This document discusses governance and public participation in Provincetown. It notes that the traditional Town Meeting process is seen as dysfunctional, inefficient, and unpredictable. It recommends reforming the process to be more efficient, collaborative, and informed through facilitated dialogues, community visioning, and establishing a civic organization to guide reform and community projects. The goal is a process that builds common understanding and reinforces community values rather than emphasizing differences. An example from Oregon uses a community information model to engage the public on the front end of decision-making.
2. Provincetown 365: Design and Resiliency Team
Wayne Feiden, FAICP
Director of Planning and Sustainability, Northampton, MA
Tilman Lukas, Principal
Housing Finance, MBL Housing and Development, Amherst, MA
Kristina Hill, PhD
Associate Professor Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning
Bill Needelman, AICP
Waterfront Coordinator, Portland, ME
Amanda Loper, AIA
Architect, Principal, David Baker Architects, San Francisco
Joel Mills
Director of Communities by Design, AIA, Washington DC
5. Resiliency
“I’ve been
dumping bodies
for years, and it
seems to me that
the sea level is
rising.”
Standard and Poors: “…large and very diverse property tax base and
extremely strong per capita market values; strong reserves…; and
favorable debt position… The town's limited, tourism-centered
local economy somewhat offsets these strengths.”
6. Resiliency Themes
• Year round community: people, vibrancy, jobs
• Economic development: people, vibrancy, jobs
• Climate: sea level, rain storms, surges
10. Zoning- Residential
• Tweak accessory dwelling units
• Tweak growth management incentives
– Provide payment in-lieu option
– More certainty, less discretion, in the process.
• Only administrative site plan for housing you want
–Not special permits (accessory dwelling units & 4+ units)
• Smaller lot size per dwelling unit for larger projects
– Not more space per unit for larger projects
11. Zoning-Commercial
• Reduce commercial front and side setbacks
–Embrace current commercial center setbacks
–Allow pedestrian-friendly general commercial
–Consider build-to lines (maximum setbacks)
12. Affordable and Community Housing
• Affordable Housing=rent ≤30% of income
– Allows for necessities such as food, clothing,
transportation and medical care.
• Why affordable housing?
– Essential for a healthy, vibrant community
– Retain year round residents
– Provide a labor force for local businesses
– Expand the tax base, decrease commuter miles,
attract new businesses
13. Types of Housing
Housing Ownership Types
• Fee-Simple
• Condos
• Cooperatives and limited equity cooperatives
• Co-housing
• Rentals
Typical types of affordable housing
• Homeownership
• Rental
• Elderly
• People with disabilities
• Family
14. Rental Levels--What can I afford?
$19.85/hour for 52 weeks for a 2-person family at 60% AMI
Pretty close to an entry level teacher
median household=1.64 persons
median family=2.55 persons
15. Big Obstacles
• Land: not enough
• Small projects: too costly per unit
• Scattered: too costly and difficult to manage
• Water/Sewer: Can’t build without these
• Cost: Limited resources available
• Focus: Community disagreement as to need
• Zoning
• NIMBY (Not in my back yard)
16. Developing Affording Housing-- Thresholds
• Site control
• Project sponsor
– experience, financial strength, vision, mission,
management capacity
– Compatible with community vision
– Limited options for sponsors
• Market study
• Zoning approval
– By Right, Special Permit, Comprehensive Permit
17. Developing Affording Housing-- Financing
• Local Match
– Community Preservation Funds (CPA)
– Provincetown Affordable Housing Trust Fund
– PILOT (Payment in lieu of taxes)
– Donation of town owned land
– Lease of public land
• Big Hurtle: Financing
– Affordable housing is expensive
– Local, State, and Federal Resources are essential
18. Development Model- VFW Site
• 41 Unit building
# of Units # bedrooms Unit Sq.ft Rent-Net Affordability
16 1 500 $930 60% AMI
16 2 750 $1,112 60%
4 2 750 $1,636 Unrestricted
4 3 950 $1,279 60%
1 3 950 $1,812 Unrestricted
• Financing
– Low Income Housing Tax Credits
– Soft debt
– Permanent debt
• Deed restrictions- for long term affordability
19. Provincetown 365: Development Budget
Sources of Funds
Construction Loan $8,200,000
Equity (Development Fee Loan) $0
Equity (Federal credits) $8,281,909
Equity (state tax credits $1,143,695
Provincetown CPA $250,000
Provincetown Affordable Housing Trust Fund $500,000
Other: $0
Mass.Housing Stabilization Fund $1,000,000
Mass. Affordable Housing Trust Fund $1,000,000
Other: CDBG $0
Permanent Debt $2,000,000
Subtotal $22,375,604
Construction Loan Repayment $8,200,000
Total Sources-w/o Constr. $14,175,604
Uses of Funds
Acquisition $750,000
Direct Construction Dwelling Units (@$275/ft²) $8,325,000
Direct Construction:Site Costs $1,000,000
Total Construction $9,325,000
Construction Contingency (5%) $466,250
Total Hard Costs $9,791,250
Soft costs $2,152,480
Developer Fees, Capitalized Reserve, etc. $1,481,873
Total Uses of Funds $14,175,603
Surplus/(Deficit) $1
Development Costs/Unit $345,746
46. Sand is GOLD for adapting to sea level rise.
Beaches and dunes can be expanded to protect coastal communities over the long-term.
Eventually, piers would have to be extended; but using sand is a “no regrets” adaptation
approach because it can be removed if it isn’t needed.
52. When well designed and managed,
these core functions support each
other as mutually supporting
systems
Boaters are tourists and tourists like boats
61. Recommendations
•Promote active use of the water
•Recreational access
•Marine employment
Working Waterfronts
Are both
Employment generators and
tourism attractions
66. If declines in commercial fishing
create berthing vacancies – only fill
with recreational boats on a season-to-
season basis.
Fishing will rebound
Aquaculture will grow
Marine transit will grow
Have faith
124. What we heard - Soul of Community
• “Despite all the change, Ptown remains the
same – it’s an attitude. It’s a spirit.”
• “Everyone feels safe here, free from judgment,
able to express themselves authentically”
• “There is universal acceptance here. There is
no requirement to fit in.”
• “Ptown is a shared experience that binds
people together”
125. Governance
• What one word describes Town Meeting:
– “dysfunctional”
– “War of the Worlds”
– “Groan”
128. Look @ What’s Happening Today
• American Planning Association (2012) – “More than 50
percent want to personally be involved in community
planning efforts, including more than half of Democrats,
Republicans, and independents as well as majorities of
urban, suburban, and rural respondents.”
131. Town Meeting Today
• Conflict-ridden – by design
• Incredibly inefficient
• Engages people at the end of the process, not the
beginning
• Unpredictable outcomes – high risk
• Can create impression that this is not a good place to
do business
• Mistrust and personal nature of conflicts –
antithetical to your community identity
132. The difference between PR & P2
Public Relations
• Sponsors decide on a course of
action and then attempt to sell
it to the public.
• people can feel manipulated
and suspicious
• often hinders them from
thinking effectively about
problems and challenges
because it avoids exposing
them to the full dialogue.
• PR seeks “buy-in”
Public Participation
• Sponsors engage public on the
front end in dialogue to help
understand the pros and cons
of different actions and seek
input, consultation,
involvement, collaboration
• Builds common understanding
of the issue and decision by
hearing and understanding all
viewpoints and information
• P2 seeks meaningful
involvement up front
133. Recommendations
• FIRST: Community Visioning Process that is
authentic, culturally relevant, meaningful
• Community Advisory Board/Cross Agency Town
Team to guide reform of Town Meeting process
to be more efficient, productive, and predictable
• Civic organization to convene, inform, lead,
program, facilitate, partner, build capacity
• Let vision drive action. Build Momentum for
implementation by integrating projects in a
community-driven process
134. Resource Guide
• Model Ordinance
• Model Charter Language
• P2 Advisory Commissions
• Policy Options
• Resources
135. One Example
“We know that collaboration
between community
members and city
government leads to better
results than either working in
a vacuum. One without the
other misses out on a whole
range of good ideas. More
importantly, public decisions
that are developed
collaboratively produce better
results and better stand the
test of time. The What’s Next
Alexandria initiative focused
on understanding how to use
civic engagement to improve
this kind of collaborative give-and-
take that will always be
more effective than
community members or City
staff working alone.”
138. Reform Town Meeting Process
• Goal: efficient, collaborative, predictable,
informed
• Address the information gaps on the front end
• Have facilitated dialogues first to build
understanding of pros and cons of issues
• Make the actual town meeting process an
administrative act only – not the place where
the community makes its voice heard, just
where the official vote occurs afterward
139. process orientation
Versus
Collaborative
Citizen-driven
Dialogue-based
Informative
Builds
Understanding
Reinforces
values
Pride
Social Capital
Partnership
Action
Inefficient
No dialogue
Grandstanding
Emphasizes
differences
Creates
conflict
Tears apart
community
Is not values-based
Apathy
Frustration
141. What can a community do?
• Articulate a Collective Vision
• Set the table for partnerships
• Position place as an attractive investment
• Mobilize volunteers
• Crowdfund
• Leverage collective capacity & Resources
• Build Civic Momentum through community projects, events &
activities that inspire pride and can be leveraged
• Requirements: Citizens (vs. Consumers or Taxpayers) and civic
leaders, vision and collaboration
• When you put it all together in a process, it can be transformative
142. “We have no public
resources to do anything”
National Statistics: About a trillion dollars in the community
•Volunteerism = $171 billion (only 64 mill people)
•Total Charitable Giving = $298.42 billion.
•Non-profits = $300 billion in investment into local communities
•Over half of all states have enacted legislation to enable private-sector
participation in infrastructure projects, where there is an
estimated $180 billion to be leveraged
•Crowdfunding - $3 billion & growing
•*billions in federal support
143. Most Communities Today
“If we can just get that
one, big, transformational
investment done, it will
change everything for us.”
[years of
effort…debates…studies..
no visual progress during
this time…loss of
excitement…bottom falls
out.]
144. The Snowball Effect
“a figurative term for a process
that starts from an initial state
of small significance and builds
upon itself, becoming larger
and faster at every stage”
Applied to a community, this is
a transformational principle…
145. “You gave us hope. Back in 1992, your ideas seemed
like dreams. Now we are living those dreams.”
– Rick Smith, San Angelo Times-Standard, 2012
147. Prioritization
• Staff picked through
and identified
implementation items
• Survey at Public
Meeting
• Committee Review
and Prioritization
• Port Angeles Forward
organization as civic
leader
148. Immediate Implementation
1. Parking study in the downtown area.
2. Increase housing opportunity and multi‐use buildings in
downtown.
3. Institute the use of form based codes rather than conventional
zoning.
4. Remove the parking regulations in downtown and let the market
drive parking.
5. Return the Farmer's Market to the downtown area.
6. Signage and wayfinding system for pedestrian and vehicles.
7. Improve existing buildings (appearance, facades, etc. in downtown
and elsewhere).
8. Provide visitor information kiosks.
9. Create an entryway monument.
10. Create nodes / centers of key intersections.
149.
150. Port Angeles, WA 2009 Project: 2 months later, 43 buildings repainted with
volunteers and donated paint, (at least 3,500 volunteer hours, or roughly
$66,500 worth of donated labor) led to a façade improvement program, then
private $
154. Public Prioritization
Paint 43 Buildings
Façade Improvement
Wayfinding
Waterfront Esplanade
Major new anchors downtown
Peninsula Campus Expansion
Downtown Health Clinic
New Transit Center
First 3 months-1 year
Bike/Ped Facilities
New small businesses
Ferry Terminal
Renovation
Renovated
shopping/restaurants at
adjacent block
1-2.5 years
4-5 years
155. Implementation
Today, major investments all over town
Some
Examples:
Waterfront
Redevelopment
$17 million
Marine
Campus
Facility
$12 million
5 macmillan pier visitor center (Stellwagen Banks, NOAA $, CCS) and fish market and public event space
Biogas and CCS monitoring? Groundwater levels, discharge from stormwater – increasing sewage pollution? …from septic systems?
2013 study by Mass Clean Energy Center evaluating technologies; state policies encouraging NO LANDFILL for organics; grants for co-gen and biogas.
U Wisconsin at Oshkosh– new biogas dry digester and co-generation facility (370 kWh); 5 biogas plants operate in Mass., new co-gen example in Fairhaven. Foodwaste, wastewater sludge, and septage?
biogas
T1 line, business and education
8 harbor access
Harbor access
Harbor access
Harbor access
9 sand adaptation zone
Bad shorezone adaptation
Bad shorezone adaptation
Bad shorezone adaptation
9 sand adaptation zone
The planning department distilled the SDAT report into a checklist of implementation items. These lists were distributed at public meetings, which allowed the community members to indicate their own priorities. The PA Forward committee then took the community’s preferences and created a scheme for prioritization and implementation.
Just two weeks after the SDAT presented more than 30 recommendations, the Port Angeles Forward committee unanimously agreed to recommend 10 of those items for immediate action.
less than a month after the conclusion of the SDAT, the community joined together in an effort to revamp the entire downtown, starting with a physical face-lift. Community members donated paint and equipment, and residents picked up their paintbrushes to start the transformation.” During the first summer of implementation, over 43 buildings in the downtown received substantial upgrades, including new paint and other improvements. This effort led to a formal façade improvement program that extended the initiative exponentially. The city dedicated $118,000 in community development block grants for the effort, which catalyzed over $265,000 in private investment.
Port Angeles also implemented a signage and wayfinding program, which at last allowed them to capture some of those visitors who came to Port Angeles merely for its proximity to Victoria.