80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
Oberbeton-Invest
1. OBERBE TON-IN V ES T, Ltd.
man uf ac t ure s rein f orce d
concrete structures to order.
The plant offers fully inte-
grated solutions and a wide
range of products for the
construction market.
T h e e n t e r p r is e u s e s
electricity and natural gas in
its production processes. The
main consumers are techno-
logical lines for the produc-
tion of concrete products
as well as gas boilers used
to heat inert concrete mix-
ture components and pro-
vide heating for industrial
premises.
About the Company
allows upgrading techno-
logical processes to reduce
energy intensity of produc-
tion, save costs of energy re-
sources and reduce adverse
environmental impact. This
translates into reduced unit
production costs and better
competitiveness.
In 2018 the enterprise
joined the Advisor y Ser-
vices for Energy Efficiency
in Companies Project im-
plemented in Ukraine by
Deutsche Gesellschaft für In-
ternationale Zusammenarbe-
it (GIZ) GmbH commissioned
by the German Government
in political partnership with
the Ministry of Economy of
Ukraine. The Project carried
out the energy ef f icien-
cy audit of the enterprise
according to the standard
The plant was commissioned
in 2008. It oper-ates today in
line with European manufac-
turing standards using the
full range of modern equip-
ment, progressive technolo-
gies, innovative designs and
quality raw materials.
To further comply with
high standards in the future,
the plant sticks to energy
ef ficiency principles. This
Path to Success
Establishment date
Location
Industry
No. shops
No. working shifts
Working shift duration
Staff
Output
2007
Zhytomyr
Non-metal
construction materials
1
2
8
215
46 617
hours
tons/year
Electricity
Natural gas
Total emissions
1 184,37
144 299
1 351
1 130,48
94 056
1 208
MWh
m3
tCO2eq
/year
2018 2019
Indicators
Review
Pilot Projects
on Energy Modernisation
in Industry
OBERBETON-INVEST,
Ltd.
МІНІСТЕРСТВО ЕКОНОМІКИ УКРАЇНИ
CO
M
PA
N
Y
2. Out of all the proposed energy
efficiency measures the enterprise
identified those most relevant for
implementation. These concerned
technological process optimisation
and increasing the efficiency of
the equipment. The measures were
successfully implemented.
Energy Efficiency
Measures
ISO 50002, type 2. The au-
dit resulted in the designing
of a range of recommended
measures, for the most part
related to optimisation of
energy-intensive production
process-es. The list included
a rather simple yet efficient
measure: modernisation of
efficiency of energy saving
potential of the plant.
Joining the Energy Effi-
ciency Network of Building
Material s Manuf ac turers ,
which was established in
2019 by the All-Ukrainian
Union of Building Materials
Manufacturers with support
the lighting system. The en-
terprise gave consideration
to the recommendations and
successfully implemented
most of the works with its
own resources. With support
from the GIZ a training was
carried out in parallel for en-
terprise employees in energy
from the GIZ, provided yet
another impetus for energy
modernisation. The sectoral
network unites 10 compa-
nies to share experience in
energy efficiency measures
implementation.
Concrete forming is one of the
technological processes for mak-
ing reinforced concrete products
at the plant. The process involves
a lengthy heating phase, which
is also rather energy-intensive.
Bringing the product’s surface
temperature to the neces-
sary level requires more than
10 hours. The hourly power for
the five production lines makes
113 kW, 40% which are for hydra-
tion heat.
In order to reduce the ener-
gy consumption of the process,
the enterprise was suggested to
change the moulding bed oper-
ating procedure and reduce the
heating time. As the measure
required an assessment of the
impact on product quality, plant
technologists were engaged in
the process and laboratory tests
were conducted. According to the
results of these studies it was de-
termined that the heating time
can be reduced by a maximum of
two hours.
Each hour less of the bed heat-
ing time allowed reducing the
consumption by 113 kWh. Tech-
nological requirements have
reduced the duration of the
moulding process by 2 hours.
Accordingly, the savings have
made 226 kWh per one such op-
eration. Given the slab forming
process on the one line averages
to more than 200 times a year, or
1,000 times for all the five lines,
the annual natural gas consump-
tion was reduced by 45.2 MWh,
or 4,860 m3
. This way the enter-
prise is saving more than UAH 55
thousand a year.
The implementation of this
measure does not require exter-
nal costs. However, it is impor-
tant to permanent monitoring
by the production laboratory is
necessary here to check on the
time when the bed heating starts
and stops. By sticking to these
heating process conditions the
enterprise was able to save 13%
of natural gas.
Duration of implementation
Implementation period
Implementation costs
Energy consumption
before implementation
after implementation
Energy savings
Savings from implementation
Simple payback period
Emission reduction
1 year
2019
n/a
339,00
293,80
45,20
55 144
n/a
9
UAH
MWh/year
MWh/year
MWh/year
UAH/year
tCO2eq
/year
Indicators
Reducing Moulding Bed Heating Time
Lighting Modernisation
Photo:
3. Optimising Mould Heating Process
In order to save energy when heat-
ing the mould for reinforced con-
crete product manufacturing, a set
ofmeasuresweretaken:thetechni-
cal one, to insulate the sides of the
mould; and the organisational one
to reduce the heating time.
The survey of the mould re-
vealed significant energy losses
on its sides (walls) that account
for up to 80% total heat transfer
surface area. The temperature of
the mould’s outer surface is in the
range between 21 and 25°C. With
the ambient air temperature inside
the production shop at 12°С, a high
temperaturegradientoccurs,which
creates conditions for intensive
cooling of the vertical walls of the
mould and leads to significant heat
losses. To limit the heat exchange
between the wall and the environ-
ment and to respectively provide
for almost complete elimination of
mould cooling, thermal insulation
was performed. The mould walls
were insulated with extruded pol-
ystyrene foam with a thickness
of 30 mm and a density of 27kg/
m3
. The measure implementation
reduced heat losses by 80 kWh,
or 8.6 m3
natural gas per cycle. In
general, that has saved 8.7% natu-
ral gas used for mould heating. The
annualsavingsamountedtoalmost
UAH 20 thousand.
Wall insulation allowed to re-
view the mould heating procedure
regulations. For this, the plant's
product engineers held laborato-
ry studies to look into the effect
of heating time changes on prod-
uct quality. The reduction of the
mould heating time by one hour
saved8 MWh,or860m3
naturalgas
a year. The cost savings amounted
to about UAH 10 thousand a year.
The range of implemented
measures allowed the enterprise to
save 12.5% energy used for mould
heating.Thecostsavingequivalent
makes UAH 29.3 thousand/year.
Duration of implementation
Implementation period
Implementation costs
Energy consumption
before implementation
after implementation
Energy savings
Savings from implementation
Simple payback period
Emission reduction
24 months
2018 – 2020
20 000
192
168
24
29 280
1 year
5
UAH
MWh/year
MWh/year
MWh/year
UAH/year
tCO2eq
/year
Indicators
Lighting Modernisation
The enterprise took into account
the recommendations of the en-
ergy audit regarding feasibility
of lighting modernisation and
included respective works in the
annual energy modernisation ac-
tion program.
Until recently the plant
premises were illuminated with
69 500W gas discharge lamps.
The not really efficient lighting
system consumed 75.14 MWh a
year accounting for about 7% all
electricity consumed by the plant.
In the Q4/2019 the enter-
prise launched a partial replace-
ment of gas discharge lamps:
52 units were replaced with 90
100W LED ones. The new lamps
consume less and give better
illumination.
This measure allowed the
enterprise to more than halve
its lighting electricity consump-
tion (by 54%). The cost savings
make about UAH 102 thousand/
year. The payback period of the
measure was less than a year. In
addition to cost reduction, the
modernisation has improved the
lighting conditions inside the
production premises thus bet-
tering the working conditions of
employees.
Duration of implementation
Implementation period
Implementation costs
Energy consumption
before implementation
after implementation
Energy savings
Savings from implementation
Simple payback period
Emission reduction
3 months
10.-12.2019
90 000
75,14
34,41
40,73
101 822
11 months
37
UAH
MWh/year
MWh/year
MWh/year
UAH/year
tCO2eq
/year
Indicators
Optimising Mould Heating
Process
Photo: