Carbon Neutral’s CEO Ray Wilson presented on ‘biodiverse revegetation in the voluntary market’ at a ‘Trees in Agriculture’ workshop facilitated by the Department of Agriculture. These are the presentation notes.
2. Topics
• Carbon Neutral
• What is biodiverse reforestation?
• Demand - capturing buyer attention
• Supply issues
• Misconceptions
• Opportunities
“Why would you plant non-commercial tree
crops?”
3. Who is Carbon Neutral?
Carbon Neutral is a carbon
solutions provider and
reforestation offset developer.
We help clients to measure,
reduce and offset greenhouse gas
emissions. As a registered
environmental charity we
specialise in biodiverse tree
plantings.
Mission: To reduce greenhouse gas emissions through education and
revegetation.
Not for profit
Carbon consultancy and
offset provider
Established 2001 by Men of
the Trees
Planted over 13 million trees
Award winning
Over 1000 business clients
Working across Australia
5. Carbon Neutral Business
Carbon Consultancy
Service
Forest Carbon Sink
Developer
Offset Retailer
• Energy audits
• Carbon footprint
analysis and reduction
programs
• Environmental
management plans
• Carbon neutral
certification
• Workshops &
seminars
• Staff engagement
surveys
• Creation of
reforestation carbon
offsets
• Unaccredited
• Certified under
the Carbon
Farming Initiative
(CFI)
• Plant-a-tree
programmes
[revegetation and
biosequestration]
• Verified Carbon
Units [VCS, Gold
Standard, Social
Carbon etc.]
• ACCUs from CFI
[for compliance
under carbon price]
• Forestry-based
offsets for voluntary
offsetting [non-
accredited]
6. Biodiverse Reforestation (Environmental Plantings)
Ecological restoration is the process of
assisting the recovery of an ecosystem that
has been degraded, damaged, or
destroyed.
Aim: To return an appropriate mix of plant
community mixes, balanced in both density
and species composition, and appropriately
matched to both soil type and landscape
position.
7. Biodiverse Reforestation
Outcomes:
Biosequestration activities can deliver direct
biodiversity benefits by providing wildlife
habitat and corridors when achieved through
conservation and restoration of natural
woodlands and forests.
Method: Direct seeding
2013 site: 100ha east of Stirlings
>200+ species (upper, mid, lower story)
5-star rating
8. How big is the market?
Compliance Market:
Top 500 emitters (> 25,000 t CO2e per site) "Misfortune 500“
(>$500k pa each emitter)
Verve Energy $200m @ 5% = $10m pa
Mid-sized mining company $20m pa @ 5% = $1m pa
Voluntary Market:
Small, medium and large companies
NAB (carbon neutral company) 260,000 t
ANZ (carbon neutral company)
News Limited (carbon neutral company)
Fosters (carbon neutral product)
Taylors Wines (carbon neutral product)
Australian paper (carbon neutral product)
City of Sydney (carbon neutral) - 100,000 t
Local government
State Fleet 70,000 t
Worldwide Online Printing (carbon neutral)
9. Why do Eastern States companies support WA projects?
• Story behind the project (conservation area, bush linkage)
• Over clearing history
• WA global Biodiversity Hotspot (Gondwana Link)
• Habitat creation (WWF)
• Protection (Bush Heritage)
• Legal protection (carbon rights & carbon covenants)
• Certification / verification
• Monitoring reports
• $3.75 per tree ($3-5000/ha) / $15-22.50 per tCO2e
Getting a price premium
10. Carbon offset + Co-benefits (Environmental + Social (indigenous))
Trees seen as an important option for sustainable management of land
(environmental or oil mallee).
Plant on unproductive farm land to assist combat environmental
issues:
• Salinisation
• Water logging
• Soil stabilisation
• Habitat and biodiversity loss
– Shelter belts for stock
– Aesthetics
– Positive impact on rainfall!!!
Co-Benefits
17. Resource Management Technical Report 379
Changing land use on unproductive soils
NORTH EASTERN AGRICULTURAL REGION STRATEGY
PROJECT 3
Andrew Blake, Mike Clarke and Angela Stuart-Street
Survey of farmers NE wheatbelt farmers: over 70
responses which account for over 12% of farms
• 10% of soils on farm surveyed are consistently
unproductive
• If climate continues to dry another 35% will be
consistently unproductive
• 75% of farmers would be willing to permanently
revegetate these soils
• Farmers see land capability planning/subdivision worth
investigating – so they may sell off unproductive land
18. Cost Neutral
Indicative Revenue:
100 ha @ 275 t/ha CO2e @95% (after buffer)
= 26,125 tCO2 @ $20/t
= $522,500 over 15-20yrs years
(>$5,000 per ha) gross. 50% GM
Significant economies of scale (esp. project
management) = >$150/ha pa net
Plus – can selectively harvest species <5%
Could transform the economic prospects of rural Australia, especially of
remote areas (Ross Garnaut).
Economics
19. Cost Neutral
1. Carbon credits will lead to plantation
companies (repeat of bluegums)
– Need to be $60/t CO2e to threaten prime farmland
– Need to fit in with regional NRM strategies
– Councils can limit via Development Applications
2. Fire Risk
– Fire management plans and insurance
3. Weed control
– Can be grazed
Concerns
20. Cost Neutral
Environmental pressures building...
• Australia—the developed world‘s largest emitter of greenhouse
gases per head of population
• Community acceptance growing that climate change is happening
• Community concerns that Australia‘s biodiversity is in decline
At least 1,700 species and ecological communities are said to be threatened
and at risk of extinction
• More firms want to Measure, Reduce and Offset their emissions
• Supply chain procurement pressures + Corporate Social
Responsibility
• Carbon Farming Initiative framework (environmental plantings)
supply internationally tradable credits
Opportunities to attract buyers
21. Barriers
External:
1. Political uncertainty on
carbon pricing
2. Economy - discretionary
spend (except where
committed to ‘carbon
neutrality’)
Domestic:
1. Land subdivision restrictions - will
force developers to buy whole farms
2. Lack of a WA strategy to integrate
biosequestration with the CFI
framework and Carbon Rights
legislation
3. Lack of clarity on land conservation
co-benefits
4. Collaboration DEC, DAFWA, NRM,
Universities post FFI CRC?
5. WA stakeholders competing for grant
funding - opportunities for
partnerships