Multiple immigration spaces
The spaces (institutional, ideational, tactical) for
producing the migrant subject can be very diverse
‐ the new transnational class of professionals
‐ the contract‐labor worker entering for seasonal
work under specific short‐term conditions
‐ the business‐visa immigrant
‐ the family‐dependent immigrant
‐ the green card immigrant
‐ the high‐tech visa worker
Top 20 remittance‐recipient countries, 2006 (US$ billions)
Billions of Billions
dollars of dollars
1. India 21.7 11. Serbia 4.1
2. China 21.3 12. Pakistan 3.9
3. Mexico 18.1 13. Brazil 3.6
4. France 12.7 14. Bangladesh 3.4
5. Philippines 11.6 15. Egypt, Arab Rep. 3.3
6. Spain 6.9 16. Portugal 3.2
7. Belgium 6.8 17. Vietnam 3.2
8. Germany 6.5 18. Colombia 3.2
9. United Kingdom 6.4 19. United States 3
10. Morocco 4.2 20. Nigeria 2.8
Source: Author’s Calculations Based on IMF BoP Yearbook, 2004, and World Bank Staff estimates.
Surveillance regimes
1,271 government organizations and 1,931
private companies work on programs related
to counterterrorism, homeland security and
intelligence in about 10,000 locations across
the US
An estimated 854,000 people – nearly 1.5 times
as many people as live in Washington, D.C. –
hold top‐secret security clearances
.
Of the estimated 265,000 private
companies doing intelligence work, 1,931
do work at the top‐secret level.
Out of 854,000 people with top‐secret
clearance, the Post estimates that 265,000
are private contractors
Income % of top 10% earners 1917‐2005
*Income is defined as market income but excludes capital gains
Source: Mishel, L. 2004. “Unfettered Markets, Income Inequality, and Religious Values.” Viewpoints. May 19, 2004.
Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved July 26, 2008 [ www.epi.org/content.cfm/
webfeatures_viewpoints_moral_markets_presentation.]
Expulsions: Foreclosures
2006 : 1.2 million foreclosures, up 42% from
2005. This is: One in every 92 U.S. households
2007: 2.2 million forecls, up 75% from 06
2008: 3.1 million, up 81% from 07
2009: 3.9 million (or 1 in 45 US hholds)
(From 2007 to 2009: 120% increase in forecls)
2010: 2.9 mill forecls. (2006‐2010: total 14.2 mil)
Source: RealtyTrac 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010;
Blomquist 2011
In the shadows of
“urbanization”
In all the talk about the growth of urban
populations there is never mention of what
processes are feeding this growth.
One set of processes consists of expulsions –
of people from their land due to “landgrabs”
or mining.
Where do they go? To cities, where they will
add to the homeless and to the slums.
One instance
From 2006 to 2010: 70million hectares of land in
Afri ,LatAm, Cambodia, Ukraine bought/
leased by rich govts,firms,fin firms
The land is now more valued than the people
or activities on it
The active making of surplus populations
Novel assemblage of Territory/Authority/
Rights
Africa: main target for land
acquisitions.
Sudan: South Korea has signed deals for
690,000 hectares and the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) for 400,000 hectares.
Ethiopia: Saudi investors are spending $100m
to raise wheat, barley and rice on land leased
to them by Ethiopia’s government; they
received tax exemptions and export the crop
back to Saudi Arabia.
30
.
Congo: China secured the right to grow palm
oil for bio‐fuels on 2.8m hectares –this would
make it the world's largest palm‐oil
plantation.
Zambia: China is negotiating to grow palm oil
for bio‐fuels on 2m hectares.
31
Russia and Ukraine
Much buying of privatized land in the former
Soviet Union, especially in Russia and
Ukraine: some cases in 2008:
A Swedish company (Alpcot Agro), bought
128,000 hectares in Russia.
South Korea's Hyundai Heavy Industries paid
$6.5m for a majority stake in Khorol Zerno, a
company that owns 10,000 hectares in
eastern Siberia.
32
More Russia and Ukraine
Morgan Stanley bought 40,000 hectares of
agricultural land in Ukraine.
Gulf investors are planning to acquire Pava,
the first Russian grain processor to be floated
on the financial markets to sell 40% of its
landowning division, giving them access to
500,000 hectares.
33
A disassembling
Regardless of their differences all these
instances can be conceived of as structural
holes, or blank spaces, in the older social and
jurisdictional fabric of the nation‐state and
the interstate system.
This entails a disassembling of nation‐state
territory,
.
These types of trends are components of our
emergent global modernity.
They are not anomalous.
They are part of the shifting ground bubbling
in the as yet illegible world beneath the tip of
the iceberg.