This academic article summarizes a study that evaluated different methods for controlling the larger wax moth (Galleria mellonella) in post-harvest honeycombs. The treatments tested included various concentrations of salt water, hermetic storage, and aluminum phosphide tablets. After 2 months of storage, all treatments resulted in 100% mortality of wax moths. Hermetic storage and aluminum phosphide best preserved the condition of the combs. None of the treatments significantly affected the amount of wax or slum gum extracted. The study concluded that hermetic storage is the best control method due to the potential for aluminum phosphide residue in treated combs.
Business Model Canvas (BMC)- A new venture concept
Control of wax moth, galleria mellonella l
1. Advances in Life Science and Technology
ISSN 2224-7181 (Paper) ISSN 2225-062X (Online)
Vol 14, 2013
www.iiste.org
Control of wax moth, Galleria mellonella L. (Lepidoptera:
Pyralidae) in post harvest honey comb
Samuel A. Babarinde1, Adeola F. Odewole1*, Adeyemi O. Akinyemi2, Timothy A. Adebayo1, Adesanya O.1,
Oluwakorede A. Omodehin1, Oluwadamilola F. Alabi1
1. Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000,
Ogbomoso 210001, Nigeria
2. Department of Agronomy, Osun State University, Ejigbo Campus, Nigeria
*Corresponding author’s e-mail: ogunkeyede@yahoo.com; aodewole@lautech.edu.ng
Abstract
An experiment was carried out in the laboratory to control the infestation of larger wax moth, Galleria
mellonella, after honey extraction. Different quantities of salt in water and hermetic storage were used as
methods of controlling the larvae. A treatment containing Aluminium phosphide tablet was incorporated as a
chemical method of control and the treated honeycomb samples were stored for two month. Of all the treatments
used, the hermetic storage and Aluminium phosphide had the best result in that the comb retained their freshness
post two months storage. The number of emerged moth in opened untreated control (61.00) was higher than
other treatments but significantly higher than the number of emerged moth observed in salt- treated comb in
opened containers. Wax and slum gum weight were not significantly affected by the treatments. Hermetic
storage is therefore recommended as a better method of controlling wax moth in honeycomb after the extraction
of honey than Aluminium phosphide, due to the possibility of residue of Aluminium phosphide in the treated
honeycomb.
Key words: Honeycomb, Galleria mellonella, salt, hermetic storage, Aluminium phosphide, bee wax, wax moth
control
1 Introduction
Beekeeping, as a practice is no longer just the rustic hobby of days past. Today it is an integral part of modern
agriculture as it provides pollination for nation’s staple crops, honey to the food sector, and bee’s wax to a broad
spectrum of industries. As a result, monitoring the health and productivity of the honeybee colonies is essential
(FAO, 2003). Although, beekeeping is known popularly for its honey as the major produce, but there are other
produce which are also good sources of income. Such produce includes; beeswax, pollen, propolis, royal jelly
and venom. But all these produce are limited in production as a result of environmental factors; such as
unfavourable weather, noise, physical disturbances amongst others, and biotic factors; such as pest, predators
and diseases like mites, wax moth, birds, lizard, nosema, sac brood amongst others (Denr-car, 1997). These
limitations lead to late colonization and absconding (Babarinde et al., 2012). Wax moth has been identified as a
major pest in Nigeria due to climatic factors such as temperature and humidity which is responsible for
absconding (Babarinde et al., 2010). This moth destroys the beeswax which is a valuable product that can
provide a worthwhile income in addition to honey. In fact one kilogram of beeswax is worth more than one
kilogram of honey (FAO, 2009). To control the menace of the wax moth, different kinds of researches have been
carried out. Different chemicals such as moth balls, particularly the Naphthalene ones, and PDB (Para
Dichlorobenzene) has been the use of insecticides at the larval stage. But these measures may not be safe due to
the residuals which are left behind in the wax. This may lead to pollution of the wax and be difficult to use for
domestic and baiting new hives for colonization.
In view of this, the present research work was designed to evaluate the efficacy of control methods on
greater wax moth infestation of honey comb and to evaluate the effect of the control methods on the quantity of the
bee wax extracted from the honey comb.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental site
The experiment was carried out at the laboratory of Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Ladoke
Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
2.2 Collection and treatment of honey comb
After the extraction of honey, the honey combs infested by wax moth were acquired from beekeepers within
Ogbomoso Metropolis. The treatments applied to the infested honeycomb include: 10 g salt in 2 litres of water
stored in a closed container (Treatment A), 20 g salt in 2 litres of water stored in a closed container (Treatment
B), 40 g salt in 2 litres of water stored in a closed container (Treatment C), 1 tablet of Aluminium phosphide
41
2. Advances in Life Science and Technology
ISSN 2224-7181 (Paper) ISSN 2225-062X (Online)
Vol 14, 2013
www.iiste.org
(Treatment D), 2 litres of water (Treatment E), Control stored in an airtight container (Treatment F), 10 g salt in
2 litres of water stored in an opened container (Treatment G), 20 g salt in 2 litres of water stored in an opened
container (Treatment H), 40 g salt in 2 litres of water stored in an opened container (Treatment I), Control stored
in an opened container (Treatment J). Eight hundred grams of infested honeycomb were weighed into 4 liter
capacity plastic jar. The treatment was applied as indicated above and replicated in two. Each experimental set
up was stored for 2 months after which ax extraction was carried out.
2.3 Wax Extraction
Wax was extracted from each of the stored treated honeycomb using the local extraction method as described by
Segeren et al. (1997). The treated honeycomb was heated using iron steeled pot and sieved using a wire mesh
sieve. This was done in order to melt out the wax in the honeycomb and separate the wax from the slum gum
respectively.
2.4 Data Collection
After 2 months after treatment, data was collected on number of dead wax moth observed before wax extraction,
the physical assessment of the treated comb before wax extraction was also collected, weight of bee wax
extracted from each treatment, weight of slum gum after wax extraction.
2.5 Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
The experiment was set up using CRD. All data was subjected to analysis of variance using SAS (2005) and
significant means was separated with LSD at 5% of probability level.
3. Results
3.1Effect of treatments on population of emerged Galleria mellonella larvae, weight of wax and slumgum
Although, the highest numbers of emerged larvae were observed in untreated controls which were 59.00
(untreated control in closed containers) and 61.00 (untreated control in opened containers), 100% mortality was
observed in all treatments at 2 months post treatment of the combs. None of the treatments had significant effect
on the weight of the wax and slum gum (Table 1).
3.2 Effect of treatment on physical appearance of honey comb before wax extraction:
Of all the treatments used, Aluminium phosphide and untreated control in closed containers (which was a
simulated hermetic storage) had the best results which preserved the state of the comb. Other methods had
fermented odour or growth of fungi except the opened control that has dry powdery dust (Table 2).
4. Discussion
The wax moth, Galleria mellonella, is one of the most devastating and economically important pests of
wax throughout the world (Burges, 1978; Chang & Hsieh, 1992; Haewoon et al., 1995; Smith, 1965). It is a
major pest that prevents farmers form storing honey combs after the extraction of honey. Therefore there is a
need for beekeepers to control wax moth from damaging the comb after extraction of honey. Many studies have
been conducted to find ways of controlling it (Burges, 1978).
After two months of storing the treated combs, it was observed that all the treatments controlled the
development of wax moth by killing them thereby preventing the destruction of the honey comb in storage. But
of all the treatments used, Aluminium phosphide and the hermetic storage had the best result which preserved
the state of the comb by maintaining freshness of the comb while the other treatments had fungal growth and
fermented odour. The development of fungi was due to high moisture content of the wax due to the water
introduced for the storage. Also it was observed that none of the treatments had a significant effect on the
weight of the wax and slum gum obtained. This implies that either of the treatment can give the same quantity of
wax and slum gum. However, since certain treatments caused fermentation and fungal growth, they cannot be
recommended for preservation of the comb. Hermetic storage without salt reduced cost and was eco-friendly. It
is therefore recommended as a better control method rather than Aluminium phosphide for the control of wax
moth in post harvest honey comb. This is because synthetic pesticide like using Aluminium phosphide,
paradichlorobenzene or naphthalene can lead to accumulation of toxic residues in the ecosystem (Bogdanov et
al., 2004).
Further studies are recommended to monitor the age of wax moth and the effect of the treatment for a
short term period. Identification of the fungi associated with the different methods is also necessary.
42
3. Advances in Life Science and Technology
ISSN 2224-7181 (Paper) ISSN 2225-062X (Online)
Vol 14, 2013
www.iiste.org
References
Babarinde, S. A., M.O Akanbi, T.A Adebayo., J. I Olaifa., A .F Odewole. & E.A Alagbe (2010) Effect of
polythene and lime applied to top bars hive on colonization, weight gain and pest infestation. Annals of
Biological Research, 1(4): 61-66
Babarinde, S. A., A.F Odewole, 0.0 Oyegoke & O.B Amao (2012) Impact of hive dimension and flight
enterance on hive colonization, pest infestation and hive weight gain in Apis
mellifera
adansonii(Hymenoptera:Apidae). Munis Entomology & Zoology, 7(1): 634-641
Bogdanov, S, V Kilchenmann,, K Seiler, H Pfefferli, T Frey, B Roux, P Wenk, J Noser, (2004) Residues of pdichlorobenzene in honey and beeswax. Journal of Apicultural Research 43 (1): 14-16
Bogdanovis and Ruoff, K. (2004). Authenticity of honey and other bee products, APIACTA 38pp.317-327.
Burges, H. D (1978) Control of wax moth: Physical, chemical and biological methods. Bee world,59(4).129-138
Chang, C.P and F.K Hsieh ( 1992 ) Morphology and bionomics of Galleria mellonella. Chinian. Journal of
Entomology. 12(2), 121-129
DENR-CAR, (1997) Technology Transfer Series, Vol. 7(1)
FAO (2009) Bees and their role in forest livelihoods, by N. Bradbear, Non – wood forest products No19, Rome.
FAO (2003) Beekeeping and sustainable livelihoods, by N Bradbear, FAO Diversification booklet No.1, Rome.
Haewoon, O.L Man Young Young duck and C.P Chang (1995) Developing periods and damage patterns of
combs by the Greater wax moth, Galleria mellonelia. Korean. Journal of Apiculture 10:1,5-10.
Segeren, P. (1997) Beekeeping in the tropics.CTA Wageningen, AGRODOK 32. 88 pp
Smith, T. L. (1965) External Morphology of the larva, pupa and adult of the wax moth Galleria mellonella.
Journal of Kansas Entomology Society, 38(3), 287-310
Winston M. L. (1987) The biology of the honeybee, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
London, England, p. 281
Table 1: Population of emerged Galleria mellonella larvae, percentage mortality in honeycomb after
treatment and wax and slum gum weight after wax extraction
Treatment*
Emerged moth
% Mortality
Wax weight
Slum gum
10 g salt closed
50.50abc
100.00a
125.00a
219.00a
20 g salt closed
51.50abc
100.00a
136.50a
314.00a
40 g salt closed
37.00abc
100.00a
192.00a
269.50a
2 litre of water closed
34.00abc
100.00a
94.50a
293.00a
Phosphine tablet closed
54.00ab
100.00a
148.00a
272.50a
Untreated control closed
59.00ab
100.00a
160.00a
279.00a
10 g salt opened
24.50bc
100.00a
90.00a
177.50a
20 g salt opened
28.50bc
100.00a
139.50a
255.00a
40 g salt opened
16.00c
100.00a
122.50a
265.00a
Untreated control opened
61.00a
100.00a
128.50a
264.50a
Means with similar alphabet along the column are not significantly different at 5% probability using Fishers’ LSD.
*Closed implies that the treated combs were stored in closed containers.
*Opened implies that the treated combs were stored in opened containers.
43
4. Advances in Life Science and Technology
ISSN 2224-7181 (Paper) ISSN 2225-062X (Online)
Vol 14, 2013
www.iiste.org
Table 2: Physical conditions of treated honey combs before wax extraction
Treatment*
Conditions
10 g salt closed
Whitish caked mucor with highly fermented odour
20 g salt closed
Greyish caked mucor with highly fermented odour
40 g salt closed
fermented odour
2 litre of water closed
Whitish mucor
Aluminium phosphide tablet
Fresh comb retained
closed
Untreated control closed
Fresh comb retained
10 g salt opened
Slightly fermented odour with no mucor
20 g salt opened
Slightly fermented odour with no mucor
40 g salt opened
Slightly fermented odour with no mucor
Untreated control opened
Dry powdery dust
*Closed implies that the treated combs were stored in closed containers.
*Opened implies that the treated combs were stored in opened containers.
44
5. This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS
The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/
The IISTE
editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a
fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the
world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from
gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available
upon request of readers and authors.
MORE RESOURCES
Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/
Recent conferences: http://www.iiste.org/conference/
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar