4. Underpinning research
VNN Valuing Peatlands project
Links between management, function and flows of
ecosystem services and their value in uplands
Implications for upland agri-environment schemes
Pressure-response functions can cost-effectively
show how climate regulation
& other services are likely to
respond to multiple pressures
5. Underpinning research
Process 1
Pressure 1
Ecosystem service
Process 1
Value (£)
Pressure 2 Process 1 Ecosystem service
Process 1
Pressure 3
Important for managing & valuing
multiple upland services…
6. Underpinning research
Developing place-based approaches for
Payments for Ecosystem Services in the English
Uplands
Cost-effective vegetation based proxies for changes
in GHG flux post-restoration to underpin future code
Feasibility of place-based
PES schemes that
bundle/layer carbon
with other services
7. Underpinning research
NERC internship with Viki Hirst, Charles Cowap,
Mark Reed & South West Water
Bundling carbon & biodiversity in a new scheme
to run alongside existing clean water scheme
Exploring pricing,
payment & contractual
issues
8. Payments for Ecosystem Services Best Practice Guide
1. Identify PES
opportunity
10. Identify opportunities for
multiple-benefit PES
2. Identify potential PES
Implement and actors
9. review PES Identify ES
Monitoring, evaluati agreements
on & review prospects, pote 3. Assess the
ntial buyers prospects for trade
and sellers
4. Establish appropriate
8. Formalise the Negotiate institutional set up
PES scheme
agreements Resolve
institutional, legal
& technical 5. Address legal
issues
issues
7. Develop „win-
win‟ markets
6. Address
technical issues
9. Visitor Payback for ES
Potential of VP to elicit PES
from the public?
Suite of smart phone apps for
Lakes plus VP module
4 investment (not offset)
options including peat
restoration
Interactive maps to learn more
11. Peatland carbon: in demand
Legislative targets
Climate (Kyoto Protocol &
national legislation)
Biodiversity (many
peatlands in poor condition
designated under UK and
EU legislation)
Water quality (Water
Framework Directive)
12. Peatland carbon: in demand
Market demand for UK land-based carbon
reduction: 1-10M tonnes p.a. (BRE, 2008)
Woodland carbon code secured 1 million tonnes of
CO2 through projects covering 2733 ha in first year
Premium for local
carbon with
co-benefits
£8B p.a. corporate
carbon accounting
for FTSE100
13. Demand could increase if:
Co-benefits can be quantified and either bundled
or layered with carbon schemes
Benefits can be counted in company carbon
accounts under GHG Accounting Guidelines
There is effective regulation of UK peatland
carbon projects to ensure benefits are:
Additional
Verifiable
Avoid trade-offs with other ecosystem services
14. Supply
Restoration & manage-
ment of upland
and lowland peats
can deliver
significant
carbon savings
over the long-term
15. Supply
Peatland restoration is approximately equivalent
to the carbon benefit provided by woodlands
Assuming 1km2 restoration delivers 250 tonnes CO2
savings per year, 30 km2 bog rewetting could deliver
0.75 million tonnes CO2 saving over 100 years
Plentiful supply:
>80% UK deep peats
damaged
Potential for 1.8M ha UK
rewetting
16. UK Peatland Carbon Code
Develop a UK Peatland
Carbon Code to:
Open, consistent, credible and
verifiable basis for good
practice peatland restoration
Register to account for projects
& avoid double counting
Standards to ensure projects
are of high environmental
quality & genuinely additional
Technical guidance to calculate
emissions savings
17. UK Peatland Carbon Code
Option to include peatland
restoration in official carbon
accounting to become “carbon
neutral”
Greenhouse Gas Accounting
Guidelines
Not possible to trade this carbon
Government could count it
towards Kyoto targets if we opt
in to Wetland Rewetting &
Drainage under Article 3.4 Kyoto
Protocol
18. UK Peatland Carbon Code
If also designed to meet the requirements of the
Verified Carbon Standard:
Peatland Code would be cheaper alternative, better
tailored to the UK context, that would still provide
investors with confidence
Possible to generate tradeable carbon credits for
voluntary carbon market (and compliance in future?)
Similar to UK Woodland Carbon Code &
German MoorFutures: we can learn from their
experience
Export expertise to develop similar peatland
regional markets elsewhere internationally
19. Targets under WFD &
Habitats Directive Legislative targets
UK climate targets
Funding Kyoto targets Co-benefits
GHG change from peats UK opt into WDR
damaged/restored since Art 3.4 Kyoto
1990 in GHG inventory Climate regulation
Private Government
CAP Rural Re-wetting/conservation
Development eg
Agri-environment
Peatland CRUs
Peatland carbon markets Changes to
REDD & Peatland
Art 3.4 VCS AAUs
EUETS & JI accred-
Compliance C market
Value of carbon itation
Voluntary C market outweighs accreditation
& other costs
Regional Carbon Market Higher uptake if
carbon accounting
Peatland becomes mandatory
Corporate Social across all sectors
UK Peatland projects used in
Responsibility
Carbon Code corporate C
GHG Accounting accounting
Guidelines integration
Underpinned by robust scientific evidence and monitoring, overseen by a science panel
20. Next steps
Developing metrics
DEFRA PES Pilot with
German MoorFutures and
learning from UK Woodland
Carbon Code
Plan to launch draft code for
CSR (not offset) investment
July 2013
Market research to tailor the
code to needs of the market
21. Next steps
Consider for inclusion in Defra/DECC GHG
Accounting Guidelines for corporate carbon
accounting
Option to trade on voluntary C markets if prices
increase
23. Conclusions
Peatland carbon markets are coming soon – we
want to work with people across the sector to
devise effective ways of regulating and paying
Opportunities to bundle payments for carbon
with existing PES schemes e.g. for clean
water, and to bundle other
services with carbon
schemes to get
premium prices