Commercialization of Ethiopian smallholders dairy: missing links
1.
COMMERCIALIZATION OF ETHIOPIAN SMALLHOLDER DAIRY: MISSINK LINKS National Dairy Forum, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 23-24 November 2010 Tesfaye Lemma, Azage Tegegne, D. Hoekstra, R.Puskur
2.
Smallholder dairy innovation systems: What the research is all about? <ul><li>Mapping and analyzing Ethiopian smallholder dairy innovation systems to better understand: </li></ul><ul><li>- contextual factors determining opportunities and necessities for innovations and commercialization of the dairy systems; </li></ul><ul><li>- mismatches between changing demand for innovation, innovation systems and practices </li></ul><ul><li>Motivation for the research </li></ul><ul><li>Huge gap between potential, R&D efforts and sub-sector performance </li></ul><ul><li>Changing opportunities, constraints and challenges for the sub-sector development </li></ul><ul><li>Source of evidence </li></ul><ul><li>- Review and analysis of project, policy and research documents on Ethiopian experience with smallholder dairy development; </li></ul><ul><li>- Rapid appraisal of dairy innovation systems carried out by IPMS project in its eight PLWs in Amhara, Oromia, SNNP and Tigray; and </li></ul><ul><li>- Review of relevant successful lessons from developing countries, which have successfully transformed their dairy sub-sector </li></ul>
3.
Overview of findings: What have we learnt? <ul><li>Development intervention </li></ul><ul><li>Prime focus has been on technology transfer and public input & service provision, as lack of technology and information was considered as the critical constraint </li></ul><ul><li>Complementarities between technical and organizational and institutional innovations were less appreciated and did not given due attention </li></ul><ul><li>Customizing policy and development interventions to suit specificity context and location received little attention in policy interventions despite the complexity and spatial & social diversity of smallholder dairy systems in Ethiopia </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of comprehensive policy; and translation of broader policy intentions into operational strategies by dev’t practitioners has been the weakest link </li></ul><ul><li>Actors and interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Many and diverse public and non-public actors in the systems with several innovative initiative at grassroots level </li></ul><ul><ul><li>huge spatial variation in number and composition of actors across PLWs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>dominance of the public sector; and private sector having a limited scope and constrained by knowledge, resources and policy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Externally funded dev’t projects are champions in promoting value chain and innovation systems approach and the creation of platform and facilitation of multi-stakeholder interaction 7 learning </li></ul></ul>
4.
What have we learnt? <ul><li>Public sector actors are weakly integrated within, and have weak linkages with NGOs, private services, rural finance. </li></ul><ul><li>Private sector actors like service providers seen, sometimes, as competitors and face bureaucratic hurdles and uneven playing field </li></ul><ul><li>On the other hand, private actors do not appreciate the significance of being part of knowledge networks to improve their response capacity. </li></ul><ul><li>Limited attempt to mobilize inputs of multiple actors due to lack of relevant and effective coordination mechanisms, also making learning & scaling out/up successful experience for wider socio-economic impact </li></ul><ul><li>Incentives, habits and practices </li></ul><ul><li>No culture of inter organizational collaboration, and the predominance of preference to work independently by organizations </li></ul><ul><li>Little evidence indicating that habits, practices and competencies of the public actors have been reconfigured in response to changes in policy, emergence of non-traditional actors and changing innovation needs of stakeholders </li></ul><ul><li>Organizational processes, incentives, criteria for performance evaluation and accountability systems have remained stagnant, inhibiting innovations and also making policy ineffective. </li></ul>
5.
Conclusion: Missing links <ul><li>Technological change is crucial to increase supply responsiveness of milk producers to expected increase in demand for milk and product </li></ul><ul><li>Most of the challenges relating to commercialization of smallholder dairy are, however, non-technical, which require non-technological/non- R&D innovations </li></ul><ul><li>- there is no adequate market incentive </li></ul><ul><li>- Serious limitation in inputs supply, credit, extension & animal health services coverage, relevance and quality; they are often not integration, and not linked to dairy value chain </li></ul><ul><li>-Historically, non-technical issues have received little attention by the national dairy and feed research, and there are limited research addressing dairy dev’t policy 7 institutional issues such as pluralistic service dev’t and coordinated delivery </li></ul><ul><li>- Agricultural education curricula & mode of delivery are also technology & production-oriented; with poor interaction and linkage to interventions for private service and value chain development </li></ul><ul><li>Coordination gap in the innovation systems, and there are missing/weak linkages between: </li></ul><ul><li>- types and sources of knowledge; </li></ul><ul><li>- R&D services and actual development challenges and innovation needs of economic agents; </li></ul><ul><li>- efforts of public and private actors </li></ul><ul><li>- policymaking and development practice </li></ul>
6.
Way forward.. <ul><li>Enhancing systems capacity demands multi-pronged, multi-level, context-specific and process-driven approaches. </li></ul><ul><li>Actors </li></ul><ul><li>Enhance competencies </li></ul><ul><li>for managing partnerships </li></ul><ul><li>Empower producer groups </li></ul><ul><li>to demand services and </li></ul><ul><li>command accountability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Interactions </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mechanisms to co-ordinate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>efforts of multiple and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>heterogeneous actors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Creating wider awareness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>about importance of </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>knowledge networks and </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>partnerships </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Enabling environment </li></ul><ul><li>Capacity development to translate </li></ul><ul><li>policy agenda into operational strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Institutionalize adaptive and participatory </li></ul><ul><li>policy making, informed by process and </li></ul><ul><li>impact monitoring </li></ul><ul><li>Appropriate incentive systems </li></ul><ul><li>Make procedures and targets ‘innovation-friendly’ </li></ul><ul><li>Habits and Practices </li></ul><ul><li>Reinforce habits and practices </li></ul><ul><li>compatible with innovation, </li></ul><ul><li>especially learning and trust </li></ul>
7.
Recommendations: options <ul><li>Formulating actionable strategy to guide locale-specific interventions for the sub-sector development </li></ul><ul><li>Create mechanisms for multi-stakeholder coordination and process management </li></ul><ul><li>Strengthening organizational base of producers and small and medium private services to improve input supply, service delivery, extension advice, and lobbying for enabling environment for smallholder dairy development </li></ul><ul><li>Public support to private sector development and deliberately encouraging public- private partnership </li></ul><ul><li>Improving economic incentives to encourage innovations through collective action, market linkage, and market development – e.g. school milk program </li></ul><ul><li>Pursuing holistic approach to the design and implementation of technological innovation with VC perspective for facilitating market-orientation and commercialization in smallholder dairy </li></ul><ul><li>Enhancing individual and collective innovation capacity of actors in local innovation systems at milkshed level with VC perspective, and link with higher level structure for coordination </li></ul>
8.
Let’s continue learning and sharing <ul><li>Thank you.. </li></ul>
Il semblerait que vous ayez déjà ajouté cette diapositive à .
Créer un clipboard
Vous avez clippé votre première diapositive !
En clippant ainsi les diapos qui vous intéressent, vous pourrez les revoir plus tard. Personnalisez le nom d’un clipboard pour mettre de côté vos diapositives.
Créer un clipboard
Partager ce SlideShare
Vous avez les pubs en horreur?
Obtenez SlideShare sans publicité
Bénéficiez d'un accès à des millions de présentations, documents, e-books, de livres audio, de magazines et bien plus encore, sans la moindre publicité.
Offre spéciale pour les lecteurs de SlideShare
Juste pour vous: Essai GRATUIT de 60 jours dans la plus grande bibliothèque numérique du monde.
La famille SlideShare vient de s'agrandir. Profitez de l'accès à des millions de livres numériques, livres audio, magazines et bien plus encore sur Scribd.
Apparemment, vous utilisez un bloqueur de publicités qui est en cours d'exécution. En ajoutant SlideShare à la liste blanche de votre bloqueur de publicités, vous soutenez notre communauté de créateurs de contenu.
Vous détestez les publicités?
Nous avons mis à jour notre politique de confidentialité.
Nous avons mis à jour notre politique de confidentialité pour nous conformer à l'évolution des réglementations mondiales en matière de confidentialité et pour vous informer de la manière dont nous utilisons vos données de façon limitée.
Vous pouvez consulter les détails ci-dessous. En cliquant sur Accepter, vous acceptez la politique de confidentialité mise à jour.