Composite Design.pdf

Amin Zuraiqi
Amin ZuraiqiIndependent Civil Engineer à Self Employed

structural design

3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
1
Composite Construction and Design
Introduction
Composite construction refers to any members composed of more than 1 material.
The parts of these composite members are rigidly connected such that no relative
movement can occur. Examples are:
Timber and steel ‘flitch’ beams Timber-reinforced concrete
Typical steel and concrete composite construction
Composite construction aims to make each material perform the function it is best at,
or to strengthen a given cross section of a weaker material.
Name and explain another form of composite construction.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
2
Behaviour of Composite Beams
In the following, we consider only the case of structural steel sections and reinforced
concrete slabs. A comparison of behaviours is:
The non-composite beam deflects further, hence it is less stiff. Note that the E-value
hasn’t changed so it is the I-value that changes. In addition to the increase in stiffness
there is also a large increase in moment capacity leading to reduced section sizes. The
metal decking can also be used as permanent formwork, saving construction time.
Non-composite behaviour
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
3
The concrete slab is not connected to the steel section and therefore behaves
independently. As it is weak in longitudinal bending, it deforms to the curvature of
the steel section and has its own neutral axis. The bottom surface of the concrete slab
is free to slide over the top flange of the steel section and slip occurs. The bending
resistance of the slab is often so small that it is ignored.
Composite Behaviour
In this case, the concrete slab is connected to the steel section and both act together in
carrying the load. Slip between the slab and steel section is now prevented and the
connection resists a longitudinal shear force similar in distribution to the vertical
shear force shown.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
4
Composite Construction Layout
Composite deck floors using shallow profiles are usually designed to span 2.5 to 4.5
m between supports. When the deck is propped during construction the spans are
around 4 to 5 m.
Long span floors (12 to 18 m) are achieved by primary beams at 6 to 9 m centres.
Shorter secondary beams support the slab (Diagram A). The type of grid shown in
Diagram B offers services integration within the depth of the floor. Alternatively the
secondary beams can be designed to span the longer distance so that the depths of the
primary and secondary beams can be optimized.
The Asymmetric Beam (ASB) system from Corus allows a squarer panel (Diagram
C) and is designed to compete with RC flat-slab construction.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
5
Note that the beam layouts all
describe simply-supported spans
and this is usual. Continuous
spans of composite beams can
cause problems, though can be
very useful nonetheless.
Over the support the concrete
cracks (and these can be large);
the steel must take the majority
of the bending alone, and so a
portion of the section is in
compression. Slender sections
are prone to local buckling in
and any intervening column may
need to be strengthened to
absorb the compression across
its web. Lateral-torsional
buckling of the beam may also
be a problem.
Propped Construction
The steel beam is supported at mid- or quarter-span until the concrete slab has
hardened sufficiently to allow composite action. Propping affects speed of
construction but allows smaller steel sections.
Unpropped Construction
The steel beams must carry the weight of the wet concrete on its own. By the time
construction loads can be applied to the slab, some composite behaviour can be used.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
6
Elements of Composite Construction
The elements that make up composite construction are:
There are two main forms of deck: shallow and deep. The figure above illustrates a
typical shallow deck (50–100 mm) and below is a deep deck (225 mm) supported on
an ASB. The deep deck systems are proprietary; we will only consider the design of
shallow deck systems, though the principles are the same.
The beams are ordinary structural steel sections (except for the ASB).
The shear studs are normally 19 mm diameter 100 mm high studs, though there are
different sizes.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
7
Design of Composite Beams
The design involves the following aspects:
1. Moment capacity:
Design the section such that the moment capacity is greater than that required.
2. Shear capacity
To ensure adequate capacity; this based on the steel section alone – as per usual
structural steel design.
3. Shear connector capacity
To enable full composite action to be achieved; these must be designed to be
adequate.
4. Longitudinal shear capacity
Check to prevent possible splitting of the concrete along the length of the beam.
5. Serviceability checks:
a. Deflection;
b. Elastic behaviour, and;
c. Vibration.
These checks are to ensure the safe and comfortable use of the beam in service. We
check to ensure it does not cause cracking of ceilings and is not dynamically ‘lively’.
Also, we verify that it is always elastic when subjected to service loads to avoid
problems with plastic strain (i.e. permanent deflection) of the beam. We will not
consider checks on vibration and will only outline the calculations for the elastic
check.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
8
Design of Composite Beams: Moment Capacity
Just as in ordinary steel and RC design, the composite moment capacity is derived
from plastic theory. There are three cases to consider, based on the possible locations
of the plastic neutral axis (PNA), shown below.
When calculating the PNA location, we assume a stress of py in the steel and 0.45fcu
in the concrete. The tensile capacity of the beam of area A is:
s y
F p A
=
The compression capacity of the slab depends on the orientation of the decking (Dp),
and is:
( )
0.45
c cu s p e
F f D D B
= −
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
9
where Be is the effective breadth of the slab. We also define the axial capacities of the
flange and web as:
f y
F BTp
= 2 or
w s f w y
F F F F Dtp
= − =
Using the notation given, where the depth of the PNA is yp, we have three capacities:
• Case (a): PNA is in the slab; occurs when c s
F F
> :
2 2
s p
s
c s s
c
D D
F
D
M F D
F
⎡ ⎤
−
⎛ ⎞
= + −
⎢ ⎥
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⎣ ⎦
• Case (b): PNA is in the steel flange; occurs when s c
F F
>
( )
2
2 2 4
s p s c
c s c
f
D D F F
D T
M F F
F
⎧ ⎫
− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎪ ⎪
= + − ⋅
⎨ ⎬
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎪ ⎪
⎩ ⎭
(the term in the braces is small and may be safely ignored).
• Case (c): PNA is in the steel web; occurs when w c
F F
>
2
2 4
s p c
c s c
w
D D D F D
M M F
F
+ +
⎛ ⎞
= + − ⋅
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
where s y x
M p S
= is the moment capacity of the steel section alone.
The effective breadth Be is taken as:
0.25
e
B B L S
≤ = ≤
where B is the width of the steel section and S
is the centre-to-centre spacing of the
composite beams (2.5 to 4.5 m) and L is the
(simply-supported) span of the beam.
Don’t Panic!
Case (a) is frequent; (b) less so, but (c) is very
rare. Therefore, for usual design, only Fc and
Fs are required (ignoring the term in the
braces). Note that if s c
F F
> , check that w c
F F
>
/
to ensure that you are using Case (b).
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
10
Design of Composite Beams: Shear Capacity
The shear capacity is based on the capacity of the steel section only.
The capacity is: 0.6
v y v
P p A
= where v
A tD
= .
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
11
Shear plane
Design of Composite Beams: Shear Connector Capacity
The shear connectors used in ordinary composite construction are dowel-type studs.
Other forms used to be used, but headed-studs are now standard. They allow easy
construction as they can be shot fixed or welded through the deck onto the beam,
after the deck has been laid. In addition to the shear strength, the headed studs
prevent the vertical separation, or uplift, of the concrete from the steel.
Note that although some slip does occur (which reduces the capacity slightly) we
usually design for full shear connection, though partial interaction is also possible.
The shear force to be transmitted is the smaller of
Fc and Fs as calculated earlier. We only need to
transfer shear in the zones between zero and
maximum moment. Therefore the number of shear
connectors required in each half of the span (see
diagram above) is:
( )
min ,
c s
p
p
F F
N
Q
=
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
12
Where Qp is the force in each shear connector, and
0.8
p k
Q Q
<
/
where Qk is the (empirical) characteristic strength of the shear studs, and is given in
the following table.
Shear Stud Strength, Qk (kN)
Concrete strength, fcu (N/mm2
)
Stud Diameter
(mm)
Stud Height (mm)
30 35 40
22 100 126 132 139
19 100 100 104 109
16 75 74 78 82
From these figures, the spacing along the full length is:
2 1
p
L
s
N
=
−
Note:
• The stud should project 25 mm into the compression zone;
• Spacing limits are: 4 ; 600 mm;
s
D
> >
/ / longitudinally and as shown in the figure:
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
13
Design of Composite Beams: Longitudinal Shear Capacity
The force transmitted by the shear studs can potentially split the concrete along the
weakest failure plane. Some such planes are shown:
Perpendicular Deck Parallel Deck
Failure planes a-a, b-b and c-c are usually critical; d-d has no strength contribution
from the decking itself (which is possible, though we will always ignore this safely).
Any reinforcement in the slab that crosses these planes is taken to contribute. The
force per unit length to be resisted is:
T p
N Q
v
s
=
where s is the shear-stud spacing and NT is the number of studs across the width of
the beam (1 or 2). This must be less than the capacity which is:
( )
( )
0.03 0.7
0.8
r cu s sv y
cu s
v f L A f
f L
= +
<
where Asv is the area of reinforcement, per unit length, crossing the failure plane and
Ls is the length of the failure plane:
• Plane a-a and c-c: 2
s p
L D
= and 2
sv s
A A
=
• Plane b-b: 2
s t
L h d s
= + + where st is the transverse spacing of the 2 studs and 0
t
s =
for only 1 stud. Also, ( )
2
sv s sc
A A A
= +
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
14
Design of Composite Beams: Serviceability checks
For these checks we define the following:
- the depth to the elastic neutral axis:
( )
2 2
1
s p
e s
e
e
D D D
r D
x
r
α
α
− ⎛ ⎞
+ +
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
+
( )
e s p
A
r
B D D
=
−
- the second moment of area of the un-cracked composite section:
( )
( )
( )
2 3
4 1 12
s p e s p
g x
e e
A D D D B D D
I I
r
α α
+ + −
= + +
+
where e
α is the effective modular ratio which can be taken as 10 for most
purposes; Ix is the second moment of area of the steel section alone; and the other
symbols have their previous meanings.
- the section modulus for the steel and concrete:
g
s
s e
I
Z
D D x
=
+ −
e g
c
e
I
Z
x
α
=
The composite stiffness can be 3–5 times, and the section modulus 1.5–2.5 times that
of the steel section alone.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
15
a. Deflection
Deflection is checked similarly to ordinary steel design, the allowable deflection is:
360
allow
L
δ =
Assuming a uniformly distributed load, the deflection is:
4
5
384
q
g
w L
EI
δ =
where wq is the imposed UDL only and E = 205 kN/mm2
.
b. Elastic behaviour
We check that the stresses in the steel or concrete remain elastic under the service
loads, that is, under ser g q
w w w
= + :
,
ser
s ser y
s
M
p
Z
σ = < , 0.45
ser
c ser cu
c
M
f
Z
σ = <
where
2
8
ser
ser
w L
M = .
c. Vibration
We will not check this.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
16
Design Example
Check that the proposed scheme shown is adequate.
Design Data
Beam:
- 457×152×52 UB Grade 43A (py = 275 N/mm2
)
- Span: 7 m simply supported; beams at 6 m centre to centre.
- Section properties:
A = 66.5 cm2
; D = 449.8 mm; tw = 7.6 mm;
Ix = 21345×104
mm4
; tf = 10.9 mm; b = 152.4 mm
Slab:
- Ds = 250 mm
- Grade 30N concrete (fcu = 30 N/mm2
)
- Reinforcement T12-150: Asv = 754 mm2
/m = 0.754 mm2
/mm
250
457×152×52 UB
T12-150
Qk = 6.5 kN/m2
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
17
Solution
Loading:
The dead load of slab is:
2
0.25 24 6 kN/m
k
G = × =
Hence, the UDL to beam, including self weight:
3
6 6 36 kN/m
52 9.81
0.5 kN/m
10
g
sw
w
w
= × =
×
= =
6 6.5 39 kN/m
q
w = × =
So the serviceability and ultimate loads are:
36 0.5 39 75.5 kN/m
ser
w = + + = ( ) ( )
1.4 36 0.5 1.6 39 113.5 kN/m
ult
w = + + =
Design moments and shear:
2 2
75.5 7
462.4 kNm
8 8
ser
ser
w L
M
×
= = =
2 2
113.5 7
695.2 kNm
8 8
ult
ult
w L
M
×
= = =
113.5 7
397.3 kN
2 2
ult
ult
w L
V
×
= = =
Moment Capacity:
Effective width; 0.25 0.25 7000 1750 mm
e
B L
= = × =
( )
( )( )( )
3
0.45
0.45 30 250 1750
10
5906.25 kN
c cu s p e
F f D D B
= −
=
=
( )
2
3
275 66.5 10
10
1828.75 kN
s y
F p A
=
×
=
=
Thus we have Case (a): PNA is in the slab because c s
F F
> :
( ) 3
2 2
449.8 1828.75 250 0
1828.75 250 10
2 5906.25 2
797.7 kNm
s p
s
c s s
c
D D
F
D
M F D
F
−
⎡ ⎤
−
⎛ ⎞
= + −
⎢ ⎥
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⎣ ⎦
⎡ ⎤
−
⎛ ⎞
= + − ×
⎜ ⎟
⎢ ⎥
⎝ ⎠
⎣ ⎦
=
Thus:
c ult
M M OK
> ∴
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
18
Shear Capacity:
( )( )( ) 3
0.6
0.6 275 449.8 7.6 10
564 kN
v y v
P p A
−
=
= ×
=
Thus:
v ult
P V OK
> ∴
Shear Connector Capacity:
Assuming a 19 mm × 100 mm high connector:
100 kN
k
Q = from the table of characteristic stud strengths
( )
0.8 0.8 100 80 kN
p k
Q Q
< = =
/
Hence the number required in each half of the span is:
( )
( )
min ,
min 5906.25,1828.75
80
1828.75
80
22.8
c s
p
p
F F
N
Q
=
=
=
=
We will use 24 studs as we are putting NT = 2 studs at each position along the beam.
( )
2 1
7000
2 12 1
304.3 mm
p
L
s
N
=
−
=
−
=
Hence use 300 mm c/c evenly spaced along the length of the beam.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
19
Longitudinal Shear Capacity:
Consider these failure planes:
The 110 mm transverse spacing is 5d
<
/ and is made as large as possible to help
prevent this type of failure. The lengths of these planes are:
- Plane a-a: 2 2 250 500 mm
s p
L D
= = × =
- Plane b-b: ( )
2 2 100 19 110 329 mm
s t
L h d s
= + + = + + =
Hence, the shortest and most critical length is 329 mm
s
L = . Therefore, on this plane,
the shear force per unit length is:
( ) 3
2 80
10
300
533.3 N/mm
T p
N Q
v
s
=
= ×
=
The capacity is:
( ) ( )
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
0.03 0.7 0.8
0.03 30 329 0.7 2 0.754 460 0.8 30 329
781.7 1441.6
781.7 N/mm
r cu s sv y cu s
v f L A f f L
= + <
= + × <
= <
=
Thus:
r
v v OK
> ∴
250
100
110 b-b
a-a
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
20
Serviceability: Deflection
Calculate the area ratio:
( ) ( )
2
66.5 10
0.0152
1750 250 0
e s p
A
r
B D D
×
= = =
−
−
Hence the second moment of area of the section is:
( )
( )
( )
( )( )
( )
( )
( )
2 3
2 3
2
4
6 4
4 1 12
66.5 10 449.8 250 0 1750 250 0
21345 10
4 1 10 0.0152 12 10
1148 10 mm
s p e s p
g x
e e
A D D D B D D
I I
r
α α
+ + −
= + +
+
× + + −
= × + +
+ ×
= ×
Therefore the deflection is:
( )( )
( )( )
4
4
3 6
5
384
5 39 7000
384 205 10 1148 10
5.2 mm
q
g
w L
EI
δ =
=
× ×
=
And the allowable is:
360
7000
360
19.4 mm
allow
L
δ =
=
=
Thus
allow OK
δ δ
< ∴
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
21
Serviceability: Elastic behaviour
In addition to our previous calculations, we need:
2
2
8
75.5 7
8
462.4 kNm
ser
ser
w L
M =
×
=
=
And the section properties, first the depth to the elastic neutral axis:
( )
( )
( )
( )
2 2
1
250 0 449.8
10 0.0152 250
2 2
1 10 0.0152
171.2 mm
s p
e s
e
e
D D D
r D
x
r
α
α
− ⎛ ⎞
+ +
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
+
− ⎛ ⎞
+ +
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
+
=
And the elastic section modulii;
6
6 3
1148 10
449.8 250 171.2
2.17 10 mm
g
s
s e
I
Z
D D x
=
+ −
×
=
+ −
= ×
( )
6
6 3
10 1148 10
171.2
67 10 mm
e g
c
e
I
Z
x
α
=
×
=
= ×
And the stresses;
,
6
6
2
462.4 10
275
2.17 10
213.1 N/mm OK
ser
s ser y
s
M
p
Z
σ = <
×
= <
×
= ∴
( )
,
6
6
2
0.45
462.4 10
0.45 30
67 10
6.9 13.5 N/mm OK
ser
c ser cu
c
M
f
Z
σ = <
×
= <
×
= < ∴
Hence both the steel and concrete stresses remain elastic under the service loads, and
so not permanent plastic deformations will occur.
This design has passed all requirements and is therefore acceptable.
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
22
Problem 1
Check that the proposed scheme shown is adequate.
Design Data
Beam:
- UB is Grade 43A
- Span: 7.5 m simply supported; beams at 6 m centre to centre;
- Use 1 shear stud at each location.
Slab:
- Grade 30N concrete (fcu = 30 N/mm2
)
250
406×140×46 UB
T10-100
Qk = 3.0 kN/m2
3rd Architecture
C. Caprani
23
Problem 2
An allowance of 2.7 kN/m2
extra dead load is required for ceilings/services and floor
tiles.
Check that the proposed scheme shown is adequate.
Design Data
Beam:
- UB is Grade 43A
- Span 8 m simply supported; beams at 5 m centre to centre;
- Use 2 shear studs at each location.
Slab:
- Grade 30N concrete (fcu = 30 N/mm2
)
180
457×152×52 UB
T10-180
Qk = 3.5 kN/m2
T10-180

Recommandé

Rcc structure design by etabs (acecoms) par
Rcc structure design by etabs (acecoms)Rcc structure design by etabs (acecoms)
Rcc structure design by etabs (acecoms)Md. Shahadat Hossain
14.8K vues97 diapositives
255788330 asi-steel-connections par
255788330 asi-steel-connections255788330 asi-steel-connections
255788330 asi-steel-connectionsJuan Jose Bazalar Carreño
8.8K vues134 diapositives
Design of connections par
Design of connectionsDesign of connections
Design of connectionsValmik Mahajan
330 vues16 diapositives
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8 par
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8 ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8
ETABS manual - Seismic design of steel buildings according to Eurocode 3 & 8 Eur Ing Valentinos Neophytou BEng (Hons), MSc, CEng MICE
72.9K vues203 diapositives
Ssb04 detailed design of portal frames par
Ssb04 detailed design of portal framesSsb04 detailed design of portal frames
Ssb04 detailed design of portal framesMd. Shahadat Hossain
2.8K vues135 diapositives
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000 par
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000
Calulation of deflection and crack width according to is 456 2000Vikas Mehta
1.8K vues51 diapositives

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02 par
Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02
Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02Engr Kamran Khan
26.5K vues25 diapositives
aisc-bolting-and-welding par
aisc-bolting-and-weldingaisc-bolting-and-welding
aisc-bolting-and-weldingtecnidibujos
3.3K vues73 diapositives
Rc19 footing1 par
Rc19 footing1Rc19 footing1
Rc19 footing1bayan mostafa
4.4K vues30 diapositives
Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000 par
Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000
Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000JavadAkbari16
197 vues57 diapositives
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie par
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul LeslieModelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul LeslieRahul Leslie
24.3K vues103 diapositives
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000 par
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000
EC3 MANUAL FOR SAP2000Muhammad Wazim Akram
6.7K vues103 diapositives

Tendances(20)

Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02 par Engr Kamran Khan
Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02
Shear Strenth Of Reinforced Concrete Beams Per ACI-318-02
Engr Kamran Khan26.5K vues
aisc-bolting-and-welding par tecnidibujos
aisc-bolting-and-weldingaisc-bolting-and-welding
aisc-bolting-and-welding
tecnidibujos3.3K vues
Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000 par JavadAkbari16
Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000
Steelwork Design Guide to BS 5950-1: 2000
JavadAkbari16197 vues
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie par Rahul Leslie
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul LeslieModelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Modelling Building Frame with STAAD.Pro & ETABS - Rahul Leslie
Rahul Leslie24.3K vues
Parametric study of rcc staging (support structure) for overhead water tanks ... par Issar Kapadia
Parametric study of rcc staging (support structure) for overhead water tanks ...Parametric study of rcc staging (support structure) for overhead water tanks ...
Parametric study of rcc staging (support structure) for overhead water tanks ...
Issar Kapadia2.3K vues
Beams design and analysis par Aman Adam
Beams design and analysisBeams design and analysis
Beams design and analysis
Aman Adam11.3K vues
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II par ijtsrd
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode IIComparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
Comparision of Design Codes ACI 318-11, IS 456 2000 and Eurocode II
ijtsrd731 vues
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.) par Malika khalil
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Malika khalil42.8K vues
Steel structures practical_design_studies_mac_ginley_2nd_ed par Thomas Britto
Steel structures practical_design_studies_mac_ginley_2nd_edSteel structures practical_design_studies_mac_ginley_2nd_ed
Steel structures practical_design_studies_mac_ginley_2nd_ed
Thomas Britto11.8K vues
Aitc step by-step procedure for pbd of 40-story rc building_overall (20141105) par Ramil Artates
Aitc step by-step procedure for pbd of 40-story rc building_overall (20141105)Aitc step by-step procedure for pbd of 40-story rc building_overall (20141105)
Aitc step by-step procedure for pbd of 40-story rc building_overall (20141105)
Ramil Artates3.5K vues
Cee 312(2) par apudgr8
Cee 312(2)Cee 312(2)
Cee 312(2)
apudgr88.6K vues
Çelik Yapıların Ekonomik Çözümleri par Yusuf Yıldız
Çelik Yapıların Ekonomik ÇözümleriÇelik Yapıların Ekonomik Çözümleri
Çelik Yapıların Ekonomik Çözümleri
Yusuf Yıldız54.3K vues
Steel strucure lec # (20) par Civil Zone
Steel strucure lec #  (20)Steel strucure lec #  (20)
Steel strucure lec # (20)
Civil Zone186 vues

Similaire à Composite Design.pdf

rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear par
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearqueripan
9.2K vues38 diapositives
Design of rectangular beam by USD par
Design of rectangular beam by USDDesign of rectangular beam by USD
Design of rectangular beam by USDSadia Mahjabeen
17.4K vues31 diapositives
presentation par
presentationpresentation
presentationBUET Khuzdar
199 vues37 diapositives
Beam design par
Beam designBeam design
Beam designMohamed Azeem Nijamdeen
57.7K vues66 diapositives
Design of reinforced concrete beam par
Design of reinforced concrete beamDesign of reinforced concrete beam
Design of reinforced concrete beamcivilengineeringfreedownload
16K vues66 diapositives
Experimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor Slab par
Experimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor SlabExperimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor Slab
Experimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor SlabIRJET Journal
57 vues4 diapositives

Similaire à Composite Design.pdf(20)

rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear par queripan
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
queripan9.2K vues
Design of rectangular beam by USD par Sadia Mahjabeen
Design of rectangular beam by USDDesign of rectangular beam by USD
Design of rectangular beam by USD
Sadia Mahjabeen17.4K vues
Experimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor Slab par IRJET Journal
Experimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor SlabExperimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor Slab
Experimental Investigation on Steel Concrete Composite Floor Slab
IRJET Journal57 vues
Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf par LandelSmith1
Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdfDiv_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf
Div_Syd_detailing_of_reinforcement_in_concrete_structures.pdf
LandelSmith134 vues
T-Beam Design by USD method-10.01.03.102 par Sadia Mitu
T-Beam Design by USD method-10.01.03.102T-Beam Design by USD method-10.01.03.102
T-Beam Design by USD method-10.01.03.102
Sadia Mitu10K vues
Design of rectangular &amp; t beam using usd par Tipu Sultan
Design of rectangular &amp; t beam using usdDesign of rectangular &amp; t beam using usd
Design of rectangular &amp; t beam using usd
Tipu Sultan2.4K vues
Ch6 Composite Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Pr... par Hossam Shafiq II
Ch6 Composite Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Pr...Ch6 Composite Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Pr...
Ch6 Composite Plate Girder Bridges (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Pr...
Hossam Shafiq II1.7K vues
Columns lecture#1 par Irfan Malik
Columns lecture#1Columns lecture#1
Columns lecture#1
Irfan Malik24.8K vues
Composite beams-and-slabs1 par Jj Teng
Composite beams-and-slabs1Composite beams-and-slabs1
Composite beams-and-slabs1
Jj Teng3.5K vues
ROLL-15601321029, SUB-RC STRUCTURE.pdf par SANDIPBERA15
ROLL-15601321029, SUB-RC STRUCTURE.pdfROLL-15601321029, SUB-RC STRUCTURE.pdf
ROLL-15601321029, SUB-RC STRUCTURE.pdf
SANDIPBERA153 vues
Lec12 Continuous Beams and One Way Slabs(2) Columns (Reinforced Concrete Desi... par Hossam Shafiq II
Lec12 Continuous Beams and One Way Slabs(2) Columns (Reinforced Concrete Desi...Lec12 Continuous Beams and One Way Slabs(2) Columns (Reinforced Concrete Desi...
Lec12 Continuous Beams and One Way Slabs(2) Columns (Reinforced Concrete Desi...
Hossam Shafiq II1.1K vues

Dernier

802.11 Computer Networks par
802.11 Computer Networks802.11 Computer Networks
802.11 Computer NetworksTusharChoudhary72015
10 vues33 diapositives
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,... par
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...AakashShakya12
72 vues115 diapositives
Saikat Chakraborty Java Oracle Certificate.pdf par
Saikat Chakraborty Java Oracle Certificate.pdfSaikat Chakraborty Java Oracle Certificate.pdf
Saikat Chakraborty Java Oracle Certificate.pdfSaikatChakraborty787148
15 vues1 diapositive
Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay... par
Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay...Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay...
Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay...AltinKaradagli
6 vues10 diapositives
DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L... par
DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L...DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L...
DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L...Anowar Hossain
13 vues34 diapositives
Proposal Presentation.pptx par
Proposal Presentation.pptxProposal Presentation.pptx
Proposal Presentation.pptxkeytonallamon
29 vues36 diapositives

Dernier(20)

Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,... par AakashShakya12
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...
Literature review and Case study on Commercial Complex in Nepal, Durbar mall,...
AakashShakya1272 vues
Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay... par AltinKaradagli
Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay...Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay...
Effect of deep chemical mixing columns on properties of surrounding soft clay...
DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L... par Anowar Hossain
DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L...DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L...
DevOps to DevSecOps: Enhancing Software Security Throughout The Development L...
Anowar Hossain13 vues
SUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptx par Sumit Jadhav
SUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptxSUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptx
SUMIT SQL PROJECT SUPERSTORE 1.pptx
Sumit Jadhav 13 vues
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ... par AltinKaradagli
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...
Investigation of Physicochemical Changes of Soft Clay around Deep Geopolymer ...
Machine Element II Course outline.pdf par odatadese1
Machine Element II Course outline.pdfMachine Element II Course outline.pdf
Machine Element II Course outline.pdf
odatadese19 vues

Composite Design.pdf

  • 1. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 1 Composite Construction and Design Introduction Composite construction refers to any members composed of more than 1 material. The parts of these composite members are rigidly connected such that no relative movement can occur. Examples are: Timber and steel ‘flitch’ beams Timber-reinforced concrete Typical steel and concrete composite construction Composite construction aims to make each material perform the function it is best at, or to strengthen a given cross section of a weaker material. Name and explain another form of composite construction.
  • 2. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 2 Behaviour of Composite Beams In the following, we consider only the case of structural steel sections and reinforced concrete slabs. A comparison of behaviours is: The non-composite beam deflects further, hence it is less stiff. Note that the E-value hasn’t changed so it is the I-value that changes. In addition to the increase in stiffness there is also a large increase in moment capacity leading to reduced section sizes. The metal decking can also be used as permanent formwork, saving construction time. Non-composite behaviour
  • 3. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 3 The concrete slab is not connected to the steel section and therefore behaves independently. As it is weak in longitudinal bending, it deforms to the curvature of the steel section and has its own neutral axis. The bottom surface of the concrete slab is free to slide over the top flange of the steel section and slip occurs. The bending resistance of the slab is often so small that it is ignored. Composite Behaviour In this case, the concrete slab is connected to the steel section and both act together in carrying the load. Slip between the slab and steel section is now prevented and the connection resists a longitudinal shear force similar in distribution to the vertical shear force shown.
  • 4. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 4 Composite Construction Layout Composite deck floors using shallow profiles are usually designed to span 2.5 to 4.5 m between supports. When the deck is propped during construction the spans are around 4 to 5 m. Long span floors (12 to 18 m) are achieved by primary beams at 6 to 9 m centres. Shorter secondary beams support the slab (Diagram A). The type of grid shown in Diagram B offers services integration within the depth of the floor. Alternatively the secondary beams can be designed to span the longer distance so that the depths of the primary and secondary beams can be optimized. The Asymmetric Beam (ASB) system from Corus allows a squarer panel (Diagram C) and is designed to compete with RC flat-slab construction.
  • 5. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 5 Note that the beam layouts all describe simply-supported spans and this is usual. Continuous spans of composite beams can cause problems, though can be very useful nonetheless. Over the support the concrete cracks (and these can be large); the steel must take the majority of the bending alone, and so a portion of the section is in compression. Slender sections are prone to local buckling in and any intervening column may need to be strengthened to absorb the compression across its web. Lateral-torsional buckling of the beam may also be a problem. Propped Construction The steel beam is supported at mid- or quarter-span until the concrete slab has hardened sufficiently to allow composite action. Propping affects speed of construction but allows smaller steel sections. Unpropped Construction The steel beams must carry the weight of the wet concrete on its own. By the time construction loads can be applied to the slab, some composite behaviour can be used.
  • 6. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 6 Elements of Composite Construction The elements that make up composite construction are: There are two main forms of deck: shallow and deep. The figure above illustrates a typical shallow deck (50–100 mm) and below is a deep deck (225 mm) supported on an ASB. The deep deck systems are proprietary; we will only consider the design of shallow deck systems, though the principles are the same. The beams are ordinary structural steel sections (except for the ASB). The shear studs are normally 19 mm diameter 100 mm high studs, though there are different sizes.
  • 7. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 7 Design of Composite Beams The design involves the following aspects: 1. Moment capacity: Design the section such that the moment capacity is greater than that required. 2. Shear capacity To ensure adequate capacity; this based on the steel section alone – as per usual structural steel design. 3. Shear connector capacity To enable full composite action to be achieved; these must be designed to be adequate. 4. Longitudinal shear capacity Check to prevent possible splitting of the concrete along the length of the beam. 5. Serviceability checks: a. Deflection; b. Elastic behaviour, and; c. Vibration. These checks are to ensure the safe and comfortable use of the beam in service. We check to ensure it does not cause cracking of ceilings and is not dynamically ‘lively’. Also, we verify that it is always elastic when subjected to service loads to avoid problems with plastic strain (i.e. permanent deflection) of the beam. We will not consider checks on vibration and will only outline the calculations for the elastic check.
  • 8. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 8 Design of Composite Beams: Moment Capacity Just as in ordinary steel and RC design, the composite moment capacity is derived from plastic theory. There are three cases to consider, based on the possible locations of the plastic neutral axis (PNA), shown below. When calculating the PNA location, we assume a stress of py in the steel and 0.45fcu in the concrete. The tensile capacity of the beam of area A is: s y F p A = The compression capacity of the slab depends on the orientation of the decking (Dp), and is: ( ) 0.45 c cu s p e F f D D B = −
  • 9. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 9 where Be is the effective breadth of the slab. We also define the axial capacities of the flange and web as: f y F BTp = 2 or w s f w y F F F F Dtp = − = Using the notation given, where the depth of the PNA is yp, we have three capacities: • Case (a): PNA is in the slab; occurs when c s F F > : 2 2 s p s c s s c D D F D M F D F ⎡ ⎤ − ⎛ ⎞ = + − ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ • Case (b): PNA is in the steel flange; occurs when s c F F > ( ) 2 2 2 4 s p s c c s c f D D F F D T M F F F ⎧ ⎫ − − ⎛ ⎞ ⎪ ⎪ = + − ⋅ ⎨ ⎬ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎭ (the term in the braces is small and may be safely ignored). • Case (c): PNA is in the steel web; occurs when w c F F > 2 2 4 s p c c s c w D D D F D M M F F + + ⎛ ⎞ = + − ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ where s y x M p S = is the moment capacity of the steel section alone. The effective breadth Be is taken as: 0.25 e B B L S ≤ = ≤ where B is the width of the steel section and S is the centre-to-centre spacing of the composite beams (2.5 to 4.5 m) and L is the (simply-supported) span of the beam. Don’t Panic! Case (a) is frequent; (b) less so, but (c) is very rare. Therefore, for usual design, only Fc and Fs are required (ignoring the term in the braces). Note that if s c F F > , check that w c F F > / to ensure that you are using Case (b).
  • 10. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 10 Design of Composite Beams: Shear Capacity The shear capacity is based on the capacity of the steel section only. The capacity is: 0.6 v y v P p A = where v A tD = .
  • 11. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 11 Shear plane Design of Composite Beams: Shear Connector Capacity The shear connectors used in ordinary composite construction are dowel-type studs. Other forms used to be used, but headed-studs are now standard. They allow easy construction as they can be shot fixed or welded through the deck onto the beam, after the deck has been laid. In addition to the shear strength, the headed studs prevent the vertical separation, or uplift, of the concrete from the steel. Note that although some slip does occur (which reduces the capacity slightly) we usually design for full shear connection, though partial interaction is also possible. The shear force to be transmitted is the smaller of Fc and Fs as calculated earlier. We only need to transfer shear in the zones between zero and maximum moment. Therefore the number of shear connectors required in each half of the span (see diagram above) is: ( ) min , c s p p F F N Q =
  • 12. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 12 Where Qp is the force in each shear connector, and 0.8 p k Q Q < / where Qk is the (empirical) characteristic strength of the shear studs, and is given in the following table. Shear Stud Strength, Qk (kN) Concrete strength, fcu (N/mm2 ) Stud Diameter (mm) Stud Height (mm) 30 35 40 22 100 126 132 139 19 100 100 104 109 16 75 74 78 82 From these figures, the spacing along the full length is: 2 1 p L s N = − Note: • The stud should project 25 mm into the compression zone; • Spacing limits are: 4 ; 600 mm; s D > > / / longitudinally and as shown in the figure:
  • 13. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 13 Design of Composite Beams: Longitudinal Shear Capacity The force transmitted by the shear studs can potentially split the concrete along the weakest failure plane. Some such planes are shown: Perpendicular Deck Parallel Deck Failure planes a-a, b-b and c-c are usually critical; d-d has no strength contribution from the decking itself (which is possible, though we will always ignore this safely). Any reinforcement in the slab that crosses these planes is taken to contribute. The force per unit length to be resisted is: T p N Q v s = where s is the shear-stud spacing and NT is the number of studs across the width of the beam (1 or 2). This must be less than the capacity which is: ( ) ( ) 0.03 0.7 0.8 r cu s sv y cu s v f L A f f L = + < where Asv is the area of reinforcement, per unit length, crossing the failure plane and Ls is the length of the failure plane: • Plane a-a and c-c: 2 s p L D = and 2 sv s A A = • Plane b-b: 2 s t L h d s = + + where st is the transverse spacing of the 2 studs and 0 t s = for only 1 stud. Also, ( ) 2 sv s sc A A A = +
  • 14. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 14 Design of Composite Beams: Serviceability checks For these checks we define the following: - the depth to the elastic neutral axis: ( ) 2 2 1 s p e s e e D D D r D x r α α − ⎛ ⎞ + + ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ = + ( ) e s p A r B D D = − - the second moment of area of the un-cracked composite section: ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 3 4 1 12 s p e s p g x e e A D D D B D D I I r α α + + − = + + + where e α is the effective modular ratio which can be taken as 10 for most purposes; Ix is the second moment of area of the steel section alone; and the other symbols have their previous meanings. - the section modulus for the steel and concrete: g s s e I Z D D x = + − e g c e I Z x α = The composite stiffness can be 3–5 times, and the section modulus 1.5–2.5 times that of the steel section alone.
  • 15. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 15 a. Deflection Deflection is checked similarly to ordinary steel design, the allowable deflection is: 360 allow L δ = Assuming a uniformly distributed load, the deflection is: 4 5 384 q g w L EI δ = where wq is the imposed UDL only and E = 205 kN/mm2 . b. Elastic behaviour We check that the stresses in the steel or concrete remain elastic under the service loads, that is, under ser g q w w w = + : , ser s ser y s M p Z σ = < , 0.45 ser c ser cu c M f Z σ = < where 2 8 ser ser w L M = . c. Vibration We will not check this.
  • 16. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 16 Design Example Check that the proposed scheme shown is adequate. Design Data Beam: - 457×152×52 UB Grade 43A (py = 275 N/mm2 ) - Span: 7 m simply supported; beams at 6 m centre to centre. - Section properties: A = 66.5 cm2 ; D = 449.8 mm; tw = 7.6 mm; Ix = 21345×104 mm4 ; tf = 10.9 mm; b = 152.4 mm Slab: - Ds = 250 mm - Grade 30N concrete (fcu = 30 N/mm2 ) - Reinforcement T12-150: Asv = 754 mm2 /m = 0.754 mm2 /mm 250 457×152×52 UB T12-150 Qk = 6.5 kN/m2
  • 17. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 17 Solution Loading: The dead load of slab is: 2 0.25 24 6 kN/m k G = × = Hence, the UDL to beam, including self weight: 3 6 6 36 kN/m 52 9.81 0.5 kN/m 10 g sw w w = × = × = = 6 6.5 39 kN/m q w = × = So the serviceability and ultimate loads are: 36 0.5 39 75.5 kN/m ser w = + + = ( ) ( ) 1.4 36 0.5 1.6 39 113.5 kN/m ult w = + + = Design moments and shear: 2 2 75.5 7 462.4 kNm 8 8 ser ser w L M × = = = 2 2 113.5 7 695.2 kNm 8 8 ult ult w L M × = = = 113.5 7 397.3 kN 2 2 ult ult w L V × = = = Moment Capacity: Effective width; 0.25 0.25 7000 1750 mm e B L = = × = ( ) ( )( )( ) 3 0.45 0.45 30 250 1750 10 5906.25 kN c cu s p e F f D D B = − = = ( ) 2 3 275 66.5 10 10 1828.75 kN s y F p A = × = = Thus we have Case (a): PNA is in the slab because c s F F > : ( ) 3 2 2 449.8 1828.75 250 0 1828.75 250 10 2 5906.25 2 797.7 kNm s p s c s s c D D F D M F D F − ⎡ ⎤ − ⎛ ⎞ = + − ⎢ ⎥ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ ⎡ ⎤ − ⎛ ⎞ = + − × ⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥ ⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦ = Thus: c ult M M OK > ∴
  • 18. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 18 Shear Capacity: ( )( )( ) 3 0.6 0.6 275 449.8 7.6 10 564 kN v y v P p A − = = × = Thus: v ult P V OK > ∴ Shear Connector Capacity: Assuming a 19 mm × 100 mm high connector: 100 kN k Q = from the table of characteristic stud strengths ( ) 0.8 0.8 100 80 kN p k Q Q < = = / Hence the number required in each half of the span is: ( ) ( ) min , min 5906.25,1828.75 80 1828.75 80 22.8 c s p p F F N Q = = = = We will use 24 studs as we are putting NT = 2 studs at each position along the beam. ( ) 2 1 7000 2 12 1 304.3 mm p L s N = − = − = Hence use 300 mm c/c evenly spaced along the length of the beam.
  • 19. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 19 Longitudinal Shear Capacity: Consider these failure planes: The 110 mm transverse spacing is 5d < / and is made as large as possible to help prevent this type of failure. The lengths of these planes are: - Plane a-a: 2 2 250 500 mm s p L D = = × = - Plane b-b: ( ) 2 2 100 19 110 329 mm s t L h d s = + + = + + = Hence, the shortest and most critical length is 329 mm s L = . Therefore, on this plane, the shear force per unit length is: ( ) 3 2 80 10 300 533.3 N/mm T p N Q v s = = × = The capacity is: ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) 0.03 0.7 0.8 0.03 30 329 0.7 2 0.754 460 0.8 30 329 781.7 1441.6 781.7 N/mm r cu s sv y cu s v f L A f f L = + < = + × < = < = Thus: r v v OK > ∴ 250 100 110 b-b a-a
  • 20. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 20 Serviceability: Deflection Calculate the area ratio: ( ) ( ) 2 66.5 10 0.0152 1750 250 0 e s p A r B D D × = = = − − Hence the second moment of area of the section is: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 3 2 3 2 4 6 4 4 1 12 66.5 10 449.8 250 0 1750 250 0 21345 10 4 1 10 0.0152 12 10 1148 10 mm s p e s p g x e e A D D D B D D I I r α α + + − = + + + × + + − = × + + + × = × Therefore the deflection is: ( )( ) ( )( ) 4 4 3 6 5 384 5 39 7000 384 205 10 1148 10 5.2 mm q g w L EI δ = = × × = And the allowable is: 360 7000 360 19.4 mm allow L δ = = = Thus allow OK δ δ < ∴
  • 21. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 21 Serviceability: Elastic behaviour In addition to our previous calculations, we need: 2 2 8 75.5 7 8 462.4 kNm ser ser w L M = × = = And the section properties, first the depth to the elastic neutral axis: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 1 250 0 449.8 10 0.0152 250 2 2 1 10 0.0152 171.2 mm s p e s e e D D D r D x r α α − ⎛ ⎞ + + ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ = + − ⎛ ⎞ + + ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ = + = And the elastic section modulii; 6 6 3 1148 10 449.8 250 171.2 2.17 10 mm g s s e I Z D D x = + − × = + − = × ( ) 6 6 3 10 1148 10 171.2 67 10 mm e g c e I Z x α = × = = × And the stresses; , 6 6 2 462.4 10 275 2.17 10 213.1 N/mm OK ser s ser y s M p Z σ = < × = < × = ∴ ( ) , 6 6 2 0.45 462.4 10 0.45 30 67 10 6.9 13.5 N/mm OK ser c ser cu c M f Z σ = < × = < × = < ∴ Hence both the steel and concrete stresses remain elastic under the service loads, and so not permanent plastic deformations will occur. This design has passed all requirements and is therefore acceptable.
  • 22. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 22 Problem 1 Check that the proposed scheme shown is adequate. Design Data Beam: - UB is Grade 43A - Span: 7.5 m simply supported; beams at 6 m centre to centre; - Use 1 shear stud at each location. Slab: - Grade 30N concrete (fcu = 30 N/mm2 ) 250 406×140×46 UB T10-100 Qk = 3.0 kN/m2
  • 23. 3rd Architecture C. Caprani 23 Problem 2 An allowance of 2.7 kN/m2 extra dead load is required for ceilings/services and floor tiles. Check that the proposed scheme shown is adequate. Design Data Beam: - UB is Grade 43A - Span 8 m simply supported; beams at 5 m centre to centre; - Use 2 shear studs at each location. Slab: - Grade 30N concrete (fcu = 30 N/mm2 ) 180 457×152×52 UB T10-180 Qk = 3.5 kN/m2 T10-180