Publicité
Publicité

Contenu connexe

Publicité

PGS - lezione B - robustness.pdf

  1. Lezione #B: Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts PONTI E GRANDI STRUTTURE - A.A. 2022/23 Franco Bontempi Professore Ordinario di Tecnica delle Costruzioni Facoltà di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA Via Eudossiana 18 - 00184 Roma – ITALIA franco.bontempi@uniroma1.it
  2. Index • DISASTROUS FAILURES • STRUCTURAL ROBUSTNESS IN THE NARROW SENSE • STRUCTURAL ROBUSTNESS IN A GENERAL SENSE • HUMAN ERROR • MANAGING THE UNEXPECTED - Unexpected events - HRO - HRO principles - People - Culture 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 2
  3. NTC 2018 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 3
  4. NTC 2018 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 4
  5. La scoperta dell’acqua calda 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 5
  6. 1846 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 6
  7. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 7
  8. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 8
  9. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 9 2005
  10. https://www.slideshare.net/FrancoBontempi/robustezza-strutturale-113343022 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 10
  11. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 11
  12. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 12
  13. DISASTROUS FAILURES 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 13
  14. Can an airplane crash because it punctured a tire? 1 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 14
  15. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 15
  16. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 16
  17. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 17
  18. 16/03/2023 18 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  19. 16/03/2023 19 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  20. 16/03/2023 20 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  21. 16/03/2023 21 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  22. 1. During takeoff from runway 26 right at Roissy Charles de Gaulle Airport, shortly before rotation, the front right tyre (tyre No 2) of the left landing gear ran over a strip of metal, which had fallen from another aircraft, and was damaged. 2. Debris was thrown against the wing structure leading to a rupture of tank 5. 3. A major fire, fuelled by the leak, broke out almost immediately under the left wing. 4. Problems appeared shortly afterwards on engine 2 and for a brief period on engine 1. 5. The aircraft took off. The crew shut down engine 2, then only operating at near idle power, following an engine fire alarm. 6. They noticed that the landing gear would not retract. 7. The aircraft flew for around a minute at a speed of 200 kt and at a radio altitude of 200 feet, but was unable to gain height or speed. Engine 1 then lost thrust, the aircraftªs angle of attack and bank increased sharply. The thrust on engines 3 and 4 fell suddenly. 8. The aircraft crashed onto a hotel. 22
  23. 1 0 2 3 16/03/2023 23
  24. How will this bridge die? 2 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 24
  25. Es.: genetics 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 25
  26. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 26
  27. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 27
  28. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 28
  29. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 29
  30. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alm%C3%B6_Bridge 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 30
  31. The Almö Bridge (inaugurated in 1960), that connected the island of Tjörn (Sweden's 7th largest island) to the mainland. The bridge collapsed January 18th 1980, when the bulk carrier MS Star Clipper struck the bridge arch. Eight people died that night as they drove over the edge until the road on the Tjörn side was closed 40 minutes after the accident. A new cable-stayed bridge, Tjörn Bridge, was built and inaugurated in 1981. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 31
  32. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 32
  33. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 33
  34. Minnesota I-35W Bridge 3 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 34
  35. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 35
  36. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 36
  37. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 37
  38. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 38
  39. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 39
  40. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 40
  41. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 41
  42. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 42
  43. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 43
  44. Downtown District I-35W Bridge Source: Google Earth 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 44
  45. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 45
  46. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 46
  47. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 47
  48. Bridge Scheme (1) DNA - INTRINSIC NATURE OF THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE: Load Path – Redundancy – Robustness – Survaivability Reliability - Availability – Maintenability - Safety 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 48
  49. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 49
  50. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 50
  51. The fixed bearing assemblies were located at piers 1, 3, 7, 9, 12, and 13. Expansion (sliding) bearings were used at the south and north abutments and at piers 2, 4, 10, and 11. Expansion roller bearings were used at piers 5, 6, and 8. Bridge Scheme (2) 16/03/2023 51 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  52. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 52
  53. The fixed bearing assemblies were located at piers 1, 3, 7, 9, 12, and 13. Expansion (sliding) bearings were used at the south and north abutments and at piers 2, 4, 10, and 11. Expansion roller bearings were used at piers 5, 6, and 8. Bridge Scheme (3) + 16/03/2023 53 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  54. Roller #5 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 54
  55. • Structural integrity is the term used for the performance characteristic applied to a component, a single structure, or a structure consisting of different components. • Structural integrity is the ability of an item to hold together under a load, including its own weight, resisting breakage or bending. It assures that the construction will perform its designed function, during reasonable use, for as long as the designed life of the structure. • Items are constructed with structural integrity to ensure that catastrophic failure does not occur, which can result in injuries, severe damage, death, or monetary losses. Structural Integrity 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 55
  56. 1 Roller #4 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 56
  57. The fixed bearing assemblies were located at piers 1, 3, 7, 9, 12, and 13. Expansion (sliding) bearings were used at the south and north abutments and at piers 2, 4, 10, and 11. Expansion roller bearings were used at piers 5, 6, and 8. Bridge Scheme (3) + 16/03/2023 57 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  58. Bridge Scheme (4) - 16/03/2023 58 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  59. 2 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 59
  60. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 60
  61. 16/03/2023 61 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  62. Time (not scaled) Critical load (not scaled) Original design 2007 modification 1998 modification 1977 modification Instantaneousload Lower bound of load Upper bound of load Failure level Precise moment of failure 3 Crossing the Threshold of Failure 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 62
  63. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 63
  64. 16/03/2023 64 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  65. Compression diagonal Tension diagonal Orange and red shading: exceeds yield stress Stress Yield stress 0 Allowable Dead Load of Original 1967 Bridge 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 65
  66. Orange and red shading: exceeds yield stress Compression diagonal Tension diagonal Stress Yield stress 0 Allowable After 1977 and 1998 Modifications 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 66
  67. Compression diagonal Tension diagonal Orange and red shading: exceeds yield stress Stress Yield stress 0 Allowable Loads at Time of Accident 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 67
  68. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 68
  69. 16/03/2023 69 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  70. 4 5 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 70
  71. HAZARD I N - D E P T H D E F E N C E HOLES DUE TO ACTIVE ERRORS HOLES DUE TO HIDDEN ERRORS Failure Logic 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 71
  72. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 72
  73. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 73
  74. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 74
  75. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 75
  76. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 76
  77. 16/03/2023 77
  78. NTSB TT 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 78
  79. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 79
  80. 15/67 Sub-structured model 16/03/2023 80 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  81. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 81
  82. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 82
  83. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 83
  84. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 84
  85. FORWARD ANALYSIS BACK ANALYSIS 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 85
  86. COSE – STRUTTURE - SISTEMI THINGS – STRUCTURES - SYSTEMS PERSONE – COMPORTAMENTI PEOPLE – HUMAN BEHAVIOR COSA WHAT CHI WHO ROTTURA – COLLASSO - CRISI FAILURES – COLLPASE - CRISIS PERCHE’ WHY SPIEGAZIONE – CAUSE REASONS - DISCLOSURE CONOSCENZA KONWLEDGE Forensic Engineering 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 86
  87. Knowledge Development 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 87
  88. RESISTANCE OF GUSSET PLATES: ✓GUSSET PLATES IN TENSION ✓GUSSET PLATES SUBJECT TO SHEAR ✓GUSSET PLATES IN COMPRESSION FHWA GUIDELINES, (2009) 26/67 RESISTANCE OF FASTENERS ✓SHEAR RESISTANCE OF FASTENERS ✓PLATE BEARING RESISTANCEAT FASTENERS http://bridges.transportation.org/Documents/FHWA-IF-09 014LoadRatingGuidanceandExamplesforGussetsFebruary2009rev3.pdf 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 88
  89. After this tragedy, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) focused its attention on all the 465 steel deck truss bridges present in the National Bridge Inventory [NTSB, 2008]. “The term “fracture critical” indicates that if one main component of a bridge fails, the entire structure could collapse. Therefore, a fracture critical bridge is a steel structure that is designed with little or no load path redundancy. Load path redundancy is a characteristic of the design that allows the bridge to redistribute load to other structural members on the bridge if any one member loses capacity. “ 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 89
  90. I-35W SAINT ANTHONY FALLS BRIDGE (September 2008) Thereare 323 sensors that regularly measure bridge conditions such as deck movement, stress, and temperature 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 90
  91. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 91
  92. http://www.startribune.com/new-35w-bridge-already-is- aging/268746561/ 16/03/2023 92 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  93. Opening day was six years ago, and the I-35W bridgeis needing repairs — somethat come from our harsh winters, but some from improper installations. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 93
  94. Examples 4 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 94
  95. Es. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 95
  96. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 96
  97. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 97
  98. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 98
  99. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 99
  100. For six days in January 1998, freezing rain coated Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick with 7-11 cm (3-4 in) of ice. Trees and hydro wires fell and utility poles and transmission towers came down causing massive power outages, some for as long as a month. It was the most expensive natural disaster in Canada. According to Environment Canada, the ice storm of 1998 directly affected more people than any other previous weather event in Canadian history. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 100
  101. Es. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 101
  102. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 102
  103. https://californiawaterblog.com/2 016/05/01/the-collapse-of-water- exports-los-angeles-1914/ 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 103
  104. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 104
  105. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 105
  106. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 106
  107. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 107
  108. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 108
  109. Es. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 109
  110. Es. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 110
  111. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 111
  112. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 112
  113. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 113
  114. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 114
  115. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 115
  116. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 116
  117. http://urbanplanet.info/architecture/par is-air-terminal-collapse-report-france/ 16/03/2023 117 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  118. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 118
  119. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 119
  120. 16/03/2023 120 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts
  121. Es. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 121
  122. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 122
  123. http://www.wise-uranium.org/img/stavaa.gif 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 123
  124. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 124
  125. System Complexity (Perrow) 16/03/2023 125
  126. Es. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 126
  127. 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 127
  128. Seismic Action 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 128
  129. Critical Node 16/03/2023 Structural Robustness of Bridges and Viaducts 129
  130. FAR FIELD ZONE EXCHAGE ZONE STRUCTURE FAR FIELD ZONE EXCHAGE ZONE STRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OBJECT NET Local / Punctual Scale Global / Regional Scale Structural System Infrastructural System Also if artificial, these systems need to have necessarily evolutive soundness, ecological coherence and sustainability chara