Diana Ürge-Vorsatz
Center for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy,
Central European University
Coordinating Lead ...
3CSEP
Rationale
Co-benefits have been on the agenda at the
rhetorical level for decades…
…but when it comes to concrete ...
3CSEPAnnual Reviews of Environment and Resources, 2014
3CSEP
What are co-benefits?
Zoo of terms used:
Ancillary benefits, multiple benefits, multiple impacts,
co-benefit, spil...
3CSEP
Conceptual map of different definitions
related to co-benefits
3CSEP
Terminology suggestion
What is a co- benefit to what….?
Co-benefits are best assessed in a multiple
impact- multip...
3CSEP
The importance of co-benefits
How do these relate to the primary benefits?
Which co-impacts are particularly impor...
3CSEP
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
Joyce et al.
2013
Clinch and
Healy 2001
Chapman
et al. 2009
Levy et al.
2003
Aunan et
al. 20...
3CSEP
3CSEP
3CSEP
3CSEP
Integration of quantified co-benefits
Extremely challenging and complex
Partially due to interactions between impa...
3CSEP
3CSEP
Conclusions
Co-impacts can be game-changers if integrated
into decision-making
Can be several times higher than di...
Thank you for your attention
Diana Ürge-Vorsatz Diana
Center for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy (3CSEP), CEU...
Supplementary slides
3CSEP
0
10
20
2005
Deep
Moderate
Frozen
India
Urban Rural Slums
EJ 0
5
10
15
20
2005
Deep
Moderate
Frozen
China
Rural
Urba...
Prochain SlideShare
Chargement dans…5
×

Urge vorsatz d-20150709_1430_unesco_fontenoy_-_room_ii

533 vues

Publié le

cfcc15

Publié dans : Sciences
  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

Urge vorsatz d-20150709_1430_unesco_fontenoy_-_room_ii

  1. 1. Diana Ürge-Vorsatz Center for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy, Central European University Coordinating Lead Author, Buildings Chapter, WGIII, AR5, IPCC Navroz Dubash, Franc Lecoq Paris July 7 - 10, 2015
  2. 2. 3CSEP Rationale Co-benefits have been on the agenda at the rhetorical level for decades… …but when it comes to concrete decision-making, it is typically the direct costs/benefits that are counted only How can co-benefits best enter decision-making frameworks?
  3. 3. 3CSEPAnnual Reviews of Environment and Resources, 2014
  4. 4. 3CSEP What are co-benefits? Zoo of terms used: Ancillary benefits, multiple benefits, multiple impacts, co-benefit, spillover effects, risks, adverse side- effects, ….
  5. 5. 3CSEP Conceptual map of different definitions related to co-benefits
  6. 6. 3CSEP Terminology suggestion What is a co- benefit to what….? Co-benefits are best assessed in a multiple impact- multiple goal framework Sometimes the impact cannot be prejudged whether negative or positive; the impact can also be different at different scales or locations (e.g. employment): Suggested terminology instead of co-benefits:  multiple impact (co-impact)
  7. 7. 3CSEP The importance of co-benefits How do these relate to the primary benefits? Which co-impacts are particularly important and which ones are more marginal?
  8. 8. 3CSEP 0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 Joyce et al. 2013 Clinch and Healy 2001 Chapman et al. 2009 Levy et al. 2003 Aunan et al. 2000 Scheer and Motherway 2011 Schweitzer and Tonn 2002 Finman and Laitner 2001 Lung et al. 2005 Lilly and Pearson 1999 Ratio of overall value of MIs to direct benefits from studies
  9. 9. 3CSEP
  10. 10. 3CSEP
  11. 11. 3CSEP
  12. 12. 3CSEP Integration of quantified co-benefits Extremely challenging and complex Partially due to interactions between impacts Baseline and additionality issues – additionality has (at least?) 4 layers Uvd et al. Proposed a conceptual framework for avoiding double counting and taking interactions into account
  13. 13. 3CSEP
  14. 14. 3CSEP Conclusions Co-impacts can be game-changers if integrated into decision-making Can be several times higher than direct impacts Health-related ones seem to far bigger than others Using a consistent framework helps in avoiding double counting For more, please see ARER 2014
  15. 15. Thank you for your attention Diana Ürge-Vorsatz Diana Center for Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Policy (3CSEP), CEU http://globalenergyassessment.org www.mitigation2014.org Email: vorsatzd@ceu.hu
  16. 16. Supplementary slides
  17. 17. 3CSEP 0 10 20 2005 Deep Moderate Frozen India Urban Rural Slums EJ 0 5 10 15 20 2005 Deep Moderate Frozen China Rural Urban EJ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2005 Deep Moderate Frozen US Urban Rural EJ 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 2005 Deep Moderate Frozen EU-27 Urban Rural EJ 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 2005 Deep Moderate Frozen World Slums Rural Urban EJ Urban vs. Rural Energy Use

×