The U.S. Army's sad dependency on wireless communications computers, and GPS for all of its communications, makes us incredibly vulnerable to enemy EW

1. U.S. Army's sad dependency on .....makes us
incredibly vulnerable to enemy EW.
 Published on Published onOctober 20, 2015
 Edit article
 View stats

2. Agha A
Investment Advisor at Maku Investments
496 articles
 53
 Like6
 Comment1

http://consultantsalpha.blogspot.com/2015/10/clinton
-heath-us-armys-sad-dependency.html
CLINTON HEATH-
The U.S. Army's sad dependency on wireless
communications computers, and GPS for all of its
communications, makes us incredibly vulnerable to
enemy EW.

3. 6 Likes






1 CommentComments on Agha A’S article
Comments settings
2yOpen options for Damir Ferenc’s comment

4. Damir Ferenc
Damir FerencHVAC+R/MEP/BMS Project
Manager, Procurator
Hehehe .... THE JOKE OF THE YEAR 2015 !!!
LikeLike Damir Ferenc’s commentReply1 Like1
Like on Damir Ferenc’s comment

5. Tuesday, October 20, 2015
CLINTON HEATH- The U.S. Army's sad
dependency on wireless communications
computers, and GPS for all of its
communications, makes us incredibly vulnerable
to enemy EW.

6. Electronic WarfareSecret Group
1,124 members

Member

7. 
Settings

Share
 Discussions
 About
 Search
 Manage
Options menu
A Amin consultant
21 days ago
HOW DO YOU COMPARE UNITED STATES
ELECTRONIC WARFARE CAPABILITIES VIS A
VIS RUSSIAN EW CAPABILITIES ?
HOW DO YOU COMPARE UNITED STATES
ELECTRONIC WARFARE CAPABILITIES VIS A
VIS RUSSIAN EW CAPABILITIES ?

8. http://consultantsalpha.blogspot.com.tr/2015/09/how-
do-you-compare-united-states.html
HOW DO YOU GAUGE EW AS A FACTOR AT
STRATEGIC LEVEL IN WINNING A WAR ?
AGHA H AMIN
GROUP FOUNDER
 Comment(2)
 Like(1)
 Unfollow
ENRICA MALATESTA likes this

Clinton Heath
Our EW versus their EW isn't the question, but
rather, our dependence on GPS, and wireless comms

9. as compared to theirs. If they jam us, how good are
we at responding, and if we jam them how do they
respond. If Russia (and I admit, I do not know their
level of dependence on wireless comms and
GPS/Glonass) does not have a strong, practiced back
up system for all their wireless comms, then it will be
a wash. If the Russians have a very strong back up
system to their digital/wireless comms, and to their
GPS/Glonass, then It is sad to say that they will have
the upper hand in the Spectrum. The U.S. Army's sad
dependancy on wireless comms, computers, and GPS
for all of its communications, makes us incredibly
vulnerable to enemy EW. Preaching for the last 4
years from within the U.S. Army about having a
strong practiced PACE plan sadly fell on deaf ears.
As a result, we have basically one means of comms,
and due to the nature of our recent enemies, no need
to have a strong practiced PACE plan, we have
become dependent to a fault on our wireless system. I
blame the congress for giving contracts for systems
to certain districts for political gain and then forcing

10. the Army to use the systems, no matter how flawed,
to the point Artillery units have even quit teaching
manual gunnery. There are manuals to teach Polaris
Kochab but no one uses it or practices it. We have a
very strong history of using EMCOM, but absolutely
no practice in the past 14 years. Trying to get the
Army to take a step backwards towards the 1980's is
not an easy thing to sell. I imagine its not that hard to
sell in Russia though, which may make our jamming
worthless if they have strong back up systems.
1 hour ago
o Unlike(1)
o Reply privately
o Delete

A Amin
brilliant comments.in 1985 december i did trials of
four terrain navigation systems for pakistan army

11. .magnavox was total failure , another based on
magnetic system did not work on tanks at all and was
failure.Only teldix based on Gyro worked .
1 hour ago
o Like(0)
o Delete

12. o
o

13. Posted by unknown at 8:29 AM
Labels: and GPS for all of its
communications, CLINTON HEATH- The U.S.
Army's sad dependency on wireless
communications computers, makes us incredibly
vulnerable to enemy EW.