Conference background document

1. Draft
Released for use by conference participants only.
Not to be referenced or quoted.
Scaling Up Access
to Essential Interventions
and Basic Services
for Occupational Health
Through Integrated Primary Health
Care
Background Document
for the WHO Global Conference
"Connecting Health and Labour: What Role for Occupational Health in
Primary Health Care?"
29 November - 1 December 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands
Geneva, November 2011
47 i

2. Acknowledgments
This document was produced under the overall direction of Ivan D. Ivanov, Team Leader for
Occupational Health at WHO Headquarters.
Contributions in the form of analysis and case studies were provided by: Carol Black, Peter Buijs,
Jorma Rantanen, Adrienne Chattoe-Brown, Jody Tate, Jos Verbeek, Chen Rui, Somkiat
Siriruttanapruk, and Claunara Mendonça.
Suggestions were received from Rania Kawar, Carlos Dora, Igor Fedotov, Bill Gunnyeon and Chris van
Weel.
Financial support from the Unites States National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health and the
Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport of the Netherlands is gratefully acknowledged.
47 ii

3. Table of Contents
Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 1
I. Introduction................................................................................................................... 4
II. Health systems and primary health care ........................................................................ 6
III. Occupational health................................................................................................... 9
Essential interventions......................................................................................................10
Occupational health services ............................................................................................11
IV. Occupational health in the context of integrated primary health care ......................14
Integrated health services.................................................................................................14
Integrated delivery............................................................................................................17
Integrated financing..........................................................................................................20
V. Examples from countries ..............................................................................................24
United Kingdom - working for a healthier tomorrow ........................................................24
Thailand – primary care units............................................................................................26
Finland - municipal health centres ....................................................................................28
Indonesia – occupational health posts in the informal sector............................................29
China - piloting basic occupational health services ...........................................................30
Brazil – family health teams ..............................................................................................33
Tanzania - essential health interventions and community based insurance......................33
India – SEWA, a community based insurance approach....................................................35
Chile – a dual social and private health insurance approach..............................................37
The Netherlands - treating the "blind spot" ......................................................................37
VI. Conclusions and recommendations ..........................................................................40
47 iii

4. 47 iv

5. Executive summary
Approximately half of the world's population spends at least one third of its time in the
workplace. Fair employment and decent work are important social determinants of health
and a healthy workforce is an essential prerequisite for productivity and economic
development. However, only a small proportion of the global workforce has access to
occupational health services for primary prevention and control of occupational- and work-
related diseases and injuries. Furthermore, certain global health problems, such as non-
communicable diseases, result in increasing rates of long-term sick leave and challenge the
ability of health systems to preserve and restore working capacity.
The 62nd World Health Assembly in 2009 emphasized the need to strengthen health systems
based on primary health care (PHC) in keeping with the values and principles enshrined in
the Alma-Ata Declaration. Action must be taken to provide universal access to PHC by
developing comprehensive health services, introducing national equitable and sustainable
financing mechanisms and implementing vertical health programmes, e.g. occupational
health, in the context of integrated primary health care.
Currently, a number of countries are reforming their health systems based on the values and
principles of PHC1 to improve service delivery, cost-efficiency and to ensure equity. National
debates on health reforms often touch upon insufficient collaboration between health and
labour sectors, the organization of preventive and curative health services for working
populations, and their relation to primary care2. Employers, businesses and the private
sector are engaging in providing health services to workers and communities.
In 2007, the 60th World Health Assembly urged Member States to work towards covering all
workers with essential interventions and basic occupational health services for primary
prevention of occupational- and work-related diseases and injuries. This coverage should be
particularly provided to those in the informal economy, small- and medium-sized
enterprises, agriculture, and migrant and contractual workers. How can this goal be
achieved, bearing in mind that most countries experience a shortage of human resources for
health and most people lack access to the most basic elements of social protection in a
world of work that is ever more diverse, small scale, precarious and informal?
Recent decades have seen significant progress in the development of occupational health
services in a number of industrialized countries and economies in transition and rapid
economic growth. Compulsory provision of services along with national funds for their
financing has led to almost universal coverage in some countries and a significant increase of
coverage and quality in others. However, there are some concerns. In many countries
coverage remains low and increasingly inequitable and workers with the biggest needs, such
as those in agriculture, small enterprises and informal economy, remain without access to
1
Primary health care (PHC) is a way of organizing a health system so that everyone, both rich and poor, is able
to access the services and the conditions necessary for realizing the highest level of health. It includes
organizing health systems to provide quality and comprehensive health care to all while ensuring that poor and
other disadvantaged people have fair access to essential health services.
2
Primary care is a component of PHC and refers to the first level of contact people have
with health-care teams. In some countries this may be a community health worker or
midwife; in others, it refers to the family practitioner.
47 1

6. the most basic occupational health services. Where occupational health services exist, they
often focus on provider-driven menus of few interventions and may not be adequate to
meet the health needs and expectations of workers. In addition, there are language,
employment status and structural barriers to accessing services which in themselves are
becoming more and more profit-oriented. In many countries occupational health is still
detached from other parts of the health system, thus resulting in fragmentation of care,
difficulties with referral and follow up, and, in general, an inability to handle work-related
health problems.
The 1978 International Conference on Primary Health Care in Alma Ata called for bringing
health care to where people live and work. However, when PHC was put into practice, the
focus was mostly on health services where people live. With only a few exceptions, the
provision of health care where people work was absent from the debate on programmes
and strategies for primary health care. Thirty years after Alma Ata there are even more
compelling arguments for using the workplace as a point of entry to the health system. The
workplace can be a setting for delivery of essential health interventions and for reaching out
to workers’ families and communities. In some cases, the workplace is the only way of
providing health care, e.g. for mining communities and migrant workers. Furthermore,
improving workers’ health can help to reduce poverty, and is an essential prerequisite for
productivity and economic development.
There have been a number of innovative attempts to extend the coverage of basic
occupational health services through integration of occupational health with primary care at
the point of delivery. One example consists of training primary care providers, such as
general practitioners, nurses, technicians and community health workers to understand
work-related health problems and to provide some basic support for small workplace
settings to improve working conditions, to train workers on how to work in a healthy and
safe way and to provide first aid. This has been undertaken primarily in rural areas and the
informal sector. Another example is designating a member of the primary care team to
provide occupational health support to workers and workplaces in the catchment area of the
primary care centre. Yet, a third example is when occupational health experts periodically
visit the primary care centre to hold an occupational health clinic providing consultations
and advice as needed.
Whatever the model, integrated PHC-based services for workers would provide the first
point of contact within the health system while emphasizing primary prevention of
occupational and work-related diseases and injuries, promotion of health and restoring
working capacity. Such services require active mechanisms for workers’ participation in
planning, delivery and evaluation, an adequate skill mix of service providers, equitable
financing and purchasing mechanisms as well as a sound policy, legal and institutional
framework.
In 2008, WHO launched a set of reforms to provide PHC to all citizens focusing on universal
coverage, people-centred care, participatory health governance and including health in all
policies.
Working towards universal coverage with occupational health services entails certain
complex measures, such as reducing the proportion of costs to the individual undertaking
the service and/or workers (insurance schemes), adding interventions to the existing
package of service provision (primary prevention in addition to curative care), increasing the
47 2

7. number of workers covered, and reducing barriers to undertaking services and to individuals
accessing health services.
A new health leadership should include a solid regulatory framework to guarantee a basic
level of health protection in all workplaces and for all workers, as well as careful planning for
the provision of different occupational and primary health care services to under-served
working populations. Collaboration between health and labour sectors is essential to ensure
comprehensiveness and continuity of care. A new leadership also requires participation of
workers, employers and other workplace actors in the debate about health-care reforms.
The delivery of the essential occupational health interventions can be leveraged significantly
through integrated primary health care by putting people in the center of care. Occupational
health institutes, laboratories, clinics and information centres should provide expertise,
information and laboratory support to occupational health services and to primary care
centres. The collaboration between occupational health services and primary care centres
should be improved. The content of occupational health services needs to be reoriented
towards the health needs and expectations of the workers and not geared towards a supply
of providers. Particularly in need is provision of workplace initiatives, practical tools and
working methods that enable workers, employers and other work actors to undertake the
most basic measures for protecting and promoting health at work without unnecessarily
relying on health services.
Finally, delivering occupational health to all workers requires public policies that stimulate
inter-sectoral collaboration and coordination, not least involving health, labour,
environment, agriculture, industry, energy, transport, construction, finance, trade and
education. Social security institutions, employers, trade unions, the private sector and civil
society organizations have a particular role to play in shaping public policies for workers’
health.
47 3

8. I. Introduction
Approximately half of the world's population spends at least one third of its time in the
workplace. Fair employment and decent work are important social determinants of health
and a healthy workforce is an essential prerequisite for productivity and economic
development. When carried out under favourable conditions, work provides income to
support human needs and has a positive impact on the health and well-being of individuals
and on social and economic development.
However, most of the world’s workers still labour under unhealthy and unsafe working
conditions, resulting in about 2 million deaths annually from diseases and injuries.
Occupational risks account for a substantial portion of the burden of chronic diseases.
Between 3 and 4% of global GDP is being lost to costs associated with sickness absenteeism,
diseases and injuries resulting from work.
The current financial and economic crises caused world production to contract and raised
the number of unemployed people. In 2010 there were 205 million unemployed people in
the world. This is, however, is only the tip of the iceberg of labour market distress. Different
forms of underemployment, vulnerable employment and working poverty also increase. ILO
estimates that in 2009 around 1.5 billion workers, or half of the world's workers, were in
vulnerable employment The share of workers living with their families below the US$ 2 a day
poverty line is estimated at around 39 per cent, or 1.2 billion workers worldwide. 3
There are a number of highly effective interventions for prevention of occupational diseases
and injuries. However in many countries health systems are not able to deliver these
interventions to those workers in greatest need. Less than 15% of the global workforce have
some coverage with occupational health services. Furthermore, certain global health
problems, such as non-communicable diseases, result in increasing rates of long-term sick
leave and challenge the ability of health systems to preserve and restore working capacity.
The 62nd World Health Assembly in 2009 emphasized the need to strengthen health systems
based on primary health care (PHC) in keeping with the values and principles enshrined in
the Alma-Ata Declaration. Action must be taken to provide universal access to PHC by
developing comprehensive health services, introducing national equitable and sustainable
financing mechanisms and implementing vertical health programmes, e.g. occupational
health, in the context of integrated primary health care.4
Currently, a number of countries are reforming their health systems based on the values and
principles of PHC5 to improve service delivery, cost-efficiency and to ensure equity. National
debates on health reforms often touch upon insufficient collaboration between health and
labour sectors, the organization of preventive and curative health services for working
3
Global Employment Trends 2011. International Labour Office, Geneva, 2011.
4
Resolution WHA62.12. Primary health care, including health system strengthening. In: Sixty-second World
Health Assembly, Geneva, 18–22 May 2009. Resolution and decisions, annexes. Geneva, World Health
Organization, 2009, (WHA62/2009/REC/1), pp 16-18.
5
Primary health care (PHC) is a way of organizing a health system so that everyone, both rich and poor, is able
to access the services and the conditions necessary for realizing the highest level of health. It includes
organizing health systems to provide quality and comprehensive health care to all while ensuring that poor and
other disadvantaged people have fair access to essential health services.
47 4

9. populations, and their relation to primary care6. Employers, businesses and the private
sector are engaging in providing health services to workers and communities.
Many countries have already in place some form of essential interventions and services for
occupational health for occupational health. Few countries, though, have managed to
achieve a more universal coverage of workers with such interventions and to establish
sustainable mechanisms for the provision of basic services for occupational health. Other
countries are approaching WHO for access to these experiences and for technical assistance
in setting up their own programmes for scaling up coverage of workers with occupational
health care.
In 2007, the 60th World Health Assembly urged Member States to work towards full
coverage for all workers with essential interventions and basic occupational health services
for primary prevention of occupational- and work-related diseases and injuries. This
coverage should be particularly provided to those in the informal economy, small- and
medium-sized enterprises, agriculture, and migrant and contractual workers.7
How can this goal be achieved, bearing in mind that most countries experience a shortage
of human resources for health and most people lack access to the most basic elements of
social protection in a world of work that is ever more diverse, small scale, precarious and
informal?
6
Primary care is a component of PHC and refers to the first level of contact people have with health-care
teams. In some countries this may be a community health worker or midwife; in others, it refers to the family
practitioner.
7
Resolution WHA 60.26 "Workers' health: Global plan of action", In: Sixtieth World Health Assembly, Geneva,
14–23 May 2007, Resolution and decisions, annexes. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2007,
(WHASS1/2006–WHA60/2007/REC/1), pp 94-99.
47 5

10. II.
II. Health systems and primary health care
A health system consists of all organizations, people and actions whose primary intent is to
promote, restore or maintain health. This includes efforts to influence determinants of
health as well as more direct health-improving activities. A health system is therefore more
than the pyramid of publicly owned facilities that deliver personal health services. It includes
e.g. a mother caring for a sick child at home; private providers; behaviour change
programmes; vector-control campaigns; health insurance organizations; and occupational
safety and health. It includes intersectoral action by health staff e.g. by encouraging the
ministry of education to promote female education, a well-known determinant of better
health.
To achieve their goals, all health systems must carry out some basic functions, regardless of
how they are organized: they have to provide services; develop health workers and other
key resources; mobilize and allocate finances, and ensure health system leadership and
governance (also known as stewardship, which is about oversight and guidance of the whole
system). For the purpose of clearly articulating what WHO will do to help strengthen health
systems, the following six essential “building blocks” have been defined; all are needed to
improve outcomes:
• Good health services are those which deliver effective, safe, quality personal and non-
personal health interventions to those that need them, when and where needed, with
a minimum waste of resources.
• A well-performing health workforce is one that works in ways that are responsive, fair
and efficient to achieve the best health outcomes possible, given available resources
and circumstances (i.e. there are sufficient staff, fairly distributed; they are competent,
responsive and productive).
• A well-functioning health information system is one that ensures the production,
analysis, dissemination and use of reliable and timely information on health
determinants, health system performance and health status.
• A well-functioning health system ensures equitable access to essential products,
vaccines and technologies for protecting and restoring health that are of assured
quality, safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness, as e well as scientifically sound and
cost-effective to use.
• A good health-financing system raises adequate funds for health, in ways that ensure
people can use needed services, and are protected from financial catastrophe or
impoverishment associated with having to pay for them. It provides incentives for
providers and users to be efficient.
47 6

11. • Leadership and governance involves ensuring that strategic policy frameworks exist
and are combined with effective oversight, coalition building, regulation, attention to
system design and accountability8.
The best measure of a health system’s performance is its impact on health outcomes.
International consensus is growing: without urgent improvements in the performance of
health systems, the world will fail to meet its health-related goals. As health systems are
highly context-specific, there is no single set of best practices that can be put forward as a
model for improved performance. But health systems that function well have certain shared
characteristics. They have procurement and distribution systems that actually deliver
interventions to those in need. They are staffed with sufficient health workers having the
right skills and motivation. And they operate with financing systems that are sustainable,
inclusive, and fair. The costs of health care should not force impoverished households even
deeper into poverty.
Primary health care is “essential health care based on practical, scientifically sound and
socially acceptable methods and technology made universally accessible to individuals and
families in the community through their full participation and at a cost that the community
and country can afford to maintain at every stage of their development in the spirit of self-
reliance and self-determination. It forms an integral part both of the country’s health
system, of which it is the central function and main focus, and of the overall social and
economic development of the community. It is the first level of contact of individuals, the
family and community with the national health system bringing health care as close as
possible to where people live and work, and constitutes the first element of a continuing
health-care process.”9
Put simply, it is aimed at ensuring that everyone, rich and poor, is able to enjoy the services
and conditions necessary for realizing the highest level of health. It includes organizing
health systems to provide quality and comprehensive health care to all, while ensuring that
the poor and other disadvantaged people have fair access to essential health services. PHC
mobilizes society and requires community participation in defining and implementing health
agendas, and underscores intersectoral approaches to health. Most important, PHC ensures
that national health development is an integral part of the overall social and economic
development of countries.10 PHC is not poor care for the poor.
Primary care is a component of PHC and usually refers to the first level of contact people
have with health-care teams. In some countries this may be a community health worker or
midwife; in others, a family practitioner.
The concepts of PHC as they were expressed 30 years ago are still valid today. The World
Health Report of 2008 "Primary Health Care: Now More Than Ever" identified major avenues
8
Everybody's business. Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. WHO's framework for
action. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2007
9
Declaration of Alma-Ata. In: Primary Health Care. Report of the International Conference on Primary Health
Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6-12 September 1978, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1978, pp 2-6.
10
Equity in health (health status) means the attainment by all citizens of the highest possible level of physical,
psychological and social well-being. Equity in health care means that health-care resources are allocated
according to need; health care is provided in response to legitimate expectations of the people; health services
are received according to need regardless of the prevailing social attributes; and payment for health services is
made according to the ability to pay.
47 7

12. for health systems to narrow the intolerable gaps between aspiration and implementation.
These avenues are as four sets of reforms that reflect a convergence between the values of
primary health care, the expectations of citizens and the common health performance
challenges that cut across all contexts. They include:
• universal coverage reforms that ensure that health systems contribute to health
equity, social justice and the end of exclusion, primarily by moving towards universal
access and social health protection;
• service delivery reforms that re-organize health services around people’s needs and
expectations, so as to make them more socially relevant and more responsive to the
changing world, while producing better outcomes;
• public policy reforms that secure healthier communities, by integrating public health
actions with primary care, by pursuing healthy public policies across sectors and by
strengthening national and transnational public health interventions; and
• leadership reforms that replace disproportionate reliance on command and control
on one hand, and laissez-faire disengagement of the state on the other, by the
inclusive, participatory, negotiation-based leadership indicated by the complexity of
contemporary health systems.
While universally applicable, these reforms do not constitute a blueprint or a manifesto for
action. The details required to give them life in each country must be driven by specific
conditions and contexts, drawing on the best available evidence.11
11
Primary Health Care: Now More than Ever, The World Health Report 2008. Geneva, World Health
Organization, 2008.
47 8

13. III.
III. Occupational health
Occupational risk factors account for substantial part of the global burden of diseases. The
WHO study from 2004 found that 37% of back pain, 16% of hearing loss, 13% of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease, 11% of asthma, 8% of injuries, 9% of lung cancer and 2% of
leukaemia can be prevented through improving the work environment12.
The Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational Health defined the following objectives of
occupational health:
• promoting and maintaining workers’ health and work ability;
• improving work and the working environment and work so it is conducive to safety
and health;
• steering work organization and culture in a direction that supports health and safety
and, in so doing, also promotes productivity of an enterprise. 13,14
12
Concha-Barrientos M et al. Selected occupational risk factors. In: Ezzati M et al., eds. Comparative
quantification of health risks: global and regional burden of diseases attributable to selected major risk factors.
Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004:1651-801.
13
Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational health. 1950. Report of the First Meeting, 28 August - 2
September 1950. Geneva: ILO
14
Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational health. 1995. Defining Occupational Health. Geneva: ILO
47 9

14. interventions
Essential interventions
The range of the interventions addressing occupational and work-related diseases and
injuries may include both clinical (e.g. health examinations) and non-clinical interventions
(e.g. workplace risk assessment). The interventions can be categorized as preventive and
treatment interventions, where preventive interventions are usually offered to persons
unsolicited and without symptoms urging to seek help.
Preventive interventions can be divided into primary, secondary or tertiary prevention.
Primary preventive interventions aim at preventing disease or injury outcomes before the
onset of the pathological process whereas other preventive interventions address later
stages. In occupational health, primary preventive interventions aim at eliminating and
decreasing exposure known to be hazardous to health or to create a barrier to exposure.
Figure 1. Occupational health interventions for primary prevention (J. Verbeek, 2011)
In 2011 WHO commissioned an analysis of the available systematic reviews on the
effectiveness of the interventions for primary prevention of these occupational risks. The
analysis found that regulation and incentives for employers were one of the main causes of
reducing inhalation exposure to occupational risks in the industrialized world.
Even though personal protective equipment could reduce exposure in a technical sense,
there were many practical barriers that impeded its effectiveness in practice. Hearing loss
prevention programmes were not sufficiently protective but regulation and enforcement
were found useful to reduce noise levels in workplaces. There was no evidence in the
available studies that back pain could be prevented neither by training and education nor by
ergonomic improvements nor by pre-employment examinations.
For preventing injuries, technical hazard controls such as roll-over protection structures on
tractors could reduce fatal injuries but for most technical controls there were no studies or
no systematic reviews. Incentives such as feedback and rewards for workers improved safety
behaviour and probably reduced injuries but there were no systematic reviews of measures
to improve the safety climate in an enterprise. Education and training to prevent injuries
47 10

15. produced mixed results with some reviews providing evidence of effectiveness but with
other reviews not. 15
Occupational health services
Employers and enterprises have the primary responsibility to ensure that the workplace,
work processes and work organization do not pose risks to the health and safety of workers.
In fulfilling these responsibilities employers are supported by experts in the different areas
of occupational safety and health. Occupational health services are those entrusted with
essentially preventive functions and responsible for advising employers, workers and their
representatives on the requirements for establishing and maintaining a safe and healthy
working environment which will facilitate optimal physical and mental health in relation to
work. ILO Convention No. 16116 specifies that occupational health services should include
those of the following functions that are adequate and appropriate to the occupational risks
at the worksite:
• identifying and assessing the risks from health hazards in the workplace;
• surveillance of the factors in the working environment and working practices which
may affect workers’ health, including sanitary installations, canteens and housing
where these facilities are provided by the employer;
• advice on planning and organization of work, including the design of workplaces, on
the choice, maintenance and condition of machinery and other equipment, and on
substances used in work;
• participating in the development of programmes for the improvement of working
practices, as well as testing and evaluation of health aspects of new equipment;
• advice on occupational health, safety and hygiene, and on ergonomics and individual
and collective protective equipment;
• surveillance of workers’ health in relation to work;
• promoting the adaptation of work to the worker;
• contributing to measures of vocational rehabilitation;
• collaborating in providing information, training and education in the fields of
occupational health and hygiene and ergonomics;
• organizing first aid and emergency treatment;
• participating in analysis of occupational accidents and occupational diseases.
Occupational health services can be organized in different ways. In countries where the
provision of general health care is not sufficient, the provision of workplace specific
preventative interventions is combined with general curative and preventive care for
workers and their families. Large enterprises usually have comprehensive occupational
health service on their premises where multidisciplinary teams provide a full range of
preventative occupational health interventions and may also provide general health services
to workers and their families. Medium size enterprises may have an in-plant unit that is
staffed by one or more occupational health nurses and a part-time occupational physician or
15
Verbeek, J. Essential occupational safety and health interventions for low and middle income countries, an
overview of the evidence. Report prepared at the request of WHO. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health,
Cochrane Occupational Safety and Health Review Group. Kuopio, 2011
16
Occupational Health Services Convention, 1985, Seventy-first Session of the General Conference of The
International Labour Organization, 7 June 1985, Geneva
47 11

16. share an occupational health services with other enterprises in the same location or
industry. Hospitals provide services to injured or sick workers who seek care in their
outpatient clinics and emergency rooms but in some cases also operate specialized
occupational health clinics or services including both preventative and curative care. Private
centres are organized by a group of occupational health experts or a private entrepreneurial
organization to provide clinical and non-clinical (occupational hygiene) services to
enterprises. In some countries the primary care centres organized by municipal or other
local authorities or by the national health service provide some basic packages of essential
occupational health interventions to workplaces and work communities.17
The Thirteenth session of the Joint ILO/WHO Committee for Occupational Health in 2003
reviewed a new approach to providing occupational health services proposed by the
International Commission of Occupational health (ICOH). In order to move towards universal
coverage of all workers with occupational health services, ICOH developed the so called
"basic occupational health services" approach. Rantanen defined this approach as a stepwise
development of occupational health services, where the most basic (starting) level uses field
occupational health workers, such as a nurse or safety agent who have a short training in
occupational health and who work for a primary health care unit or a respective grassroots
level facility. The content of such service includes prevention of risks for accidents, healthy
physical work, basic sanitation and hygiene, and dealing with the most hazardous chemical,
physical and biological factors, including HIV/AIDS and referral to specialized services as
necessary.18
The next level is called "Basic Occupational Health Services" (BOHS) as an infrastructure-
based services working as close as possible to the workplaces and communities. Figure 2
depicts the key components of BOHS. The ILO/WHO Joint Committee on Occupational health
specified that the core content of basic occupational health services should include
surveillance and assessment of OSH risks, surveillance of individual worker health, informing
workers and managers on health hazards at work and providing preventative advice on safe
practices.19
17
Rantanen, J. and I. Fedotov, Standards, principles and approaches in occupational health services, In:
Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, Fourth Edition, edited by J.M. Stellman, volume I, pp. 16.2-
16.8, ILO, Geneva, 1998
18
Rantanen, J. Basic Occupational Health Services, 3rd Edition, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. Helsinki,
2007.
19
Joint ILO/WHO Committee on Occupational health. 2003. Report of the Thirteenth Session. 9-12 December
2003. Geneva: ILO.
47 12

17. Basic Occupational Health Services
Risk assessment Health education Provision of basic
and monitoring of and health curative services
the work promotion: including first aid:
environment:
•Workers provided •Provision of first aid
•Identification of with appropriate as required
workers or groups of information on
workplace risks and •Identification of
workers exposed to
hazards exposure(s) which
specific hazards
may cause
•Control of causal •Workers understand occupational disease
agents such as dust, the nature and
severity of the risks to •Diagnosis of
harmful chemicals or
which they are occupation related
heat.
exposed disease
•Suggestions for the
•Workers given •Provision of basic
control of occupational
information to curative health
health related risks
manage, mitigate and services to treat
•Identification and avoid those risks by occupation related
control of occupational making their working diseases
health hazards practices safer •Reporting of
through the use of
occupational disease
personal protective
and injuries
equipment etc.
Adapted from J. Rantanen, basic Occupational health services, 2007
Figure 2 Content of the basic occupational health services
BOHS are supposed to be staffed with a physician and a nurse with short (ten weeks) training
in occupational health as well as support from an expert with competence in basic safety and
accident prevention. The skill mix required for delivery of BOHS includes workplace and
health surveillance, risk assessment, disease and accident prevention, basic occupational
hygiene, general health care (GP level) in occupational medicine and general medicine,
communication, health promotion, self-auditing. Rantanen estimates that a minimum one
physician and two nurses are needed for every 5000 workers with great variation depending
on industrial activities and the size of workplaces and argues that BOHS should be provided
by the public sector, because of the very limited ability of small enterprises, self employed
and informal sector settings to purchase external services.15
47 13

18. IV.
IV. Occupational health in the context of
integrated primary health care
Integrated health services
There is some evidence suggesting that integrated approaches to delivering health services,
compared with vertical approaches improves outcomes in selected areas including HIV,
mental health and certain communicable diseases. Nevertheless, Atun et al argue that
vertical programmes may be desirable as a temporary measure in the following cases: weak
primary health care, need for a rapid response to a health problem; to address the health
needs of specific difficult to reach target groups, or to deliver certain complex health
interventions that require highly specialized health workforce. In fact, most health services
usually combine vertical and integrated elements, with varying degrees of balance between
them.20
International evidence indicates that a well organized and integrated PHC approach will
deliver better health outcomes in the most efficient and equitable way, at a lower cost and
with higher levels of user satisfaction than other approaches to providing healthcare21. The
effective PHC system should aim to provide universal coverage of services that deliver
comprehensive, integrated and appropriate care over time and that emphasize disease and
accident prevention and health promotion. In this context integration is defined by WHO as:
“The organization and management of health services so that people get the care
they need, when they need it, in ways that are user-friendly, achieve the desired
results and provide value for money22”
For the user, integration means health care that is seamless, smooth and easy to navigate.
For providers, integration means that separate technical services (and their management
support systems) are provided, managed, financed and evaluated either together, or in a
closely coordinated way. At the macro level of senior managers and policy-makers,
integration happens when decisions on policies, financing, regulation or delivery are not
inappropriately compartmentalized. Organizational integration happens when there are
mergers, contracts or strategic alliances between different institutions. Professional
integration occurs when different health professions or specialties work together to provide
joined-up services. 23
There are strong arguments for integrating some basic services for occupational health into
existing arrangements for providing primary health care. One of the principal advantages of
an integrated PHC approach is that this will enable basic services for occupational health to
20
Atun, R., S. Bennet, A. Duran, When do vertical (stand-alone) programmes have a place in health systems?
WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, 2008
21
Is primary care essential? Starfield B., Lancet. 1994
22
Integrated Health Services – what and why, Technical Brief No.1, WHO, May 2008
23
Ibid
47 14

19. be provided closer to the locations where people live and work and to a much larger number
of workers than currently covered with specialized occupational health services.
A number of countries are testing models to integrate PHC and the basic services for
occupational health. Their experience is discussed in more detail later in this paper.
However, experience gained to-date indicates that it is possible to begin to combine PHC
and occupational health in order to provide essential occupational health interventions
services to working populations and settings with constrained resources and lack of access
to mutidiciplinary comprehensive occupational health services. An integrated approach
should not try to focus of all aspects of occupational health, but should concentrate on a
highly selective package of essential interventions that would deliver the greatest return.
Some existing public health programmes, such as HIV/AIDS, Malaria, Maternity and Child
Health, have demonstrated ability to quickly reach populations at risk and to provide them
with health information and care. Some of the most successful among these have largely
been vertically funded and managed but integrated with other PHC activities at the point of
delivery. Similarly, essential interventions and some basic services for occupational health
can be effectively integrated into existing primary health care structures and local health
systems could enable similar opportunities for providing target worker populations with a
range of appropriate OSH services. Appropriate integrated models that identify systems,
structures and health worker capacities need to be developed
An integrated approach should have a specific focus on providing services to workers in
SMEs, workers who are self-employed and those in the informal sector in order to be able to
provide these important groups with effective services. The design of such integrated
services should take careful account of what is really needed by workers. Integrating
essential interventions and basic services for occupational health into PHC could lead to
more efficient service delivery and less costly utilization by recipients than providing a
standalone system for occupational safety and health.
There are a number of potential benefits from integration. These include:
Improved access
• Integration would also assist with the reduction of occupational and work-related
diseases and injuries through improved prevention practices and better access to
education for workers through their local PHC system
• Clients could make one visit to one practitioner or group of practitioners rather than
having to travel between different teams of providers in various locations thus
improving continuity of service provision and reducing the likelihood of dropout.
• Small enterprises and informal sector workers would be more likely access services
provided through their local health facility and may feel more comfortable in getting
treatment in their normal healthcare setting rather than having to incur significant
travel costs to be treated at a specialist facility in an urban centre
Greater health system efficiency
• Specialists in occupational health are in very short supply in many countries, and,
therefore, providing supplementary training in basic occupational health to existing
primary health care workers could be an effective strategy for rolling out these
47 15

20. services into the community and providing prevention and treatment for
uncomplicated cases.
• Using existing but up-skilled networks of health volunteers, auxiliary health workers,
workers' activists and community health workers to provide support for the delivery
of essential interventions for occupational health may prove to be an effective
strategy for delivering services right to the community level.
• Integration of the basic services for occupational health into PHC can avoid
duplication in management and support costs. Separate programmes need separate
staffing and infrastructure; and sometimes run separate supporting systems e.g.
logistical and procurement systems. The experience of other programmes that have
been integrated into PHC has demonstrated reduced overall costs and improved
treatment practices24
• Integrating into PHC may also be more cost effective. Duplicate implementation and
management arrangements potentially increase the cost of programme delivery –
however there is very little data on costs in the studies that have been undertaken to
date.
Better prevention of illness and injury
• Many of the disabling and costly occupational and work-related health conditions
that health systems have to deal with are preventable. With appropriate support,
additional complications can be avoided or their onset delayed and health outcomes
for clients improved
• Health systems can optimize the returns from scarce human and financial resources
through offering new services in innovative ways and by emphasizing those activities
that help to prevent accidents and illness and which delay the onset of complications.
The existing evidence base describing the benefits of integrating PHC is limited.
Reproductive health has been the focus of most of the work that has been done to date. The
research there is available suggests that the “move from disease specific programmes to
integrated services has risks as well as benefits and needs to be managed carefully”25. A
2006 Cochrane Collaboration review of “Strategies for integrating primary health services in
middle- and low-income countries at the point of delivery” concluded:
Few studies of good quality, large and with rigorous study design have been carried
out to investigate strategies to promote service integration in low and middle income
countries. All describe the service supply side, and none examine or measure aspects
of the demand side. Future studies must also assess the client's view, as this will
influence uptake of integration strategies and their effectiveness on community
health.”
There have been few high quality studies of integrating health programmes into PHC. More
high quality research is needed to be able to draw satisfactory conclusions regarding the
impact of integration on cost, access, service quality and health outcomes.
24
Jenkins R, Strathdee G: The Integration of Mental Health Care with Primary Care. International Journal of Law
and Psychiatry 2000, 23:277-291.
25
Integrated Health Services – what and why, Technical Brief No.1, WHO, May 2008
47 16

21. Integrated delivery
ntegrated
In 2011, HLSP Institute at the request of WHO reviewed the different practices for delivery of
essential interventions and basic services for occupational health in settings with constrained
resources26. The experience from a number of countries around the world in delivering basic
occupational health through integrated PHC was summarized in three main models as
described below.
Model 1: Financing and delivering essential occupational health care through standalone
community based insurance schemes
Community based insurance
Contribution from Organisation (e.g. SEWA, India) Contributions from
Social Fund? workers
Defined package of OH care
and prevention offered
through network of own
providers
SEWA Care SEWA Care SEWA Care
provider provider provider
In India, SEWA is a trade union for workers, mainly women, in the informal sector. It has
introduced a number of community based insurance (CBI) schemes including one for health
cover. Through its health scheme, it has addressed a number of important OSH issues by the
training and development of a cadre of its own, local health workers. The coverage and
operation of the SEWA community based insurance scheme is discussed in more detail in the
country case studies later in the report.
A recent discussion paper by the World Bank’s Social Protection and Labour Division on
community based risk management arrangements noted a number of potential weaknesses
of community based insurance schemes27. These included:
• exclusion of the most vulnerable groups leading to gaps in coverage and service
provision particularly to the poorest
• may require the support of donor or government financed Social Funds to be fully
effective
• vulnerability to manipulation by local leaders especially in poor and isolated rural
communities
26
HLSP, The role of health system in basic occupational health service provision for underserved groups -
experiences and challenges, Report prepared at the request of WHO. London, 2011
27
Community-based Risk Management Arrangements: An Overview and Implications for Social Fund Programs,
Bhattamishra R., Barrett C, World Bank Division of Social Protection and Labour, Oct 2008
47 17

22. Model 2: Publicly funded essential occupational health care delivered by NGOs and private
providers
MoH and/or MoL
Tax revenues & • Sets norms and standards for OH
user fees • Provides funding and capacity building Donor funds
• Manages/regulates provision of services
by third party providers
OH funding,
capacity building Information
and oversight
Intermediate level in the health system (e.g. district)
Contract management Information
and funding
CSOs or private
providers
Essential OH
interventions
Informal & vulnerable Informal & vulnerable
workers workers
This approach to delivering care involves contracting NGOs or private providers already
delivering PHC to extend their reach to include the delivery of BOSH services to the target
groups. The reach of government services/funding can be effectively extended through the
appropriate use of non state actors. Experience in Cambodia and in other countries such as
Bangladesh has highlighted the effectiveness of using NGOs to deliver PHC to reach
underserved groups or geographically hard to reach areas28.
However, there are certain pre-requisites if this approach is to be successful. These include:
government capacity and commitment to the contracting out of services; capacity at the
national and intermediate levels to manage contracts and monitor compliance with service
28
Cambodia: Using Contracting to Reduce Inequity in Primary Health Care Delivery, Schwartz B., Bhushan I.,
World Bank 2004
47 18

23. level agreements etc; and the availability of NGOs or private sector providers with the
capability to deliver contractually agreed services.
A 2005 review of the impact of contracting out health service provision in a range of
countries concluded that contracting out for the delivery of primary care “can be very
effective, that improvements can be rapid and that contracting for health service delivery
should be expanded and evaluated rigorously”29. However, it was also noted that many
countries which lack the capacity to organize and deliver basic health services themselves
may not have the means with which to manage contracts with NGO or private suppliers
effectively either.
Model 3: Integrating basic occupational health into state delivered primary health care
Ministry of Health
Tax revenues & • Sets norms and standards forOH in
user fees partnership with Min of Labour? Donor funds
• Provides funding and capacity building
• Manages provision of services through
own network of facilities and CHWs
OH funding,
capacity building Information
and oversight
Intermediate level in the health system (e.g. district)
Training, capacity
building & supervision Information
Primary Health Care Facility
OH integrated with PHC
OH
interventions
– preventive
& curative
Community
health workers
Preventive interventions
Informal & Informal &
vulnerable workers vulnerable workers
29
Buying Results? Contracting for health service delivery in developing countries, Loevinsohn B, Harding A., The
Lancet 2005
47 19

24. Model 3 illustrates how basic services for occupational health might be both funded and
integrated into a PHC approach. MoH staff are responsible for developing a package of
essential occupational health interventions in partnership with the Ministry of Labour where
appropriate and, providing adequate training, supervision and funding, managing its
integration with other elements of PHC and then delivering services through a network of
primary care facilities and community health workers.
Conventional public health interventions such as immunization or DOTS treatment for TB
follow a fairly standard format and design that can be relatively easily replicated and
adapted for different country contexts. Whilst, the mode of delivery may need to change
according to the setting in which the intervention is being applied, the essential nature of
the treatment to be applied (i.e. vaccine delivery or the provision of TB drugs) remains
largely the same.
However, the OH needs of agricultural workers in Africa are going to be very different from
those of street vendors or rubbish collectors in India or artisanal fishermen in the
Philippines. This implies that a creative and flexible approach to OH design needs to be taken
that takes into account the OH needs of particular groups of workers and which tailors the
interventions to their requirements. There is therefore no “one size fits all” or standard
approach to designing and developing OH interventions. This will offer a particular challenge
to the health sector. Moreover High level knowledge and skills will be needed to accomplish
this effectively.
It is therefore not possible to be prescriptive about how OH interventions can be integrated
into PHC as health systems vary so widely from country to country. Model 3 attempts to
provide a generalized outline of how integration could be organized. However, the existing
structure of the health system in individual countries and the method of funding health
services will in large part determine how OH services can be effectively integrated into PHC.
The essential interventions and services for occupational health should be integrated as
seamlessly as possible into PHC delivery and funding mechanisms, whilst ensuring that
funding mechanisms do not throw up specific barriers to access. One size will not fit all and
it will be important to adapt the organization and services to the local context.
Integrated
Integrated financing
The integration of primary health care services is taking place in many developing countries
around the world. Many of the existing PHC programmes (malaria, reproductive health,
HIV/Aids, TB etc.) are vertically funded and managed interventions which are integrated at
the point of delivery in health facilities or communities. Experience in many countries has
demonstrated that whilst this approach can be very effective it can also lead to a number of
important problems such as poor allocation of funding across programmes (some can be
greatly overfunded and vice-versa), inefficiency and duplication in the use of resources and
real difficulties in getting funding for training and operational costs down to the service
delivery level. These are all important challenges that will need to be tackled when
integrating OH with PHC.
47 20

25. There are five main health financing approaches which are used to fund healthcare30 (this
analysis does not include financial transfers from donors) and which could potentially serve
as funding mechanisms for OH as it integrates with PHC. These are:
Taxation – public funding of healthcare is provided through the collection of a range of
taxes including income tax, corporation tax, customs duties and licence fees etc.
Advantages – taxation is generally an inexpensive way of raising funds - most
countries already have an existing revenue collection system which can be adapted
or expanded. Taxation can be progressive meaning those who have the most pay the
most (e.g. income tax). Some countries are taxing good and products that are
hazardous to health, such as alcohol, tobacco (sin tax).
Disadvantages – tax revenues may be unpredictable due to fluctuations in the
business cycles. The recent global financial crisis has had a significant impact on tax
revenue collection in most countries around the world which has led to a reduction
in the amount of funding available for public health systems and primary care.
Taxes may be regressive - sales taxes and VAT have a disproportionate impact on the
poor.
This is potentially a mechanism for funding OH although any new package of interventions
would have to compete with existing PHC interventions and services for resources. Public
funding of services frequently provides few incentives to improve staff performance and
under performing staff may be difficult to replace. Important issues such as the quality of
care are also difficult to address in a system that does not provide incentives (or
disincentives) for doing so.
Social Insurance – a form of service funding where people contribute a fixed proportion
of their income in return for a defined package of healthcare or other benefits.
Advantages - By reinforcing the principle of risk pooling it can be a means to promote
greater social solidarity in a health system, and can ultimately be used as a means of
achieving universal coverage. It can be seen as a more transparent and more
legitimate than tax-based funding as there is a clearer link between payments and
benefits. Beneficiaries are seen as “members”. As such this approach may be more
acceptable to the public and, as a result, also have the potential to raise more funds.
Social insurance may be more responsive than tax funded systems as “everyone is a
private patient not a nuisance”. It can also challenge the status quo as funding is tied
to patients, not facilities, which is often not the case under a tax based system
Disadvantages - Rarely self-sustaining (especially when coverage increases), requiring
subsidies for the poor. Coverage of social health insurance is generally limited to
curative and medical interventions (not public health). It does not always provide for
expensive, catastrophic care – which insurance is best designed for. There is risk
pooling although only between members and, as a result, the pool may not be that
big if coverage is low. Social insurance must be financed from employment income -
a narrower base than for general taxation (business taxes, import duties etc. Social
insurance tends to be restricted (largely) to the formal sector given problems in
30
Understanding Health Economics for Development, HLSP CD Rom, 2010
47 21

26. collecting funds from the informal sector. Vulnerable groups of people are therefore
likely to be excluded.
For example, China is piloting the use of social insurance to fund BOSH interventions for
informal and migrant workers delivered through a PHC network. Experience there, where
the cost of providing BOSH is shared between the government and employers has
demonstrated that this can be a reasonably effective system for providing services to the
majority of workers. An evaluation of the BOSH scheme in 2008 found that employers had
spent 200 RMB for each worker per year on OH per year (compared with 3000 RMB lost per
worker per year due to occupational disease). However, there were administrative problems
in keeping migrant workers enrolled in the system particularly when they moved jobs
frequently31.
Community based health insurance - is an emerging approach, which addresses the health
care challenges faced in particular by the rural poor and which helps to address both health
financing and service provision simultaneously (many of the CBI schemes are organized by
local providers of health care). It has grown rapidly in recent years, particularly in West
Africa.
Advantages - the success of community health insurance depends upon a number of
factors, including: trust and solidarity, typically requiring significant community
participation; a willingness to pay which depends on economic and social factors;
subsidies - otherwise the approach will only meet some needs of the rural sector;
good design (to counter adverse selection, moral hazard); and a strong
marketing/business culture.
Disadvantages - Although sometimes successful on a smaller scale, these approaches
have rarely been taken to scale. Establishing schemes creates a dilemma. Initial
subsidization can be helpful in introducing the concept of insurance and reducing
risks to those implementing any scheme, but this can be counterproductive and
subsidies become difficult to remove. Sustainability is a key concern - access by the
poor and vulnerable populations will invariably require subsides. The problem is that
poor countries which have the greatest need to subsidise the poor are the very
countries least able to provide such subsidies.
There is some evidence from the SEWA scheme in India of the successful application of the
CBI approach to providing a limited range of OSH services. However, coverage of the scheme
is limited and there are challenges in taking this kind of approach to scale.
Tanzania has developed a social health insurance organization (UMASIDA) targeted at the
informal sector in Dar es Salaam. The scheme provides both health and occupational safety
and health services to its members. It was recognized that access to social services has a
large impact on productivity and organizations of informal workers would be an appropriate
mechanism for providing such services. PHC services are provided through its own network
of dispensaries and by private providers. Secondary level care is provide through
government funded hospitals32
31
Basic Occupational Health Services in Ba’oan, China, Chen Y., Chen J, Journal of Occupational Health, 2010
32
The UMASIDA Mutual Health Care Scheme, A case study of an Urban based Community Health Fund, Kiwara
A, Institute of Develoment Studies, May 2005
47 22

27. The main advantage of social or community health insurance schemes for informal workers
is that they improve health expenditure efficiency (the relationship between quality and cost
of health services. There are three main reasons why informal workers would prefer group
schemes to individual spending and financing on healthcare33:
• by making regular contributions, the problem of indebtedness brought about by high
medical bills can be overcome
• the financial power of the group may enable its administrators to negotiate services
of better quality or which represent better value for money from private health care
providers; and
• the group may be willing to spend on preventive and health promotion activities so
as to keep down the cost of curative services.
Private health insurance - In low income countries, private insurance typically serves the
rich, though it may enjoy both direct (tax relief) or indirect subsidies (e.g. through tax
funding of the regulatory system).
Disadvantages – whilst private insurance provides choice and is responsive to patient
needs it introduces serious problems of adverse selection, moral hazard, supports
little risk pooling and has the potential to absorb resources from elsewhere in the
system (either directly or indirectly. It has high administration costs and also provides
an escape route for the middle classes who might otherwise press for better services
for the population at large. There is no evidence that subsidizing private insurance
reduces the burden on the public sector as is often claimed.
This is not likely to be an effective approach for extending basic services to poor and
disadvantaged groups of workers given the scale of the costs involved and the disposable
incomes of the workers concerned.
User Fees - In the past user fees were seen as a way of raising revenue and deterring
frivolous use of health services. They were also seen as a way of formalizing informal fees
(or under the table payments). Well meaning efforts to protect the poor through waivers or
exemptions are almost always ineffective, although experience in Cambodia suggests that
exemptions may be possible. Recently there has been a strong political shift in favour of the
abolition of fees based, in part, on positive experiences in Uganda. In some countries – most
notably Uganda - the abolition of user fees has been associated with a large increase in
utilization, especially by the poor, although accompanying measures to improve the drug
supply and strengthen financial management also played key roles.
This is not likely to be an effective approach for extending basic OH services to poor and
disadvantaged groups of workers.
33
Working Paper on the Informal Economy The Informal Sector in Sub-Saharan Africa, ILO, 2002
47 23

28. V. Examples from countries
countries
This section looks at the approaches taken by different countries to delivering essential
interventions and basic services for occupational health in the context of integrated primary
health care. The case studies were developed by the HLSP Institute and by experts who
participated in the inter-country consultation "Integration of Workers’ Health in the
Strategies for Primary Health Care" organized by WHO and the Government of Chile on 4–7
May 2009 in Santiago, Chile. The available evidence in this area was primarily from
descriptive publications and there was little quantitative data or information available on
key issues such as costs and health impact and outcomes.
United Kingdom - working for a healthier tomorrow 34
The UK health-care system is universal and funded from taxation, free at the point of
delivery, and covers the entire population. The National Health Service (NHS) is divided into
primary and secondary care. Primary care is controlled by regional health authorities
through primary care trusts. Primary care is the first point of contact for the public and
includes GP practices, pharmacists, opticians and dentists. Secondary care is hospital care,
both acute and planned.
Currently GPs have no access to occupational health services. Sixty years ago, when the NHS
was founded, occupational health was not included, as it was seen to be of most value and
concern to industries and businesses, and so to be paid for by employers. The current
coverage of occupational health is about 30% of workers. The trend since the 1990s has
been to outsource in-house occupational health services to external contracted service
units. There are no national standards for occupational health provision in the UK as yet.
The major causes of people leaving the workplace (2006 figures) are mental health problems
(40%), musculoskeletal (18%), cardiovascular and respiratory diseases (8%), nervous system
diseases (6%), injury and poisoning (6%) and others (22%). The overall cost of working-age
ill-health is 100 billion pounds per year, and the cost of sickness absenteeism is 13 billion
pounds per year. In addition, there are social problems and consequences beyond the
workplace, e.g. for children in workless families.
At a time when rising dependency ratios and the effects of ever-greater global competition
place huge pressures on economic and welfare systems all around the world, acting to
prevent people from becoming ill at work – and supporting and rehabilitating those who do
become ill – is not only crucial to the physical and mental health of the nation’s workforce,
but ultimately critical to the nation’s financial health, the success of British business, the
economy and the very fabric of society.
Current occupational health structures in the UK may have been right when they were
created, but there is a need now to make sure that they are appropriate for the present and
the future. It is time to reposition and redefine the role of occupational health as an integral
part of the new public health policy for the 21st century, and to reconsider the relationship
34
Contribution from Professor Dame Carl Black, 2009
47 24

29. between occupational health and the NHS, especially primary care, together with the wider
contribution of occupational health to the national economy.
GPs are critically important colleagues, and need to be supported to change and enlarge
their attitude to work as a desirable outcome of a clinical encounter. There is now clear
evidence that work is generally good for health, and therefore the benefits of work must
feature more prominently in the advice that GPs give to their patients. But general
practitioners cannot be expected to change without being offered significantly more
support. Occupational health has a role in providing such support.
The challenge for a new paradigm of occupational Health is to examine the care pathways
for working people and find new ways to support them before, during and after illness at
work. This will require forging new partnerships and new ways of working across traditional
boundaries. There is a need to bring together at local level anyone with interest or expertise
in occupational health, to find locally tailored and ever more innovative ways to allow
occupational health to make its crucial contribution to the health of the national economy.
Carol Black's report to Government, Working for a healthier tomorrow, published in March
2008, had three key objectives:
i) preventing illness and promoting health and well-being in the workplace;
ii) early intervention for those who are employed but absent with a “sick note”;
iii) improving the health and well-being of unemployed people within the UK benefit
system.
The report included the following recommendations:
• Government should work with employers to develop a robust model for
measuring and reporting on the benefits of investment in health and well-being.
• Employers should report at board level on staff health and well-being.
• A health and well-being consultancy service should be set up to provide
employers with advice and support.
• The role of safety and health practitioners, and where present trades union safety
representatives, in promoting the benefits of investing in health and well-being
should be expanded.
Practical ways should be explored to make it easier for smaller employers to establish health
and well-being initiatives. An integrated approach to working-age health should be taken,
underpinned by:
• inclusion of occupational health and vocational rehabilitation within
mainstream healthcare;
• clear professional leadership from the occupational health and vocational
rehabilitation communities to expand their remits and work with new
partners in supporting the health of all working-age people;
• clear standards of practice and formal accreditation for all providers of OH
engaged in supporting working-age people;
47 25

30. • a revitalized OH workforce with the development of a sound academic base
to provide research and support in relation to the health of all working-age
people;
• systematic gathering and analysis of data at the national, regional and local
level to inform the development of policy and the commissioning of services
relating to the health of working-age people; and
• awareness and understanding of the latest evidence on the most effective
interventions developed by organizations such as the Occupational Health
Clinical Effectiveness Unit.
The UK Government’s response to Black's report, entitled Improving health and work:
changing lives, was published in November 2008. The government accepted the broad thrust
and most of the detail of the recommendations in the report. The response sets out new
perspectives on health and work, improvement of workplaces, supporting people to work
and measuring outcomes of the process.
The new approach includes a new electronic “Fit Note”; piloting of a new “Fit for Work”
service; training and education for healthcare professionals especially GPs; national
standards for occupational health providers; a strategy for mental health and employment; a
national centre for working-age health and well-being; and a council of occupational health.
The response says: “By working together, our efforts will help us to combat social exclusion,
eradicate child poverty, support our aging population and build a workforce for tomorrow. By
improving health and work we will make a real difference to people’s lives.”
Thailand – primary care units35
In 2003, the total Thai workforce was estimated at 33.8 million people. Of these, at least 51
per cent worked in the informal sector with approximately 40 per cent of the population
working in agriculture, 16 per cent in manufacturing and 6 per cent in construction. There
were also an estimated two million migrant workers, mainly from Myanmar36.
In Thailand, the Ministry of Public Health is responsible for the provision of the majority of
health services. The public health system has a four level structure:
• Health volunteers who have been trained in primary health care and provide services
to 5-10 families in the local area.
• Primary Care Units (PCUs) of which there are approximately 7700 in Thailand, are
normally staffed with eight trained health care workers who can provide more
specialized services than health volunteers and who provide health care to the
community. A PCU will service 10,000 people on average and its responsibilities will
include disease prevention, health promotion, and treatment of illness.
• Secondary level services provided by medical and health personnel based in
community hospitals.
35
Contribution from HLSP and S. Siriruttanapruk, 2009
36
Labour Force Survey. National Statistics Office, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology,
Thailand. http://web.nso.go.th/eng/en/stat/lfs_e/lfse.htm (accessed 29 August, 2007).
47 26

31. • Tertiary level services which cover more specific and complicated cases provided by
specialist medical and health care staff. These services are based in Regional, General,
Specialized and University Hospitals.
Health system financing
Following the launch of universal health care coverage in 2002, general health services are
available to all Thai citizens, funded through health insurance. More than 25 million Thais
however do not hold public health insurance (Siriruttanapruk et al, 2006). Migrants who are
registered are able to access general health services through the Compulsory Migrant Health
Insurance (CMHI) scheme but this is not available to migrants who are not registered.
Unregistered migrants pay for services out of pocket although hospital exemptions are
available and international donors provide health services in many areas where migrants are
concentrated in addition to some provinces providing voluntary health insurance schemes to
the unregistered (IOM/WHO, 2009).
Health services are also provided by private providers under the supervision of the MOPH
and other public agencies such as the Ministry of Defence who provide services to officials
and their families and the public37.
Occupational Safety and Health in Thailand
Responsibility for occupational health and safety in Thailand is divided between three
government ministries. The Ministry of Labour enforces OSH regulations and undertakes
workplace safety inspections. The Ministry of Industry is responsible for enforcing the
Factories Act which covers workplaces with large machines and/or more than seven
workers. The Ministry of Public Health provides technical support for occupational health
services in five main areas: occupational disease surveillance; technical support;
development of OSH guidelines; training of health care workers; and research and
development.
Traditionally, OH services in Thailand have been provided through provincial and regional
public hospitals and also through some community hospitals in industrial areas. Typically,
the staff in these hospitals would have received some training in OSH and would have the
means available to monitor occupational safety risks in the workplace. The public health
office in each province has a specialist in occupational and environmental health that is
responsible for developing OSH strategies for each province.
Role of Primary Care Units (PCU) in providing basic occupational health
In order to improve the coverage and availability of OH services an initial, strategy of using
PCUs to deliver both PHC and basic OH services was developed. A pilot project was
established by the MOPH in 2004 to test a model which integrated occupational health
services into the existing public health system and which assessed the capacity of PCU staff
to deliver OSH services. The model was found to be reasonably effective and it was
demonstrated that staff in PCUs were able to effectively deliver both PHC and basic OSH
services.
PCU staff undertake OH outreach visits to workplaces - these tend to be mainly factories or
other formal work settings. However, workers in the informal sector would often still find
37
Integrating Occupational Health Services into Public Health Systems: A Model Developed with Thailand’s
Primary Care Units, Somkiat Siriruttanapruk and team Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, ILO (2006)
47 27

32. difficulty in accessing OH services due to their dispersed, sometimes difficult to reach work
locations and a general lack of knowledge on their part of OSH issues.
In 2007 the MOPH decided to extend the model in order to identify improved ways of
delivering basic occupational health services to workers in the informal sector (Agriculture,
SMEs, Fisheries, Migrant workers and Home workers). The services included:
• Risk assessment and workplace improvement
• Surveillance of work-related diseases and chronic diseases
• Health promotion
• Provision of safety equipment
Health volunteers were used to deliver both PHC and basic OH services in the community
(Siriruttanapruk et al, 2009). The health volunteers (who receive a small stipend from the
government) were trained to work with occupational health teams to provide basic OSH
services in addition to PHC. The rationale behind the strategy is that by up-skilling the large
network of health volunteers to provide PHC and OH services, local needs can be met more
effectively and services provided more efficiently to workers in the informal economy. In
some of the test locations, health volunteers have been involved in providing workplace
safety improvements and in reducing the use of dangerous chemicals and pesticides.
Finland - municipal health centres38
According to the Primary Health Care Act the entire Finnish population is covered by primary
health care services provided by municipal health centres. Finland has had a special
legislation on occupational health services since 1978 and it was revised in 2001. The law
obligates the employer to organize preventive OHS for his/her employees by using
competent occupational health personnel (OHP + OHN) and according to need other
experts, such as hygienists, psychologists, physiotherapists/ergonomists etc.. The obligation
is universal in all sectors, private and public, regardless of the size of company, geographical
location or type of employment contract. Provided the requirements of legislation are met,
the employer is entitled to reimbursement of 50 to 60% of the costs of the services he/she
has provided to employees.
The law requires preventive content of services, including among others workplace
surveillance, risk assessment, accident prevention, ergonomics, surveillance of health,
promotion of health and work ability of workers and advice, information and education of
occupational health, and safe and healthy working practices to workers and employers. The
employer is entitled to provide also GP level curative services for his/her employees in
connection with occupational health services and about 80% of them do so. The employer is
entitled to buy services from any of the competent and registered occupational health
service units, organize own in-company services, group services, or buy the services from a
private occupational health centre or from a municipal health centre.
The municipal health centres have a legal obligation to provide occupational health services
to anybody who is interested in getting them. Virtually all farmers and self-employed who
are covered by OHS are served by municipal health centres and for farmers the preventive
OHS workplace visits by experts are provided free of charge.
38
Contribution from Professor J. Rantanen, 2009
47 28

33. The coverage of Finnish OHS is one of the highest in the world, about 85% of all (including
self-employed) and about 90% of the workers employed by the employer. The coverage of
services is 90 to 100% of companies with 10 workers and more, while the coverage of
companies decreases substantially among the SMEs and self-employed being on average at
the level of 60%.
The municipal health centres (primary health care units) have occupational health physician
and nurse for provision of services and they can use services of other experts, e.g.
occupational hygienists or psychologists e.g. from the multidisciplinary teams of the regional
offices of occupational health (FIOH).
The experiences from provision of services by PHC units are positive. The municipal health
centres accommodate 29% of all occupational health service units in Finland and provide
occupational health services for 32% of all workers covered by OHS and for 61% of all
enterprises.
Obstacles are the thin resources and shortage of service time of OHS personnel and
tendency to prioritize the worker-oriented health service provided from the centre at the
cost of preventive interventions to the work environment, which would require more active
visiting at the workplaces.
occupational
Indonesia – occupational health posts in the informal sector
Indonesia is the fourth largest country in population terms after China, India and the USA. In
2008, its total population was 228 million39. The total labour force (15 years and above) was
approximately 108 million in 2007. In 2006 it was estimated that about 63 percent of
Indonesia’s workers were employed in the informal sector, mostly in agriculture, home-
industries and fisheries etc. . Small enterprises contribute about 38 per cent of GDP40.
PHC in Indonesia is largely provided through a large network of facilities that includes: health
centres (PUSKESMAS), sub-health centres, mobile units and community based activities at
the village level. PHC and OH services are co-funded by central and local governments. A
typical health centre is led by a medical doctor supported by a range of health and other
professionals. It is responsible for providing preventative and curative services to the
community including OH together with activities aimed at health promotion, education and
empowerment41.
In 1980 Indonesia introduced Occupational Health Posts (OHP) at the community level. It is a
self-care model run by workers who are trained by health staff from a local health centre.
Services provided by OHPs include: basic first aid delivery for accidents and OH related
disease together with preventive and educative interventions intended to encourage
workers to use appropriate safety equipment. Service provision is intended to be integrated
within the PHC approach. Significant progress has been reported to-date in rolling-out the
basic OSH training required by staff at all levels of the health system in order to implement
the OHP approach42.
39
Indonesian Country Paper on the Informal Sector and its Measurement, BPS-Statistics Indonesia, May 2008
40
The Informal Sector and Informal Employment in Indonesia, ADB Country Report, 2010
41
Revitalizing Primary Health Care, Indonesia Country Experience, WHO Regional Conference, Aug 2008
42
Ibid
47 29

34. By 2008 it was reported that over 8,000 OHPs had been established although problems with
funding had been experienced. The provision of occupational health has not yet been
included in the basic PHC package of care in Indonesia and the support and financing of basic
OSH has been rather patchy both from the central level and through local administrations43.
It is important to integrate OSH into the basic PHC package of care in order to ensure that
appropriate structures are in place to provide training and supervision and also that funding
for OSH is included in overall PHC allocations.
China - piloting basic occupational health services44
piloting
The economic reforms and industrialization over the last 25 years in China have resulted in a
substantial increase in the numbers of migrants moving from rural to urban areas of the
country45. A rigid system of household registration (Hukou) that only allowed people to
access social services in the areas where they are registered has been applied. Whilst this
has begun to be relaxed in a number of cities, it has still been identified as an area of
concern. As migrants generally retain their rural registration, they are often excluded from
accessing services in the areas to which they migrate, including health care and occupational
health services. In 2008 health insurance coverage was only 19% among rural migrants
compared to 58% of urban residents whose cover was generally linked to the place of
work46.
China lacks good quality, accessible primary care system. Traditionally, in urban areas,
hospitals have provided PHC - there has been a widespread belief among the urban Chinese
that hospital is best and that the quality of care provided by hospital specialist is superior to
that of general practitioners. The creation of a comprehensive primary health care system is
the centre piece of China’s health care reform announced in 200947.
The State Administration of Work Safety, a ministerial level national authority directly under
the State Council, is responsible for workplace safety and health inspection, and for ensuring
compliance with OSH provisions at provincial, city and country levels. The labour
inspectorates enforce the implementation of various laws and regulations through
supervising employers in order to establish and standardize labour contracts and collective
contracts48.
Workers in SMEs, including migrants however have limited coverage of OSH which is
attributed to a number of factors including:
• Factory managers and workers having little understanding of OHS.
43
Impact and Effectiveness of Occupational Health Interventions: a qualitative study on multiple stakeholders in
occupational health for informal sectors in Indonesia, Hanifa M. Denny, College of Public Health, University of
Florida (on-going research project)
44
HLSP analysis
45
Hesketh, T; Jun, Y. X; Mei, L. H.(2008) Health Status and Access to Health Care of Migrant Workers in China,
Public Health Reports 2008 Mar–Apr; 123(2): 189–197
46
Ibid
47
China’s primary health-care reform, Liu Q., Wang B., The Lancet, March 2011
48
Zhu, C (2008) Labour protection for women workers in China, Asian-Pacific Newsletter on Occupational
Health and Safety;15:47
47 30