SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 49
Technical Communicators and Personality Types What’s the hype? Results of an international Internet-based survey of technical writers   Deborah Hemstreet http://www.tech-challenged.com [email_address]
Reasons to look at personality… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Let’s Look at Our Work ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],RE Burnett (1997) Technical Communication
Things We Look for in TCs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
These Qualities are Linked with Personality!
Hard skills ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Soft skills
Why is personality typing useful for leading teams? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
We forget that people are different… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
My research question was ,[object Object]
Technical Communicators and the “Big 5” The Five Factors of Personality
Personality tool: “The Big 5” ,[object Object],Openness Conscientiousness Extroversion Agreeableness Neuroticism Low (-) High (+) Average (o)
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Openness Schriver KS (1997)  Dynamics in Document Design . John Wiley & Sons, New York. Preserver Moderate Explorer Terminology of Howard & Howard, 2000 Low (-) High (+) Average (o)
Conscientiousness ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Porter LR and Coggin W (1995)  Research Strategies in Technical Communication . John Wiley & Sons, New York. Flexible Balanced Focused Terminology of Howard & Howard, 2000 Low (-) High (+) Average (o)
Extraversion ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Aiken LR (1997)  Psychological Testing and Assessment . Ninth edition, Allyn and Bacon, London. Introvert Ambivert Extravert Terminology of Howard & Howard, 2000 Low (-) High (+) Average (o)
Agreeableness ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Molisani J (1999) “Tools or talent? Hiring a technical writer.”  Intercom , 46 (2): 24-25.  Challenger Negotiator Adaptor Terminology of Howard & Howard, 2000 Low (-) High (+) Average (o)
Neuroticism ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Sharples M (1999)  How We Write: writing as Creative Design . Routledge, London. Resilient Responsive Reactive Terminology of Howard & Howard, 2000 Low (-) High (+) Average (o)
Results 223 Respondents
OCEAN Results Responsive / Resilient Adaptor Will Vary Focused Explorer Hypothesis Reactive 20 Adaptor 148 Extravert 57 Focused 69 Explorer 127 High Responsive 95 Negotiator 69 Ambivert 129 Balanced 128 Moderate 74 Avg. Resilient 108 Challenger 6 Introvert 37 Flexible 26 Preserver 22 Low N A E C O N=223
Correlations to Professional Effectiveness Based on additional TC-related survey and information provided by respondents
How to determine “effective” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Results: Effectiveness
OCEAN vs Effectiveness scores   Hypothesis: O + , C + , E o/+/-  , A + , N o /N - - + o o +  42% + More Effective (n=24) - + o o + Average  (n=141) o -  41% + o o + Less Effective (n=58) N A E C O Effectiveness
A Quick Look at the Differences Conscientiousness and Extraversion
Conscientiousness (Not!) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The big controversy: Extraversion ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Extraversion Correlations
Understanding less effective TCs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Less effective TCs close-up Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o  , A + , N - /N o Reactive 9 (16%) Adaptor 37 (64%) Extravert 11 (19%) Focused 10 (17%) Explorer 31 (53%) High Responsive 25 (43%) Negotiator 19 (33%) Ambivert 29 (50%) Balanced 38 (66%) Moderate 21 (36%) Avg. Resilient 24 (41%) Challenger 2 (3%) Introvert 18 (31%) Flexible 10 (17%) Preserver 6 (10%) Low N A E C O N=58
Understanding more effective TCs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
More effective TCs close-up Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o  , A + , N - /N o Reactive 1 (4%) Adaptor 19 (79%) Extravert 10 (42%) Focused 10 (42%) Explorer 19 (79%) High Responsive 6 (25%) Negotiator 5 (21%) Ambivert 14 (58%) Balanced 12 (50%) Moderate 3 (13%) Avg. Resilient 17 (71%) Challenger 0 (0%) Introvert 0 (0%) Flexible 2 (8%) Preserver 2 (8%) Low N A E C O N=24
Understanding average TCs ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Average TCs close-up Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o  , A + , N - /N o Reactive 10 (7%) Adaptor 92 (65%) Extravert 36 (26%) Focused 49 (35%) Explorer 77 (55%) High Responsive 64 (45%) Negotiator 45 (32%) Ambivert 86 (61%) Balanced 78 (55%) Moderate 50 (35%) Avg. Resilient 67 (48%) Challenger 4 (3%) Introvert 19 (13%) Flexible 14 (10%) Preserver 14 (10%) Low N A E C O N=141
Personality typing benefits ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Tips about typing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Top 5 pitfalls to avoid ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
What do you think? Lets talk about these results and how to use them in real life situations
Contact Me Deborah Hemstreet http://www.tech-challenged.com [email_address]
Selected Bibliography ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Review of Common Factors ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o  , A + , N - /N o
Review of Common Factors ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o  , A + , N - /N o
Review of Common Factors ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o  , A + , N - /N o
Close-up: General Writers (n=84) Reactive 8 (10%) Adaptor 60 (71%) Extravert 20 (24%) Focused 27 (32%) Explorer 47 (56%) High Responsive 36 (43%) Negotiator 21 (25%) Ambivert 51 (61%) Balanced 47 (56%) Moderate 27 (32%) Avg. Resilient 40 (48%) Challenger 3 (4%) Introvert 13 (15%) Flexible 10 (12%) Preserver 10 (12%) Low N A E C O N=84
Close-up: Lone Writers (n=53) Reactive 5 (9%) Adaptor 31 (58%) Extravert 10 (19%) Focused 16 (30%) Explorer 31 (58%) High Responsive 24 (45%) Negotiator 21 (40%) Ambivert 33 (62%) Balanced 30 (57%) Moderate 17 (32%) Avg. Resilient 24 (45%) Challenger 1 (2%) Introvert 10 (19%) Flexible 7 (13%) Preserver 5 (9%) Low N A E C O N=53
Close-up: Managers (n=25) Reactive 0 (0%) Adaptor 16 (64%) Extravert 8 (32%) Focused 11 (44%) Explorer 16 (64%) High Responsive 11 (44%) Negotiator 8 (32%) Ambivert 13 (52%) Balanced 12 (48%) Moderate 6 (24%) Avg. Resilient 14 (56%) Challenger 1 (4%) Introvert 4 (16%) Flexible 2 (8%) Preserver 3 (12%) Low N A E C O N=25
Close-up: Info Design & Visual Arts (n=23) Reactive 2 (9%) Adaptor 13 (57%) Extravert 5 (22%) Focused 4 (17%) Explorer 14 (61%) High Responsive 9 (39%) Negotiator 10 (43%) Ambivert 15 (65%) Balanced 17 (74%) Moderate 8 (35%) Avg. Resilient 12 (52%) Challenger 0 (0%) Introvert 3 (13%) Flexible 2 (9%) Preserver 1 (4%) Low N A E C O N=23
Close-up: Editors (n=18*) *Not statistically significant – more research is needed Reactive 5 (28%) Adaptor 13 (72%) Extravert 6 (33%) Focused 3 (17%) Explorer 11 (61%) High Responsive 4 (22%) Negotiator 4 (22%) Ambivert 7 (39%) Balanced 10 (56%) Moderate 5 (28%) Avg. Resilient 9 (50%) Challenger 1 (6%) Introvert 5 (28%) Flexible 5 (28%) Preserver 2 (11%) Low N A E C O N=18
Openness—a key factor! ,[object Object],[object Object]
Agreeableness: Balancing Factor ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Neuroticism: How We Respond! ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (7)

Psychometric testing certification introduction
Psychometric testing certification introductionPsychometric testing certification introduction
Psychometric testing certification introduction
 
Oral exams Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019
Oral exams Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019Oral exams Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019
Oral exams Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019
 
Question clarity and why its important Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019
Question clarity and why its important Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019Question clarity and why its important Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019
Question clarity and why its important Liz Norman ANZCVS 2019
 
wheebox reort
wheebox reortwheebox reort
wheebox reort
 
Decoding word association 3 - sentence completion test
Decoding word association 3 - sentence completion testDecoding word association 3 - sentence completion test
Decoding word association 3 - sentence completion test
 
CEFS 521 Quiz -5, Liberty University_3 Version answer, secure HIGHSCORE
CEFS 521 Quiz -5, Liberty University_3 Version answer, secure HIGHSCORECEFS 521 Quiz -5, Liberty University_3 Version answer, secure HIGHSCORE
CEFS 521 Quiz -5, Liberty University_3 Version answer, secure HIGHSCORE
 
Chap5
Chap5Chap5
Chap5
 

Similar to Personality of Technical Communicators

Ob12 01st 1
Ob12 01st 1Ob12 01st 1
Ob12 01st 1
ccrumly
 
1 what is ob updated
1 what is ob updated1 what is ob updated
1 what is ob updated
Sheenu
 
Unit i what is ob - s robbins
Unit i   what is ob - s robbinsUnit i   what is ob - s robbins
Unit i what is ob - s robbins
Nabendu Maji
 
MBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 Xx
MBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 XxMBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 Xx
MBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 Xx
Derek Nicoll
 
Career Counseling A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docx
Career Counseling  A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docxCareer Counseling  A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docx
Career Counseling A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docx
tidwellveronique
 
Business writing and communication best practices
Business writing and communication best practicesBusiness writing and communication best practices
Business writing and communication best practices
Christine Miles
 

Similar to Personality of Technical Communicators (20)

Ob12 01st
Ob12 01stOb12 01st
Ob12 01st
 
Ob12 01st 1
Ob12 01st 1Ob12 01st 1
Ob12 01st 1
 
Ch1 (ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR)
Ch1 (ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR)  Ch1 (ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR)
Ch1 (ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR)
 
1 what is ob updated
1 what is ob updated1 what is ob updated
1 what is ob updated
 
What is ob
What is obWhat is ob
What is ob
 
Chapter 1 what is organizational behaviour
Chapter 1   what is organizational behaviourChapter 1   what is organizational behaviour
Chapter 1 what is organizational behaviour
 
What is ob
What is obWhat is ob
What is ob
 
Unit i what is ob - s robbins
Unit i   what is ob - s robbinsUnit i   what is ob - s robbins
Unit i what is ob - s robbins
 
Unit i what is ob - s robbins
Unit i   what is ob - s robbinsUnit i   what is ob - s robbins
Unit i what is ob - s robbins
 
MBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 Xx
MBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 XxMBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 Xx
MBA MCO101 Unit 9 Lecture 10 200806 Xx
 
Ob12 01st
Ob12 01stOb12 01st
Ob12 01st
 
Dynamic Communication
Dynamic CommunicationDynamic Communication
Dynamic Communication
 
Kate McKegg and Nan Wehipeihana (2010). A practitioners introduction to Devel...
Kate McKegg and Nan Wehipeihana (2010). A practitioners introduction to Devel...Kate McKegg and Nan Wehipeihana (2010). A practitioners introduction to Devel...
Kate McKegg and Nan Wehipeihana (2010). A practitioners introduction to Devel...
 
Career Counseling A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docx
Career Counseling  A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docxCareer Counseling  A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docx
Career Counseling A Holistic ApproachTheories of.docx
 
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastriAttitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
Attitude scale construction by sakshi shastri
 
PBL in TVET
PBL in TVETPBL in TVET
PBL in TVET
 
Business writing and communication best practices
Business writing and communication best practicesBusiness writing and communication best practices
Business writing and communication best practices
 
Organizational Beahavior Ch1.pptx
Organizational Beahavior Ch1.pptxOrganizational Beahavior Ch1.pptx
Organizational Beahavior Ch1.pptx
 
Organizational Beahavior Ch1.pptx
Organizational Beahavior Ch1.pptxOrganizational Beahavior Ch1.pptx
Organizational Beahavior Ch1.pptx
 
HCS321 201790 Assesment 2
HCS321 201790 Assesment 2HCS321 201790 Assesment 2
HCS321 201790 Assesment 2
 

Recently uploaded

Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for SuccessStructuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
UXDXConf
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Microsoft CSP Briefing Pre-Engagement - Questionnaire
Microsoft CSP Briefing Pre-Engagement - QuestionnaireMicrosoft CSP Briefing Pre-Engagement - Questionnaire
Microsoft CSP Briefing Pre-Engagement - Questionnaire
 
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System StrategyA Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
A Business-Centric Approach to Design System Strategy
 
Introduction to FDO and How It works Applications _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdf
Introduction to FDO and How It works Applications _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdfIntroduction to FDO and How It works Applications _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdf
Introduction to FDO and How It works Applications _ Richard at FIDO Alliance.pdf
 
State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!
State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!
State of the Smart Building Startup Landscape 2024!
 
Easier, Faster, and More Powerful – Notes Document Properties Reimagined
Easier, Faster, and More Powerful – Notes Document Properties ReimaginedEasier, Faster, and More Powerful – Notes Document Properties Reimagined
Easier, Faster, and More Powerful – Notes Document Properties Reimagined
 
WSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptx
WSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptxWSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptx
WSO2CONMay2024OpenSourceConferenceDebrief.pptx
 
TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024
TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024
TopCryptoSupers 12thReport OrionX May2024
 
Your enemies use GenAI too - staying ahead of fraud with Neo4j
Your enemies use GenAI too - staying ahead of fraud with Neo4jYour enemies use GenAI too - staying ahead of fraud with Neo4j
Your enemies use GenAI too - staying ahead of fraud with Neo4j
 
Working together SRE & Platform Engineering
Working together SRE & Platform EngineeringWorking together SRE & Platform Engineering
Working together SRE & Platform Engineering
 
1111 ChatGPT Prompts PDF Free Download - Prompts for ChatGPT
1111 ChatGPT Prompts PDF Free Download - Prompts for ChatGPT1111 ChatGPT Prompts PDF Free Download - Prompts for ChatGPT
1111 ChatGPT Prompts PDF Free Download - Prompts for ChatGPT
 
IESVE for Early Stage Design and Planning
IESVE for Early Stage Design and PlanningIESVE for Early Stage Design and Planning
IESVE for Early Stage Design and Planning
 
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
Integrating Telephony Systems with Salesforce: Insights and Considerations, B...
 
ASRock Industrial FDO Solutions in Action for Industrial Edge AI _ Kenny at A...
ASRock Industrial FDO Solutions in Action for Industrial Edge AI _ Kenny at A...ASRock Industrial FDO Solutions in Action for Industrial Edge AI _ Kenny at A...
ASRock Industrial FDO Solutions in Action for Industrial Edge AI _ Kenny at A...
 
ECS 2024 Teams Premium - Pretty Secure
ECS 2024   Teams Premium - Pretty SecureECS 2024   Teams Premium - Pretty Secure
ECS 2024 Teams Premium - Pretty Secure
 
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for SuccessStructuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
Structuring Teams and Portfolios for Success
 
WebRTC and SIP not just audio and video @ OpenSIPS 2024
WebRTC and SIP not just audio and video @ OpenSIPS 2024WebRTC and SIP not just audio and video @ OpenSIPS 2024
WebRTC and SIP not just audio and video @ OpenSIPS 2024
 
Google I/O Extended 2024 Warsaw
Google I/O Extended 2024 WarsawGoogle I/O Extended 2024 Warsaw
Google I/O Extended 2024 Warsaw
 
AI mind or machine power point presentation
AI mind or machine power point presentationAI mind or machine power point presentation
AI mind or machine power point presentation
 
How we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdf
How we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdfHow we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdf
How we scaled to 80K users by doing nothing!.pdf
 
Long journey of Ruby Standard library at RubyKaigi 2024
Long journey of Ruby Standard library at RubyKaigi 2024Long journey of Ruby Standard library at RubyKaigi 2024
Long journey of Ruby Standard library at RubyKaigi 2024
 

Personality of Technical Communicators

  • 1. Technical Communicators and Personality Types What’s the hype? Results of an international Internet-based survey of technical writers Deborah Hemstreet http://www.tech-challenged.com [email_address]
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5. These Qualities are Linked with Personality!
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10. Technical Communicators and the “Big 5” The Five Factors of Personality
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 18. OCEAN Results Responsive / Resilient Adaptor Will Vary Focused Explorer Hypothesis Reactive 20 Adaptor 148 Extravert 57 Focused 69 Explorer 127 High Responsive 95 Negotiator 69 Ambivert 129 Balanced 128 Moderate 74 Avg. Resilient 108 Challenger 6 Introvert 37 Flexible 26 Preserver 22 Low N A E C O N=223
  • 19. Correlations to Professional Effectiveness Based on additional TC-related survey and information provided by respondents
  • 20.
  • 22. OCEAN vs Effectiveness scores   Hypothesis: O + , C + , E o/+/- , A + , N o /N - - + o o + 42% + More Effective (n=24) - + o o + Average (n=141) o - 41% + o o + Less Effective (n=58) N A E C O Effectiveness
  • 23. A Quick Look at the Differences Conscientiousness and Extraversion
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 27.
  • 28. Less effective TCs close-up Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o , A + , N - /N o Reactive 9 (16%) Adaptor 37 (64%) Extravert 11 (19%) Focused 10 (17%) Explorer 31 (53%) High Responsive 25 (43%) Negotiator 19 (33%) Ambivert 29 (50%) Balanced 38 (66%) Moderate 21 (36%) Avg. Resilient 24 (41%) Challenger 2 (3%) Introvert 18 (31%) Flexible 10 (17%) Preserver 6 (10%) Low N A E C O N=58
  • 29.
  • 30. More effective TCs close-up Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o , A + , N - /N o Reactive 1 (4%) Adaptor 19 (79%) Extravert 10 (42%) Focused 10 (42%) Explorer 19 (79%) High Responsive 6 (25%) Negotiator 5 (21%) Ambivert 14 (58%) Balanced 12 (50%) Moderate 3 (13%) Avg. Resilient 17 (71%) Challenger 0 (0%) Introvert 0 (0%) Flexible 2 (8%) Preserver 2 (8%) Low N A E C O N=24
  • 31.
  • 32. Average TCs close-up Actual Overall Results: O + , C o , E o , A + , N - /N o Reactive 10 (7%) Adaptor 92 (65%) Extravert 36 (26%) Focused 49 (35%) Explorer 77 (55%) High Responsive 64 (45%) Negotiator 45 (32%) Ambivert 86 (61%) Balanced 78 (55%) Moderate 50 (35%) Avg. Resilient 67 (48%) Challenger 4 (3%) Introvert 19 (13%) Flexible 14 (10%) Preserver 14 (10%) Low N A E C O N=141
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
  • 36. What do you think? Lets talk about these results and how to use them in real life situations
  • 37. Contact Me Deborah Hemstreet http://www.tech-challenged.com [email_address]
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42. Close-up: General Writers (n=84) Reactive 8 (10%) Adaptor 60 (71%) Extravert 20 (24%) Focused 27 (32%) Explorer 47 (56%) High Responsive 36 (43%) Negotiator 21 (25%) Ambivert 51 (61%) Balanced 47 (56%) Moderate 27 (32%) Avg. Resilient 40 (48%) Challenger 3 (4%) Introvert 13 (15%) Flexible 10 (12%) Preserver 10 (12%) Low N A E C O N=84
  • 43. Close-up: Lone Writers (n=53) Reactive 5 (9%) Adaptor 31 (58%) Extravert 10 (19%) Focused 16 (30%) Explorer 31 (58%) High Responsive 24 (45%) Negotiator 21 (40%) Ambivert 33 (62%) Balanced 30 (57%) Moderate 17 (32%) Avg. Resilient 24 (45%) Challenger 1 (2%) Introvert 10 (19%) Flexible 7 (13%) Preserver 5 (9%) Low N A E C O N=53
  • 44. Close-up: Managers (n=25) Reactive 0 (0%) Adaptor 16 (64%) Extravert 8 (32%) Focused 11 (44%) Explorer 16 (64%) High Responsive 11 (44%) Negotiator 8 (32%) Ambivert 13 (52%) Balanced 12 (48%) Moderate 6 (24%) Avg. Resilient 14 (56%) Challenger 1 (4%) Introvert 4 (16%) Flexible 2 (8%) Preserver 3 (12%) Low N A E C O N=25
  • 45. Close-up: Info Design & Visual Arts (n=23) Reactive 2 (9%) Adaptor 13 (57%) Extravert 5 (22%) Focused 4 (17%) Explorer 14 (61%) High Responsive 9 (39%) Negotiator 10 (43%) Ambivert 15 (65%) Balanced 17 (74%) Moderate 8 (35%) Avg. Resilient 12 (52%) Challenger 0 (0%) Introvert 3 (13%) Flexible 2 (9%) Preserver 1 (4%) Low N A E C O N=23
  • 46. Close-up: Editors (n=18*) *Not statistically significant – more research is needed Reactive 5 (28%) Adaptor 13 (72%) Extravert 6 (33%) Focused 3 (17%) Explorer 11 (61%) High Responsive 4 (22%) Negotiator 4 (22%) Ambivert 7 (39%) Balanced 10 (56%) Moderate 5 (28%) Avg. Resilient 9 (50%) Challenger 1 (6%) Introvert 5 (28%) Flexible 5 (28%) Preserver 2 (11%) Low N A E C O N=18
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.

Editor's Notes

  1. A Preliminary International Internet-Based Study of the Personality Characteristics of Technical Communicators