SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 35
Download to read offline
BAYESIAN STATISTICAL
CONCEPTS
A gentle introduction
Alex Etz
@alxetz ßTwitter (no ‘e’ in alex)
alexanderetz.com ßBlog
November 5th 2015
Why do we do statistics?
•  Deal with uncertainty
•  Will it rain today? How much?
•  When will my train arrive?
•  Describe phenomena
•  It rained 4cm today
•  My arrived between at 1605
•  Make predictions
•  It will rain between 3-8 cm today
•  My train will arrive between 1600 and 1615
Prediction is key
•  Description is boring
•  Description:
•  On this IQ test, these women averaged 3 points higher than these men
•  Prediction is interesting
•  Prediction:
•  On this IQ test, the average woman will score above the average man
•  Quantitative (precise) prediction is gold
•  Quantitative prediction:
•  On this IQ test, women will score between 1-3 pts higher than men
Evidence is prediction
•  Not just prediction in isolation
•  Competing prediction
•  Statistical evidence is comparative
Candy bags
5 orange, 5 blue 10 blue
Candy bags
•  I propose a game
•  Draw a candy from one of the bags
•  You guess which one it came from
•  After each draw (up to 6) you can bet (if you want)
Candy bags
•  If orange
•  Bag A predicts orange with probability .5
•  Bag B predicts orange with probability 0
•  Given orange, there is evidence for A over B
•  How much?
•  Infinity
•  Why?
•  Outcome is impossible for bag B, yet happened
•  Therefore, it cannot be bag B
Candy bags
•  If blue
•  Bag A predicts blue with probability .5 (5 out of 10)
•  Bag B predicts blue with probability 1.0 (10 out of 10)
•  Cannot rule out either bag
•  Given blue, there is evidence for B over A
•  How much?
•  Ratio of their predictions
•  1.0 divided by .5 = 2 per draw
Evidence is prediction
•  There is evidence for A over B if:
•  Prob. of observations given by A exceeds that given by B
•  Strength of the evidence for A over B:
•  The ratio of the probabilities (very simple!)
•  This is true for all of Bayesian statistics
•  More complicated math, but same basic idea
•  This is not true of classical statistics
Candy bag and a deck of cards
•  Same game, 1 extra step
•  I draw one card from a deck
•  Red suit (Heart, Diamond) I draw from bag A
•  Black suit (Spade, Club) I draw from bag B
•  Based on the card, draw a candy from one of the bags
•  You guess which one it came from
•  After each draw (up to 6) you can bet
•  (if you want)
Candy bags and a deck of cards
•  If orange, it came from bag A 100%. Game ends
•  If blue
•  Both bags had 50% chance of being selected
•  Bag A predicts blue with probability .5 (5 out of 10)
•  Bag B predicts blue with probability 1.0 (10 out of 10)
•  Evidence for B over A
•  How much?
•  Ratio of their predictions
•  1.0 divided by .5 = 2 per blue draw
Candy bags and a deck of cards
•  Did I add any information by drawing a card?
•  Did it affect your bet at all?
•  If the prior information doesn’t affect your conclusion,
it adds no information to the evidence
•  “Non-informative”
Candy bags and a deck of cards
•  Same game, 1 extra step
•  I draw one card from a deck
•  King of hearts I draw from bag B
•  Any other card I draw from bag A
•  I draw a ball from one of the bags
•  You guess which one it came from
•  After each draw (up to 6) you can bet
Candy bags and a deck of cards
•  Did I add any information by drawing a card?
•  Did it affect your bet at all?
•  Observations (evidence) the same
•  But conclusions can differ
•  Evidence is separate from conclusions
• The 1 euro bet
•  If orange draw
•  Bet on bag A, you win 100%
•  We have ruled out bag B
•  If blue draw
•  Bet on bag A, chance you win is x%
•  Bet on bag B, chance you win is (1-x)%
Betting on the odds
Betting on the odds
•  Depends on:
•  Evidence from sample (candies drawn)
•  Other information (card drawn, etc.)
•  A study only provides the evidence contained in the
sample
•  You must provide the outside information
•  Is the hypothesis initially implausible?
•  Is this surprising? Expected?
Betting on the odds
•  If initially fair odds
•  (Draw red suit vs. black suit)
•  Same as adding no information
•  Conclusion based only on evidence
•  For 1 blue draw
•  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 1
•  Evidence 2 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Final (posterior) odds 2 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Probability of bag B = 67%
Betting on the odds
•  If initially fair odds
•  (Draw red suit vs. black suit)
•  Same as adding no information
•  Conclusion based only on evidence
•  For 6 blue draws
•  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 1
•  Evidence 64 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Final (posterior) odds 64 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Probability of bag B = 98%
Betting on the odds
•  If initially unfair odds
•  (Draw King of Hearts vs. any other card)
•  Adding relevant outside information
•  Conclusion based on evidence combined with outside information
•  For 1 blue draw
•  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 51 in favor of bag A
•  Evidence 2 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Final (posterior) odds 1 to 26 in favor of bag A
•  Probability of bag B = 4%
Betting on the odds
•  If initially unfair odds
•  (Draw King of Hearts vs. any other card)
•  Adding relevant outside information
•  Conclusion based on evidence combined with outside information
•  For 6 blue draws
•  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 51 in favor of bag A
•  Evidence 64 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Final (posterior) odds 1.3 to 1 in favor of bag B
•  Probability of bag B = 55%
Betting on the odds
•  The evidence was the same
•  2 to 1 in favor of B (1 blue draw)
•  64 to 1 in favor of B (6 blue draws)
•  Outside information changed conclusion
•  Fair initial odds
•  Initial prob. of bag B = 50%
•  Final prob. of bag B = 67% (98%)
•  Unfair initial odds
•  Initial prob. of bag B = 2%
•  Final prob. of bag B = 4% (55%)
Should you take the bet?
•  If I offer you a 1 euro bet:
•  Bet on the bag that has the highest probability
•  For other bets, decide based on final odds
Evidence is comparative
• What if I had many more candy bag options?
Graphing the evidence
•  What if I wanted to compare every possible option at
once?
•  Graph it!
Graphing the evidence (1 blue)
Graphing the evidence (1 blue)
Graphing the evidence (6 blue)
Graphing the evidence (6 blue)
Graphing the evidence
•  This is called a Likelihood function
•  Ranks probability of the observations for all possible
candy bag proportions
•  Evidence is the ratio of heights on the curve
•  A above B, evidence for A over B
Graphing the evidence
•  Where does prior information enter?
•  Prior rankings for each possibility
•  Just as it did before
•  But now as a prior distribution
Prior information
•  “Non-informative” prior information
•  All possibilities ranked equally
•  i.e. no value preferred over another
•  Weak prior information; vague knowledge
•  “The bag has some blue candy, but not all blue candy”
•  After Halloween, for example
•  Saw some blue candy given out, but also other candies
•  Strong prior information
•  “Proportion of women in the population is between 40% and 60%”
Non-informative
No preference for any values
Weakly-informative
Some blue candy, but not all
Strongly-informative
Only middle values have any weight
Information and context
•  Your prior information depends on context!
•  And depends on what you know!
•  Just like drawing cards in the game
•  Just harder to specify
•  Intuitive, personal
•  Conclusions must take context into account

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Bayes theorem explained
Bayes theorem explainedBayes theorem explained
Bayes theorem explained
Daniel Ross
 
Chapter 3 maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fix
Chapter 3   maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fixChapter 3   maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fix
Chapter 3 maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fix
jelli123
 
Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)
Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)
Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)
jemille6
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Bayes theorem explained
Bayes theorem explainedBayes theorem explained
Bayes theorem explained
 
Bayesian statistics
Bayesian statisticsBayesian statistics
Bayesian statistics
 
Introduction to Bayesian Statistics
Introduction to Bayesian StatisticsIntroduction to Bayesian Statistics
Introduction to Bayesian Statistics
 
Spanos lecture 7: An Introduction to Bayesian Inference
Spanos lecture 7: An Introduction to Bayesian Inference Spanos lecture 7: An Introduction to Bayesian Inference
Spanos lecture 7: An Introduction to Bayesian Inference
 
ma12012id536
ma12012id536ma12012id536
ma12012id536
 
Measuring International Financial Supervisory Transparency
Measuring International Financial Supervisory TransparencyMeasuring International Financial Supervisory Transparency
Measuring International Financial Supervisory Transparency
 
No use reasoning with adolescents? A randomised controlled trial comparing pe...
No use reasoning with adolescents? A randomised controlled trial comparing pe...No use reasoning with adolescents? A randomised controlled trial comparing pe...
No use reasoning with adolescents? A randomised controlled trial comparing pe...
 
Crisis of confidence, p-hacking and the future of psychology
Crisis of confidence, p-hacking and the future of psychologyCrisis of confidence, p-hacking and the future of psychology
Crisis of confidence, p-hacking and the future of psychology
 
Work in progress and the state of affairs
Work in progress and the state of affairsWork in progress and the state of affairs
Work in progress and the state of affairs
 
Behaviour change and intervention research
Behaviour change and intervention researchBehaviour change and intervention research
Behaviour change and intervention research
 
Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradient
Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradientHyperparameter optimization with approximate gradient
Hyperparameter optimization with approximate gradient
 
4 pillars of visualization & communication by Noah Iliinsky
4 pillars of visualization & communication by Noah Iliinsky4 pillars of visualization & communication by Noah Iliinsky
4 pillars of visualization & communication by Noah Iliinsky
 
Chapter 3 maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fix
Chapter 3   maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fixChapter 3   maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fix
Chapter 3 maximum likelihood and bayesian estimation-fix
 
Severe Testing: The Key to Error Correction
Severe Testing: The Key to Error CorrectionSevere Testing: The Key to Error Correction
Severe Testing: The Key to Error Correction
 
Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)
Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)
Mayo aug1, jsm slides (3)
 
3 recursive bayesian estimation
3  recursive bayesian estimation3  recursive bayesian estimation
3 recursive bayesian estimation
 
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
Graduate Econometrics Course, part 4, 2017
 
Understanding your data with Bayesian networks (in Python) by Bartek Wilczyns...
Understanding your data with Bayesian networks (in Python) by Bartek Wilczyns...Understanding your data with Bayesian networks (in Python) by Bartek Wilczyns...
Understanding your data with Bayesian networks (in Python) by Bartek Wilczyns...
 
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
Slides econometrics-2017-graduate-2
 
Econometrics 2017-graduate-3
Econometrics 2017-graduate-3Econometrics 2017-graduate-3
Econometrics 2017-graduate-3
 

Recently uploaded

Chiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptx
Chiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptxChiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptx
Chiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptx
raffaeleoman
 
Uncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac Folorunso
Uncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac FolorunsoUncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac Folorunso
Uncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac Folorunso
Kayode Fayemi
 
No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...
No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...
No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...
Sheetaleventcompany
 
Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...
Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...
Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...
amilabibi1
 
If this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New Nigeria
If this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New NigeriaIf this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New Nigeria
If this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New Nigeria
Kayode Fayemi
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Air breathing and respiratory adaptations in diver animals
Air breathing and respiratory adaptations in diver animalsAir breathing and respiratory adaptations in diver animals
Air breathing and respiratory adaptations in diver animals
 
Sector 62, Noida Call girls :8448380779 Noida Escorts | 100% verified
Sector 62, Noida Call girls :8448380779 Noida Escorts | 100% verifiedSector 62, Noida Call girls :8448380779 Noida Escorts | 100% verified
Sector 62, Noida Call girls :8448380779 Noida Escorts | 100% verified
 
Chiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptx
Chiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptxChiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptx
Chiulli_Aurora_Oman_Raffaele_Beowulf.pptx
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.pdf
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.pdfICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.pdf
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.pdf
 
The workplace ecosystem of the future 24.4.2024 Fabritius_share ii.pdf
The workplace ecosystem of the future 24.4.2024 Fabritius_share ii.pdfThe workplace ecosystem of the future 24.4.2024 Fabritius_share ii.pdf
The workplace ecosystem of the future 24.4.2024 Fabritius_share ii.pdf
 
Uncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac Folorunso
Uncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac FolorunsoUncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac Folorunso
Uncommon Grace The Autobiography of Isaac Folorunso
 
lONG QUESTION ANSWER PAKISTAN STUDIES10.
lONG QUESTION ANSWER PAKISTAN STUDIES10.lONG QUESTION ANSWER PAKISTAN STUDIES10.
lONG QUESTION ANSWER PAKISTAN STUDIES10.
 
Dreaming Marissa Sánchez Music Video Treatment
Dreaming Marissa Sánchez Music Video TreatmentDreaming Marissa Sánchez Music Video Treatment
Dreaming Marissa Sánchez Music Video Treatment
 
My Presentation "In Your Hands" by Halle Bailey
My Presentation "In Your Hands" by Halle BaileyMy Presentation "In Your Hands" by Halle Bailey
My Presentation "In Your Hands" by Halle Bailey
 
Presentation on Engagement in Book Clubs
Presentation on Engagement in Book ClubsPresentation on Engagement in Book Clubs
Presentation on Engagement in Book Clubs
 
No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...
No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...
No Advance 8868886958 Chandigarh Call Girls , Indian Call Girls For Full Nigh...
 
Report Writing Webinar Training
Report Writing Webinar TrainingReport Writing Webinar Training
Report Writing Webinar Training
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 97 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 97 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 97 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 97 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Aesthetic Colaba Mumbai Cst Call girls 📞 7738631006 Grant road Call Girls ❤️-...
Aesthetic Colaba Mumbai Cst Call girls 📞 7738631006 Grant road Call Girls ❤️-...Aesthetic Colaba Mumbai Cst Call girls 📞 7738631006 Grant road Call Girls ❤️-...
Aesthetic Colaba Mumbai Cst Call girls 📞 7738631006 Grant road Call Girls ❤️-...
 
Thirunelveli call girls Tamil escorts 7877702510
Thirunelveli call girls Tamil escorts 7877702510Thirunelveli call girls Tamil escorts 7877702510
Thirunelveli call girls Tamil escorts 7877702510
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 93 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 93 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 93 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 93 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Causes of poverty in France presentation.pptx
Causes of poverty in France presentation.pptxCauses of poverty in France presentation.pptx
Causes of poverty in France presentation.pptx
 
Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...
Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...
Bring back lost lover in USA, Canada ,Uk ,Australia ,London Lost Love Spell C...
 
If this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New Nigeria
If this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New NigeriaIf this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New Nigeria
If this Giant Must Walk: A Manifesto for a New Nigeria
 
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Lucas Price, Yardstick
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Lucas Price, YardstickSaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Lucas Price, Yardstick
SaaStr Workshop Wednesday w/ Lucas Price, Yardstick
 

Bayesian statistical concepts

  • 1. BAYESIAN STATISTICAL CONCEPTS A gentle introduction Alex Etz @alxetz ßTwitter (no ‘e’ in alex) alexanderetz.com ßBlog November 5th 2015
  • 2. Why do we do statistics? •  Deal with uncertainty •  Will it rain today? How much? •  When will my train arrive? •  Describe phenomena •  It rained 4cm today •  My arrived between at 1605 •  Make predictions •  It will rain between 3-8 cm today •  My train will arrive between 1600 and 1615
  • 3. Prediction is key •  Description is boring •  Description: •  On this IQ test, these women averaged 3 points higher than these men •  Prediction is interesting •  Prediction: •  On this IQ test, the average woman will score above the average man •  Quantitative (precise) prediction is gold •  Quantitative prediction: •  On this IQ test, women will score between 1-3 pts higher than men
  • 4. Evidence is prediction •  Not just prediction in isolation •  Competing prediction •  Statistical evidence is comparative
  • 5. Candy bags 5 orange, 5 blue 10 blue
  • 6. Candy bags •  I propose a game •  Draw a candy from one of the bags •  You guess which one it came from •  After each draw (up to 6) you can bet (if you want)
  • 7. Candy bags •  If orange •  Bag A predicts orange with probability .5 •  Bag B predicts orange with probability 0 •  Given orange, there is evidence for A over B •  How much? •  Infinity •  Why? •  Outcome is impossible for bag B, yet happened •  Therefore, it cannot be bag B
  • 8. Candy bags •  If blue •  Bag A predicts blue with probability .5 (5 out of 10) •  Bag B predicts blue with probability 1.0 (10 out of 10) •  Cannot rule out either bag •  Given blue, there is evidence for B over A •  How much? •  Ratio of their predictions •  1.0 divided by .5 = 2 per draw
  • 9. Evidence is prediction •  There is evidence for A over B if: •  Prob. of observations given by A exceeds that given by B •  Strength of the evidence for A over B: •  The ratio of the probabilities (very simple!) •  This is true for all of Bayesian statistics •  More complicated math, but same basic idea •  This is not true of classical statistics
  • 10. Candy bag and a deck of cards •  Same game, 1 extra step •  I draw one card from a deck •  Red suit (Heart, Diamond) I draw from bag A •  Black suit (Spade, Club) I draw from bag B •  Based on the card, draw a candy from one of the bags •  You guess which one it came from •  After each draw (up to 6) you can bet •  (if you want)
  • 11. Candy bags and a deck of cards •  If orange, it came from bag A 100%. Game ends •  If blue •  Both bags had 50% chance of being selected •  Bag A predicts blue with probability .5 (5 out of 10) •  Bag B predicts blue with probability 1.0 (10 out of 10) •  Evidence for B over A •  How much? •  Ratio of their predictions •  1.0 divided by .5 = 2 per blue draw
  • 12. Candy bags and a deck of cards •  Did I add any information by drawing a card? •  Did it affect your bet at all? •  If the prior information doesn’t affect your conclusion, it adds no information to the evidence •  “Non-informative”
  • 13. Candy bags and a deck of cards •  Same game, 1 extra step •  I draw one card from a deck •  King of hearts I draw from bag B •  Any other card I draw from bag A •  I draw a ball from one of the bags •  You guess which one it came from •  After each draw (up to 6) you can bet
  • 14. Candy bags and a deck of cards •  Did I add any information by drawing a card? •  Did it affect your bet at all? •  Observations (evidence) the same •  But conclusions can differ •  Evidence is separate from conclusions
  • 15. • The 1 euro bet •  If orange draw •  Bet on bag A, you win 100% •  We have ruled out bag B •  If blue draw •  Bet on bag A, chance you win is x% •  Bet on bag B, chance you win is (1-x)% Betting on the odds
  • 16. Betting on the odds •  Depends on: •  Evidence from sample (candies drawn) •  Other information (card drawn, etc.) •  A study only provides the evidence contained in the sample •  You must provide the outside information •  Is the hypothesis initially implausible? •  Is this surprising? Expected?
  • 17. Betting on the odds •  If initially fair odds •  (Draw red suit vs. black suit) •  Same as adding no information •  Conclusion based only on evidence •  For 1 blue draw •  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 1 •  Evidence 2 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Final (posterior) odds 2 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Probability of bag B = 67%
  • 18. Betting on the odds •  If initially fair odds •  (Draw red suit vs. black suit) •  Same as adding no information •  Conclusion based only on evidence •  For 6 blue draws •  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 1 •  Evidence 64 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Final (posterior) odds 64 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Probability of bag B = 98%
  • 19. Betting on the odds •  If initially unfair odds •  (Draw King of Hearts vs. any other card) •  Adding relevant outside information •  Conclusion based on evidence combined with outside information •  For 1 blue draw •  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 51 in favor of bag A •  Evidence 2 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Final (posterior) odds 1 to 26 in favor of bag A •  Probability of bag B = 4%
  • 20. Betting on the odds •  If initially unfair odds •  (Draw King of Hearts vs. any other card) •  Adding relevant outside information •  Conclusion based on evidence combined with outside information •  For 6 blue draws •  Initial (prior) odds 1 to 51 in favor of bag A •  Evidence 64 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Final (posterior) odds 1.3 to 1 in favor of bag B •  Probability of bag B = 55%
  • 21. Betting on the odds •  The evidence was the same •  2 to 1 in favor of B (1 blue draw) •  64 to 1 in favor of B (6 blue draws) •  Outside information changed conclusion •  Fair initial odds •  Initial prob. of bag B = 50% •  Final prob. of bag B = 67% (98%) •  Unfair initial odds •  Initial prob. of bag B = 2% •  Final prob. of bag B = 4% (55%)
  • 22. Should you take the bet? •  If I offer you a 1 euro bet: •  Bet on the bag that has the highest probability •  For other bets, decide based on final odds
  • 23. Evidence is comparative • What if I had many more candy bag options?
  • 24. Graphing the evidence •  What if I wanted to compare every possible option at once? •  Graph it!
  • 29. Graphing the evidence •  This is called a Likelihood function •  Ranks probability of the observations for all possible candy bag proportions •  Evidence is the ratio of heights on the curve •  A above B, evidence for A over B
  • 30. Graphing the evidence •  Where does prior information enter? •  Prior rankings for each possibility •  Just as it did before •  But now as a prior distribution
  • 31. Prior information •  “Non-informative” prior information •  All possibilities ranked equally •  i.e. no value preferred over another •  Weak prior information; vague knowledge •  “The bag has some blue candy, but not all blue candy” •  After Halloween, for example •  Saw some blue candy given out, but also other candies •  Strong prior information •  “Proportion of women in the population is between 40% and 60%”
  • 35. Information and context •  Your prior information depends on context! •  And depends on what you know! •  Just like drawing cards in the game •  Just harder to specify •  Intuitive, personal •  Conclusions must take context into account

Editor's Notes

  1. Draw white, white, black
  2. Like when I drew colors to pick the basket