Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

How far can Member States go to derogate from Third Package obligations and maintain price controls?

387 vues

Publié le

Rozeta Karova presents at the Vienna Forum on European Energy Law, 2013

Publié dans : Droit
  • Soyez le premier à commenter

  • Soyez le premier à aimer ceci

How far can Member States go to derogate from Third Package obligations and maintain price controls?

  1. 1. - Prepared by ECS - 1 How far can Member States go to derogate from Third Package obligations and maintain price controls? Energy Community Secretariat Rozeta Karova, Ph.D. Vienna Forum on European Energy Law 8 March 2013, ECS, Vienna
  2. 2. - Prepared by ECS - 2 Outline of the presentation  What is the problem with price regulation?  End-users’ price regulation under EU law  PSO: meaning v understanding and usage  ECJ on Member States’ intervention in price regulation  Post-Federutility: Member States’ understanding of the judgment  Actions of the EU Commission and of the ECS  Concluding remarks
  3. 3. - Prepared by ECS - 3 What is the problem with regulated end-users prices? If end-users’ prices are regulated at a low (non-cost reflective) level:  Prevent market entry for new suppliers  Limited number of suppliers => limited wholesale and retail market competition => negative impact on customers’ choice & no incentive for customer’s switching  No incentive for investments => endanger viability of companies & energy system as a whole => risk for SoS  Low prices give wrong signals both to investors & population => no incentive for energy efficiency  Applied in a non-targeted way => should be decoupled from social protection
  4. 4. - Prepared by ECS - 4 End-users’ price regulation under EU law  Not addressed explicitly, but could fall under Article 3 Directives 2009/72/EC and 2009/73/EC  Article 3(7) ED and 3(3) GD – vulnerable customers’ protection non-tariff v tariff protection  Article 3(3) – provision of universal service (electricity) the right to be supplied with electricity of a specified quality at easily and clearly comparable, transparent and reasonable prices  Article 3(2) – PSO related to price of supply  State aid  Court of Justice case law: Federutility case (Case C-265/08, 20.04.2010)
  5. 5. - Prepared by ECS - 5 PSO - tool to address liberalisation impact: meaning v understanding and usage  PSO in the EU acquis  Provision of SGEI – from derogation of the Treaty rules to positive obligation of the MS & the Community (Art.14TFEU)  SGEI = economic public service  PSO = sector-specific tool for providing SGEI  Types of PSO • USO for HH and SMEs • PSO related to price of supplies for all customers  Understanding & (ab)use of PSO at national level  SGEI / public service – key concept  Whole sector = public service  Public services = Universal service  Incumbents in charge with providing PSO  No understanding of PS Obligation & lack of notification  PSO shall be an exception NOT a rule Temporary, clearly defined, verifiable, transparent, objective and non- discriminatory measures with clear criteria for calculating the compensation (Article 3(2) ED and GD)
  6. 6. - Prepared by ECS - 6 Court of Justice on end-users’ price regulation Federutility case  The State intervention in determination of price of supply is permitted (para.24) if: Justified in the general economic interest  Compliance with principle of proportionality:  transitory intervention with limited duration and the administration to make a periodic reexamination at close intervals (para.35)  not to go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective (para.36) & limited to the price component influenced by the specific circumstances, but not to the final end-users’ price (para. 38)  scope of beneficiaries – all customers - including undertakings (irrespective of size) - may benefit (para.41), but not in an identical manner as HH and SMEs (para.43)  Compliance with criteria from Article 3(2):  PSO must be transparent, non-discriminatory, verifiable...
  7. 7. - Prepared by ECS - 7 Post-Federutility: EU Member States  AEEG Decision n. 79/07 and subsequent decisions challenged before T.A.R. => preliminary ruling  T.A.R. decision after ECJ challenged again => Decision of Consiglio di Stato (n. 7645, 28.10.2010):  Price intervention attains an objective GEI - protects final customers from excessive price rises (volatiliity of oil prices at int. market)  National law allows price intervention as long as justified by market conditions  The measure suitable for the goal of protecting final customers against price rises (concentrated wholesale market and undeveloped retail market)  AEEG decision allows reference prices only for undertakings with low consumption  Satisfies conditions of Art. 3(2)
  8. 8. - Prepared by ECS - 8 EU Commission & EnC Secretariat’s actions  EU Commission  several waves of infringement proceedings against EU MS (2006, 2009, 2012)  no case in front of the Court of Justice  Energy Community Secretariat  Analytical paper (presented at PHLG, consulted with Electricity and Social Fora and submitted for public consultation)  joint action needed as more CPs are concerned  limited to what is really needed to attain objectives of EnCT  not only price regulation but also issued closely linked  coupling with measures on social protection  Recommendation  presented at PHLG (June and October 2012)  published on the ECS website  Future steps – dispute settlement
  9. 9. - Prepared by ECS - 9 Concluding remarks  Price regulation NOT prohibited by the acquis BUT can be allowed only:  for protection of vulnerable customers  as a USO – only for HH and SMEs for supply at reasonable prices  as a price of supply PSO for all customers  Under strict conditions:  Shall satisfy the conditions from Article 3(2)  Shall be compliant with requirements from Federutility case (price component only; lack of effective (?!) competition)  Shall be notified to the Commission / ECS NEW  NRA shall monitor level & effectiveness of market opening & competition, including HH prices NEW  NRA shall assess compliance of supply prices with Art.3 on annual basis & NCAs to be informed if needed NEW PSO – a tool for balancing diverging interests; price regulation – obstacle for achieving competitive energy market => shall be an exception NOT a rule => It will hardly be justified for protection of large undertakings
  10. 10. - Prepared by ECS - 10 Thank you for your attention! Rozeta KAROVA Energy Lawyer Energy Community Secretariat Am Hof 4, Level 5 A-1010 Vienna Email: rozeta.karova@energy-community.org website: http://www.energy-community.org/