the results are sorted?
41. Give users feedback about their search terms Spell checking Autocompletion Faceted Browsing Subject headings & authority files as Linked Open Data?
42. Bibliographic data is not sufficient for powerful relevance ranking. Number of copies Circulation data Citations Publishers Usage in lists Impact Factor Download statistics
60. Trust and quality are main concerns of researchers regarding 2.0 and open science tools. Procter, R.; Williams, R.; Stewart, J.: If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0. Research Information Network. 2010.