1) Conducting impact evaluations in fragile settings is challenging but necessary to identify effective interventions and efficiently allocate scarce humanitarian funds. 2) This document outlines the challenges of impact evaluations in fragile settings such as complex environments, time constraints, and ethical concerns, and provides solutions like quasi-experimental designs, mixed methods, and tracking techniques to address issues like invalid counterfactuals and attrition. 3) Rigorous impact evaluations are possible in fragile settings with flexible designs, collaboration between agencies, and a focus on less but more reliable evidence to balance evaluation rigor with humanitarian needs.