SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Challenges	
  of	
  Free	
  and	
  Fair	
  Elections	
  Towards	
  2011	
  General	
  Elections	
  

STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVES
Challenges of free and fair election in any democratic setting could best be
viewed against the structural setting of the environment i.e. the electoral
management bodies involved in the conduct, supervision regulating and
adjudicating over all elections in that jurisdiction.


Election Management Bodies and Democratic System Of Government
Election management bodies occupy a strategic position in the electoral
process and by implication are decisive for the success of any democratic
system of government. Since they are charged with the responsibility of
organizing elections, their omission or commission could make or mar
elections.
This paper examines the challenges of free and fair election and the
relationship between election management bodies and the institutionalization
of democratic governance. The focus is that an independent, impartial,
transparent, effective and efficient electoral management body is a prerequisite
for the institutionalization of a viable democratic political system.


The variables which determine a credible election management bodies are:
Independence, Transparency and Impartiality.


CONCEPT OF IMPARTIALITY
Impartiality is another variable which determines the credibility of election
management bodies. Members of election management bodies are human
beings and are likely to have their party preferences. However, such
preferences should not in any way affect their official duties.
Care should be taken while recruiting temporary staff who are employed during
registration and election exercises to ensure that card carrying or die-hard




	
                                                                                                    1	
  
partisans are not recruited. This can be achieved through a careful screening
exercise.


An impartial election management body deals openly and on equal terms with
each political party. This is to ensure that each party has equal access to the
state – owned media, freedom to campaign and respect by candidates and
parties of limits set for campaign expenses.


NEEDS TO SITUATE ELECTORAL MALPRACTICES
There is a general need to situate the prevalence of electoral malpractices in an
amoral political culture, whose thrust is anti-democratic in significant ways,
and which shows general indifference to the desecration of the electoral
process, whereas, much lip service is paid to upholding the sanity of the
electoral process, the full weight of the law is not generally and typically
brought to bear on those who desecrates it, except in some rare cases; nor
has the moral outrage voiced by some being channeled. Again, except in a
number of rare cases, into outbursts of spontaneous collective political and
social action or the expression of people’s power within the ambit of the law
that would shame and penalize perpetrators of electoral malpractices and deter
would-be-perpetrators.


PAINS OF ELECTORAL LITIGATION
The situation is understandably fed by the tardy and expensive nature of the
country’s judicial process and a legal culture, which deliberately
encourages violation of the spirit of the law, through taking advantage of
ambiguities in the letter of the law and hiding behind procedural
technicalities in the judicial process to frustrate and prolong litigations.
The result is a cynical resignation and a general disenchantment with the
electoral process.


The need for Nigerians to stand and defend their suffrage irrespective of


	
                                                                                2	
  
intimidation of any sort is imperative. We must be ready to create and
strategize to create a democratic men and women in the country that will be
ready to defend their votes.


In handling this subject at hand, I feel challenged because of my experience as
a victim of election fraud which spanned about four years in my state. In fact, I
feel more challenged because I had an insider account of the details of the
intricacies and politics of election crisis in Ekiti State in the last few years.
Coming from the background of a politician who shares similar experience
with Governor Adams Oshiomhole on mandate stealing through the mighty
powers of the ruling party at the Federal level, it is incumbent upon me to share
my experiences and what I consider the viable options for electoral sanctity in
our country Nigeria.


The credibility or otherwise of electoral process becomes one major factor that
determines the acceptability index of a nation in the wider comity of nations
where respect for the choice of the people in electoral process has contributed
greatly to the economy well-being and social security of the people in Africa.
In recent history in Africa, we have seen that played out in South Africa and
Ghana. In these countries, not only has the modern world seen that these two
countries hold much promise for their people, but also that they have become a
reference point as a model of transparent electoral process in African continent.


For Nigeria, sadly one of the countries that gained early independence from
colonial rule, the stories that have emerged are sad memories of electoral
frauds, which had led to sudden changes in government with the succeeding
governments posting worse results in the conduct of elections. For instance,
while the Western Region parliament poll fraud led to a crisis that snowballed
into the emergency rule that triggered further crisis in the First Republic that
eventually led to the civil war, the Second Republic election that Nigerians
thought would mark a beginning of electoral sanity turned out to be a veritable


	
                                                                                  3	
  
impetus for the military take-over of government. Massive electoral heists in
various parts of the country and the backlash in people’s angst was what the
military needed to sack the Second Republic.


What could have been a safety valve was truncated by the military when it
annulled the freest and fairest election in June 1993. What followed were mere
selections of candidates by godfathers in the primaries which further set the
tone for desperation by the contending parties in which case the parties
controlled by moneybags and vested interests always carry the day against the
current of people preference, which further erodes the confidence of the people
in the sanctity of the ballot box. For example in Nigeria in 2007, the Party that
controlled the commending height of the Federal authorities made no pretence
about its insistence on abridging the right of the people in the choice of their
leaders. Votes were allocated to the candidates of the ruling Party at the
detriment of more popular candidates in opposition Parties.


Litigations of the election tribunals clearly showed that things were not
working according to the expectations of Nigerians who desired transparent
process of electoral contests. Several years after the poll, those who
fraudulently found their ways to the seat of power were illegally directing the
affairs of their states using state funds to prosecute their cases at the tribunals.
While impostors closed their eyes to the shame they have brought upon
themselves and the nation, the highly partisan and irresponsible electoral
umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), did not help
matters.
Often in hand-in-glove with the ruling Party, INEC under Prof Maurice Iwu
showed itself as the worst in the supervision of electoral contests in Nigeria.


The victory we celebrate today in Edo State is one singular relish of electoral
fraud by the ruling Party in cahoot with the electoral umpire. By the Appeal




	
                                                                                     4	
  
Court ruling, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole clearly won his election in 2007
only for him to retrieve his mandate two years after.
The period of litigation in court in Edo State clearly showed the side-effect of
illegitimacy marked by decayed infrastructure, mismanagement of funds and
general dislocation in the governance process as we have seen in Kenya in
December 2007, and in Cameroon and Zimbabwe in 2008. The same played
itself out in Ekiti. From our experience in the last few days after our
inauguration, decayed infrastructure hallmarked almost four years
administration in Ekiti State.


Indeed, the worst form of electoral fraud manifested in the 2009 rerun in the
Ekiti State governorship election in which I was the prime victim. That
singular sordid experience put Nigeria on the hall of infamy in election process
across the world. Widely criticized as the worst form of poll management in
the choice of the people’s leaders, the world rose in unison to put a question
mark on Nigeria’s image as a country that can take a front in modelling
democracy a system of government that can drive a free and just society, which
of course is one factor that in turn drives development and growth. It is
however gratifying that the revelation at the election tribunal and the
perseverance of Ekiti people gave them victory, which was celebrated across
the globe.


But all these inadequacies, both man-made and human errors, which have
hampered Nigeria’s march to electoral Promised Lands can be taken care of if
deliberate policies and measures are put in place. Even though reform process
that could cleanse the conduct of election in Nigeria was instituted, what we
have seen thereafter clearly pointed out that Nigeria as a nation has missed the
mark.
It is however regrettable that after the efforts and funds expended on this, what
can be said today about that initiative is a resounding loss of faith. This is
more so as the authorities of government that ought to add fillip to the


	
                                                                                 5	
  
rebuilding of acceptable conduct of elections are themselves stumbling blocks
in the way of free and fair elections.. For example, the National Assembly has
thrown out Justice Mohammed Uwais recommendation on the appointment of
INEC leaders by the National Judicial Council (NJC), which should have
served as a neutral organ of government in charge of recruiting capable hands
in election management instead of leaving the appointment in the hands of a
partisan President whose choice of INEC officials is first condition for
suspicion among the opposition parties.
As it stands today, particularly in reference to the last rerun election, it is clear
that deliberate measures have to be put in place for a free and fair elections in
2011, as it is believed that it is not the electoral laws that are actually
responsible for the inadequacies in our election process but the actors, most
often in the ruling Party who employ do or die tactics to subvert the people’s
will. They do this through devious manipulation and government machineries
at their disposal. These elements are still around, which further hightens fears
that 2011 polls may as well succumb to the evil machinations of dor-or-die
politicians.


Indeed, what actually bothers the minds of Nigerians is that those who should
ordinarily act as statesmen and vanguards of social change are themselves the
architects of the current sorry state of our electoral process. For instance,
former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who Nigerian State has so much invested
in for both personal comfort and robust international stature later turned against
Nigerians by getting himself involved in unbridled manipulation of state power
to strangulate electoral space. In his avowed commitment to that sordid
agenda, Obasanjo declared to the bewildered Nigerians that 2007 general
elections would be a do-or-die affair. What truly followed during the elections
was an audacious poll robbery through thuggery, ballot stuffing, votes
manipulations, compromise of INEC officials through intimidation, complicity
by security agencies in favour of the ruling Party, particularly as witnessed
during rerun poll in Ekiti State.


	
                                                                                      6	
  
In fact, Ekiti State rerun in which I was a prime victim provides me with
enough insight on the challenges the nation may face in 2011 elections. What
reinforces this line of thought is that even though the late President Umaru
Yar-Adua admitted that his election was fraught with irregularities and indeed
set up an election reform panel to fine-tune the nation’s electoral process,
what followed in the few States where rerun or bye-elections were held even
with Professor Attahiru Jega at the driver seat gives no hope that we may not
witness a worst scenario in the next election.
It is in this light that Nigerians must insist on minimum standard that
guarantees the sanctity of the ballot box, which of course remains the vehicle
for a stable government that in turns guarantees socio-economic development.
The Ekiti State scenario under Mr Segun Oni has produced enough evidence
that the problem of illegitimacy is unquantifiable. Apart from litigations, the
fear of the unknown unsettles the man on the driver’s seat, thereby limiting his
scope of developing strategies to address the state problems.


Part of this is the issue of seeking favours in many quarters. This goes with
unnecessary application of state’s funds to seek favours from both real and
imagined influence peddlers.


To guide against the identified lapses in 2011 general elections, all these
problems need to be tackled and new strategies evolved for Nigerians for once
to beat their chests that indeed they are in the starting block to grow democracy
for social change and development.


The challenges of free and fair elections are indeed enormous. They start from
the outset of electoral process namely party primaries. The challenge we face
through party organs on this is great. We have the problem of manipulating the
choice of party candidates through overbearing attitude of political godfathers
and manipulation of the entire process to achieve pre-determined ends. This


	
                                                                                7	
  
manifests in the circumvention of the provisions of party constitution to secure
undue advantage in the process of selecting delegates that would elect party
candidates. This is already creating a serious problem in the ruling party at the
Federal level. It should be noted that the current stalemate in the second
amendment to the Electoral Act is as a result of foisting an agenda that would
make for direct delegates to participate in the election of candidates. By this
arrangement, personal aides and political appointees would become delegates
for the selection of party candidates. This of course can only lead to an
advantage in favour of the Principals, which questions the credibility of the
choice of candidates by the appointing bosses who call the shots. The
desperation that goes with this is unquantifiable. Apart from limiting the scope
of people’s choice, the candidates that emerge through this process often
become willing tools in the hands of those who plotted their ascendancy. We
have seen this in Ekiti State where we had no evidence that Mr Segun Oni had
any agenda other than to satisfy the whims and caprices of those that foisted
him on the people.


More troubling is the law governing elections in Nigeria. As we speak, no one
is sure of how the new Electoral Law will look like except that at the moment,
the most crucial element in the election reform process has been thrown out by
the National Assembly whose members believe that having a truly independent
electoral umpire will undermine their return to power, hence the rejection of
the recommendation in the Mohammed Uwais report making the Nigeria
Judicial Council the recruitment authority of INEC officials to guarantee the
independence of INEC.


One other element critical to free and fair elections is the voter registration. As
seen in Ekiti State in the April 27, 2007 election, the problem of underage
registration and multiple registration set the tone for election manipulations.
This clearly showed at the tribunal hearings of the litigation that arose from the
fraud that characterized that election. In some of the registers, it was


	
                                                                                8	
  
discovered that multiple registration led to the inaccurate number of voters.
The tragedy of this is that such fraud did not arise out of human error but a
deliberate plan by politicians to have numerical advantage in election results.
For instance in Ifaki Ekiti, Mr Segun Oji, who usurped the powers of Governor
for almost four years, registered in more than one place. In one place, he was
registered as an artisan while in the other, he registered as a civil servant. This
and other several instances were revealed at the tribunal hearing.
Closely related to this is the problem of adequate time for credible registration.
As we speak, no one is sure as to when voters registration will commence.
Apart from the bureaucratic bottleneck that dogs the award of contract for the
Direct Data Imaging for voter registration, the ability of the contractors and
reliability of the machines are not what can be guaranteed at least for now.
What this can expose the system to is an ad-hoc arrangement including the use
of the discredited voters’ register to conduct 2011 general elections.


Even if the equipment and other logistics are well on ground, one other
important factor Nigerians must contend with is INEC personnel. As we saw
in Ekiti State , particularly during rerun election, it is clear that the most
daunting challenge facing the electoral umpire today is the crisis of credibility
on the part of INEC officials.


With particular reference to Ekti rerun, we all saw the shame that characterized
the entire conduct of the elections. For instance, Mrs Ayoka Adebayo, who
was the Ekiti Resident Electoral Commissioner, in the midst of the
announcement of the results refused to conclude the declaration of the results,
citing pressures to announce fake results. She resigned and went into hiding
only for her to emerge days later after she was declared wanted by the Federal
authorities to announce the result she had earlier rejected.


Also at the tribunal hearings were revelations over official complicity by INEC
officials. It was clear through the pieces of evidence by INEC officials that


	
                                                                                9	
  
they were choreographed to follow same pattern of evidence presentations.
But for the ingenuity of the prosecuting counsel, some INEC officials would
have gone away with their fake evidence during cross examination sessions.


More intriguing was the collaboration between the security agencies and INEC
officials particularly as seen in Ido Osi. The security agents literally provided
cover for INEC officials to perpetrate fraud. For instance, as the PDP thugs
set fire on INEC building at Ido Ekiti, the security agents watched on in
ecstasy. And during tribunal hearing, police declared that the building was
burnt by unknown men, even as a PDP member testified that he led a band of
thugs that set the building on fire as policemen watched because the arsonists
were PDP members.


Even though all these atrocities were reported by the monitoring teams
comprising NGOs, members of international agencies and journalists , it was
clear that these observers were overwhelmed by the inadequacies of INEC in
providing a conducive environment for the observers to functions optimally.
For instance, some remote parts of certain areas could not be accessed by the
observers, and most of these areas were fertile grounds for election
manipulations. It was therefore not surprising that in some voting centres t, the
number of accredited voters were less than the results returned. In other words,
the results returned were higher than the number of those physically present to
vote during the election.
Another problem is the avalanche of corruption charges against the Judges of
the election petitions tribunal. The Osun State presented a bizarre spectacle of
shame and corrupt conduct of the election petition tribunal Judges. In the first
tribunal that tried Raufu Aregbesola’s case incontrovertible evidence was
proved in the discovery of correspondence between the defence counsel and the
Judges. In a drama that shocked Nigerians, the calls log of MTN was shown
where the defence counsel within the hours of court hearing were exchanging
text messages with the Judges on the direction to follow during the cross-


	
                                                                              10	
  
examination. This led to the quashing of the tribunal judgement for another
tribunal to be set up to retry the petition.


If Osun case was bizarre, the Ekiti case was intriguing. Against the run of
common sense and application of law, the Judges freely awarded reliefs to the
law breakers in the case. For instance, the Judges said the ACN members burnt
the INEC office even when evidence by a PDP member incontrovertibly
suggested PDP thugs torched the building. He was never cross examined to
discredit his evidence.


INEC official, Innocent Akao, in open court disowned the results declaring Mr
Oni as the winner. The Judges also said Mrs Ayoka never resigned even
though the police, a co-defendant in the case, admitted that the woman actually
resigned and was declared wanted to defend the allegations in her resignation
letter. Figures in unsigned or altered documents were awarded to the defendant
by the Juges, and all evidence of violence was overlooked by the Judges in
favour of the defendants.
All these lapses militated greatly against the transparency of the 2007 elections
and the rerun polls that followed.


To mitigate all these shortcomings, therefore, the institutions of electoral
process must be strengthened to ensure credible polls in 2011. This must start
with internal democracy within the parties to ensure credible primaries to elect
party candidates. Credible primaries will ensure the elimination of imposition
of candidates by godfathers. The proposed amendments to the Electoral Act
must be credible enough to ensure the right of party members and voters
generally to freely vote for candidates of their choice.


It is gratifying that Governor Adams Oshiomhole actually started the crusade
for free and fair balloting through his one-man one-vote crusade. This




	
                                                                             11	
  
initiative is commendable as it remains the only option that can generate stable
democracy in our country.


All encumbrances on the way of effective sourcing, deployment and
application of equipment for voter registration must be checked and effective
security of these equipment maintained. To ensure credible conduct of INEC
officials, recruitment strategies must be strengthened to ensure that only non-
partisan Nigerians are on board of INEC. This is where Uwais’ report is
relevant. The NJC should be put in charge of recruiting credible Nigerians to
conduct elections.


It is also important that the functions of the security agencies in election
monitoring be redefined to insulate them from partisan. Among this is to hold
the security agents accountable for all the lapses in the areas where they
supervise elections.. Also relevant is the training of the NGOs in election
monitoring activities while they are equipped with necessary tools to carry out
their duties particularly in difficult terrains.


It is also important to introduce Election Offences Tribunals to try election
offenders. This will act as a check on the activities of election riggers.


More importantly, one-man, one-vote crusade must be taken to all corners of
the country.
These are the challenges we face today in our nation as we march to strengthen
the institutions of democracy for economy growth and progress. The challenge
is more daunting because there are road blocks on the way, some of which are
deliberately created by politicians who are averse to decent way of conducting
men’s affairs. It is a challenge we face both individually and collectively to
build a society that can raise its head in the comity of nations that are today
dictating the pace in shaping policies for growth and development across the
globe


	
                                                                                12	
  
Another election is around the corner, just about five months to come, the
INEC chairman Prof. Attaihiru Jega said his biggest problem is time and not
money. Many have argued that the time-table for the polls is just too narrow for
any meaningful result to be achieved, but the biggest headache of the majority
is neither the time nor the money, it is whether Nigeria can indeed hold
credible polls. Will the country make vote rigging unattractive? Will the
electorate look away from the fleeting offers of bribe from desperate
politicians to vote as their conscience leads them?
Will they vote and insist that their votes must count?
Will the authorities do everything possible to break the jinx?
Or will we walk the Oshiomole, Mimiko and Fayemi path again?
Never and never.


Governor Oshiomhole, ladies and gentlemen, I thank you very much for giving
me this opportunity to once again ventilate what I know about the crisis of
confidence we have about electoral process in the country. It is hoped that all
the issues raised shall be of immense advantage for us to rethink Nigeria where
opportunities are provided for the citizens to rediscover themselves. It is only
in the atmosphere of freedom that we can release our entrepreneurial
potentialities to grow our economy for the survival of our great country
Nigeria.


Thanks and God bless you all.


Dr. Kayode Fayemi.
2010
	
  




	
                                                                             13	
  

Contenu connexe

Plus de Government of Ekiti State, Nigeria

2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State
2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State
2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti StateGovernment of Ekiti State, Nigeria
 
Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.
Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.
Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.Government of Ekiti State, Nigeria
 
Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...
Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...
Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...Government of Ekiti State, Nigeria
 

Plus de Government of Ekiti State, Nigeria (20)

Scholarship for Post Graduate Ng
Scholarship for Post Graduate NgScholarship for Post Graduate Ng
Scholarship for Post Graduate Ng
 
Scholarship for Overseas Students
Scholarship for Overseas StudentsScholarship for Overseas Students
Scholarship for Overseas Students
 
Scholarsrhip for Undergraduate
Scholarsrhip for UndergraduateScholarsrhip for Undergraduate
Scholarsrhip for Undergraduate
 
Physically Challenged
Physically ChallengedPhysically Challenged
Physically Challenged
 
Busary form 1
Busary form 1Busary form 1
Busary form 1
 
2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State
2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State
2015 Budget Speech Delivered by the Executive Governor of Ekiti State
 
Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.
Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.
Ekit State Budget 2015 Analysis by the Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning.
 
Bursary Award 2012/2013
Bursary Award 2012/2013Bursary Award 2012/2013
Bursary Award 2012/2013
 
Effective service delivery
Effective service deliveryEffective service delivery
Effective service delivery
 
Prof. ade ajayi ad. approved
Prof. ade ajayi ad. approvedProf. ade ajayi ad. approved
Prof. ade ajayi ad. approved
 
Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...
Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...
Ekiti State College of Technical and Commercial Agriculture Academic & Non-Ac...
 
Champion Newspapers' Governor of the year
Champion Newspapers' Governor of the yearChampion Newspapers' Governor of the year
Champion Newspapers' Governor of the year
 
1st Year Memorial Service of Mrs Funmilayo Adunni OLAYINKA
1st Year Memorial Service of Mrs Funmilayo Adunni OLAYINKA1st Year Memorial Service of Mrs Funmilayo Adunni OLAYINKA
1st Year Memorial Service of Mrs Funmilayo Adunni OLAYINKA
 
One Year After...Moremi Lives on
One Year After...Moremi Lives onOne Year After...Moremi Lives on
One Year After...Moremi Lives on
 
Overview of 2014 Budget
Overview of 2014 BudgetOverview of 2014 Budget
Overview of 2014 Budget
 
State Of The State Presented By Dr Kayode Fayemi
State Of The State Presented By Dr Kayode FayemiState Of The State Presented By Dr Kayode Fayemi
State Of The State Presented By Dr Kayode Fayemi
 
Ekiti State Water and Sanitation Law 2013
Ekiti State Water and Sanitation Law 2013   Ekiti State Water and Sanitation Law 2013
Ekiti State Water and Sanitation Law 2013
 
Order of Funeral Service
Order of Funeral ServiceOrder of Funeral Service
Order of Funeral Service
 
Transition
TransitionTransition
Transition
 
Happy birthday to JKF
Happy birthday to JKFHappy birthday to JKF
Happy birthday to JKF
 

Dernier

One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduDreamTamilnadu
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioAlexisTorres963861
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde NewsFeed1
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinIpsos France
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...virgfern3011
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfSABC News
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...University of Canberra
 

Dernier (9)

One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream TamilnaduOne India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
One India vs United India by Dream Tamilnadu
 
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicioPor estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
Por estos dos motivos, defensa de JOH solicita repetir juicio
 
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe WhitleyAnother Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
Another Day, Another Default Judgment Against Gabe Whitley
 
Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde  Anantkumar Hegde
Anantkumar Hegde
 
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
19032024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutinEuropéennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
Européennes 2024 : projection du Parlement européen à trois mois du scrutin
 
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
Green Aesthetic Ripped Paper Thesis Defense Presentation_20240311_111012_0000...
 
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdfMinistry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
Ministry of Justice Extradition Eswatini 3.pdf
 
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
Light Rail in Canberra: Too much, too little, too late: Is the price worth th...
 

Challenges of Free and Fair Elections Towards the 2011 General Elections

  • 1. Challenges  of  Free  and  Fair  Elections  Towards  2011  General  Elections   STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVES Challenges of free and fair election in any democratic setting could best be viewed against the structural setting of the environment i.e. the electoral management bodies involved in the conduct, supervision regulating and adjudicating over all elections in that jurisdiction. Election Management Bodies and Democratic System Of Government Election management bodies occupy a strategic position in the electoral process and by implication are decisive for the success of any democratic system of government. Since they are charged with the responsibility of organizing elections, their omission or commission could make or mar elections. This paper examines the challenges of free and fair election and the relationship between election management bodies and the institutionalization of democratic governance. The focus is that an independent, impartial, transparent, effective and efficient electoral management body is a prerequisite for the institutionalization of a viable democratic political system. The variables which determine a credible election management bodies are: Independence, Transparency and Impartiality. CONCEPT OF IMPARTIALITY Impartiality is another variable which determines the credibility of election management bodies. Members of election management bodies are human beings and are likely to have their party preferences. However, such preferences should not in any way affect their official duties. Care should be taken while recruiting temporary staff who are employed during registration and election exercises to ensure that card carrying or die-hard   1  
  • 2. partisans are not recruited. This can be achieved through a careful screening exercise. An impartial election management body deals openly and on equal terms with each political party. This is to ensure that each party has equal access to the state – owned media, freedom to campaign and respect by candidates and parties of limits set for campaign expenses. NEEDS TO SITUATE ELECTORAL MALPRACTICES There is a general need to situate the prevalence of electoral malpractices in an amoral political culture, whose thrust is anti-democratic in significant ways, and which shows general indifference to the desecration of the electoral process, whereas, much lip service is paid to upholding the sanity of the electoral process, the full weight of the law is not generally and typically brought to bear on those who desecrates it, except in some rare cases; nor has the moral outrage voiced by some being channeled. Again, except in a number of rare cases, into outbursts of spontaneous collective political and social action or the expression of people’s power within the ambit of the law that would shame and penalize perpetrators of electoral malpractices and deter would-be-perpetrators. PAINS OF ELECTORAL LITIGATION The situation is understandably fed by the tardy and expensive nature of the country’s judicial process and a legal culture, which deliberately encourages violation of the spirit of the law, through taking advantage of ambiguities in the letter of the law and hiding behind procedural technicalities in the judicial process to frustrate and prolong litigations. The result is a cynical resignation and a general disenchantment with the electoral process. The need for Nigerians to stand and defend their suffrage irrespective of   2  
  • 3. intimidation of any sort is imperative. We must be ready to create and strategize to create a democratic men and women in the country that will be ready to defend their votes. In handling this subject at hand, I feel challenged because of my experience as a victim of election fraud which spanned about four years in my state. In fact, I feel more challenged because I had an insider account of the details of the intricacies and politics of election crisis in Ekiti State in the last few years. Coming from the background of a politician who shares similar experience with Governor Adams Oshiomhole on mandate stealing through the mighty powers of the ruling party at the Federal level, it is incumbent upon me to share my experiences and what I consider the viable options for electoral sanctity in our country Nigeria. The credibility or otherwise of electoral process becomes one major factor that determines the acceptability index of a nation in the wider comity of nations where respect for the choice of the people in electoral process has contributed greatly to the economy well-being and social security of the people in Africa. In recent history in Africa, we have seen that played out in South Africa and Ghana. In these countries, not only has the modern world seen that these two countries hold much promise for their people, but also that they have become a reference point as a model of transparent electoral process in African continent. For Nigeria, sadly one of the countries that gained early independence from colonial rule, the stories that have emerged are sad memories of electoral frauds, which had led to sudden changes in government with the succeeding governments posting worse results in the conduct of elections. For instance, while the Western Region parliament poll fraud led to a crisis that snowballed into the emergency rule that triggered further crisis in the First Republic that eventually led to the civil war, the Second Republic election that Nigerians thought would mark a beginning of electoral sanity turned out to be a veritable   3  
  • 4. impetus for the military take-over of government. Massive electoral heists in various parts of the country and the backlash in people’s angst was what the military needed to sack the Second Republic. What could have been a safety valve was truncated by the military when it annulled the freest and fairest election in June 1993. What followed were mere selections of candidates by godfathers in the primaries which further set the tone for desperation by the contending parties in which case the parties controlled by moneybags and vested interests always carry the day against the current of people preference, which further erodes the confidence of the people in the sanctity of the ballot box. For example in Nigeria in 2007, the Party that controlled the commending height of the Federal authorities made no pretence about its insistence on abridging the right of the people in the choice of their leaders. Votes were allocated to the candidates of the ruling Party at the detriment of more popular candidates in opposition Parties. Litigations of the election tribunals clearly showed that things were not working according to the expectations of Nigerians who desired transparent process of electoral contests. Several years after the poll, those who fraudulently found their ways to the seat of power were illegally directing the affairs of their states using state funds to prosecute their cases at the tribunals. While impostors closed their eyes to the shame they have brought upon themselves and the nation, the highly partisan and irresponsible electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), did not help matters. Often in hand-in-glove with the ruling Party, INEC under Prof Maurice Iwu showed itself as the worst in the supervision of electoral contests in Nigeria. The victory we celebrate today in Edo State is one singular relish of electoral fraud by the ruling Party in cahoot with the electoral umpire. By the Appeal   4  
  • 5. Court ruling, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole clearly won his election in 2007 only for him to retrieve his mandate two years after. The period of litigation in court in Edo State clearly showed the side-effect of illegitimacy marked by decayed infrastructure, mismanagement of funds and general dislocation in the governance process as we have seen in Kenya in December 2007, and in Cameroon and Zimbabwe in 2008. The same played itself out in Ekiti. From our experience in the last few days after our inauguration, decayed infrastructure hallmarked almost four years administration in Ekiti State. Indeed, the worst form of electoral fraud manifested in the 2009 rerun in the Ekiti State governorship election in which I was the prime victim. That singular sordid experience put Nigeria on the hall of infamy in election process across the world. Widely criticized as the worst form of poll management in the choice of the people’s leaders, the world rose in unison to put a question mark on Nigeria’s image as a country that can take a front in modelling democracy a system of government that can drive a free and just society, which of course is one factor that in turn drives development and growth. It is however gratifying that the revelation at the election tribunal and the perseverance of Ekiti people gave them victory, which was celebrated across the globe. But all these inadequacies, both man-made and human errors, which have hampered Nigeria’s march to electoral Promised Lands can be taken care of if deliberate policies and measures are put in place. Even though reform process that could cleanse the conduct of election in Nigeria was instituted, what we have seen thereafter clearly pointed out that Nigeria as a nation has missed the mark. It is however regrettable that after the efforts and funds expended on this, what can be said today about that initiative is a resounding loss of faith. This is more so as the authorities of government that ought to add fillip to the   5  
  • 6. rebuilding of acceptable conduct of elections are themselves stumbling blocks in the way of free and fair elections.. For example, the National Assembly has thrown out Justice Mohammed Uwais recommendation on the appointment of INEC leaders by the National Judicial Council (NJC), which should have served as a neutral organ of government in charge of recruiting capable hands in election management instead of leaving the appointment in the hands of a partisan President whose choice of INEC officials is first condition for suspicion among the opposition parties. As it stands today, particularly in reference to the last rerun election, it is clear that deliberate measures have to be put in place for a free and fair elections in 2011, as it is believed that it is not the electoral laws that are actually responsible for the inadequacies in our election process but the actors, most often in the ruling Party who employ do or die tactics to subvert the people’s will. They do this through devious manipulation and government machineries at their disposal. These elements are still around, which further hightens fears that 2011 polls may as well succumb to the evil machinations of dor-or-die politicians. Indeed, what actually bothers the minds of Nigerians is that those who should ordinarily act as statesmen and vanguards of social change are themselves the architects of the current sorry state of our electoral process. For instance, former President Olusegun Obasanjo, who Nigerian State has so much invested in for both personal comfort and robust international stature later turned against Nigerians by getting himself involved in unbridled manipulation of state power to strangulate electoral space. In his avowed commitment to that sordid agenda, Obasanjo declared to the bewildered Nigerians that 2007 general elections would be a do-or-die affair. What truly followed during the elections was an audacious poll robbery through thuggery, ballot stuffing, votes manipulations, compromise of INEC officials through intimidation, complicity by security agencies in favour of the ruling Party, particularly as witnessed during rerun poll in Ekiti State.   6  
  • 7. In fact, Ekiti State rerun in which I was a prime victim provides me with enough insight on the challenges the nation may face in 2011 elections. What reinforces this line of thought is that even though the late President Umaru Yar-Adua admitted that his election was fraught with irregularities and indeed set up an election reform panel to fine-tune the nation’s electoral process, what followed in the few States where rerun or bye-elections were held even with Professor Attahiru Jega at the driver seat gives no hope that we may not witness a worst scenario in the next election. It is in this light that Nigerians must insist on minimum standard that guarantees the sanctity of the ballot box, which of course remains the vehicle for a stable government that in turns guarantees socio-economic development. The Ekiti State scenario under Mr Segun Oni has produced enough evidence that the problem of illegitimacy is unquantifiable. Apart from litigations, the fear of the unknown unsettles the man on the driver’s seat, thereby limiting his scope of developing strategies to address the state problems. Part of this is the issue of seeking favours in many quarters. This goes with unnecessary application of state’s funds to seek favours from both real and imagined influence peddlers. To guide against the identified lapses in 2011 general elections, all these problems need to be tackled and new strategies evolved for Nigerians for once to beat their chests that indeed they are in the starting block to grow democracy for social change and development. The challenges of free and fair elections are indeed enormous. They start from the outset of electoral process namely party primaries. The challenge we face through party organs on this is great. We have the problem of manipulating the choice of party candidates through overbearing attitude of political godfathers and manipulation of the entire process to achieve pre-determined ends. This   7  
  • 8. manifests in the circumvention of the provisions of party constitution to secure undue advantage in the process of selecting delegates that would elect party candidates. This is already creating a serious problem in the ruling party at the Federal level. It should be noted that the current stalemate in the second amendment to the Electoral Act is as a result of foisting an agenda that would make for direct delegates to participate in the election of candidates. By this arrangement, personal aides and political appointees would become delegates for the selection of party candidates. This of course can only lead to an advantage in favour of the Principals, which questions the credibility of the choice of candidates by the appointing bosses who call the shots. The desperation that goes with this is unquantifiable. Apart from limiting the scope of people’s choice, the candidates that emerge through this process often become willing tools in the hands of those who plotted their ascendancy. We have seen this in Ekiti State where we had no evidence that Mr Segun Oni had any agenda other than to satisfy the whims and caprices of those that foisted him on the people. More troubling is the law governing elections in Nigeria. As we speak, no one is sure of how the new Electoral Law will look like except that at the moment, the most crucial element in the election reform process has been thrown out by the National Assembly whose members believe that having a truly independent electoral umpire will undermine their return to power, hence the rejection of the recommendation in the Mohammed Uwais report making the Nigeria Judicial Council the recruitment authority of INEC officials to guarantee the independence of INEC. One other element critical to free and fair elections is the voter registration. As seen in Ekiti State in the April 27, 2007 election, the problem of underage registration and multiple registration set the tone for election manipulations. This clearly showed at the tribunal hearings of the litigation that arose from the fraud that characterized that election. In some of the registers, it was   8  
  • 9. discovered that multiple registration led to the inaccurate number of voters. The tragedy of this is that such fraud did not arise out of human error but a deliberate plan by politicians to have numerical advantage in election results. For instance in Ifaki Ekiti, Mr Segun Oji, who usurped the powers of Governor for almost four years, registered in more than one place. In one place, he was registered as an artisan while in the other, he registered as a civil servant. This and other several instances were revealed at the tribunal hearing. Closely related to this is the problem of adequate time for credible registration. As we speak, no one is sure as to when voters registration will commence. Apart from the bureaucratic bottleneck that dogs the award of contract for the Direct Data Imaging for voter registration, the ability of the contractors and reliability of the machines are not what can be guaranteed at least for now. What this can expose the system to is an ad-hoc arrangement including the use of the discredited voters’ register to conduct 2011 general elections. Even if the equipment and other logistics are well on ground, one other important factor Nigerians must contend with is INEC personnel. As we saw in Ekiti State , particularly during rerun election, it is clear that the most daunting challenge facing the electoral umpire today is the crisis of credibility on the part of INEC officials. With particular reference to Ekti rerun, we all saw the shame that characterized the entire conduct of the elections. For instance, Mrs Ayoka Adebayo, who was the Ekiti Resident Electoral Commissioner, in the midst of the announcement of the results refused to conclude the declaration of the results, citing pressures to announce fake results. She resigned and went into hiding only for her to emerge days later after she was declared wanted by the Federal authorities to announce the result she had earlier rejected. Also at the tribunal hearings were revelations over official complicity by INEC officials. It was clear through the pieces of evidence by INEC officials that   9  
  • 10. they were choreographed to follow same pattern of evidence presentations. But for the ingenuity of the prosecuting counsel, some INEC officials would have gone away with their fake evidence during cross examination sessions. More intriguing was the collaboration between the security agencies and INEC officials particularly as seen in Ido Osi. The security agents literally provided cover for INEC officials to perpetrate fraud. For instance, as the PDP thugs set fire on INEC building at Ido Ekiti, the security agents watched on in ecstasy. And during tribunal hearing, police declared that the building was burnt by unknown men, even as a PDP member testified that he led a band of thugs that set the building on fire as policemen watched because the arsonists were PDP members. Even though all these atrocities were reported by the monitoring teams comprising NGOs, members of international agencies and journalists , it was clear that these observers were overwhelmed by the inadequacies of INEC in providing a conducive environment for the observers to functions optimally. For instance, some remote parts of certain areas could not be accessed by the observers, and most of these areas were fertile grounds for election manipulations. It was therefore not surprising that in some voting centres t, the number of accredited voters were less than the results returned. In other words, the results returned were higher than the number of those physically present to vote during the election. Another problem is the avalanche of corruption charges against the Judges of the election petitions tribunal. The Osun State presented a bizarre spectacle of shame and corrupt conduct of the election petition tribunal Judges. In the first tribunal that tried Raufu Aregbesola’s case incontrovertible evidence was proved in the discovery of correspondence between the defence counsel and the Judges. In a drama that shocked Nigerians, the calls log of MTN was shown where the defence counsel within the hours of court hearing were exchanging text messages with the Judges on the direction to follow during the cross-   10  
  • 11. examination. This led to the quashing of the tribunal judgement for another tribunal to be set up to retry the petition. If Osun case was bizarre, the Ekiti case was intriguing. Against the run of common sense and application of law, the Judges freely awarded reliefs to the law breakers in the case. For instance, the Judges said the ACN members burnt the INEC office even when evidence by a PDP member incontrovertibly suggested PDP thugs torched the building. He was never cross examined to discredit his evidence. INEC official, Innocent Akao, in open court disowned the results declaring Mr Oni as the winner. The Judges also said Mrs Ayoka never resigned even though the police, a co-defendant in the case, admitted that the woman actually resigned and was declared wanted to defend the allegations in her resignation letter. Figures in unsigned or altered documents were awarded to the defendant by the Juges, and all evidence of violence was overlooked by the Judges in favour of the defendants. All these lapses militated greatly against the transparency of the 2007 elections and the rerun polls that followed. To mitigate all these shortcomings, therefore, the institutions of electoral process must be strengthened to ensure credible polls in 2011. This must start with internal democracy within the parties to ensure credible primaries to elect party candidates. Credible primaries will ensure the elimination of imposition of candidates by godfathers. The proposed amendments to the Electoral Act must be credible enough to ensure the right of party members and voters generally to freely vote for candidates of their choice. It is gratifying that Governor Adams Oshiomhole actually started the crusade for free and fair balloting through his one-man one-vote crusade. This   11  
  • 12. initiative is commendable as it remains the only option that can generate stable democracy in our country. All encumbrances on the way of effective sourcing, deployment and application of equipment for voter registration must be checked and effective security of these equipment maintained. To ensure credible conduct of INEC officials, recruitment strategies must be strengthened to ensure that only non- partisan Nigerians are on board of INEC. This is where Uwais’ report is relevant. The NJC should be put in charge of recruiting credible Nigerians to conduct elections. It is also important that the functions of the security agencies in election monitoring be redefined to insulate them from partisan. Among this is to hold the security agents accountable for all the lapses in the areas where they supervise elections.. Also relevant is the training of the NGOs in election monitoring activities while they are equipped with necessary tools to carry out their duties particularly in difficult terrains. It is also important to introduce Election Offences Tribunals to try election offenders. This will act as a check on the activities of election riggers. More importantly, one-man, one-vote crusade must be taken to all corners of the country. These are the challenges we face today in our nation as we march to strengthen the institutions of democracy for economy growth and progress. The challenge is more daunting because there are road blocks on the way, some of which are deliberately created by politicians who are averse to decent way of conducting men’s affairs. It is a challenge we face both individually and collectively to build a society that can raise its head in the comity of nations that are today dictating the pace in shaping policies for growth and development across the globe   12  
  • 13. Another election is around the corner, just about five months to come, the INEC chairman Prof. Attaihiru Jega said his biggest problem is time and not money. Many have argued that the time-table for the polls is just too narrow for any meaningful result to be achieved, but the biggest headache of the majority is neither the time nor the money, it is whether Nigeria can indeed hold credible polls. Will the country make vote rigging unattractive? Will the electorate look away from the fleeting offers of bribe from desperate politicians to vote as their conscience leads them? Will they vote and insist that their votes must count? Will the authorities do everything possible to break the jinx? Or will we walk the Oshiomole, Mimiko and Fayemi path again? Never and never. Governor Oshiomhole, ladies and gentlemen, I thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to once again ventilate what I know about the crisis of confidence we have about electoral process in the country. It is hoped that all the issues raised shall be of immense advantage for us to rethink Nigeria where opportunities are provided for the citizens to rediscover themselves. It is only in the atmosphere of freedom that we can release our entrepreneurial potentialities to grow our economy for the survival of our great country Nigeria. Thanks and God bless you all. Dr. Kayode Fayemi. 2010     13