The document discusses four key reasons for low levels of investment in livestock funding from major players in the livestock field: 1) Issues in livestock are complex with slow progress and benefits that are difficult to measure, unlike "silver bullet" solutions in other areas. 2) There is a weak evidence base on how livestock benefits smallholders and economic development. 3) Livestock lacks strong advocates to make the case for long-term investment. 4) The sector faces vocal criticism from animal rights, environmental, and health activists based on data of varying quality.

1. Low Livestock Funding Carlos Seré, John McDermott, Steve Staal, Tom Randolph, Delia Grace, Derek Baker 27 July 2011 Why has funding for livestock been so low from key players in the livestock field?

2. Experts cite four key reasons for low levels of investment in livestock funding No silver bullets in livestock—issues are complex, progress is slow, and benefits are harder to measure Weak evidence base on how livestock can benefit smallholders and economic development Few strong advocates=lack of long-term investment from the right players Vocal negative publicity from activists in animal rights, environment, and health 1 2 3 4