The document discusses recommendations from a review of HEFCE metrics in 2015, including using indicators instead of metrics, ensuring peer review is not replaced by metrics, being transparent about how institutions use data, and dialoging with staff. It also notes that journal impact factors do not accurately reflect the variation in citations individual papers receive and that distributions of citations are highly skewed across journals. The document calls for redefining good behaviors in research and incentivizing behaviors like research quality, open and efficient publishing practices, and contributions to mentoring and peer review.