2002 ibc - Assessing the safety of staffing arrangements
1. Creating the environment for business
Staffing arrangements that ensure
capable teams
Andrew Brazier
Principal consultant
Entec UK Ltd.
Gadbrook Business Park
Northwich, Cheshire CW9 7TN
01606 354866
andrew.brazier@entecuk.co.uk
www.entecuk.com
2. Creating the environment for business
Contents
Identifying the individual and team capabilities
required to operate safely under all circumstances
Minimising factors that affect capabilities in the short
term
Ensuring capabilities can be maintained over the
longer term
Staffing assessment methodology
– Developed by Entec on behalf of the HSE
– Lessons learned from applying the method
3. Creating the environment for business
What defines an individual’s capability?
Physical and mental attributes
Training they have received
The tests and exams they have passed
Their experience of the job
Their experience of specific tasks
Their knowledge and understanding of the systems
they work with.
Their ability to deal with all events they are
likely to encounter
4. Creating the environment for business
What makes a team capable?
Individual capabilities
Team work
– Structure (hierarchical/self-managed)
– Communication
– Inter-personal skills
Information
– ‘Live’ process data
– Technical information
(design/procedures)
5. Creating the environment for business
For emergency scenarios this involves
Detecting
– searching, reading and monitoring displays
– hearing alarms
Diagnosing
– consulting documents & colleagues
– thinking
Responding
– using controls (in the field, in the control room)
– raising the alarm & mobilising emergency services
Working effectively under time pressure, threat of
harm in an unfamiliar situation
6. Creating the environment for business
What can make a capable team incapable?
Distractions
– ‘Noise’
– Competing tasks
– Morale
Trauma
– Stress/fatigue
System inadequacy
– Unreliable control/communication systems
– Human-machine interface
Poor health of team members
7. Creating the environment for business
HSE concerns
The ‘physical’ ability to detect, diagnose and recover
from scenario’s in time to prevent accidents
Willingness to initiate scenario recovery actions
Training, development, roles & responsibilities
Teamworking and the role of support staff outside of
the ‘normal’ team
Management of organisational change
Management of safety
Entec commissioned in 1997 to develop a method for
assessing the adequacy of staffing arrangements
8. Creating the environment for business
Specification of the staffing assessment method
• Support duty holders in obligations to assess & manage risks
• Focus on loss of containment events with off-site potential
• Bring staffing issues into the open
• Be valid for the operational circumstances found in the
chemical and allied industries
• Enable duty holders to obtain a clear cut indication of
whether their staffing arrangements are unsafe
• Gauge the impact of staffing changes prior to implementation
• Practical, useable & intelligible to duty holders & inspectors;
− Not reliant on specialist skills
• Be structured and auditable;
• Facilitate dialogue between duty holders & inspectors.
9. Creating the environment for business
Assessment Methodology
Method does not attempt to calculate a minimum or optimum number of staff
There may be technological options to improve staffing arrangements as an
alternative to an increase in operator numbers
It assesses staffing numbers plus how the arrangements are managed
– Decision trees
PHYSICAL ASSESSMENT
YES
YES NO
NO
– Individual and organisational factors
LADDER ASSESSMENT
10. Creating the environment for business
Resourcing
Facilitator
Secretary
Assessment team
Key people to involve
– independence
– experience
– roles
– skills
11. Creating the environment for business
Physical Assessment - The Six Principles
There should be continuous supervision of the process by
skilled operators
Distractions should be minimised
Information required for diagnosis and recovery should be
accessible, correct and intelligible
Communication links between the control room and field
should be reliable
Staff required to assist in diagnosis and recovery should
be available with sufficient time to attend when required
Operating staff should be allowed to concentrate on
recovering the plant to a safe state
1
2
3
4
5
6
12. Creating the environment for business
Assessment of physical arrangements
Are people where they need to be?
– To hear alarms, to read displays
Are there enough people around?
– Will stand-by operators be able to leave their own units
– Will off-site staff travel in in enough time
Can people do their tasks in the time available?
– Can field operators get from place to place in time
Will the communications be reliable?
– Will the batteries last
Eight decision trees provided to assess the adequacy of
physical arrangements
13. Creating the environment for business
Is Control Room (CR)
continuously manned?
Yes No
Does the CR operator go into the field?
What is the maximum time
the CRO is away from CR?
Mins.
Where does the CRO go?
Define:
Is it more than the minimum
time it takes to develop an
unrecoverable scenario?
Yes No
Yes No
14. Creating the environment for business
What happens if the CRO gets retained e.g.
treating a process problem, or he falls over?
What is the primary way that a process alarm or
trip is detected when he is away?
FAIL
Sufficient
Reliability?
No Yes
None Pager? External Alarm? 3rd Party?
Other?
No Yes
15. Creating the environment for business
No Yes
Sufficient and
robust
justification?
Yes No
FAILEND
Is there a back-up?
Yes
Define:
No
FAIL
Sufficient
Reliability?
No Yes
FAIL Sufficient and
robust
justification?
Yes No
FAILEND
16. Creating the environment for business
Assessment of individual and
organisational factors
Set of questions encourage assessment team to
consider the key issues
‘Ladders’ provided to assess adequacy
– Each rung is a description of system attributes
– Start at the bottom, how high do you get?
Minimum, acceptable levels are defined for each
ladder
17. Creating the environment for business
Ladder topics
Situational awareness
Teamworking
Alertness and fatigue (work pattern)
Alertness and fatigue (health)
Training and development
Roles and responsibilities
Willingness to initiate recovery actions
Management of operating procedures
Management of change
Continuous improvement of safety
Management of safety
18. Creating the environment for business
Situational Awareness Ladder - Questions for Operators
1) Can you think of any examples of critical situations
where you were uncertain about the state of the
process?
2) How do you monitor process trends?
3) How do you decide when to take action to improve a
process condition (e.g. alarms, trends etc)?
4) How do you track plant conditions?
5) What do you do to make shift handover easier for the
shift coming on to understand the plant condition?
6) How easy do you find it to access process
information
7) How would you like to improve the screens?
8) How frequently are you disturbed in the middle of
tracking process conditions? By what?
19. Creating the environment for business
Situational awareness ladder
There is a high level of continuity in the Operator(s) tasks during critical process events i.e.
Operators are not required to perform tasks that significantly disrupt their concentration on the
process, and they are able to delay/bring forward activities in order to minimise distractions.
During critical process activities that demand the Operator’s attention, they are not disturbed
unnecessarily by other activities such as mustering, site alarms, telephone/ radio communications,
permit raising, issuing of interlock keys, visitors etc.
Information about the process and plant condition is adequate for Operators to be confident they can
monitor ‘smooth’ running.
It is possible for operators to keep track of the process during upset/emergency conditions if they
work hard to gather all relevant information from control room displays/log books. There can be
times when they rely on other Operators/ Field Operators relaying information to them
The presentation of information makes it straightforward for Operators to gauge accurately and
reliably within the available time the condition and behaviour of the plant in normal and
upset/emergency conditions, without reliance on support.
In upset and emergency conditions all relevant Operators and Supervisors can gauge accurately and
reliably the condition and behaviour of the plant within the available time, without disturbing each
other or blocking each other’s access to information.
Operators find it difficult to keep track of the process even in smooth conditions. This may be due to
insufficient information, unreliability of sensors or displays, or they can’t attend to the process
because of other tasks they are required to perform, or distractions.
A
B
C
D
X
Y
Z
GRADE ANCHOR
20. Creating the environment for business
Case study 1
Moving operation to a centralised control room
Re-instrumentation and advanced control
Reduction in field operators from 4 to 3 in one area
Reduction of Shift Supervisors from 3 to 2
21. Creating the environment for business
Impact on staffing arrangements
Possible increased workload because of less people
on each shift
Teamwork to become even more critical, especially in
upset and emergency situations
Training plans need to be updated to reflect new
organisation
Change of interfaces with plant could affect situation
awareness
22. Creating the environment for business
Case Study 2
Change from 4 shifts to 5 shifts
Change from week on week off, to 4-3-4 3-4-4
On-call rota introduced
No job losses or change in average working hours
Impact on staffing arrangements
Change in competency profiles as shifts change (mix of
experienced operators and trainees)
Existing teams disbanded and new teams to be formed
Unknown effect on fatigue caused by the call-out rota
Reduced morale due to change anxiety
23. Creating the environment for business
Case study 3
Reduction in shift personnel from 5 to 3
Implementation of self managed teams
Team leaders to work days only
Impact on staffing arrangements
Need to change operating philosophy, initiate
shutdown earlier during a plant upset
Uncertainty about who would act as incident controller
Difficulty in covering absence as less people available
24. Creating the environment for business
Common themes (usually unrelated to
changes taking place)
Over reliance on informal training
Inadequate refresher training
Too many distractions in control rooms
– Nuisance alarms
– Visitors, contractors, day staff
No control on shift swaps, overtime etc.
Very passive approach to stress and fatigue
Poor management of the safety implications of
organisational change (including staffing levels)
25. Creating the environment for business
HSE Contract Research Report
CRR 348/2001
Assessing the safety of staffing arrangements for
process operations in the chemical and allied
industries
www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_htm/index.htm
Editor's Notes
The ‘physical’ ability to be able to detect, diagnose and recover from scenario’s in time. The risk of failure must be demonstrated to be as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP).
Willingness to initiate major hazard scenario recovery actions. Any reluctance due to operators being aware of the financial consequences of action or the environmental consequences, adverse public relations consequence etc.
Training, development, roles & responsibilities. The maintenance of core competencies and skills on each shift
Teamworking and the role of outside support staff. The interaction with the control room plus their use as ‘covering’ operators
Management of organisational change. The presence of a policy to identify safety implications of a change:
e.g. use of skills analysis
leading to a gap analysis of training and development needs
additional training and development being implemented prior to the change
involvement of operators in the change process
Management of safety. The strength of the site’s safety policy. Workforce involvement plus the organisation’s safety culture
Attached sheet gives three example sites that the HSE HID Human Factors team have investigated in the past 12 months which exhibit problems in the areas above.
The Government has made a commitment to “become green”.
To support this, the DSS has produced a Policy Statement for Greening Operations, together with and improvement programme.
ITSA, as a part of the DSS must meet the requirements of this policy and have produced a policy statement.
Trillium (responsible for estates management) and all of the major services providers (ICL, EDS and SEMA) have signed up to Policy Statement for Greening Operations.
ITSA’s Peel Park site has been selected as a pilot site for the implementation of an environmental management system that meets the requirements of ISO 14001. ISO 14001 will then be rolled out to the rest of the DSS. The next six sites have been selected.
Several other Government Departments are implementing ISO 14001 and some have already achieved the standard (e.g. Customs and Excise).
The Government has made a commitment to “become green”.
To support this, the DSS has produced a Policy Statement for Greening Operations, together with and improvement programme.
ITSA, as a part of the DSS must meet the requirements of this policy and have produced a policy statement.
Trillium (responsible for estates management) and all of the major services providers (ICL, EDS and SEMA) have signed up to Policy Statement for Greening Operations.
ITSA’s Peel Park site has been selected as a pilot site for the implementation of an environmental management system that meets the requirements of ISO 14001. ISO 14001 will then be rolled out to the rest of the DSS. The next six sites have been selected.
Several other Government Departments are implementing ISO 14001 and some have already achieved the standard (e.g. Customs and Excise).
The Government has made a commitment to “become green”.
To support this, the DSS has produced a Policy Statement for Greening Operations, together with and improvement programme.
ITSA, as a part of the DSS must meet the requirements of this policy and have produced a policy statement.
Trillium (responsible for estates management) and all of the major services providers (ICL, EDS and SEMA) have signed up to Policy Statement for Greening Operations.
ITSA’s Peel Park site has been selected as a pilot site for the implementation of an environmental management system that meets the requirements of ISO 14001. ISO 14001 will then be rolled out to the rest of the DSS. The next six sites have been selected.
Several other Government Departments are implementing ISO 14001 and some have already achieved the standard (e.g. Customs and Excise).