Presentación de CLACSO-FOLEC (Rovelli-Babini) en Global Research Council (GRC), Americas Regional Meeting side event. 3 diciembre 2021. https://fapesp.br/files/upload/15191/program3011.pdf
A turn towards the transformation of evaluative cultures in the Americas: equity, bibliodiversity, multilingualism and inclusiveness
1. Global Research Council (GRC) Americas Regional Meeting 2021
A turn towards the transformation of evaluative cultures in the Americas: equity, bibliodiversity,
multilingualism and inclusiveness - side event
December 3rd
Time: 14:00 - 15:30 (GTM-3)
3. From tackling
the pandemic
to addressing
climate
change
“Assessment of
scholarly publishing
based on traditional
indicators (e.g. impact
factor of journals) does
not contribute to
incentivize inclusive
and participatory open
science practices using
bibliodiverse and
multilingual local as
well as international
open access venues for
publishing”
CLACSO-FOLEC
“Mission-oriented
research assessment
requires
contextualizing
frameworks and
situated
methodologies,
particular or extended
evaluation criteria, and
reviewers with wider
backgrounds and
expertise and the
participation of social
movements and/or local
communities”
CLACSO-FOLEC
4. LatinAmerica open access-open
sciencelandscape
- Region with the highest % of open access adoption among its scholarly
journals, with no APCs and no outsourcing to commercial publishers
- Community owned and governed open access: bibliodiversity &
multilingualism
- University leadership of open access publishing in:
* open access journal platforms (university and national -OJS + regional
Latindex, Redalyc-AmeliCA, SciELO)
* institutional repositories (LA Referencia-COAR)
- National and institutional open access policies prioritize open access
repositories for publications and data, more incipient open research data
- More recently, open science is promoted in the region
* research data platforms (institutional, national)
* co-production of knowledge with other societal actors
Source: Babini, D. & Rovelli, L. (2020). Tendencias recientes en las políticas científicas de ciencia abierta y acceso abierto en
Iberoamérica. Buenos Aires:CLACSO.http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/se/20201120010908/Ciencia-Abierta.pdf
6. Researchassessment
review is influenced by
science global
organizations
Recent examples
Global Research Council (GRC)
call to concrete actions to incentivise and fulfil responsible research
assessment (RRA) ambitions.
champion a more equitable, diverse, sustainable and inclusive future to
harnesses the diversity of talent which can contribute to the research
and innovation enterprise.
International Science Council (ISG)
vision of science as a global public good
GlobalYoungAcademy (GYA) + InterAcademy Partnership (IAP) +
International Science Council (ISC)
scoping group will take stock of existing research evaluation worldwide and
re-imagine research evaluation for the 21st century.
UNESCO approved its Recommendations on Open Science:
reviewing research assessment and career evaluation systems in order to
align them with the principles of open science
7. From the principles
and actions
established in the
UNESCO
Recommendation
onOpenScience,
CLACSO-FOLEC
wishes to highlight
some concepts that
strengthen science
as a public good
Provide opportunities to access, contribute to and benefit from
open science, regardless of discipline, geographic location, gender,
ethnicity, language or socio-economic circumstances;
Build on collaborative practices, services and infrastructures and long-
term funding models that ensure the equitable participation of
science producers from less advantaged institutions and countries;
Integrate community knowledge into the solution of problems of
societal importance;
Promoting bibliodiversity and encouraging multilingualism in the
practice of science, in scientific publications and in scholarly
communications;
Support collaborative, non-commercial publishing models that do
not involve article or book processing charges;
Harmonise incentives and evaluation systems in favour of open
science, taking into account the wide range of missions that form the
knowledge production environment, and the different forms of
knowledge creation and communication that are not limited to
publication in international peer-reviewed journals.
8. In 2019: 416 LAC journals inWoS and Scopus (18,079) 23% of the total
in OA. Of the 416, 93% inOA. 80% publish in local journals. Diamond
model (collaborative and non-commercial).
Distancing between this tradition and the criteria and indicators of
national evaluation systems, based on the widespread use of impact
indicators constructed by commercial databases, which exclude a
large part of the region's knowledge production.
Researchers rewarded only when publishing in “mainstream” journals
with “prestige industry” indicators, making invisible other
contributions.
Underfunding of community-owned infrastructures because scarce
funds directed to APCs
10. FOLEC-CLACSO
Multiscale
strategy
All voices,
formats and
perspectives of
knowledge
production and
circulation
Mobilization
• Declaration of
principles;
• Workshops;
• Webinars.
Resources
• Series I (Diagnosis
and proposals);
• Series II:
Intervention tools
Research
projects
•IDRC
•Survey forms of
evaluation of
development-oriented
research proposals
•UNESCO
•Regional Peer Review
Consultation
14. Recognition ofOpenScience in RRA
Develop and value open science skills throughout educational
and professional trajectory of students and researchers.
Reduce the influence of the impact factor of journals, starting by
eliminating all references to this indicator and the H-index in the
texts of calls for projects and in the evaluation of careers
(example of the University of Utrecht or the European Research
Council).
Value open science and the diversity of scientific production in
the evaluation of research and teaching staff, projects,
universities and research organizations.
Encourage research centers and organizations to sign up to and
support the effective application of the principles adopted.
Source: Second Plan for Open Science,Generalizing Open Science in France 2021-
2024: https://www.ouvrirlascience.fr/second-national-plan-for-open-science/
VSNU, KNAW and NOW (2020) Colophon The
Strategy Evaluation Protocol 2021-2027. The Hague,
Design: BUREAUBAS Illustration: Great Graphic
Design.
https://www.vsnu.nl/files/documenten/Domeinen/On
derzoek/SEP_2021-2027.pdf
15. Academic
assessment:
journals,
books &
repositories
Open access books
New generation repositories
Aguado-López, E. y Becerril-García, A. (2020a). El antiguo ecosistema de acceso abierto de América Latina
podría ser quebrantado por las propuestas del Norte Global. London School of Economics, LSE Blog.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/latamcaribbean/2020/01/21/el-antiguo-ecosistema-de-acceso-abierto-de-americalatina-
podria-ser-quebrantado-por-las-propuestas-del-norte-global/
https://coartraining.gitbook.io/coar-repository-toolkit/nextgen-repositories
UNESCO-CLACSO Project
2021-222
https://www.doabooks.org/
en/publishers/join-doab
16. Challenges
Participate in an international but also in a regional OS alliance.
Policy designs in situated contexts & diversity of instruments to
strengthen access, openness, participation and collaboration.
Transform research assessment at funding councils & agencies and
institutions.
Financial support to the openness of publications and research data
and to the necessary infrastructure and training of skilled human
resources.
https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-
future/open-science/recommendation
17. Join us: Latin American Forum for Research Assessment FOLEC-CLACSO
7-10 June 2022, National Autonomous University of México-UNAM
https://www.clacso.org/clacso2022/