جاهزين ببدالء المناصب قوة قياس نموذج
عدد
االشخاص
خالل الجاهزين
سنتي او سنةن
المناصب
شخص بجاهزية
االقل على واحد
اآلن
عدد
الجاهزين
اآلن
المستوى
القيادي
عدد
المناصب المنصب
المستهدف
Mid-
Level
0 1 X
Director of
Construction
02 Senior 3 X 4 X
Customer
Service
Manager
03 Front-
Line
2 X 3 X
HR Manager 04 Mid-
Level
0 0
بجاهزية المناصب
على واحد شخص
او سنة خالل االقل
سنتين
# Position Incumbent Criticality
No. of nominees at various readiness levels
Comments Action1. Ready
now
2. Ready
within 1-2
Year
3. Ready within
3 - 5 Years
4. Lateral
Relief
1 A Nasser Abdallah
2 B Sultan Ahmad
3
C Yousef 3
No. of Critical Positions 2out of 2 = 100%
No. Critical
Positions
Covered
% of Positions
with Successors
Bench Strength
Successor Readiness Levels
Readiness Level 1 0 0% 0
Readiness Level 2 0 0% 0
Readiness Level 3
Critical Positions with
Lateral Relieves (4)
0% 0
No. of Critical Positions with NO Successor / Lateral Relief 50%
Critical Incumbents due for retirement in next 3 years 0 0%
البدالء جاهزية تحليل
Summary Report for Abdullah Abdullah (managers report) 22/9/12
The table below shows a summary of the outcomes from the assessment center for the participant:
Strengths: Areas for Development:
Strong drive and skills set to influence and lead
others
A systematic approach to building stakeholder
relationships
Well organized and systematic approach to project
management and delivery
An effective use of financial and commercial
analysis skills
Needs to utilize a more integrated approach
to aligning financial data with strategic
business analysis and performance
A need to balance the focus on task delivery
with people engagement
Analysis performance and skills can be
inconsistent with unfamiliar material
Recommended Development Actions
1 Greater exposure and involvement in strategic planning and strategy implementation perhaps via short
term shadowing and part-time project work with strategic projects
2 Using his work with his Executive MBA as a strategy based project inside outside org.
3 Mentoring and coaching to establish a better balance between task and people based emotional intelligence
type skills and reviewing progress with this via periodic 360 degree feedback
4 Additional practice and evaluation of the skills of evaluating complex written material and identifying the
key messages using analysis tools and frameworks
Work on assignment to coach others to improve their empathy and emotional intelligence skills
Centre Performance
Limited Performance Moderate Performance Strong Performance
Readiness
Unlikely to progress
further
Ready in 3 + years Ready in 1- 2 years Ready Now
Centre Performance Readiness Explanation
Strong Ready Now
Candidate has performed strongly in the centre and following feedback discussion and
current experience, is ready now for a more senior role
Strong Ready in 1 – 2
Years
Candidate has performed strongly in the centre and following feedback discussion and
current experience, is likely to be ready for a more senior role in 1- 2 years. Clear
development will hasten the speed to promotion.
Moderate Ready in 1 – 2 years
Candidate has performed credibly in the centre and meets the expectation of current
role. We anticipate that with development over next 1 – 2 years, then potentially ready
for senior role. But caveat is that they go through some form of further assessment to
qualify this.
Moderate Ready in 3+ years
Candidate has performed credibly in the centre and meets the expectations for role.
However, due to a lack of relevant experience at this level, the recommendation is that
they acquire more experience.
Limited Ready in 1 – 2
Years
Candidate struggled during the centre, and has shown more areas for development than
clear strengths. But there is potential and with further development, could be brought
up to a credible level
Limited Ready in 3+ years
Candidate struggled during the centre, and has shown more areas for development than
clear strengths. More experience and focussed development required
Limited Unlikely to progress
further
Candidate struggled at the centre, and is unlikely to progress further within the
organisation without significant development investment
القياس مراكز نتائج
Assessment Centers Results
POSITION / INCUMBENT BADGE# PC POTENTIAL GC
CANDIDATE BADGE# PC POTENTIAL GC
RIYADH W. SADOON 5698 1 III 54 1 *1 A
MOHAMMED S. ABDULJABBAR 2365 1 III 54 2
WALEED Y. RAMI 2014 2 III 54 3
SAIF I. SAAD 8590 1 III 55 4
SAAD I. ZIAD 6036 1 III 55 5 B
ABDULLAH A. NOAMAN 3500 2 III 53 *2
ABDULAZIZ I. SUFAYAN 1002 2 III 53 2 2
ABDULRAHMAN A. HUSSAIN 2089 1 III 53 3
IBRAHIM M. OMER 2058 1 III 56 4 C
SULIMAN A. WALEED 7895 1 II 55 4 4
KHALID M. SAUD 2101 1 II 52 1
ABDULRAHMAN A. AL-MAHMOUD 3023 1 III 53 2
MOHAMMED N. AL-MANAA 6059 2 III 53 3 2 D
MESHAL K. JALAL 9658 1 III 53 3
MAJED A. YASSER 7856 1 II 55 4 4
RIYADH F. ABDULLAH 9685 2 II 54 *1
RIYADH W. SADOON
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
DEPARTMENT MANAGER, NINTH POWER PLANT DEPARTMENT 55
A
IBRAHIM M. OMER 2058 1
55
III 56
DEPARTMENT MANAGER, EIGHT POWER PLANT DEPARTMENT 55
SAIF I. SAAD 8590 1 II
DEPARTMENT MANAGER, GAS POWER PLANT DEPARTMENT (INSIDE RIYADH) 55
C
SULIMAN A. WALEED 7895 1 III 55
DEPARTMENT MANAGER, GAS POWER PLANT DEPARTMENT (OUTSIDE RIYADH) 55
D
YOUSUF M. SAEED 888888 1 III 55
ABDULLAH A. NOAMAN
Will Continue in Position
READINESS COMMENTS ON OUTGOING INCUMBENT
Normal Retirement
Will be Reasigned
Developmental Assignment
B
KHALID M. SAUD
االحالل جدول
30
Sales
Marketing
Engineering
R&D