Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results

Hatch Early Learning
Hatch Early LearningeMarketing Specialist à Hatch Early Learning

Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results

iStartSmart® Learning System | Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results
                                                                                                HatchEarlyChildhood.com | 800.624.7968

Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results
Lilla Dale McManis, PhD & Mark H. McManis, PhD
May 2012

Background. There is very strong evidence that young children who participate in high-quality preschool programs
enter school more ready to learn than children without this opportunity (e.g., Early Childhood Longitudinal Study,
NIEER). As children who attend low-quality schools have the highest level of preschool fadeout, high-quality is the
essential qualifier (Bogard & Takanishi, 2005). This is particularly critical for under-resourced children. Children who are
poor before age 6 are at risk for educational deficits; and 25 percent of very young children in America are now living in
poverty (Carsey Institute, 2011). Compared to their middle-income peers, young low-income children display poorer
language/literacy and mathematics skills, putting them at high risk for school failure (Lee & Burkam, 2002). The
National Early Literacy Panel (2008) and the National Research Council Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics
(2009) as a result have identified the basic skills in which children must have competency in order to be successful in
school; skills critical for children to then engage successfully in higher-order thinking and applied learning.

Rationale. Educational technology is one promising component of a high quality early childhood education classroom
to support these core foundational skills for all subsequent school-based learning (McCarrick & Li, 2007). To be
effective in supporting these early learning goals, technology must combine appropriate, interactive, scaffolded
content and experiences for children; and accurate, consistent performance data to help teachers provide guidance
and intervention (McManis & Gunnewig, 2012). In this way, technology can become a valuable tool with the power to
directly teach, support and extend what young children learn and know.

iStartSmart Educational Technology Solution. iStartSmart (iSS) is an educational technology system that brings
language/literacy and math content based on the NELP Report and NRC-Math Report to children in a scaffolded
systematic manner. Delivered on an interactive touchscreen computer, there are 18 skill areas in 5 skill families that
take children from emerging to completed. Children move through the levels at a rate based on demonstrating learning
mastery of the content. The iSS has progress monitoring which allows teachers to see at any time how children are
progressing through the levels.

iStartSmart Outcome Study. The purpose of the current study was to investigate language/literacy and math outcomes
for preschool children using the iSS over a school year compared to children in classrooms without the iSS.
Sample. The results are based on 9 classrooms with the iSS All-in-One computer and 9 control classrooms without the
iSS. The classrooms were in childcare centers serving substantial numbers of children attending on subsidies located in
a major metropolitan area. Within each classroom, a subset of children was randomly selected for individual testing by
externally trained assessors using standardized tests: TOPEL-Test of Preschool Early Literacy (measures print
knowledge, definitional vocabulary, and phonological awareness) and Bracken School Readiness (measures colors,
letter identification, numbers/counting, sizes/comparison, and shapes). Both have a nationally representative norm
group and strong validity and reliability. Complete data (pre- and post-test) were available for 125 children (55 iSS and
70 control).
Procedures. The study protocol called for children selected for individually administered external assessments to use
the iSS literacy and math games for at least 30 minutes per week. The study ran over approximately 20 instructional
weeks, excluding pre- and post-testing. iSS teachers and directors received a monthly report and on-site check in visit
by the Research Director to review children’s time on the system and progress.

Key Findings.
• Children using the iSS scored statistically significantly higher than control children on standard scores at the end of
    the study on both of the school readiness language/literacy and math measures.
• Children using the iSS scored statistically significantly higher than control children on percentile scores at the end of
    the study on both of the school readiness language/literacy and math measures.
• Improvement on the literacy and math scores was significantly correlated with time spent by the children on these
    types of activities in the iSS.
©2012 Hatch Inc. | All Rights Reserved                                                                                           1
iStartSmart® Learning System | Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results
                                                                                                                                                                               HatchEarlyChildhood.com | 800.624.7968




                                                                              10
                                                                                   Improvement in Standardized Test Scores


                                                                               9
                                                                               8
                                                                               7
                                                                               6

                                                          Difference score*
                                                                               5
                                                                               4
                                                                               3
                                                                                                                                                                 Control (n=70)


                                                                               2
                                                                                                                                                                 iSS (n=55)

                                                                               1
                                                                               0
                                                                                         TOPEL                 Bracken
                                                                                              Standardized Test


                                                        Figure 1

                                         National Percentile Rank Improvement                                                                           National Percentile Rank Improvement

                                          15                                                                                                             10
                                                     on the TOPEL                                                                                                  on the Bracken


                                                                                                                                                          8
                                          10
                                                                                                                   Difference from Normative Standard



                                                                                                                                                          6
    Difference from Normative Standard




                                                                                                                                                          4
                                           5
                                                                                                                                                          2
             (50th percentile)*




                                                                                                                            (50th percentile)*




                                           0                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                                                                         -2
                                                                                                 Pretest                                                                                             Pretest

                                          -5                                                                                                             -4
                                                                                                 Posttest                                                                                            Posttest


                                                                                                                                                         -6
                                         -10
                                                                                                                                                         -8
                                         -15                                                                                                            -10
                                               Control (n=70) iSS (n=55)                                                                                      Control (n=70)    iSS (n=55)


Figure 2                                                                                                        Figure 3

The control group was not significantly different than the national average on percentile rank at post-test; while the iSS
group was performing statistically significantly above the national average after using the system.

Time on Task. There was a significant relationship between the amount of time spent on the iSS and mastery of the iSS
skills overall. Improvement scores on the language/literacy measure (TOPEL) were significantly related to time on the
iSS language/literacy activities, and improvement scores on the math measure (Bracken) significantly related to time on
the iSS math activities. Over 20 weeks of instruction in the study (Oct. 15-Apr.15), the average amount of time spent by
the children on the iSS was just over 30 minutes per week.

Summary. For technology to be meaningful in early education, it must provide opportunities for children to gain the
essential skills that prepare them for school. The results of this outcomes-based study strongly demonstrate that the
iStartSmart made a unique, statistically significant, and meaningfully significant contribution to this goal. The full study
report will be available mid-summer 2012. To read more about iStartSmart visit HatchEarlyLearning.com/iStartSmart.
©2012 Hatch Inc. | All Rights Reserved                                                                                                                                                                          2

Recommandé

Jta education conference 2013a par
Jta education conference 2013aJta education conference 2013a
Jta education conference 2013aRobert Philips
1.5K vues40 diapositives
Arborfield School Survey Results par
Arborfield School Survey ResultsArborfield School Survey Results
Arborfield School Survey Resultsarborfield
132 vues3 diapositives
Educators Empowerment April 2009 par
Educators Empowerment April 2009Educators Empowerment April 2009
Educators Empowerment April 2009Ariellah Rosenberg
496 vues21 diapositives
Sharborne C of E Primary School par
Sharborne C of E Primary School Sharborne C of E Primary School
Sharborne C of E Primary School Centre for Multigrade Education
438 vues17 diapositives
Survey Results par
Survey ResultsSurvey Results
Survey Resultssubirkdas
221 vues13 diapositives
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report par
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School ReportDeer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School Report
Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Gr JK - 8 - EQAO School ReportEvanSage
387 vues31 diapositives

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results

Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn... par
Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn...Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn...
Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn...Hatch Early Learning
643 vues1 diapositive
Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011) par
Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011)Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011)
Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011)Cynthia Anderson
856 vues44 diapositives
5 Steps for Progress Monitoring by Dr. Dale McManis par
5 Steps for Progress Monitoring by Dr. Dale McManis5 Steps for Progress Monitoring by Dr. Dale McManis
5 Steps for Progress Monitoring by Dr. Dale McManisHatch Early Learning
2.7K vues49 diapositives
Brochure par
BrochureBrochure
BrochureMaahir Shah
105 vues13 diapositives
Oerc va sessions dec 12 2013 final for post par
Oerc va sessions dec 12 2013 final for postOerc va sessions dec 12 2013 final for post
Oerc va sessions dec 12 2013 final for postOhio Education Research Center
532 vues34 diapositives
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10 par
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10SABES
21.5K vues40 diapositives

Similaire à Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results(20)

Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn... par Hatch Early Learning
Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn...Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn...
Literacy and Math Outcomes among Preschoolers using a Computer Assisted Learn...
Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011) par Cynthia Anderson
Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011)Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011)
Overview of School Wide PBIS (West Virginia Workshop, 2011)
Cynthia Anderson856 vues
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10 par SABES
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
Administering & scoring tabe 9 10
SABES21.5K vues
Principals meeting msl standard 6 update par dowelld
Principals meeting msl standard 6 updatePrincipals meeting msl standard 6 update
Principals meeting msl standard 6 update
dowelld277 vues
Uconn Mission, Focus and Coherence Share par EdAdvance
Uconn Mission, Focus and Coherence ShareUconn Mission, Focus and Coherence Share
Uconn Mission, Focus and Coherence Share
EdAdvance289 vues
Action research plan 2 par txagman
Action research plan 2Action research plan 2
Action research plan 2
txagman175 vues
Makalah nrt n crt par Nur Arif S
Makalah nrt n crtMakalah nrt n crt
Makalah nrt n crt
Nur Arif S2.3K vues
Goals Proposal par dvodicka
Goals Proposal Goals Proposal
Goals Proposal
dvodicka2.9K vues

Plus de Hatch Early Learning

Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl... par
Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl...Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl...
Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl...Hatch Early Learning
2K vues46 diapositives
Family Engagement Through Music par
Family Engagement Through MusicFamily Engagement Through Music
Family Engagement Through MusicHatch Early Learning
3.6K vues34 diapositives
STEM in the Early Early Education Round Table par
STEM in the Early Early Education Round TableSTEM in the Early Early Education Round Table
STEM in the Early Early Education Round TableHatch Early Learning
5.1K vues58 diapositives
Understanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum Design par
Understanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum DesignUnderstanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum Design
Understanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum DesignHatch Early Learning
1.3K vues38 diapositives
What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs? par
What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs?What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs?
What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs?Hatch Early Learning
1.9K vues56 diapositives
Evaluating Educational Technology par
Evaluating Educational Technology Evaluating Educational Technology
Evaluating Educational Technology Hatch Early Learning
2.1K vues76 diapositives

Plus de Hatch Early Learning(20)

Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl... par Hatch Early Learning
Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl...Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl...
Learning with New Technologies: Encouraging and Scaffolding Activities & Expl...
Understanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum Design par Hatch Early Learning
Understanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum DesignUnderstanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum Design
Understanding How to Use Real Time Assessment as a Tool in Curriculum Design
What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs? par Hatch Early Learning
What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs?What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs?
What's REALLY Happening with Technology in Early Childhood Programs?
Math & Reading Difficulties in Young Children: Risk Factors and Intervention ... par Hatch Early Learning
Math & Reading Difficulties in Young Children: Risk Factors and Intervention ...Math & Reading Difficulties in Young Children: Risk Factors and Intervention ...
Math & Reading Difficulties in Young Children: Risk Factors and Intervention ...
NAEYC AC 2012: Cooperative and Collaborative Preschoolers Learning with Multi... par Hatch Early Learning
NAEYC AC 2012: Cooperative and Collaborative Preschoolers Learning with Multi...NAEYC AC 2012: Cooperative and Collaborative Preschoolers Learning with Multi...
NAEYC AC 2012: Cooperative and Collaborative Preschoolers Learning with Multi...

Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results

  • 1. iStartSmart® Learning System | Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results HatchEarlyChildhood.com | 800.624.7968 Hatch iStartSmart Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results Lilla Dale McManis, PhD & Mark H. McManis, PhD May 2012 Background. There is very strong evidence that young children who participate in high-quality preschool programs enter school more ready to learn than children without this opportunity (e.g., Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, NIEER). As children who attend low-quality schools have the highest level of preschool fadeout, high-quality is the essential qualifier (Bogard & Takanishi, 2005). This is particularly critical for under-resourced children. Children who are poor before age 6 are at risk for educational deficits; and 25 percent of very young children in America are now living in poverty (Carsey Institute, 2011). Compared to their middle-income peers, young low-income children display poorer language/literacy and mathematics skills, putting them at high risk for school failure (Lee & Burkam, 2002). The National Early Literacy Panel (2008) and the National Research Council Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics (2009) as a result have identified the basic skills in which children must have competency in order to be successful in school; skills critical for children to then engage successfully in higher-order thinking and applied learning. Rationale. Educational technology is one promising component of a high quality early childhood education classroom to support these core foundational skills for all subsequent school-based learning (McCarrick & Li, 2007). To be effective in supporting these early learning goals, technology must combine appropriate, interactive, scaffolded content and experiences for children; and accurate, consistent performance data to help teachers provide guidance and intervention (McManis & Gunnewig, 2012). In this way, technology can become a valuable tool with the power to directly teach, support and extend what young children learn and know. iStartSmart Educational Technology Solution. iStartSmart (iSS) is an educational technology system that brings language/literacy and math content based on the NELP Report and NRC-Math Report to children in a scaffolded systematic manner. Delivered on an interactive touchscreen computer, there are 18 skill areas in 5 skill families that take children from emerging to completed. Children move through the levels at a rate based on demonstrating learning mastery of the content. The iSS has progress monitoring which allows teachers to see at any time how children are progressing through the levels. iStartSmart Outcome Study. The purpose of the current study was to investigate language/literacy and math outcomes for preschool children using the iSS over a school year compared to children in classrooms without the iSS. Sample. The results are based on 9 classrooms with the iSS All-in-One computer and 9 control classrooms without the iSS. The classrooms were in childcare centers serving substantial numbers of children attending on subsidies located in a major metropolitan area. Within each classroom, a subset of children was randomly selected for individual testing by externally trained assessors using standardized tests: TOPEL-Test of Preschool Early Literacy (measures print knowledge, definitional vocabulary, and phonological awareness) and Bracken School Readiness (measures colors, letter identification, numbers/counting, sizes/comparison, and shapes). Both have a nationally representative norm group and strong validity and reliability. Complete data (pre- and post-test) were available for 125 children (55 iSS and 70 control). Procedures. The study protocol called for children selected for individually administered external assessments to use the iSS literacy and math games for at least 30 minutes per week. The study ran over approximately 20 instructional weeks, excluding pre- and post-testing. iSS teachers and directors received a monthly report and on-site check in visit by the Research Director to review children’s time on the system and progress. Key Findings. • Children using the iSS scored statistically significantly higher than control children on standard scores at the end of the study on both of the school readiness language/literacy and math measures. • Children using the iSS scored statistically significantly higher than control children on percentile scores at the end of the study on both of the school readiness language/literacy and math measures. • Improvement on the literacy and math scores was significantly correlated with time spent by the children on these types of activities in the iSS. ©2012 Hatch Inc. | All Rights Reserved 1
  • 2. iStartSmart® Learning System | Outcomes-Based Study: Overview of Results HatchEarlyChildhood.com | 800.624.7968 10 Improvement in Standardized Test Scores 9 8 7 6 Difference score* 5 4 3 Control (n=70) 2 iSS (n=55) 1 0 TOPEL Bracken Standardized Test Figure 1 National Percentile Rank Improvement National Percentile Rank Improvement 15 10 on the TOPEL on the Bracken 8 10 Difference from Normative Standard 6 Difference from Normative Standard 4 5 2 (50th percentile)* (50th percentile)* 0 0 -2 Pretest Pretest -5 -4 Posttest Posttest -6 -10 -8 -15 -10 Control (n=70) iSS (n=55) Control (n=70) iSS (n=55) Figure 2 Figure 3 The control group was not significantly different than the national average on percentile rank at post-test; while the iSS group was performing statistically significantly above the national average after using the system. Time on Task. There was a significant relationship between the amount of time spent on the iSS and mastery of the iSS skills overall. Improvement scores on the language/literacy measure (TOPEL) were significantly related to time on the iSS language/literacy activities, and improvement scores on the math measure (Bracken) significantly related to time on the iSS math activities. Over 20 weeks of instruction in the study (Oct. 15-Apr.15), the average amount of time spent by the children on the iSS was just over 30 minutes per week. Summary. For technology to be meaningful in early education, it must provide opportunities for children to gain the essential skills that prepare them for school. The results of this outcomes-based study strongly demonstrate that the iStartSmart made a unique, statistically significant, and meaningfully significant contribution to this goal. The full study report will be available mid-summer 2012. To read more about iStartSmart visit HatchEarlyLearning.com/iStartSmart. ©2012 Hatch Inc. | All Rights Reserved 2