SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  26
SINCE 1829
SINCE 1829
Market Characteristics
SINCE 1829
Market
Characteristics
▪ Largest country in South America (Area and
population) - 200 million people.
▪ World’s 7th fastest growing economy.
▪ Expanding middle class population.
▪ Majority population in age group of 15 – 45
years and has highest purchasing power.
▪ Major investments in education and R&D
across sectors.
Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/br.html
SINCE 1829
Economic
Environment
▪ A4 level risk country – Medium Level
▪Favorable for domestic and foreign
companies to do business.
▪ A few of the country’s major enterprises are
under government control. Increasingly more
are privately owned.
▪ Mix of socialist and capitalist market
ideologies.
Source: http://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/brazil/government
SINCE 1829
Tax Structure
▪ Import Duty : Ranges between 10% and 35%. The
import duty rate for importing Beer into Brazil is
around 14%
▪ Industrialized Product Tax (IPI): Federal tax
levied on most domestic and imported manufactured
goods. Ranges between 0% and 15%.
▪ Merchandize and Service Circulation Tax : State
government value-added tax levied on both domestic
and imported products. Rate varies among states.
Source: http://fita.org/countries/brazil.html
SINCE 1829
Consumer
Profile
▪ Brazilian consumers spend some 70% of their
income on goods and services.
▪ Average gross income in Brazil increased by
124% between 2003 to 2007.
▪ Food, beverages and tobacco account for 16%
of household expenditure.
Source: http://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/brazil/government
SINCE 1829
Market Analysis
SINCE 1829
 Market Size  GDP and Population
6 largest
capitals,
$748 , 24%
Pop. 46M
Others,
$2,324 ,
76%
Pop. 153M
Craft,
$200 ,
0.97%
Regular,
$20,500 ,
99%
(US$billion)(US$million)
 Targeted niche: Craft Beer in Top 6 Capitals
Market Potential
SINCE 1829
Porter’s 5 Forces
Threat of new entrants
Moderate
•Low capital outlay required –for low-scale craft beer
microbreweries
•Access to supply chain and retail distribution
•Need economies of scale and local partnerships to distribute
widely
•Government regulations may impact ease of entry
Supplier Power
Moderate
•Vertical integration of microbreweries weakens supplier
power.
•Many independent hops growers.
•Independent barley growers can find alternative markets.
Threat of Substitutes
Moderate
•High penetration of cheaper economy/mass-market beer
brands
•Other alcoholic/ non-alcoholic beverages readily available
•Low switching costs for both consumers and distributers
•High distribution and storage costs than other alcoholic
beverages e.g. spirits
Buyer Power
Largely moderate
•Low switching costs
•Products compete on differentiation.
•High brand loyalty
•Retail outlets have more bargaining power with producers.
Industry Competition
Moderate to low
•Low penetration of premium beers (1% of market)
•No large players in the market
•Wide differentiated variety of products
•Downward pressure of prices from large-scale retailers and on-trade outlets.
SINCE 1829
Yuengling
SINCE 1829
Company
▪ Founded in 1829 by David
Yuengling
▪ Americas oldest existing
brewery
▪ 6 different lines of beers -
ales, lagers, porters and
premium tastes
▪ A private company - not
publically traded
SINCE 1829
Company
Performance
▪ In 2014, Yuengling surpassed Boston’s Samuel
Adams in annual sales volume to become the
country’s top craft beer brewery.
▪ Only available in a few states, including
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Washington DC,
Delaware, Maryland, Florida and Alabama.
▪ Limited distribution has kept the company strong
against larger American distributors. Only 2
breweries, in Tampa Florida and Pottsville
Pennsylvania.
SINCE 1829
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
 High local demand for American
craft beer
 Craft beer perceived as an
“affordable luxury”
 Product differentiation (oldest)
Weaknesses
 Lack of brand recognition
 Premium pricing may deter
demand
 Poor access to local distribution
and supply channels
Opportunities
 Create strong brand recognition -
leveraging already existing
demand
 Build robust distribution
networks and local partnerships.
Threats
 Competition from highly
recognizable local and
international craft beer brands
 High saturation of cheaper
standard beer brands
 New local/international entrants
SINCE 1829
Market Entry Strategy
SINCE 1829
Entry Strategy
▪ Exporting – Directly from Yuengling breweries in USA.
▪ Licensing – License to a Brazilian Brewery to produce
and distribute Yuengling in the local market, in exchange
of royalties or fees.
▪ Contract Manufacturing – Hire a Brazilian Brewery
to produce and sometimes distribute.
▪ Joint Venture – Forming and alliance with a local
Brazilian brewery to carry out joint operations.
SINCE 1829
Entry Strategy
Criteria
Entry
Strategy
Effect
on U.S.
business
Initial
Investment
Profitability ROI
Total
Score
Exporting (-) (+) (-) (-) 2 (-)
Licensing (+) (+) (+) (+) 4 (+)
Contract
Manufacturing
(+) (-) (-) (-) 2 (-)
Joint
Venture
(+) (-) (-) (-) 2 (-)
SINCE 1829
Licensing
 Pros:
 Leverage Yeungling’s recognizable name brand
 Benefit of local business insights and knowledge of
supply chain and distribution
 Low investment and involvement
 High ROI
 Cons:
 Difficult to assure quality and manufacturing
standards
 Sharing margins with licencee
SINCE 1829
Segmentation &
Targeting
 Two key segments in
Brazil’s 6 major cities
 Young (21-40),
Metropolitan middle to
upperclass adults
 Women living in major
cities - growing segment
SINCE 1829
Positioning
 An “Afforable Luxury”
 Craft beer is viewed as an affordable luxury
 Positioning yuengling as a premium brand - people
can “treat themselves”
 Everyone’s Beer
 People from a variety of backgrounds
 Tailored to both men and women’s tastes and
aspirations.
SINCE 1829
Pricing Strategy & Sales
Forecasts
SINCE 1829
Pricing Strategy
▪ Average Brazilian Market Price = $11.78 / l
▪ Customer percieved value
▪ Proposed go-to-market price = $12.00 / l
Benefit
Value
Cost
SINCE 1829
Pricing Strategy
49%
40%
6%
5%
Manufacturer Taxes
Retailers Distributor
$12.00
$ 5.87
Production
$ 5.40
Profit
$ 0.47
(US average profit = $0.50 / liter)
SINCE 1829
Expected Results
 Steady Market (no growth considered)
 Initial licensing contract
 Small brewer
 500,000 l/month
 Start w/ 125,000
 Diverse beer line
 Royalties - 25%
of profits (KPMG)
 Sales revenue of
$ 72million/year
 3.6% market share
SINCE 1829
Expected Results
▪ Benchmark (Boston Beer Co. & Brooklyn)
▪ Yuengling doesn’t releases financial results
▪ Brooklyn: 300,000 liters exported in 2015
▪ Boston Beer Co.: Annual profits of $59 million
▪ Financial results expected
▪ Licensing revenues of $3 million/year
▪ Accounts for 5% increase in company’s net profit
▪ Extremely high Return on Investment
SINCE 1829
Post-Entry
Recommendations
▪ Gain strong foothold of the local market and the
distribution network.
▪ Open “Exclusive Yuengling Bars” in the
identified locations to provide the Yuengling
experience.
▪ Fresh / Mature / Bottled beer.
▪ Merchandise.
▪ “Get the consumer Yuengling-ed”.
SINCE 1829
Group 08
Adithya Nishanth
adinish1991@gmail.com

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Diageo - Competitive Advantages
Diageo - Competitive Advantages Diageo - Competitive Advantages
Diageo - Competitive Advantages nevenaz
 
Boston Beer Company Final Presentation Final
Boston Beer Company Final Presentation FinalBoston Beer Company Final Presentation Final
Boston Beer Company Final Presentation FinalKelsey_Schmidt
 
Boston Beer Company Presentation
Boston Beer Company PresentationBoston Beer Company Presentation
Boston Beer Company Presentationbenminter
 

Tendances (8)

Global Marketer Conference 2013 - Andy Fennell, CMO, Diageo
Global Marketer Conference 2013 - Andy Fennell, CMO, DiageoGlobal Marketer Conference 2013 - Andy Fennell, CMO, Diageo
Global Marketer Conference 2013 - Andy Fennell, CMO, Diageo
 
Lagunitas Case Study
Lagunitas Case StudyLagunitas Case Study
Lagunitas Case Study
 
Beer industry
Beer industry Beer industry
Beer industry
 
Diageo - Competitive Advantages
Diageo - Competitive Advantages Diageo - Competitive Advantages
Diageo - Competitive Advantages
 
Boston Beer Company Final Presentation Final
Boston Beer Company Final Presentation FinalBoston Beer Company Final Presentation Final
Boston Beer Company Final Presentation Final
 
Diageo London
Diageo LondonDiageo London
Diageo London
 
Boston Beer Company Presentation
Boston Beer Company PresentationBoston Beer Company Presentation
Boston Beer Company Presentation
 
About SABMiller
About SABMillerAbout SABMiller
About SABMiller
 

Similaire à Adithya International marketing

Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
 
Us wine industry section c_group2
Us wine industry section c_group2Us wine industry section c_group2
Us wine industry section c_group2pg13tarun_g
 
Bartles & Jaymes Case study.pptx
Bartles & Jaymes Case study.pptxBartles & Jaymes Case study.pptx
Bartles & Jaymes Case study.pptxRimjhimShrivastava3
 
Crafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine market
Crafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine marketCrafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine market
Crafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine marketSaurabh Arora
 
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case StudyThe Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case StudySara Jacob
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2tingche
 
Investor presentation 06022015
Investor presentation 06022015Investor presentation 06022015
Investor presentation 06022015Ian Schuster
 
MGMT614: Corporate Strategy for Diageo
MGMT614: Corporate Strategy for DiageoMGMT614: Corporate Strategy for Diageo
MGMT614: Corporate Strategy for DiageoAlvin J. Lin
 
Guinness marketing strategy
Guinness marketing strategyGuinness marketing strategy
Guinness marketing strategyAjay Sharma
 
Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015
Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015
Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015Cassie Martinez Pastorfide
 
Harvard Business Case review - Case Study
Harvard Business Case review - Case StudyHarvard Business Case review - Case Study
Harvard Business Case review - Case StudyPlayground
 
Arcor presentation slides
Arcor presentation slidesArcor presentation slides
Arcor presentation slidesHala Taha
 
Amarillo Craft Brewing Company
Amarillo Craft Brewing CompanyAmarillo Craft Brewing Company
Amarillo Craft Brewing CompanyMatthew Helm
 
Business plan power point
Business plan power pointBusiness plan power point
Business plan power pointMatthew Helm
 
Analysis of beer industry in INDIA
Analysis of beer industry in INDIAAnalysis of beer industry in INDIA
Analysis of beer industry in INDIAChirag Kohli
 
Heineken 1229458438627486-2
Heineken 1229458438627486-2Heineken 1229458438627486-2
Heineken 1229458438627486-2Garima Allawadhi
 

Similaire à Adithya International marketing (20)

Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Us wine industry section c_group2
Us wine industry section c_group2Us wine industry section c_group2
Us wine industry section c_group2
 
Bartles & Jaymes Case study.pptx
Bartles & Jaymes Case study.pptxBartles & Jaymes Case study.pptx
Bartles & Jaymes Case study.pptx
 
Crafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine market
Crafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine marketCrafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine market
Crafting winning strategies in a mature market - US wine market
 
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case StudyThe Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
The Mountain Man Brewing Company : A Case Study
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2Sse Cola Wars Group2
Sse Cola Wars Group2
 
Investor presentation 06022015
Investor presentation 06022015Investor presentation 06022015
Investor presentation 06022015
 
MGMT614: Corporate Strategy for Diageo
MGMT614: Corporate Strategy for DiageoMGMT614: Corporate Strategy for Diageo
MGMT614: Corporate Strategy for Diageo
 
Guinness marketing strategy
Guinness marketing strategyGuinness marketing strategy
Guinness marketing strategy
 
Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015
Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015
Integrated Marketing Communications Plan - Greg Award 2015
 
Harvard Business Case review - Case Study
Harvard Business Case review - Case StudyHarvard Business Case review - Case Study
Harvard Business Case review - Case Study
 
Immix
ImmixImmix
Immix
 
Arcor presentation slides
Arcor presentation slidesArcor presentation slides
Arcor presentation slides
 
Amarillo Craft Brewing Company
Amarillo Craft Brewing CompanyAmarillo Craft Brewing Company
Amarillo Craft Brewing Company
 
Business plan power point
Business plan power pointBusiness plan power point
Business plan power point
 
Analysis of beer industry in INDIA
Analysis of beer industry in INDIAAnalysis of beer industry in INDIA
Analysis of beer industry in INDIA
 
Canned Wine.pptx
Canned Wine.pptxCanned Wine.pptx
Canned Wine.pptx
 
Heineken 1229458438627486-2
Heineken 1229458438627486-2Heineken 1229458438627486-2
Heineken 1229458438627486-2
 

Adithya International marketing

  • 3. SINCE 1829 Market Characteristics ▪ Largest country in South America (Area and population) - 200 million people. ▪ World’s 7th fastest growing economy. ▪ Expanding middle class population. ▪ Majority population in age group of 15 – 45 years and has highest purchasing power. ▪ Major investments in education and R&D across sectors. Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/br.html
  • 4. SINCE 1829 Economic Environment ▪ A4 level risk country – Medium Level ▪Favorable for domestic and foreign companies to do business. ▪ A few of the country’s major enterprises are under government control. Increasingly more are privately owned. ▪ Mix of socialist and capitalist market ideologies. Source: http://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/brazil/government
  • 5. SINCE 1829 Tax Structure ▪ Import Duty : Ranges between 10% and 35%. The import duty rate for importing Beer into Brazil is around 14% ▪ Industrialized Product Tax (IPI): Federal tax levied on most domestic and imported manufactured goods. Ranges between 0% and 15%. ▪ Merchandize and Service Circulation Tax : State government value-added tax levied on both domestic and imported products. Rate varies among states. Source: http://fita.org/countries/brazil.html
  • 6. SINCE 1829 Consumer Profile ▪ Brazilian consumers spend some 70% of their income on goods and services. ▪ Average gross income in Brazil increased by 124% between 2003 to 2007. ▪ Food, beverages and tobacco account for 16% of household expenditure. Source: http://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/brazil/government
  • 8. SINCE 1829  Market Size  GDP and Population 6 largest capitals, $748 , 24% Pop. 46M Others, $2,324 , 76% Pop. 153M Craft, $200 , 0.97% Regular, $20,500 , 99% (US$billion)(US$million)  Targeted niche: Craft Beer in Top 6 Capitals Market Potential
  • 9. SINCE 1829 Porter’s 5 Forces Threat of new entrants Moderate •Low capital outlay required –for low-scale craft beer microbreweries •Access to supply chain and retail distribution •Need economies of scale and local partnerships to distribute widely •Government regulations may impact ease of entry Supplier Power Moderate •Vertical integration of microbreweries weakens supplier power. •Many independent hops growers. •Independent barley growers can find alternative markets. Threat of Substitutes Moderate •High penetration of cheaper economy/mass-market beer brands •Other alcoholic/ non-alcoholic beverages readily available •Low switching costs for both consumers and distributers •High distribution and storage costs than other alcoholic beverages e.g. spirits Buyer Power Largely moderate •Low switching costs •Products compete on differentiation. •High brand loyalty •Retail outlets have more bargaining power with producers. Industry Competition Moderate to low •Low penetration of premium beers (1% of market) •No large players in the market •Wide differentiated variety of products •Downward pressure of prices from large-scale retailers and on-trade outlets.
  • 11. SINCE 1829 Company ▪ Founded in 1829 by David Yuengling ▪ Americas oldest existing brewery ▪ 6 different lines of beers - ales, lagers, porters and premium tastes ▪ A private company - not publically traded
  • 12. SINCE 1829 Company Performance ▪ In 2014, Yuengling surpassed Boston’s Samuel Adams in annual sales volume to become the country’s top craft beer brewery. ▪ Only available in a few states, including Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Washington DC, Delaware, Maryland, Florida and Alabama. ▪ Limited distribution has kept the company strong against larger American distributors. Only 2 breweries, in Tampa Florida and Pottsville Pennsylvania.
  • 13. SINCE 1829 SWOT Analysis Strengths  High local demand for American craft beer  Craft beer perceived as an “affordable luxury”  Product differentiation (oldest) Weaknesses  Lack of brand recognition  Premium pricing may deter demand  Poor access to local distribution and supply channels Opportunities  Create strong brand recognition - leveraging already existing demand  Build robust distribution networks and local partnerships. Threats  Competition from highly recognizable local and international craft beer brands  High saturation of cheaper standard beer brands  New local/international entrants
  • 15. SINCE 1829 Entry Strategy ▪ Exporting – Directly from Yuengling breweries in USA. ▪ Licensing – License to a Brazilian Brewery to produce and distribute Yuengling in the local market, in exchange of royalties or fees. ▪ Contract Manufacturing – Hire a Brazilian Brewery to produce and sometimes distribute. ▪ Joint Venture – Forming and alliance with a local Brazilian brewery to carry out joint operations.
  • 16. SINCE 1829 Entry Strategy Criteria Entry Strategy Effect on U.S. business Initial Investment Profitability ROI Total Score Exporting (-) (+) (-) (-) 2 (-) Licensing (+) (+) (+) (+) 4 (+) Contract Manufacturing (+) (-) (-) (-) 2 (-) Joint Venture (+) (-) (-) (-) 2 (-)
  • 17. SINCE 1829 Licensing  Pros:  Leverage Yeungling’s recognizable name brand  Benefit of local business insights and knowledge of supply chain and distribution  Low investment and involvement  High ROI  Cons:  Difficult to assure quality and manufacturing standards  Sharing margins with licencee
  • 18. SINCE 1829 Segmentation & Targeting  Two key segments in Brazil’s 6 major cities  Young (21-40), Metropolitan middle to upperclass adults  Women living in major cities - growing segment
  • 19. SINCE 1829 Positioning  An “Afforable Luxury”  Craft beer is viewed as an affordable luxury  Positioning yuengling as a premium brand - people can “treat themselves”  Everyone’s Beer  People from a variety of backgrounds  Tailored to both men and women’s tastes and aspirations.
  • 20. SINCE 1829 Pricing Strategy & Sales Forecasts
  • 21. SINCE 1829 Pricing Strategy ▪ Average Brazilian Market Price = $11.78 / l ▪ Customer percieved value ▪ Proposed go-to-market price = $12.00 / l Benefit Value Cost
  • 22. SINCE 1829 Pricing Strategy 49% 40% 6% 5% Manufacturer Taxes Retailers Distributor $12.00 $ 5.87 Production $ 5.40 Profit $ 0.47 (US average profit = $0.50 / liter)
  • 23. SINCE 1829 Expected Results  Steady Market (no growth considered)  Initial licensing contract  Small brewer  500,000 l/month  Start w/ 125,000  Diverse beer line  Royalties - 25% of profits (KPMG)  Sales revenue of $ 72million/year  3.6% market share
  • 24. SINCE 1829 Expected Results ▪ Benchmark (Boston Beer Co. & Brooklyn) ▪ Yuengling doesn’t releases financial results ▪ Brooklyn: 300,000 liters exported in 2015 ▪ Boston Beer Co.: Annual profits of $59 million ▪ Financial results expected ▪ Licensing revenues of $3 million/year ▪ Accounts for 5% increase in company’s net profit ▪ Extremely high Return on Investment
  • 25. SINCE 1829 Post-Entry Recommendations ▪ Gain strong foothold of the local market and the distribution network. ▪ Open “Exclusive Yuengling Bars” in the identified locations to provide the Yuengling experience. ▪ Fresh / Mature / Bottled beer. ▪ Merchandise. ▪ “Get the consumer Yuengling-ed”.
  • 26. SINCE 1829 Group 08 Adithya Nishanth adinish1991@gmail.com