Agencia Marketing Branding Examen Fundamentals Digital Marketing Google Abril...
B2B Branding
1. AN EXPLORATORY
LITERATURE REVIEW TO
IDENTIFY THE ELEMENTS
OF B2B BRANDING
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Anchit Walia –
13125007Om shri Krishna sharnaye Gachhami
2. PROJECT TIME LINE
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Brand relevance
Secondary Literature review
Questionnaire
Statistical Analysis
Defining the term
Next
Semester
Till Date
3. FIRST LOOK AT B2B MARKETS
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Hard Facts
Costing
Delivery
Product Specifications
Support Services
Product Performance
Reject the relevance of Brands & Branding
Involves rationality of Buying Centre
Source :
Understanding the Role of Brands in Business and Consumer Markets
Managing industrial brand equity Developing tangible benefits for intangible benefits
3
4. B2B BRAND : GLOBAL STUDY
1/14/2015S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
27
73
Top 100 Global
Brands
B2B
B2C
43
42
41.5
42
42.5
43
43.5
WoMI
B2B
Global
Brands
61
39
Revenue
B2B
B2C
5. BRANDING IN B2B
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Branding sits at the core industry’s philosophy.
Technical personnel are prone to brand specification in their preferences.
(Industrial Buyer Behavior, HBS, 1989)
Price is found to have weakest potential for differentiation (Ulaga &
Eggert 2006a)
Existence of customer perception of superior value in Industrial Markets
(Judith, Mylles & Hill 2010)
Mudambi 2002, in his survey of industrial buyers, found that 37% of these
were Brand receptive
5
6. MARKET DATA FINDINGS
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Industrial buyers are not price conscious
Industrial buyers are rational
Industrial distributors are willing to sell a product by a well known company
Companies with high reputation, market share charge premium price
Some intangible factors like country of origin as well as the brand name play an
important factor in industrial purchase
Large companies having larger budgets go for the branded products
7. S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
8. FEW TOP VALUABLE B2B BRANDS: BRANDZ 2014
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T
W A L I A
8
Source :
Millward & Brown: The BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2014
9. LITERATURE REVIEW & FINDINGS
Factor Literature Review Description
Product Performance Personn 2010; Beverland,
lindgreen, ferrelley 2007;
Zaichkowsky , Parlee, Hill
2010; Herbst & Merz 2011;
Mudambi 1997; Sweeney
2002; Bendixen 2004
Proven performance; ease to
install & upgrade; total
solution; customization
Distribution Zaichkowsky, Parlee, Hill
2010; Mudambi 1997; Low &
bloiss 2002; Sheena 2011;
Zablah 2010; Bendixen 2004;
Personn 2010; Bukasa,
Abratt 2003; Keller 1998
Delivery speed; lead time;
reliability; availability; ease of
ordering & payment;
minimize costly disruptions
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
10. S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Services Baxter & matear 2004; Mudambi
2002; Cretu & Brodie; Zablah
2010; Bendixen 2004;
Zaichkowsky, Parlee, Hill 2010; Kim
& Hyun 2010; Herbst & Merz 2011;
Chen, Su, Lin 2011; Personn 2010
Technical support; design;
training; financial services;
development support;
information services; after
sales services
Company Image Zaichkowsky, Parlee, Hill 2010;
Mudambi 1997; Gross 1994;
Sheena 2011; Bendixen 2004; Kim
& Hyun 2010; Beverland 2010;
Backhaus 2011; Zeithaml 1988;
Levit 1995; Personn 2010
Stability; success;
credibility; social
responsibility; history; size;
leadership; experience;
country of origin; staff
employed
Product Quality Mudambi 1997; Zaichkowsky,
Parlee, Hill 2010; Sheena 2011;
Bendixen 2004; Christodoulides
2010; Herbst & Merz 2011; Chen,
Su, Lin 2011; Personn 2010
Value; features; innovation;
competence;
11. Relationship Zaichkowsky, Parlee, Hill 2010;
Sheena 2011; Lindgreen,
beverland, Farrelley 2011;
Noordhoff; Bendixen 2003;
Persson 2010; Walter et al 2003;
Ulaga & Eggert 2005; Kuhn,
Alpha & Pope 2008
Sales team rapport;
interpersonal relations;
information sharing;
cooperation; partnership;
long term effect; Sales
force relationship
Credibility Herbst & Merz 2011; Zeithaml
1988; Shaw et al 1989
History; experience;
Word of Mouth;
reputation; expertise;
product image
Risk Reduction Mudambi 2002; Sheena Leek
2011; Kotler 2006; Backhaus,
Steiner, Lugger 2011; Zablah,
Brown 2011
Customer Satisfaction Ulaga & Eggert 2006a; Low &
Blois 2002; Sheena Leek 2011;
Herbst & Merz 2011;
Technology; drive;
integrity; perceived
benefits
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
12. S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Competence Baxter & Mataer 2004;
Michell, King & Reast 2011;
Backhaus, Steiner, Luggger
2011; Chen, Su, Lin 2011
Product quality; performance;
innovation; time
Commitment & Trust Burmann, Schoffer &
Maloney 2008; Mudambi
1997; Sheena 2011; Herbst
& Merz 2011; Noordhoff;
Backhaus, Steiner, Lugger
2011
Reliability; embedded ties;
stability; product image; It is
inbuilt with Product,
distribution & services
Country of Origin Agarwal & Teas 2010;
Bendixen 2003; Chen, Su,
Lin 2003; Mudambi 1997
Knowledge; staff employed;
culture; country reputation;
stability
Awareness Dawar & Parker 1994;
Backhaus, Steiner, Lugger
2011; Zeithaml 1988; Keller
1998; Aaker 1996
13. S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
A brand for a B2B firm is an intangible asset that supports the rational
behind a purchase decision in B2B market.
B2B Brand
Product
Category Parity
Differential
Potential
Customer
Perceived
Value
Price Premium
Brand Loyalty
Positive Word
of Mouth
Network
Cooperation
Effects of Branding: A Model Proposed by Dr. S.S.Mishra
14. SCOPE & FURTHER RESEARCH
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
To identify the most significant factors in the B2B
marketing which act as “decision influencers” in the
Industrial Buying Cycle
Test the significance of these factors and use the
most significant of them to define the term “B2B
Branding”
15. S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
Feedbacknk
16. DECISION INFLUENCERS
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T
W A L I A 16
Buying
Center
Buying Situation
•Straight Rebuy
•Modified Rebuy
•NewTask Soft Facts
•Security/Risk Reduction
•Relationships
•Trust
•Time Pressure
•Image Benefits
Hard Facts
•Price
•Features/Functionality
•Quality
•Delivery
•Service
Environmental Organizational Interpersonal Individual
•Level of demand
•Interest Rate
•Competition
•Political
developments
•Technological
developments
•Objectives
•Policies
•Procedures
•Systems
•Organizational
Structures
•Interests
•Authority
•Status
•Empathy
•Persuasiveness
•Job position
•Age
•Income
•Personality
•Culture
•Attitude towards
risk
17. Brand
Loyalty
Corporate
image
Awareness
Trust
Product
Quality
Relationship
Personn 2010;
Mudambi 2002;
Sheena 2010;
Noordhoff;
Zaichkowsky et
al 2010;
Mudambi 1997;
Personn 2010;
Zaichkowsky et
al 2010;
Humphreys &
Williams 1996
Maloney 2008;
Ulaga 2006;
Herbst & Merz
2011;
Noordhoff;
Backhaus 2011
Dawar & Parker 1994; Backhaus
2011; Zeithaml 1988;Keller 1998;
Aaker 1996; Mudambi 1997
Zaichkowsky et al
2011; Chen, Su,
Lin 2011;
Mudambi 197; Kim
& Hyun 2010;
Levitt 1995;
Balmer 1995
19. KEY ELEMENTS
S P E C I A L S T U D I E S _ A N C H I T W A L I A
1. Corporate brand
2. Credibility
3. Staff Employed
4. Sales force relationship &
Knowledge
5. Corporate relationship
6. Competence
7. Attitude
8. Satisfaction
9. Trust
10.Commitment
11.Quality
12.Reliability
13.Reputation
14.Expertise
15.Sales team rapport
16.Product image
17.Corporate financial stability
18.Country of Origin
19.Risk
20.Product Performance
Notes de l'éditeur
The entire Special Studies project is divided into two part. In this semester, I have tried to first identify whether branding exists in a B2B market or not and after that I have tried to understand what constitutes branding through secondary literature review. A questionnaire has been designed which will be floated in the next semester to the industrial distributors as well as the buyers.
Millward & Brown found out that out of top 100 global Brands, there are 27% B2B brands, They suspect that this number could be more had they removed the eligibility criteria of 25% revenue coming from retail operations
Interbrand’s 2012 list of top 100 brands found out that the avg word of mouth index score for B2B brands is more than the avg score for the entire data set
SuperBrands of UK estimated that 61% of the global revenue generated is by the B2B companies
I went to Latouche road, kanpur to conduct a small survey in order to find out the relevance of branding in industrial markets. The parameter, I chose to highlight the brand relevance was the price differential between the offerings of a market leader and a follower. From the market survey, I found out that there exists a huge price differential in the industrial markets and the companies with high reputation has high market share even though they are charging the highest price for similar technical specifications. The data is collected for various product categories and similar results are obtained. It is an interesting finding that there exists a huge price gap for the products which require huge installation or setup costs. The products whose failure may cause much more cost to the company or the tolerance for failure is low also charge high prices, thus indicating a low functionality to price ratio and thereby putting a lot on brand name as a reason to charge more for same.
An important point to note is that maximum of them are leading technology companies. This is important as technology has a relationship with risk which gets reduced with trust. Trust is something which develops with time and is dependent on the name. I have used many such inferences while collecting data and making sense out of it.
Proposed by Hutton 1997
Suggested by Hutton 1997
Till now we have been able to establish that in business markets a brand can build customer loyalty and price premiums, but the question is : What specific brand image elements are driving customers’ willingness to pay a premium price.
Find definition for each term
Who the company is and what it stands for?
Should I talk about these in the report or describe every part during presentation
After this jump to the Questionnaire