St. Maarten Pride Foundation's Objection to the filling-in of the Great Salt Pond, St. Maarten

1. October 2nd, 2012
Minister William Marlin
Clem LaBega Square
Philipsburg,
Sint Maarten
Objection to the filling-in of the Great Salt Pond including but not limited to the filling-in
of the Pond for the Drag Strip and the Cricket stadium.
Honorable Minister Marlin,
St. Maarten Pride Foundation has taken notice of the recent (and on-going) filling-in of the Great
Salt Pond. The Foundation has no objections to the construction of a Drag Strip or a Cricket
stadium on Sint Maarten. Pride does however strongly object to any and all filling-in of the Great
Salt Pond, including the filling-in which has taken place for the construction of the proposed
Drag Strip and the filling-in for the proposed Cricket stadium.
The Foundation would like to remind the Minister of the following:
That the Preamble of the Constitution of Sint Maarten states: “WE, THE PEOPLE OF SINT
MAARTEN”, (are)“…DETERMINED to care for the perpetual maintenance of nature and
the environment”;
That Article 22 of the Constitution of Sint Maarten states that: “It shall be the constant
concern of the government to keep the country habitable and to protect and improve the
natural environment and the welfare of animals”;
That Netherlands Antilles laws on the protection of nature and environment have been taken
over by Sint Maarten including the Landsverordening grondslagen natuurbeheer en –
bescherming (P.B. 1998, 49)”;
The “Eilandsverordening natuurbeheer en- bescherming Sint Maarten (A.B. 2003,25)”.
That emission norms or standards have been drafted and implemented for Sint Maarten.
“Lucht & Geluid, Water, Afvalwater, Afval, Afval, Eindrapport Milieunormen, 2007”.
1

2. That Sint Maarten is party to several international and regional environmental agreements,
treaties and conventions. The following conventions, to which Sint Maarten is (indirectly)
bound, are of significance to the protection of the Great Salt Pond;
1. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (1992)
2. The Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. /The
Ramsar Convention/ Convention on Wetlands. (1971)
3. The Convention on Migratory Species, (CMS or Bonn Convention). (1979)
4. The Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) Protocol of the Cartagena Convention,
(1990)
The Foundation is objecting to the filling-in of the Great Salt Pond based on the following
reasons;
The Great Salt Pond played a prominent role in both Sint Maarten’s and the Kingdom of the
Netherlands’ history due to its immense size and its central location, particularly in the wide
scale salt mining industry which started with the Dutch around 1631. Salt was collected from the
Great Salt Pond and subsequently exported all over the world or locally used to conserve food.
The last commercially significant salt reaping occurred in the 1940’s. Many Sint Maarteners are
descendants of people who worked in the Great Salt Pond during and after slavery, a fact which
makes the Pond an important aspect of the island’s and the Kingdom’s heritage.
The Great Salt Pond was identified and designated as a monument by the Executive Council
of the Island Territory of Sint Maarten (BC Decision 040308, Arch nr. 1172-08) the
monument was officially registered in 2009; in doing so, government acknowledged the
cultural and historical significance of the area and committed to protecting it;
The construction of the Cricket stadium, as it is currently proposed, will destroy a large
portion of the Great Salt Pond National monument ;
The Foundation is of the opinion that an undesirable precedent would be set if Government
destroys an area which has been identified and designated as a national monument based on
its cultural/ historical significance.
The entire Great Salt Pond serves as a natural cache for much of the run-off water from
surrounding hills. Government commissioned reports have advised government to expand the
island’s rain water storage capacity. Even partially filling in the Great Salt Pond will
significantly reduce water storage capacity and is likely to have drastic consequences for the
surrounding areas as excess run-off water will lead to additional flooding of the already
overburdened districts adjacent to the pond.
Sint Maarten’s ponds (including parts of) the Great Salt Pond have been recommended for
protection in reports such as The Ponds of Sint-Maarten, (Ecovision, 1996) and many other
studies which concluded that the ponds are of ecological and environmental importance.
2

3. The entire Great Salt Pond is of crucial importance for the survival of many species of birds,
fish and other wetland life; It is an important feeding, breeding and nesting area for numerous
species of migratory and resident birds.
BirdLife International (de Vogelbescherming) has recognized the Great Salt Pond as one of
the Caribbean’s “Important Bird Areas (IBA)”. IBAs are places of the highest global priority
for bird and biodiversity conservation.
“Great Salt Pond IBA is in south-central St. Maarten, on the outskirts of the capital
Philipsburg....This IBA is significant for its population of Laughing Gull (Larus atricilla). Up
to 5.800 gulls congregate at the IBA prior to the breeding season. About 50 pairs of Black-
necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) breed .... within the IBA.”
(St. Maarten, Important Bird Areas In the Caribbean, Key sites for conservation, BirdLife
International, 2008)
The area is also of importance for the:
o White-cheeked Pintail (Anas bahamensis) a regionally threatened species
experiencing declining populations due to habitat restriction,
o Ruddy Duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) which is found on only four other Lesser Antillean
islands due to habitat restriction,
o Caribbean Coot (Fulica caribaea) a regionally threatened species experiencing
declining populations due to habitat restriction,
o Sint Maarten’s national bird, the Brown Pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis), with up to
60 pairs known to breed in the Greater Great Bay Area.
In addition to the aforementioned it should also be noted that the proposed location of the Drag
Strip is in close proximity to a number of residential areas. Emissions and Noise pollution will
likely exceed the norms for Sint Maarten as compiled in the government report: “Lucht &
Geluid, Water, Afvalwater, Afval, Eindrapport Milieunormen 2007”.
The constitution of Sint Maarten states the following: “It shall be the constant concern of the
government to keep the country habitable and to protect and improve the natural environment
and the welfare of animals”.
It is for this reason inexcusable and incomprehensible that Government would commission the
filling-in of the Great Salt Pond in the first place, moreover, that government would do so
without following the proper stakeholder consultation, research and permitting procedures.
3

4. Activities such as the illegal dumping of sand into the Great Salt Pond should not be condoned or
legalized by Government after the fact. The Foundation therefore calls on Government to take
appropriate measures towards the removal of the illegally dumped sand and the restoration of the
effected areas. Additional measures such as the drafting and implementation of a Zoning Plan for
the Great Salt Pond should be taken immediately to prevent any more filling-in of the Pond.
Sint Maarten Pride Foundation reserves its right to review, revise and resubmit these objections
in the event that permit requests are submitted for the filling-in of the Great Salt Pond.
Sincerely,
Sint Maarten Pride Foundation
4