1. Patent Application Drafting forPatent Application Drafting forPatent Application Drafting forPatent Application Drafting for
Quality and IPR ChallengesQuality and IPR ChallengesQuality and IPR ChallengesQuality and IPR Challenges
Martine Penilla Group, LLP
Sunnyvale, CA
mpiplaw.com
2. Patent Quality – Limited MetricsPatent Quality – Limited Metrics
HOW SHOULD QUALITY BE MEASURED
Martine Penilla Group, LLP 2
• The patent covers the invention
• The independent claims are broad/abstract
• The inventor was satisfied with the process
• The application was allowed quickly
• The USPTO is issuing fewer RCEs
• The Examiner was easy to work with
Patent Quality – PTAB in mindPatent Quality – PTAB in mind
• Are varying scope claims prepared (i.e., broader and
narrower)?
• Are alternativealternativealternativealternative implementations covered by claimsclaimsclaimsclaims,
specspecspecspec and drawingsdrawingsdrawingsdrawings?
• Are dependent claimsdependent claimsdependent claimsdependent claims usable for claim constructionclaim constructionclaim constructionclaim construction?
• Is case important (continuation practice)?
01
02
3. PATENT PREPARATION DRIVERS AND THE PTAB
3Martine Penilla Group, LLP
• Drafting ClaimsDrafting ClaimsDrafting ClaimsDrafting Claims
– Are independent claims broad enough
based on prior art?
– Are independent claims too broad?
– Do dependent claims provide substance
for prosecution amendment?
– Do dependent claims provide substance
for PTAB challenges?
• Defending ClaimsDefending ClaimsDefending ClaimsDefending Claims
– Broadest reasonable Interpretation
(BRI)
– Draft more dependent claims with
increasingly narrower scope or varying
scope
– Consider PTAB limitations on
amendment
– Prepare specification for claim
construction
Patent Preparation Drivers PTAB
• ApplicantApplicantApplicantApplicant
– Constraints on budget
– Constraints on timing
• Law firmLaw firmLaw firmLaw firm
– Focused on budget
– Focused on timing
• ResultResultResultResult
– Specification focused on specific
implementation
– Claims follow specific implementation
– Dependent claim(s) lack substance
4. DEPENDENT CLAIMS FOCUS ON KEY CLAIM TERMS
4Martine Penilla Group, LLP
Independent ClaimIndependent Claim
Dependent Claims Dependent Claims
Detailing existing terms* Adding new elements
*Substantive dependent claims
providing definitions and/or
alternatives for key terms
6. DEPENDENT CLAIMS AND DEEP SPECIFICATION SUPPORT
6Martine Penilla Group, LLP
DisclosureDisclosureDisclosureDisclosureDisclosureDisclosureDisclosureDisclosure Business FocusBusiness FocusBusiness FocusBusiness Focus
CompetitorCompetitorCompetitorCompetitor
LandscapeLandscapeLandscapeLandscape
Prior ArtPrior ArtPrior ArtPrior ArtPrior ArtPrior ArtPrior ArtPrior Art
ClaimsClaimsClaimsClaims
Independent Claim
1. A Method. Comprising
A. term B.B.B.B. termtermtermterm C. term
D.D.D.D. termtermtermterm E. term
Dependent Claims
Wherein term B includes x
Wherein term B includes x’
Wherein term B includes x+y
Wherein term B includes x+z
Where in term D includes α
Wherein term D includes α’
Wherein term D includes α+ β
Wherein term D includes α + Γ
SpecificationSpecificationSpecificationSpecificationSpecificationSpecificationSpecificationSpecification
A. term
B.B.B.B. termtermtermterm
e.g. x
e g. x’
e.g. x+y
e.g. x+z
C. term
D.D.D.D. termtermtermterm
e.g. α
e.g. α '
e.g. α + β
e.g. α +Γ
E. term
PO Benefits
at PTAB
•Claim
Construction/BRI
•Amendments
built-in
7. Patent Prosecution Done Right!
Silicon Valley Offices
Martine Penilla Group, LLP
710 Lakeway Drive, Suite 200
Sunnyvale, California 94085 | USA
mpiplaw.com
Albert S. Penilla
al@mpiplaw.com
Thank you.