2. 2
Agenda
New Technology
IBM Tivoli Monitoring Solutions
IBM Event Management and Business Service Management
Nordic Customer Examples
3. 3
Directly access trusted, multi-vendor data from any source
Visualize trusted, multi-vendor data from any source
Easily plug in or swap out multi-vendor tools
Integrate multi-vendor tools at a fraction of time/cost
Develop integrations once and reuse them many times
Stop reworking integrations with every point release
Leverage open services to speed multi-vendor integration
An open & flexible architecture designed to enable
simplified integration of multi-vendor tools for
improved visibility, control and automation.
VISIBILITY
CONTROL
AUTOMATIO
N
Linked Data OSLC Specifications
Registry Security Reporting
Administration Visualization
Open Services
IBM Jazz for Service Management
4. 4
Benefits of Jazz for Service management
For Clients:
Ability to integrate applications by minimizing dependencies on proprietary API’s
Identify KPI’s across their service environment thus improving business response
Improve ROI by efficiently integrating your existing IT investments with higher reuse
For Business Partners:
Ability to provide value added services instead of spending time on developing
integrations
Increase solution footprint through simplified product extensions
For IBM:
To be a value added contributor and help maximize the clients IT investments
Enable a consistent and in-context client experience in a multi-vendor environment
4
“Jazz for Service Management and OSLC can reduce the integration costs of an
average project with 4 integrations by 33%, and the average time to develop an
integration by 75%, based on the principle that we can develop once, and reuse many
times.” -- Icaro
“DASH, your user interface service, is incredibly clean and efficient to use. It
was very intuitive and I’m excited for the future of dash boarding and
visualization.” -- UPMC
5. 5
5
Multi-vendor, Cloud Service Delivery without OSLC
Public Cloud
Private Cloud
VMware
Provisioning
VMware
Provisioning
EMC
Provisioning
EMC
Provisioning
Cisco
Provisioning
Cisco
Provisioning
In-house
Orchestration
In-house
Orchestration
Amazon Cloud
Orchestration
Amazon Cloud
Orchestration
External Billing
PayPalPayPal
Development
Open source
Development
Open source
Development
VisaVisa
AmExAmEx
BMC Service DeskBMC Service Desk
SalesOneSalesOne
Tivoli
Monitoring
Tivoli
Monitoring
HP Mercury
Monitoring
HP Mercury
Monitoring
CA Wiley
Monitoring
CA Wiley
Monitoring
API Integration Scenario:
• Total: 16 API Integrations
• 3 Orchestration to Billing
• 2 Orchestration to Public Cloud
• 3 Orchestration to Provisioning
• 1 Development to Orchestration
• 3 Orchestration to Monitoring
• 3 Monitoring to Service Desk
• 1 Service Desk to Fix Tracking
• Estimated: 2 Weeks per Integration
• 32 weeks total integration time
• Services $3,000/day or 15,000/week
• 1st
year integration cost = $480,000
• All tools upgraded once/year
• 2nd
year integration costs = $480,000
• 3rd
year integration cost = $480,00
• Total time
96 weeks
• Total costs
= $1,440,000
Open source
Fix Tracking
Open source
Fix Tracking
5) Fix tracking needs problem details from service
desk, & service desk needs status of fixes
5) Fix tracking needs problem details from service
desk, & service desk needs status of fixes
1) Orchestration needs to know what to provision
from Dev and needs to deploy monitoring
1) Orchestration needs to know what to provision
from Dev and needs to deploy monitoring
4) External billing needs usage
information from orchestration
4) External billing needs usage
information from orchestration
2) Provisioning tools & public clouds need to
be told what to provision by orchestration
2) Provisioning tools & public clouds need to
be told what to provision by orchestration
3) Service Desk needs health
information from monitoring
tools
3) Service Desk needs health
information from monitoring
tools
Point to Point API Integration
ISST validated estimates of man hours required to develop OSLC-wrappers for non-OSLC enabled 3rd
party tools.
6. 6
Multi-vendor, Cloud Service Delivery with OSLC
Public Cloud
Private Cloud
VMware
Provisioning
VMware
Provisioning
EMC
Provisioning
EMC
Provisioning
Cisco
Provisioning
Cisco
Provisioning
SmartCloud
Orchestration
SmartCloud
Orchestration
Amazon Cloud
Orchestration
Amazon Cloud
Orchestration
External Billing
PayPalPayPal
Development
Open source
Development
Open source
Development
VisaVisa
AmExAmEx
SmartCloud
ControlDesk
SmartCloud
ControlDesk
SmartCloud
Enterprise
SmartCloud
Enterprise
SmartCloud
Monitoring
SmartCloud
Monitoring
HP Mercury
Monitoring
HP Mercury
Monitoring
CA Wiley
Monitoring
CA Wiley
Monitoring
OSLC Integration Scenario:
• Each OSLC wrapper takes 2 weeks
• 10 custom OSLC-wrappers = 20 weeks
• 20 weeks @ $3k/day or $15k / week
• 1st
year integration cost = $300,000
• 2nd
year integration cost = $45,000
• 1 point revision per tool per year
• 1 Day to test * 15 tools
• 3rd
year integration cost = $45,000
• Total Time: 26 weeks
• Total Labor Costs:
= $390,000
• Total Time Savings 70 weeks
• Total Labor Savings
= $1,050,000
Rational Team
Concert
Rational Team
Concert
OSLC-Enabled
IBM or 3rd
party
OSLC-Enabled
IBM or 3rd
party
Tools without native
OSLC support
Tools without native
OSLC support
OSLC-wrapper
enabling one-to-many
ISST validated estimates of man hours required to develop OSLC-wrappers for non-OSLC enabled 3rd
party tools.
http://open-services.net
7. 8
8
Common Data Access, Common Visualization, Mashup Combinations
Data provider Toolkit (UI / OSLC)
ITM SC APM TBSM Omnibus
Data Provider Data Provider Data Provider Data Provider
Solution OOTB Views Customized Views for Clients
TPC
Data Provider
Widgets for Mobile
Impact
Data Provider
Purpose-built UIs
9. 10
Agenda
New Technology
IBM Tivoli Monitoring Solutions
IBM Event Management and Business Service Management
Nordic Customer Examples
10. 11
ITM , IBM SmartCloud APM and SmartCloud Monitoring Offerings
Traditional
Data Center
Private Cloud
(Self Service)
Public Cloud
Application
Owners
IT Ops
Cloud
Tenant
SmartCloud
Monitoring
IaaS - Manage Cloud
infrastructure
SmartCloud
Monitoring
Application Insight
SmartCloud Application
Performance Management
MSP
Tivoli
Monitoring
Manage Applications and
Infrastructure for Hybrid
environments
Develop apps and
manage workloads in
a cloud
Manage physical
Infrastructure
11
11. 12
IBM Infrastructure Management Dashboards for Servers
Features
Displays event count data for all
Managed System Groups (MSG)
and Managed System Names
(MSN) in ITM
Displays graphical
representation of specific
situation events
Displays selected key metric
data for OS's: Windows, Linux
and Unix
Integrated with ITM Role Based
Authorization Policies
Provides “Launch in context to
TEP” capability for viewing more
OS metric data
Data displayed can be different
per user depending on
authorization policies
12
This release of ITM introduces additional infrastructure components to support web-
based dashboards for infrastructure management, a linked data registry for cross-
product data integration, and enablement for granular role-based access policies.
Purpose
Complements the TEP
Intended for use primarily by “Operator” persona and secondarily by “SME” persona
Provides a modern Web-2.0 style UI for selected ITM data
13. 14
ITM , IBM SmartCloud APM and SmartCloud Monitoring Offerings
Traditional
Data Center
Private Cloud
(Self Service)
Public Cloud
Application
Owners
IT Ops
Cloud
Tenant
SmartCloud
Monitoring
IaaS - Manage Cloud
infrastructure
SmartCloud
Monitoring
Application Insight
SmartCloud Application
Performance Management
MSP
Tivoli
Monitoring
Manage Applications and
Infrastructure for Hybrid
environments
Develop apps and
manage workloads in
a cloud
Manage physical
Infrastructure
14
14. 15
IBM SmartCloud Monitoring
Key benefits:
Visibility into the cloud infrastructure
o Integrated “out-of-the-box” contextual views of health and performance in the
complete context of the virtual environment to include physical and virtual
servers, storage and network resources
o Receive real-time proactive & predictive alerts
o Side-by-side and historical data to identify problems quickly
Virtual environment management
o Out-of-the-box alerts, best practices, expert advice and workflows for detecting
performance problems and identifying their source
o Web 2.0 dashboards, operational workspaces and reports
Capacity planning
o Predict physical and virtual resource capacity bottlenecks and trends
o Gain business agility by determining room for expansion
Optimization
o Right-size virtual machines
o Policy-driven workload placement for performance and security optimization
IBM SmartCloud Monitoring is an infrastructure-as-a-service cloud monitoring tool,
providing scale, performance and availability monitoring of the cloud resources and the
virtual machines running within it. Enjoy real cost savings with cloud optimization and
automation, and resiliency from resource and workload analytics.
15. 16
Health Dashboards Capacity Assessments
Integrated Monitoring Capacity Planning
A single tool for all infrastructure management
Reports on the health
trends of cloud components
and workloads, powered by
Cognos.
Performance Analytics
for right-sizing of virtual
machines.
Integration with industry-
leading Tivoli service
management portfolio.
Policy-Based
optimization to put
workloads where they’ll
perform best, not just
where they’ll fit.
Health dashboards to
provide an instant,
consolidated glimpse into
cloud health.
Topology views of the key
interrelated components of
the cloud.
What-If capacity
planning scenarios.
17. 18
ITM , IBM SmartCloud APM and SmartCloud Monitoring Offerings
Traditional
Data Center
Private Cloud
(Self Service)
Public Cloud
Application
Owners
IT Ops
Cloud
Tenant
SmartCloud
Monitoring
IaaS - Manage Cloud
infrastructure
SmartCloud
Monitoring
Application Insight
SmartCloud Application
Performance Management
MSP
Tivoli
Monitoring
Manage Applications and
Infrastructure for Hybrid
environments
Develop apps and
manage workloads in
a cloud
Manage physical
Infrastructure
18
18. 19
Understand the
end-user experience
Follow changing
workloads
Mobile devices &
smart endpoints
Private, public &
hybrid clouds
Highly virtualized applications, storage
& networks
Discovery
Visibility into
application
resources
End User
Experience
Transaction
performance
monitoring to
ensure SLA
compliance
Transaction
Tracking
Rapid problem
isolation through
transaction
path analysis
Diagnostics
Domain-specific
operations tools
for diagnosis and
repair
Predictive
Analytics
Proactive
Management to
reduce outages &
improve business
performance
shared data & common services
See steps
across the cloud
Visibility, control and automation to intelligently manage critical applications in
cloud and hybrid environments.
What is Application Performance Management?
19
Visibility, control and automation to intelligently manage critical applications in cloud
and hybrid environments.
19. 20
New Application-Oriented Dashboards!
Take guesswork out of application issues
with smart drill downs
Easy to understand dashboards
Quickly renders data
Customizable with a wide variety of charts
and graphs and data sources
Runs on smart devices
Dramatically simplified visibility into the application environment
20
20. 21
End User Monitoring
Ensure end user’s experience always meets their expectations
See what your users are experiencing
Identify problems before they affect SLAs:
• Real-User monitoring
• Robotics monitoring
Continuously validate production system
performance
• Captures performance and availability data of actual
users for SLA reporting
Monitors network traffic for HTTP(S) requests to the
web server
Completely non-invasive, agentless monitoring
If you have a problem, find out about it
before the customers complain
50% of problems found through
customer complaints to help desk!
50% of problems found through
customer complaints to help desk!
21
21. 22
Unified, end-to-end transaction tracking
Heterogeneous environments
– fully integrated across distributed and System z
Start with agentless and add agents as needed!
Problem Isolation Through Transaction Tracking
• Support for asynchronous
transactions
• Extensible, modular
framework
• Integrated response time
and transaction tracking
22
22. 23
Diagnostics
Quickly identify the source of the failure within the component
When the failing component has been
isolated, detailed performance and
availability metrics provided to SME to
troubleshoot
– Access to both Real-time and Historical
data within a single UI
Access to key performance metrics for
each resource to quickly identify source
of failure
Expert Help and Best Practice guidance
for optimum performance
23
23. 24
Business Value of Adopting Analytics
Predictive Outage
Avoidance
Ensure availability of
applications and services
Use learning tools to
augment custom best
practices
Leverage statistical
methods to maximize
predictive warning
Improve problem
detection across IT silos
Predict
Faster Problem
Resolution
Find & correct problems faster
with tools that determine
actions required to resolve
issues
Identify problems quicker
with insight to large
unstructured repositories
Isolate problems quicker by
bringing relevant
unstructured data into
problem investigations
Repair problems quicker
with the right details quickly
to hand.
Resolve
Optimized
Performance
Track, Optimize, and Predict
capacity and performance
needs over time
Track capacity and
performance of applications
and services in classic and
cloud environments
Optimize resource
deployment with what-if and
best fit planning tools
Escalate capacity and
performance problems
before they cause critical
failures
Perform
Improved Insight
Enhance visibility into systems
resource relationships while
increasing customer
satisfaction
Determine what
resources are
interdependent to assess
impact of failures
Gain insight into what is
important to your
customer
Decrease customer
churn and acquisition
costs while increasing
customer retention and
satisfaction
Know
Automated Analytics helps lower IT Administration Costs:
Performance and Capacity planning tools monitor appropriately and escalate, reducing
time consuming report browsing
Learning tools reduce customization and best practices investment on initial deployment
Log Analysis helps speed problem resolution to be able to do more with less
24. 26
ITM , IBM SmartCloud APM and SmartCloud Monitoring Offerings
Traditional
Data Center
Private Cloud
(Self Service)
Public Cloud
Application
Owners
IT Ops
Cloud
Tenant
SmartCloud
Monitoring
IaaS - Manage Cloud
infrastructure
SmartCloud
Monitoring
Application Insight
SmartCloud Application
Performance Management
MSP
Tivoli
Monitoring
Manage Applications and
Infrastructure for Hybrid
environments
Develop apps and
manage workloads in
a cloud
Manage physical
Infrastructure
26
25. 27
Your Workloads Today:
•Smaller & More Focused
•Numerous and geographically
distributed
•Dynamic & More Ephemeral
•Automatically Provisioned
The Challenge:
•Difficult & expensive to manage with
traditional tools
•Must be able to follow dynamic,
mobile workloads around
•Licenses must be based on a virtual
machine, and portable
Our Solution:
Midmarket Viable
•Competitively priced, concurrent licenses
•Easy to sell & deploy
•Low maintenance
•Rebrandable
Cloud Resonant – a solution for cloud consumers,
who don’t have control of the infrastructure, but still
want to monitor the health and performance of their
workloads
•Quickly understand if application problems or VM
issues are impacting user experience, so you can
rectify quickly
•Bottom-up monitoring, instead of top-down,
focused on consumers, not operations
•Real-time user experience monitoring for cloud
applications
•Ensure customer satisfaction
Innovative Monitoring Technology
•Extremely light-weight, with extremely desirable
TTV and TCO
•Multi-tenancy
•Elastic and self-optimizing
•Currently developing broader anomaly detection via
unstructured data analytics, maturation of alerting from
thresholds to base-lining and anomaly detection
Dynamic
workloads appear
rapidly, from
different
sources…
IBM SmartCloud Monitoring Application Insight
29. 31
OS Shows High CPU Utilization and 1 Process Has High Usage
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/servicemanagement/apm/sim/index.html
30. 32
Support Application Developers with enhanced
capabilities for deep dive diagnostics
IBM’s direction for APM products
Empower Application Owners with full visibility
into customer experience including mobile devices
Superior Analytics with Actionable Insights to
enable faster problem resolutions and predictive
outage avoidance
Simplify Solution Delivery with enhanced
approaches to try & buy easy solution deployment
Revolutionize the Cloud with new elastic scaling
architecture, designed for the cloud and hybrid
applications
1
2
3
4
5
31. 33
IBM Application Performance Diagnostics Lite
• Designed for portability
– Free downloadable tool (limitation: pre-production only)
– Can be deployed and providing valuable data in about 15 minutes
– Very lightweight, infrastructure-less architecture makes it usable in multiple use cases
• Use Cases
– Services engagement
Identify root cause of performance issues for WAS and WebSphere Portal server
Performance tuning
– Solution troubleshooting: Capture data from your solutions running in WAS and WebShere
Portal for root cause analysis
• Supported Middleware
– WebSphere Application Server v7.0+
– WebSphere Portal Server 6.1, 7.0, and 8.0
33
33. 35
Diagnostics tools to help optimize performance
ITCAM for ADITCAM for AD
1. IBM APD Lite
– Pre-Production
– Developer tool
– Value in < 1 hour
– Key use cases
• Identify execution time and CPU time
for individual methods
• Collect and correlate contextual data,
such as the SQL query and execution
time
3. ITCAM for AD
– Best suited for production and
near production environments
– App support teams and IT Ops
– Key use cases
• App server health monitoring
• Automatically capture method level
trace information on slow running
transaction, even in production
• Memory leak diagnosis
• Lock analysis
• Reporting and analytics
APD LiteAPD Lite
Development Test Production
34. 36
Agenda
New Technology
IBM Tivoli Monitoring Solutions
IBM Event Management and Business Service Management
Nordic Customer Examples
35. 37
Netcool/Im
pact
Service-centric
Modeling, impact & RCA
BusinessBusiness
ServiceService
ManagementManagement
Consolidated OperationsConsolidated Operations
ManagementManagement
DomainDomain--Specific ManagementSpecific Management
Cross-domain Correlation,
Topology & Analytics
Dependency CollectionDependency Collection Event & Performance CollectionEvent & Performance Collection
NetworkApplication
System Mainframe
Security
Storage
Performance
Transaction
IBM Tivoli
Monitoring
Network Manager
NetView Z
Security Ops. Manager
TotalStorage Prod. Center
Perf. Analyzer, Proviso*
Comp. App. Mgr., Net. Assure*
Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus & Analytics
TBSM, TNSQM
Enrichm
ent&
OperationalAutom
ation
Enrichm
ent&
OperationalAutom
ation
Leverage
externaldata,enrich
and
autom
ate
actions.
IBM CCMDB & any IBM & 3rd
Party discovery & data sources. IBM and 3rd
Party event source.
NetworkSystems SecurityApplications Voice Mainframe OtherStorage Business
Note: All layers are inclusive of distributed and mainframe.* Service Provider
Wireless
Netcool/Im
pact
Service-centric
Modeling, impact & RCA
BusinessBusiness
ServiceService
ManagementManagement
Consolidated OperationsConsolidated Operations
ManagementManagement
DomainDomain--Specific ManagementSpecific Management
Cross-domain Correlation,
Topology & Analytics
Dependency CollectionDependency Collection Event & Performance CollectionEvent & Performance Collection
NetworkApplication
System Mainframe
Security
Storage
Performance
Transaction
IBM Tivoli
Monitoring
Network Manager
NetView Z
Security Ops. Manager
TotalStorage Prod. Center
Perf. Analyzer, Proviso*
Comp. App. Mgr., Net. Assure*
Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus & Analytics
TBSM, TNSQM
Enrichm
ent&
OperationalAutom
ation
Enrichm
ent&
OperationalAutom
ation
Leverage
externaldata,enrich
and
autom
ate
actions.
IBM CCMDB & any IBM & 3rd
Party discovery & data sources. IBM and 3rd
Party event source.
NetworkNetworkSystems SecuritySecurityApplicationsApplications VoiceVoice MainframeMainframe OtherOtherStorageStorage BusinessBusiness
Note: All layers are inclusive of distributed and mainframe.* Service Provider
Wireless
ReactiveReactive
Resource AlignedResource Aligned
SystemSystem
ProactiveProactive
Business AlignedBusiness Aligned
ServiceService
Enable Service
Management through
Consolidation and
Integration
Meet the needs of
businesses with
Quality, Scale, &
Total Service
Solutions
IBM Event and Business Service Management
SmartCloud Monitoring:
Monitoring, Performance and Capacity
management for Virtual Environments
SmartCloud Application Performance Management
Single solution with End to End, Transaction Tracking
and End User Oriented APM
IBM Tivoli Monitoring and ITCAM:
Monitoring and Performance management
for infrastructure and application middleware
Netcool OMNIbus and Impact:
Event management with filtering,
correlation and event enrichment
Tivoli Business Service Manager:
Real-time IT service visibility and
health indicators, and business KPI’s
40. 42
Achieve End-to-End Process Visibility
Understand, monitor and explore the state of business operations
Business
Impacting Alerts
Notification of situations
that require response
External Information
Information affecting
business service performance
Process Metrics
Key Performance Indicators
for business services
Reports & Analyses
Understanding trends by
combining multiple KPI’s using
historical information
Collaboration
Share metrics and
models with teams
to resolve situations
Tivoli Business Service Management
41. 43
Improved consumability:
– Custom dashboards
– Mobile Visualization (via smart devices and
tablet devices)
– Simplified, standardized data integration
Ease of deployment via enabling:
– UI widget catalogs
– Self-service capabilities
– Configuration simplification
What’s New In Tivoli Business Service Manager
IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager
New
42. 44
44
IBM Solution Dashboard – Example: eDayTrader Application
Revenue (Impact Data Provider)
Drill Down
Configuration Details (TADDM)
Health and Performance Details
Drill Down
43. 45
Agenda
New Technology
IBM Tivoli Monitoring Solutions
IBM Event Management and Business Service Management
Nordic Customer Examples
44. 46
Case 1: Nordea Capital Market
Why an IBM solution?
• The Tivoli solution has enterprise maturity
and stability – it don’t loose any events
• Scalability and performance to handle more
than 1,000 servers on different platforms
without increasing overhead or staff
• Integration with other non-IBM solutions
• IBM capability to provide support 24 x 7
Challenges
The IT organization need to deliver high
availability and service on the critical
business application in Nordea Capital
Market, covering platforms, middleware,
network and applications all combined in a
consolidated view.
SOLUTION
IBM Solution:
• IBM Tivoli Monitoring for Windows, Unix
and Linux
• IBM Tivoli Monitoring for VE
• ITM Agent Builder to handle Nordea
specific applications
• IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus as focal point
with integration from 3rd party vendors
and Remedy service desk
Case Study
45. 47
Case 2: Øresundsbron
Why an IBM solution?
• Ability to proactively correct potential failures
• Reduced operational administration through
automated processes
• The IBM solution was based on standards and
was easy to implement to Øresundsbron’s
requirements
• One vendor with easy integration between
the different components
Challenges
Øresundsbron had to adapt their IT service to
match the business requirements. This
included improving service for user support
and improving availability of critical business
services without increasing IT staff
SOLUTION
IBM Solution:
• IBM Tivoli Monitoring of Windows and
Linux
• IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
for Microsoft Applications
• IBM SmartCloud Control Desk
• IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus
• IBM Tivoli Network Manager
Case Study
46. 48
Case 3: Solar
Why an IBM Solution?
• Support for ITIL processes
• One integrated solution
• Monitoring of services covering all
infrastructure components
• Provide dashboard to the business owners
of critical business services
• Fast and efficient implementation
Challenges
Solar was going to implement a new SAP
solution and needed an integrated solution
with service management, monitoring and
consolidated events management,
including a business service dashboard
SOLUTION
IBM Solution:
• IBM Tivoli Monitoring on AIX and Windows
• IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
for SAP, DB2 and Microsoft Applications
• IBM Tivoli Netcool/OMNIbus to consolidate
events
• IBM Tivoli Business Service Manager to
provide a Business Service Dashboard
• IBM SmartCloud Control Desk
Case Study
47. 49
Case 4: Danish Municipality (Kommune)
Why an IBM solution?
• Can reuse current Tivoli knowledge and
licenses, and purchase new SmartCloud
• Easy to implement the solution using IBM best
practices
• Can manage Tivoli solution using IBM services
and few internal resources
Challenges
The kommune had decided to out-source their
server farm and establish a new virtual
environment. Their existing Tivoli monitoring
solution had not been used efficient and they
wanted to make a new installation based on
newest SmartCloud releases.
SOLUTION
IBM Solution:
• IBM SmartCloud Monitoring for Windows
and VMware
• IBM SmartCloud APM Entry for Microsoft
Applications, Databases and Notes
• ITCAM for Transaction for user experience
Case Study
Notes de l'éditeur
Unlike traditional approaches to integrating multi-vendor tools that rely on expensive and fragile point to point API integration. Jazz for Service Management is an open & flexible architecture designed to enable simplified integration of multi-vendor tools for improved visibility, control and automation. Jazz for Service Management uses simple web links to find and share trusted multi-vendor data from any source. With Jazz for Service management you can v isualize trusted, multi-vendor data from any source, in any tool, in a single view You can easily plug in or swap out multi-vendor tools as needed, much like you can plug and play any android device or ipad/iphone with your PC. You can easily integrate multi-vendor tools at a fraction of time/cost, because it uses community specifications to simplify integrations You can develop integrations once and reuse it many times for similar tools – like multiple monitoring tools. You can stop reworking integrations with every point release, because the integrations don ’ t break as point revisions happen with products And, Jazz for Service Management comes with a set of open, shared services that are available for use by any multi-vendor application to speed integration. These services include, visualization, security (single sign on), administration, registry, and reporting. It ’ s the combination of these capabilities that delivers new levels of visibility, control and automation for your business.
16 integrations x 2 weeks/per = 32 weeks integration time. 3k per day x 5 days = 15k/week. 15k x 32 weeks = 480k. Each integrations must be revisited every year. 480k x 3 years = 1,440,000
2 weeks per wrapper x 10 wrappers = 20 weeks of integration time. Tivoli services = $3000/day x 5 day/week = $15k / week integration. 20 weeks x 15k = $300k first year Validate each OSLC wrapper each year: 15 tools x 2 years x 3k for one day validation = 90,000 300k + 90k = 390k
Lower cost of management New works with existing Simpler deployment, simpler update, faster ROI Transcript: Open infrastructure, federated data, dynamic interaction and a set of common services, this is all about providing a realistic model across the industry so our partners and customers can more easily consume and deploy capabilities around ISM, positioning them to understand, optimize and react more quickly to changing business needs, hence, managing business risk. Author's Original Notes:
SOR , and SOE and dc a and cloud Develop apps and manage workloads in a cloud We looked previously at the long-range forecast for APM opportunity. Let ’ s pause here to consider the 2013 opportunity. Our 2013 opportunity, $173.5 M, is based on Fall Plan data, and represents a healthy business for our SmartCloud APM solution. With much of the roadmap technology for Consumer Insight being delivered later in the year – along with vibrant partner ecosystem – we ’ ll certainly have to rely on SC APM for the lion ’ s share of APM revenue in 2013. However, this “ big picture ” view of the APM market here shows the evolution of the market as emphasis shifts from Systems of Record to Systems of Engagement. Our traditional approach to the market has been through IT Operations, who install, configure and run our centralized infrastructure and application monitoring solutions. This has always made sense, as good application management requires an understanding of the infrastructure it ’ s running on. However, as the influence of applications running on Systems of Engagement increases, it becomes increasingly possible – and increasingly BENEFICIAL from an IT cost savings standpoint – to move those applications out of expensive data centers into public cloud environments. That move is accompanied by a shift in buyer behavior to application owners and developers, as well as public cloud tenants. Today the traditional data center market is still more lucrative, as the APM opportunity figures show in the colored blocks at the bottom of this chart. However, the trend is moving away from the traditional data center toward public clouds, and our goal with this new market approach is to position ourselves to follow the money as APM spending moves toward the public cloud. Sources: Total 2013 APM Opportunity – 2H12 GMV, Performance Management category Public Cloud Private Cloud 2013 Opp – 26% of total APM opportunity is based on GB-MM revenue of Performance Management category in 2H12 GMV Private Cloud (Self Service) 2013 Opp – 32% of Enterprise / GB-LE revenue based on slide 10 of “ Tivoli Buyer Behavior refresh May 2012 ” study. Combined all non C-level exec roles for “ Identified Need ” , then combined LOB roles and divided by total. Total 2013 IBM APM Opportunity – 2012 Plan of $170.1M with 2% growth for 2013
SOR , and SOE and dc a and cloud Develop apps and manage workloads in a cloud We looked previously at the long-range forecast for APM opportunity. Let ’ s pause here to consider the 2013 opportunity. Our 2013 opportunity, $173.5 M, is based on Fall Plan data, and represents a healthy business for our SmartCloud APM solution. With much of the roadmap technology for Consumer Insight being delivered later in the year – along with vibrant partner ecosystem – we ’ ll certainly have to rely on SC APM for the lion ’ s share of APM revenue in 2013. However, this “ big picture ” view of the APM market here shows the evolution of the market as emphasis shifts from Systems of Record to Systems of Engagement. Our traditional approach to the market has been through IT Operations, who install, configure and run our centralized infrastructure and application monitoring solutions. This has always made sense, as good application management requires an understanding of the infrastructure it ’ s running on. However, as the influence of applications running on Systems of Engagement increases, it becomes increasingly possible – and increasingly BENEFICIAL from an IT cost savings standpoint – to move those applications out of expensive data centers into public cloud environments. That move is accompanied by a shift in buyer behavior to application owners and developers, as well as public cloud tenants. Today the traditional data center market is still more lucrative, as the APM opportunity figures show in the colored blocks at the bottom of this chart. However, the trend is moving away from the traditional data center toward public clouds, and our goal with this new market approach is to position ourselves to follow the money as APM spending moves toward the public cloud. Sources: Total 2013 APM Opportunity – 2H12 GMV, Performance Management category Public Cloud Private Cloud 2013 Opp – 26% of total APM opportunity is based on GB-MM revenue of Performance Management category in 2H12 GMV Private Cloud (Self Service) 2013 Opp – 32% of Enterprise / GB-LE revenue based on slide 10 of “ Tivoli Buyer Behavior refresh May 2012 ” study. Combined all non C-level exec roles for “ Identified Need ” , then combined LOB roles and divided by total. Total 2013 IBM APM Opportunity – 2012 Plan of $170.1M with 2% growth for 2013
SOR , and SOE and dc a and cloud Develop apps and manage workloads in a cloud We looked previously at the long-range forecast for APM opportunity. Let ’ s pause here to consider the 2013 opportunity. Our 2013 opportunity, $173.5 M, is based on Fall Plan data, and represents a healthy business for our SmartCloud APM solution. With much of the roadmap technology for Consumer Insight being delivered later in the year – along with vibrant partner ecosystem – we ’ ll certainly have to rely on SC APM for the lion ’ s share of APM revenue in 2013. However, this “ big picture ” view of the APM market here shows the evolution of the market as emphasis shifts from Systems of Record to Systems of Engagement. Our traditional approach to the market has been through IT Operations, who install, configure and run our centralized infrastructure and application monitoring solutions. This has always made sense, as good application management requires an understanding of the infrastructure it ’ s running on. However, as the influence of applications running on Systems of Engagement increases, it becomes increasingly possible – and increasingly BENEFICIAL from an IT cost savings standpoint – to move those applications out of expensive data centers into public cloud environments. That move is accompanied by a shift in buyer behavior to application owners and developers, as well as public cloud tenants. Today the traditional data center market is still more lucrative, as the APM opportunity figures show in the colored blocks at the bottom of this chart. However, the trend is moving away from the traditional data center toward public clouds, and our goal with this new market approach is to position ourselves to follow the money as APM spending moves toward the public cloud. Sources: Total 2013 APM Opportunity – 2H12 GMV, Performance Management category Public Cloud Private Cloud 2013 Opp – 26% of total APM opportunity is based on GB-MM revenue of Performance Management category in 2H12 GMV Private Cloud (Self Service) 2013 Opp – 32% of Enterprise / GB-LE revenue based on slide 10 of “ Tivoli Buyer Behavior refresh May 2012 ” study. Combined all non C-level exec roles for “ Identified Need ” , then combined LOB roles and divided by total. Total 2013 IBM APM Opportunity – 2012 Plan of $170.1M with 2% growth for 2013
File Name Here.ppt Online Trading Application – Didn ’t need to wait for a call to the help desk or abandoned transactions, we had alerts to give us the info that trades are taking longer than the 5 second service level that’s been set. These alerts have come in intermittently over the past week. Robotic monitoring - synthetic understand all the moving parts, but you cannot script reality and user action but you need to know when affecting performance. Which is better? Complimentary, not competitive. - HP Mercury gives you robotic and all that is needed. - simulate and measure how long it takes… something systemic .. Never catch sporatic? - specific my non-scripted user action? Weird code paths? Those are the ones we spend … - user didn ’t use it as intended.. Not possible to conceive every possible example? - company was having .. Takes for ever to log on, cannot get into the system? Could never find out .. Used o ’brien.. - address the unexpected .. Particular action after one and buffer not cleared. 3 failed login attempts, - impossible to find. Without real user monitoring.. - real-user monitoring.. -> easier than robotic – tell it which URL ’s to watch and see the real user experience. - robotic monitoring .. Simulates.. Got to do.. Not a replacement. - just getting start user.. Robotics.. got to do and hear is how you do it! Fastest TTV!!! Apostrophe messed up the index.. Assumed length of names, irish clients can login. - international, zipcode.. Key points: Traditional approaches to management just aren ’t up to the task in this new world of composite applications. Highlight the problems associated with applications that touch many different systems and how difficult and expensive it can be to find and correct problems. Need to move from reacting to customer calls to identifying problems early and taking action. When problems do occur it can take a lot of time to find which system the problem is occurring on before the actual problem solving can occur Once the problem system is identified, finding the root cause can require a lot of skilled resource If the problem is in the code, trying to recreate the situation in a development environment can be very difficult given the complexity of the production environment Two ways for end-user response monitoring Real End-User Transactions Web Response Time Monitoring Reports end user experience for web applications Appliance mode eliminates overhead at the server Client Response Time Monitoring Monitors real user client desktop Windows applications and transactions Robotic Transactions Robotic Response Time Monitoring Periodic testing of business transactions Record and execute a set of user defined steps Internet Service Monitoring Periodic testing of service availability Simple and lightweight
Online Trading Application – Now that we’ ve isolated the failing component, we can drill down and start troubleshooting the issue on the WAS server, which also happens to be the one that showed that a change had been made. At this point, you might roll back the new version to see if it fixes the problem in production, but that doesn ’ t resolve the problem with the new version, which has enhancements that are needed. Looking at the WAS server metrics for a few hours prior to the last alert, and looking at key metrics such as heap usage and garbage collection, you find that heap usage was high and increasing and garbage collection was running frequently. This indicates that there ’ s a memory leak or other memory issue. Key points: Tivoli offers a broad coverage for enterprise resource Diagnostics – both distributed and mainframe based. This coverage is across the application stack – from Operating Systems and Virtual Environments, through Middleware such as Databases, Web and Application Servers, and Connectivity products such as WebSphere MQ and Message Broker to Applications including JEE based applications, ERP applications such as SAP, Siebel, Peoplesoft, and collaboration apps such as Lotus Notes and Sametime. We also offer the full coverage for Microsoft products.
IBM is investing in a broad range of analytics capabilities all targeted towards addressing a few fundamental value propositions: Analytics for Performance and Capacity Track Capacity and Performance of resources within Dynamic and Classic environments. Know in dynamic environments what the total requested additional capacity actually is. Balance this against the available capacity of your cloud infrastructure to be able to optimize cloud capital investment. An ideal cloud infrastructure uses every resource in the cloud, but never needs a single one more. How close to perfect is your infrastructure? [note: the capacity and performance tools we talk about are all integrated into and shipping with products which are available today.] Analytics for Outage Avoidance The outage avoidance value proposition is for behavior learning tools that use statistical methods to recognize normal usage patterns and can immediately alert when usage patterns change in negative ways. IBM uses multiple algorithms and approaches here including univariate, multivariate and other statistical analyses to provide maximum predictive information on emerging problems. [note: this is TASP. This product is in pilot program and when discussed we will go into real-world examples of problems that were detected using TASP.] Analytics for Faster Problem Isolation While all solutions promise to speed problem isolation, the analytics associated with interpreting log file (and other unstructured data sources) are likely to be used initially to improve MTTR (mean time to repair). Active pattern discovery, and integration with our statistical learning technologies promises to enable problem discovery as well, but the first value proposition is around helping the user to discover the right data to understand and resolve a problem quickly from amongst all of the uninteresting data that is out there. Remember that trials are on going for the methods used to find the most related data and also for enhanced techniques using pattern matching and advanced integration of log data and exit. Analytics for Customer Insight & Care Our Communications Service Provider customers are seeking any way to help manage and maintain their customers. Our customer analytics solution has just been released and helps OSS Operations know everything about there customers to better manage them and ensure that the most important customers are also amongst the happiest. IBM is investing in analytics across the board, using many techniques to improve Application, Service, and IT Operations Administration and reduce costs while enhancing ability to understand total capacity from an operations and application perspective. We see cost savings on setup due to reduced system configuration and automated application of best practices that are customized to your enviornment, as well as savings on the overall escalation and response to alerts on the backend.
SOR , and SOE and dc a and cloud Develop apps and manage workloads in a cloud We looked previously at the long-range forecast for APM opportunity. Let ’ s pause here to consider the 2013 opportunity. Our 2013 opportunity, $173.5 M, is based on Fall Plan data, and represents a healthy business for our SmartCloud APM solution. With much of the roadmap technology for Consumer Insight being delivered later in the year – along with vibrant partner ecosystem – we ’ ll certainly have to rely on SC APM for the lion ’ s share of APM revenue in 2013. However, this “ big picture ” view of the APM market here shows the evolution of the market as emphasis shifts from Systems of Record to Systems of Engagement. Our traditional approach to the market has been through IT Operations, who install, configure and run our centralized infrastructure and application monitoring solutions. This has always made sense, as good application management requires an understanding of the infrastructure it ’ s running on. However, as the influence of applications running on Systems of Engagement increases, it becomes increasingly possible – and increasingly BENEFICIAL from an IT cost savings standpoint – to move those applications out of expensive data centers into public cloud environments. That move is accompanied by a shift in buyer behavior to application owners and developers, as well as public cloud tenants. Today the traditional data center market is still more lucrative, as the APM opportunity figures show in the colored blocks at the bottom of this chart. However, the trend is moving away from the traditional data center toward public clouds, and our goal with this new market approach is to position ourselves to follow the money as APM spending moves toward the public cloud. Sources: Total 2013 APM Opportunity – 2H12 GMV, Performance Management category Public Cloud Private Cloud 2013 Opp – 26% of total APM opportunity is based on GB-MM revenue of Performance Management category in 2H12 GMV Private Cloud (Self Service) 2013 Opp – 32% of Enterprise / GB-LE revenue based on slide 10 of “ Tivoli Buyer Behavior refresh May 2012 ” study. Combined all non C-level exec roles for “ Identified Need ” , then combined LOB roles and divided by total. Total 2013 IBM APM Opportunity – 2012 Plan of $170.1M with 2% growth for 2013
In plain English describe what value the customer is going to receive from this offering. Really describe the value the customer will get. Including some context of product roadmap on the elevator pitch may be helpful context to the reviews.
UI- evolved discovery to shifted to find everything to thing that really matter for purpose. Compose your application carefully selected. .. Available, responding as expected, had usage changed. Action... enough context to investigate it.