Benefits Of Paying College Athletes

Benefits Of Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes For over a decade, there has been an ongoing debate for and against paying college athletes. Those in favor quickly point
out the benefits to players. Those against this practice concentrate on the possible detriment to both the educational and athletic systems currently
in place at institutions of higher learning. Merit can be found in both arguments; however, the changes that would be necessary to put the payment
practice into place would take years to implement. Many current and former athletes and coaches have spoken out publicly in favor of paying
athletes a small stipend or salary while they are in college. One of the reasons most frequently cited in favor of payment is the risk of physical
injury to the athlete. These injuries can be career ending both on and off the field. If a player is injured during practice or a game and they are
unable to continue playing, they are likely to lose their athletic scholarship. Without these scholarships many players would not be able to cover the
gap left by their financial aid in their tuition. If the players are paid per game, there may be money available to finish their educations. Because of
the severity of some of these injuries, may have to be changed to something less demanding physically that the players are able to do. This could
result in a postponed graduation date. These injuries often also lead to extended periods of medical care and expensive medical bills that neither the
player nor the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Paying College Athletes Essay
Paying College Athletes Every child at some point in their lives dream about becoming a rock star, doctor or an astronaut, but the career that stands
out the most is becoming a professional athlete. Why? One reason could be the ever increasing media coverage on each individual sport with
certain channels devoted for just that particular sport, keeping viewers updated and thirsting to get out and play. Another could be the ease of getting
out in the backyard as a kid to shoot the basketball, throw a football, or hit a baseball because it is harder to perform heart surgery or fly to the moon
when you're only a child. With that being said; it is easy to look up to a professional athlete and put your heart and soul into them wearing...show more
content...
College student athletes at the division one level should be paid to play. When the topic is brought up about how college athletes should be paid
to play, more then half of people instantly will disagree and say no way, what for? But have they really looked into all the answers pointing toward
it might be a good idea to pay them? I know it sounds like I'm trying to say give them million dollar contracts and call it a done deal but that is not
the case. Aside from the athletic and academic scholarships to pay for tuition, the money they would be receiving would be miniscule to what
they could be making if they were working at a job instead. This money would basically cover small costs an athlete must make when living on his
own, since there is no time for a job when the careful balancing act of school and sports is in place. Only a select few big time athletes will actually
make it all the way to the show and receive a big payout. Once this money distribution to the players is in affect, it will clean up a lot of problems in
college sports. One question that needs to be answered first is, what is the NCAA? The NCAA or (National Collegiate Athletic Association) are the
members that make the rules for college sports at most colleges and universities across the United States. It is not just the college that isn't given
athletes extra money it is this organization that says

Paying College Athletes Pros And Cons Essay
For years the question or topic of paying college athletes has been given much debate. Countless studies show that this idea has many negative factors
associated with it, which in–return make it unreasonable. The cons associated with the idea of paying college/amateur athletes include that many
student–athletes already receive scholarships and other benefits, paying college athletes could detract from the purity of the game, and the process of
figuring out how to pay these athletes would be extremely difficult. Based upon many studies the idea has more consequential cons that outweigh the
potential pros. Even though college athletes aren't able to receive any type of monetary compensation they receive thousands of dollars in scholarships
...show more content...
Although athletes come to play their sports at the next level they are still considered student–athletes if hundreds of thousands of dollars are given
away to a lot of just one and done college players who are just using college as a gateway to their professional careers how does this growing thing
continue to affect regular students. If continuous money is handed out to athletes then what percentage is left to give to other unfortunate students that
are in need and want to receive a valuable education. For athletes getting an education to essentially fall back on is in their best interest, making it to
the professional level isn't promised anything could go wrong. After making the decision to try and it doesn't work out would leave large amounts of
money wasted and the athlete may be stuck without a clue of what to do because they aren't able to turn back and get their education or continue
pursuing their college major. The debate on whether college athletes should be paid or not has gone on for years and continues to go on now. Many
studies show that the idea has far more consequential cons associated with it than it does pros. Figuring out this on–going debate is difficult and will
take some time to completely figure out and in the end with a debate like this no one will be fully satisfied as with an issue like this you can't please

Essay On College Athletes Getting Paid
An issue that has been a well–known topic of conversation recently is the subject of college athletes getting paid or not. This issue has been
circulating amongst sports fans throughout the country. Everyone from the fans, players, parents, and media groups all have opinions on this matter.
Over the past ten years college athletics has gained an enormous amount of popularity and income from American audiences. As a result of this, the
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been debating about collegiate athletes getting paid for their participation and I am going to
discuss the reasons for why people are for it and why people are against it. The real questions most people are wondering is: Is it ethically right to pay
college...show more content...
As the final four comes to a close and the two champions are presented with their trophies, the real winners in some people's eyes are the sponsors,
advertisers, the schools, and finally the NCAA. All of these groups are the ones who end up with the money generated as a result of the games in the
tournament and college athletes who particiapte. "The NCAA basketball tournaments, or "March Madness," have become a huge business. As Forbes'
Chris Smith wrote, CBS and Turner Broadcasting make more than $1 billion off the games" (US News– Forbes' Chris Smith). Smith's statement shows
how much money these athletes' skills and contributions are generating. In return for giving their efforts and producing all this money, the student
athletes do not receive any of these proceeds. People think college athletes should also be paid because of the money the NCAA makes off using
these athletes names and likeness, like jerseys with an athlete's number being sold and even in video games being played. Because of this, a group of
former players filed an

Paying College Athletes: Article Analysis
The source that will be evaluated is a scholarly article from the articles provided in Unit 4 that corresponds to the topic of paying college athletes. To
begin, the article is titled "Paying College Athletes" by Justin D. Garda. This article was published in the March 2016 Research Starters Education on
pages 1 through 1.4. The article is directly related to the topic concerning financial compensation for student athletes across the United States. In the
article, "Paying College Athletes", the main topics that are discussed mainly include the debate of whether college athletes should be compensated by
their respective institutions, insights involving the value of the scholarships these athletes receive, court actions that attempted to force

Paying NCAA Athletes Essay
Outline Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to inform my audience about the issue of potentially paying college athletes so that they may make an
informed decision themselves. Thesis: As the popularity, and revenue continues to grow in college sports, the debate will be taken to new heights
about whether or not college athletes are being exploited, and if they should be compensated monetarily. I. (C)The National Collegiate Athletic
Association (NCAA) defines amateurism as, "The conviction that people should participate in sports as a hobby (for the fun of it) rather than for
money." The NCAA mandates that all college athletes maintain this level of amateurism while in college, however, college sports have never been
more of a...show more content...
b. Throw in all of the gear associated with being a Division I college athlete and you're looking at a hefty amount of cash being invested in each
athlete. C. Obviously some colleges have higher budgets and higher amounts of athletes than others, so how do you make sure you pay each
athlete equally while still staying above the budget? You can't. 1. Trying to pay a football team alone could plunge a university underneath their
budget with an average of nearly 100 players per team. 2. On top of that, there are 28 more sports with athletes waiting to have their pockets filled
with cash. 3. And finally, it takes away funding for other important academic areas of the college. Transition: The budget just simply isn't there for
a university of any size to reasonably pay each and every athlete so finally I will explain some different ways an NCAA athlete could possibly
make some money. IV. There are plenty of ways an athlete could make money, but it would require some self marketing and a little help from the
NCAA. A. A player could seek out additional sponsorships and advertising deals like a professional athlete. 1.The athlete isn't technically making
money off their playing ability they're making the money from the name on the back of their jersey. B. Opposers of this idea would say that equality
plays a factor here as well. 2. Not every athlete is as

Essay on Paying College Athletes
College sports are big money makers now a days. For most universities, the athletic department serves as one of the main sources of cash flow.
Athletes are used to create millions of dollars for the NCAA and the schools that they participate in, and never receive a penny. If we are talking about
profit, if all bonds with the university were removed, an athletic department representing itself could compete with some of the most successful
companies. So, why does the most important parts of the machine, the players, do not receive any money for their training and participation? The
answer lies in the NCAA which keeps all the money and their practice of keeping all the revenue for future use. College athletes should be paid for their
This leaves basically give no time to earn money. The way life is for a student athlete is very different from what a regular student's life is. A
student–athlete is required to attend practice for 10 to 20 hours per week which is around 4 hours a day, traveling to games everywhere throughout the
season, and at the same time, having to deal with the same amount of academic work as regular students. Everyone who is against paying
student–athletes rely on the fact that they get paid through scholarships, so apparently they're already getting paid. Yes, a scholarship indeed is a form
of compensation. A scholarship is good to have, but it is not enough to go through life as a student–athlete. A scholarship will not cover the bills. Not
only that but, unlike regular students without athletics, student–athletes must also most of the time take care of their families and spouses. Believe it or
not many student athletes are married, and most of the athletes married have children. The students which don't have spouses or children, most of
them have to care for parents and siblings. Universities would not get financially hurt if they would decide to pay players just a little. The average
Division One School profits around $6 million per year only on football and basketball. Universities like University of Florida or University of
Michigan have profits of more than $10 million per year on all their

Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes After high school, some students decide to make the decision to go to college to further their education, earn a degree, have
fun, and some, to play sports. College sporting events bring in money through tickets, jerseys, shirts, and other gear. The money made for all of these
items and expenses go to paying coaches, the school, charities, utilities, and other expenses a school has to pay to have a sports team. Most college
athletes are given scholarships to allow them not to have to pay for college or anything that comes with the college experience. Some athletes, that are
good enough athletically, do not ever pay for tuition, living expenses, meal plans, books, and everything else a normal student would have to pay for.
For some college athletes that is not enough. Some college athletes believe that they should get a paycheck based on the money that the school makes
on putting on sporting events that these athletes are participating in. Other college athletes are satisfied with the scholarship given to them and do not
seek additional money. Colleges bring an incredible amount of money by their sport teams alones. According to John Brill, a sports journalist writer,
"College football and basketball generate more than the National Basketball Association, a total of more than $6 billion yearly." The money made from
these sporting events are not being used correctly which is frustrating many college athletes. The money that is being

Essay On Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes Imagine a business that was bringing in millions of dollars every year in revenue solely off the employees, and the
individuals who are working to bring in the money, do not see a cent of it. This is essentially how college athletes feel at their respective universities.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is seeing $11 billion dollars in revenue come through their doors annually, and not one penny
goes back to the student athletes who, in reality, create that money. The money is passed down through the executives, directors and coaches, but none
is given to the players. With putting in an average to 43 hours per week, which is more than the average work week, student athletes can be compared to
The student athletes at most universities can be compared to employees, yet receiving no wages (Cooper 12). Along with time in the classroom and
being a full–time student, athletes are expected to spend just as much time on their respective sport. In an article "Top 10 Reasons College Athletes
Should Be Paid," Dave Anderson explains that a college athlete spends just over 43 hours a week devoted to their sport. Those hours are spent
with mandatory lifting workouts, conditioning workouts, watching film, position meetings, and practice. As I stated earlier, all this time that is
spent on their sport is in addition to the time spent in the classroom with homework and studying. All of that added up well surpasses the time of
the average work week at 40 hours and these athletes can quite honestly be looked at as workers for their universities. A few problems arise as a
result of the athletes overloaded schedule. With barely any room for free time, these athletes have no chance at obtaining even a part time job to
earn money for things that a full scholarship simply does not cover. 85 percent of college athletes on a scholarship live below the poverty line, this
fact found in a 2011 report (Mitchell and Edelman). That fact is surreal considering millions of dollars are being made of these athletes and well over
half of them are below the line. With the overloaded schedule the athletes time to eat often does not align with the hours of operation of the cafeteria
which can

Essay on Paying College Athletes
Should college athletes get paid more money?
There has been a constant debate the past few years on whether college athletes, particularly football players, should get paid. In 1988, the Nebraska
legislature passed a bill that would allow the University of Nebraska football players to receive better cash incentives. The bill was later vetoed by
Governor Kay Orr, who was governor of Nebraska at the time (O'Toole etal. 2). . The dispute comes from coaches, parents of the players, and the
players themselves arguing that universities make money off their own athletes and the athletes, in turn, do not receive any money from that. Many
NCAA officials disagree stating their case that college athletes already receive...show more content...
But the bill is getting exploited by NCAA rules and by the official in the Big 12.
According to Big 12 Commissioner Kevin Weiberg, the bill, if passed in Nebraska, has a slim chance of passing in other states that has schools in
the Big 12. He states, "At this point, I know of no other state legislative activity that relates to a bill like this" (cite). Weiberg expands on how he is
not alone in this decision by saying, "Our presidents and chancellors have been uniformly opposed to any plan that would give the appearance of
play–for–pay"(O'Toole etal. 2). With these statements it seems like Chambers doesn't have good position in getting the bill passed, but the bill can
initiate an argument saying that if college athletes do not get paid, the temptation of illegal consumption of money by athletes could rise.
In agreeing with Weiberg, Wally Renfro, who is an assistant to NCAA president Myles Brand, states, "It (the bill) shouldn't happen for two reasons.
One is philosophical. It's not the model of intercollegiate athletics. Second, it's impractical. They're basically talking, I think, about paying football
players. I don't think that's going to stand the test of a court challenge from students who play basketball or students who play baseball or students in
the tennis

When it comes to college athletics, there always will be a problem that arises. It is one of the most controversial topics there is. One of the main
issues within athletics is the idea of whether to pay college athletes or not. Several studies have been done along with articles from various sources.
This has been on the rise especially since "March Madness" is coming up. "March Madness" may only consist of three weekends, however, an 11
billion dollar deal is made to televise the games (Wilbon). This is when you have to take the time to sit back and contemplate whether these college
athletes really are getting the fair end of the stick. Under NCAA laws it is forbidden to pay these athletes for their performance yet at the same time they
So even though they are given a significant amount, many athletes will owe between 8000 and 12,000 dollars. As stated before, many of these athletes
are poor and cannot rub two pennies together. It does not seem right that if they are not going to pay the athletes, then why not give them a full
scholarship.
We often forget that playing a sport is not the only way to earn a scholarship. Many students are accepted for exceptional grades, involvement in the
band, clubs, or being well rounded. Most of these students just have to study to keep their scholarship, while the athletes have to work hard and be a
student. In a competitive market, "workers" are paid according to the value of the output they produce (Heath). It does not seem right that the
college journalist can sell their piece to a paper for extra cash, or the local band can play for a few dollars at the bar Saturday night, or the biology
major that takes an internship at the school lab can be profitable yet college athletes cannot. Under the NCAA they are not allowed to make any money
of their skill. Any college student should be able to endorse products (Wilbon). This is why the idea of going to school for free should not be an
argument against paying athletes, because that is not the case and they have earned it.
One last reason college athletes

Argumentative Essay On Paying College Athletes
Paying College Athletes I am against paying college athletes. I am against it because the athletes are not just athletes; they are students too. The
athletes are getting paid to go to college at the school that they are attending. Being an athlete is second to being a student, because if the
student–athletes do not make the grade to pass, then they can not play. There is already so much going against paying these student–athletes. Will all
the athletes be paid the same amount? Will a starting football player at Ohio State get paid the same amount or more than a walk–on redshirt freshman
that will not get to go on the field on Saturdays for three more years? Will some schools get to pay the student–athletes more than others? For say
The athletes would be trying to prove that they deserve more money than the guy they are playing against. Also, others say that athletes work 43.3
hours each week on their sport. They also put in ten hours of class work each day, which reflects into about ninety hours of work each week for a
student–athlete. The NCAA is an eleven billion dollar organizations ("Should"). There are also other arguments saying that the athletes bring in the
revenue. College sports are a business, every person that buys a ticket to go either to a football game or a field hockey game generates money
("Paid"). The athletes put their bodies on the line every time they go to practice or a game. Fitzpatrick said, "Players are entitled to some
compensation because of the revenue they bring in and the risk of injury they face." Mike Wilbon said, "If a music student goes out in the summer and
earns fifty grand, who objects? Who even knows? The student–musician is no less a college student because he struck a lucrative deal" (Tinker). Each
argument for the paying of college athletes has a counterargument. One response is that it is possible that college sports would not become more
competitive. Just look at what happens in the professional leagues. Players would want more money and may not play hard until they get what they
want. Another is that the athletes should not be bothered by how much

College Athletes Should Get Paid Essay
If you were a college–athlete what would you do if you got paid a tremendous amount of money? Right now, no college athlete are getting paid for
their work, but it is a very strong debate going on in the country whether they should or not. Many people believe that since they are spending several
hours into their sports, to entertain the world, that they deserve some type of payment. There are several amounts of pros and cons of paying college
athletes, and you have to really "dissect" it and imagine about their future. From my standpoint, I believe that college–athletes should not be paid
because of the risk of them forgetting about their academics, using their money for non–important items, and because most of them are "technically"
getting paid.
Starting off, if college athletes got paid they would look at their "student–athlete career" as more of a job, other than academics and one of their
hobbies. To extend off, the people that believe that the athletes should receive payment because of their consistent work, aren't really thinking about
what their purpose is to even be there. It is called "student–athlete" because...show more content...
Anyone could say or think that "no they aren't getting paid," but you have to think about what they are getting in replacement of a check. First payment
in my eyes, is that, I quote "The average NCAA athlete on scholarship gets, per year, about $10,000" (http://www.marcusfootball.com). Not to mention
the outstandingly–talented students that receive a full–ride (everything paid for). Over the full four years of playing the sport that is saving
approximately $40,000. That amount of money is tremendous to families and could be very helpful for them. The other way of payment is all of the
popularity and fame they get. The students literally are getting shown on television and are getting their name known all around the campus, if not the
whole

Essay On Paying College Athletes
Justin Rogers
Ms. Stott
English II
22 March 2016
Paying college athletes would be beneficial for the athletes and the programs..The NCAA membership has adopted amateurism rules to ensure the
students' priority are to obtain a quality educational experience and that all of student–athletes are competing equitably.The NCAA made these rules a
long time ago to make sure that college athletes didn't feel like playing sports in college was their job and tried to emphasize that education came before
sports.They want to make these rules and restrictions more strict because they feel that athletes are starting to do their own thing. NFL athletes are
coming back and admitting that they took money during college, so the NCAA...show more content...
Now they can get paid off of their performance, so they will go 110% in everything they will which will make sports better. These athletes deserve
money for not only themselves, but their families if they do all that hard work and earn the NCAA billions of dollars they deserve a paycheck. Studies
feel that paying these athletes will raise performance. Athletes should also get paid to show them how to control and manage their money. These
arguments all have the same goal which is to get the athletes

Paying College Athletes College sports are a phenomenon that keeps viewers coming back for more. Stated in an article on Money Nation the
NCAA makes an estimated $1 billion per year and this number is still growing. What really is insane is that all that money is made off of college
athletes, who don't get a penny from that total number. The debate on whether or not college athletes should be paid has been around for decades
and probably will still be here for years to come. Paying college athletes would make the teams unfair, change how hard players will work to get
better, affect the amateurism of college sports, and lastly influence the athlete's willingness to participate in college sports. Many also look at this
debate problem and say...show more content...
Recruitment is a process in which colleges find high–level prospects from around the country to come play for them, and from there it is the athlete's
choice to where he will be excelling his athletic career. In an article written on recruiting 101, it states some of the top reasons a recruit will choose
the college they want to go to. Some that they introduce are "Location, Success of Program, Coaches, and Incentives," ( There are many decisions
that the athlete has to go through when it comes to selecting the right college consisting of, location of school, the environment of the college and the
team staff, and incentives that were given to them from the colleges' booster club members. Though it is against the rules for the colleges to give
incentives to persuade a recruit to come there, it isn't for a booster club member to present the athlete with a gift. This happens to many college
athletes, even though it is still against the rules, an example of this happening was brought up in Walter Byers book Unsportsmanlike
Conduct:Exploiting College Athletes which included hall of famer Eric Dickerson. "After Dickerson finished college ball, he disclosed that the
$15,000 Trans Am was purchased by Texas A&M boosters who tried to recruit him but failed" (Byers 20). Though in this situation it didn't work, in
many other instances this approach is successful. By paying college

Every child, at some point in their life, dream about becoming a rock star, a doctor or an astronaut. The career that stands out the most in young
boys and girls dreams, is becoming a professional athlete; Why is that? One reason could be the ever increasing media coverage on each
individual sport. Certain channels are devoted just for that particular sport, keeping viewers updated and thirsting to get out and play just like
professionals on television. Another reason could be, how easy it is to get out in the backyard as a kid to shoot the basketball, throw a football, or hit a
baseball because it is a lot harder to perform heart surgery or fly to the moon when you're only a child. With that being said, it is so easy to look up to a
With that in mind, to keep college sports prestigious, colleges must come up with a way to keep their athletes interested in playing at their school
until they have finished their degrees. College athletes at the Division One level should be paid to play. When the topic is brought up about why
college athletes should be paid to play, more then half of people instantly will disagree and say "no way, what for"? But have they really looked into
all the reasons pointing towards paying them? I know it sounds like I'm trying to say give them all million dollar contracts and call it a done deal, but
that is not the case. Aside from the athletic and academic scholarships to pay for tuition, the money they would be receiving would be miniscule to
what they could be making if they were working at a full–time job instead. This money would basically cover small costs an athlete must make when
living on his own, since there is no time for a job, he has to balance the careful act of school and sports. Only a select few big time athletes will
actually make it all the way to the big leagues and receive a big payout. Once this money distribution to the players is in affect, it will clean up a lot
of problems in college sports. One question that needs to be answered first is, what is the NCAA? The NCAA or (National Collegiate Athletic
Association) are the members that make the rules for college sports at most colleges and

Argumentative Essay On Paying College Athletes
Since 1957, student athletes have been given scholarships to further their career in the sport that they excel in. During the late 1970's, college
basketball became more popular and more profitable. ("Paying College Athletes"). The controversy surrounding student athletes revolves around
financial compensation specifically concerning the position that college student athletes should either be paid, not paid, or paid via scholarship.
The supporters believe that student athletes should get paid. The National College Athletic Association (NCAA) brings in a lot of revenue, some
believe that the student athletes should get a fair share of that revenue. ESPN basketball analyst and former player Jay Bilas argues, "The NCAA and
the schools are making money off of the names and likenesses of the players, and the players are being cut totally out of it. To me it's pretty simple
analysis." ("Paying College Athletes"). According to the article "Paying College Athletes: Should theNational Collegiate Athletic Association(NCAA)
pay college athletes?" in 2009 the top earning school was University of Louisville with their revenue at $25,494,904, expenses at $8,625,245, and
their profit being $16,869,659. Supporters of athletes believe that this is one of the very few times where people are helping an organization bring in
money that then don't see any in return. Boyce Watkins, a finance professor at Syracuse University in upstate New York, said, "If what you do

The college athletes of their respective sports today, have the opportunity of showcasing their talents in competition on local and national
programming on a regular basis which has lately brought attention this controversy, paying college athletes. The issue was brought on by the athletes
over time, then caught onto coaches, sports columnists, and fans. The athletes dedicate themselves to the sport to a caliber comparable to the
professional tier. The idea of paying the athletes could be considered as they play major factor in reputation of their schools, as well as funds for their
schools. However most colleges do not have profitable sports teams. Thus, paying athletes would prove to be a very difficult endeavor and this could
destroy...show more content...
They practice, they travel for games, and they represent their school. They also put themselves in the way of personal injury. In the article, "In
Defense of Cheering", by "New York Times" writer, Jennie Yabroff, she demonstrates just how hard individuals on a cheerleading squad work. "One
member has a broken rib. The other a possible concussion from a nasty fall. A third wraps a compression bandage around a sprained ankle. They've
been practicing day and night, focusing on their sport to the exclusion of most everything else, and the strain is showing" (Yabroff, p. 524). These
athletes spend a tremendous amount of time and energy preparing to compete. According to former Nebraska Senator, Ernie Chambers, "[College
athletes] are unpaid workers, and in big–time college athletics, not just football, there are no amateurs, you're a professional. They call it a scholarship,
fees, books, tuition and so forth. What I want is the athletes to have some spendable money". Advocates argue that they don't necessarily want these
students to make large sums of money, just some spending money.
Although, there are also many benefits to playing college sports that aren't monetary. Yes, student athletes do get significant financial aid packages, but
they also get to experience something more. When students join a college sports team they form a relationship with people from different areas,

Your Name Professor Miller English 106 11 April 2008 Paying College Athletes College sports have gained a lot of positive attention over the past
couple of years due to the athletes' passion and desire for the sports. Being nationally televised and making it deep into big tournaments can rack up a
lot of wealth that colleges and universities can respectively cash in. Only the schools and sponsors of these profiting tournaments and bowl games
collect the profits that athletes bring in and it is not fair. The athletes do not garner any benefits for the timeless hours and dedication they put into their
sports. College athletes should be paid because they bring in an extensive amount of money and publicity to colleges and...show more content...
Athletes should be compensated in some way for being exploited for money. One that stands out is the money made from selling merchandise. This
merchandise can range from hats, t–shirts, and any other miscellaneous apparel but the most important items sold are the jerseys. Yes they do not
have the names on the back of the jerseys to protect the athletes, but it is not like there is more than one player on the same team with the identical
jersey. Even if their names aren't on the back of the jerseys being sold, customers buy the jersey because they know who the player's number. This is
true because so many times people watch these games being "advertised" nationally and they're faster to recognize the jersey number first rather than
the last name. This also brings up the issue that players' names on the back of their jersey are not sold because the athletes could plead a legitimate
case that they should be compensated in some way because of the use of their name. Because of the merchandise being sold and marketed from the
schools and other sporting goods retailers, athletes should consume, at the least, a share of the profit being made. Notable and talented athletes bring in
a great deal of exposure to universities because of their success. They should not be paid directly because of this but this exposure draws attention to
potential incoming students; both freshmen and transfers. In a way, coaches recruit

Benefits Of Paying College Athletes

Benefits Of Paying College Athletes

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Benefits Of Paying College Athletes

Similaire à Benefits Of Paying College Athletes(20)

Plus de Buy A College Paper UK

Plus de Buy A College Paper UK(20)

Dernier

Dernier(20)

Benefits Of Paying College Athletes