Peer Reviews of Theory and Proposal Presentations
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•1,134 views
The documents provide assessment forms and rating sheets for evaluating theory presentations, proposal presentations, and assessment skills. For theory presentations, areas like the title, theory description, image quality, and citations are assessed. Proposal presentations are assessed on the title, design, images, summaries, spelling/grammar, and presentation. Finally, assessors are evaluated on their assessment accuracy by a lecturer, with errors reducing their grade. Overall grades are averaged to calculate assessor performance.
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (13)
Similar to Peer Reviews of Theory and Proposal Presentations
Similar to Peer Reviews of Theory and Proposal Presentations (20)
More from Jaime Alfredo Cabrera
More from Jaime Alfredo Cabrera (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Peer Reviews of Theory and Proposal Presentations
- 1. Comments on the Theory Presentation Assessor Presenter Proposal Title ASSESSOR’S COMMENTS 01 Positive 02 Negative 03 Positive 04 Negative 05 Positive 06 Negative
- 2. Peer Assessment of Theory Presentation Assessor Date: Presenter Theory Title Proposal Title 01 Title The theorist’s last name and year of publication PASS FAIL 02 Theory A specific part of the theory, not the entire theory PASS FAIL 03 Image Source is APA style at the bottom of the slide PASS FAIL 04 Image Image is high quality, not pixilated PASS FAIL 05 Summary A few words in the writer’s own words, with citation PASS FAIL 06 Citation APA Style: (Author, year) before the full-stop symbol. PASS FAIL 07 Focus One part of a complex image is presented separately PASS FAIL 08 Application How the theory is used in the proposal is clearly presented PASS FAIL 09 Text Large text visible to the end of the room. PASS FAIL 10 Text A few words that can be read in 30 seconds are used PASS FAIL 11 Speech Clear, syllabicated, can be heard to the back of the room PASS FAIL 12 Action Eyes mostly on audience; hands and feet not distracting PASS FAIL 13 Reference Each slide with an reference; each in correct APA format PASS FAIL 14 Reference All references listed on last slide; each in correct APA format PASS FAIL TOTAL # of PASS / 14
- 3. Comments on the Proposal Presentation Assessor Presenter Proposal Title ASSESSOR’S COMMENTS 01 Positive 02 Negative 03 Positive 04 Negative 05 Positive 06 Negative
- 4. Peer Assessment of Proposal Presentation Assessor Date: Presenter Theory Title Proposal Title 01 Title The problem to be solved and the location is stated PASS FAIL 02 Title A specific part of the theory, not the entire theory PASS FAIL 03 Design Complete headings, text and photos look professional PASS FAIL 04 Image Images are clear; sources are recorded PASS FAIL 05 Summary A short story in the writer’s own words related to the topic PASS FAIL 06 Theory Theory is used to explain or solve a problem in the proposal PASS FAIL 07 Spelling No spelling errors that can be seen PASS FAIL 08 Grammar No grammar errors that can be seen PASS FAIL 09 Formatting No formatting errors that can be seen PASS FAIL 10 Vocabulary No vocabulary errors that can be seen PASS FAIL 11 Speech Clear, syllabicated, can be heard to the back of the room PASS FAIL 12 Action Eyes mostly on audience; hands and feet not distracting PASS FAIL 13 Presentation Professional, smooth, clearly well prepared and practiced PASS FAIL 14 Enthusiasm Presenter is enthusiastic and positive in speech and action PASS FAIL TOTAL # of PASS / 14
- 5. How the Assessor is Assessed Assessor's Peer Assessment Grade (by Lecturer) % • For instance, a presentation has spelling errors. • However, an assessor gives a PASS grade for “No spelling errors that can be seen.” • That is equal to one assessment error. • Each assessment error is minus 5 points against the assessor. • For instance, an assessor with minus 45 points will get a grade of (100-45 = 55%). • Each assessor will complete one assessment for each team member. • The total scores will be averaged.
- 6. G01 Assessment Skills Rating Sheet Assessor 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Errors Yusuf Saleh Lubama Demuna Zhang Jiguang Sadiq Yahya Bakhit Lin Ye Htut Aung Ameroden Datusolaiman Lao Myo Thura Lwin Pa Pa Min Patrya Paing Khine Khant Soe Lwin Zhang Zhiguang Isaac Bate Obenson TOTAL AVERAGE MARK
- 7. G05 Assessment Skills Rating Sheet Assessor 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 Errors Said Ismail Abdullahi Imran Ali Ahmed Osman Adem Jama Hassan Anwar Mohamed Mukthar Ahmad Hamdan Mukthar Ali Ahmad Hamud Hossen Musawar Hasan Ahmedov Lazizhon Taibu Robson Makumba Sadeq Saif Mohammed Assalami Tania Allan Edgorov Temurmalik Chimi Yangzom Akbarhon Toshkujayev TOTAL AVERAGE MARK
- 8. G10 Assessment Skills Rating Sheet Assessor Errors 01 Adam Mohamed Ali Gedi 02 Abdihamid Osman Mohamed 03 Said Abid S/O Said Tahir 04 Yuhan Satapo 05 Suwaibah Yama 06 Kamalrul Syazwan bin Marakan 07 Mohamad Helmi bin Abdul Khadir 08 Muhamadd bin Arsad 09 Muhamad Syazani bin Mohamad Sanee 10 Amirul Anwar bin Rosli 11 Liban Omar Moalim Mohamud TOTAL AVERAGE MARK
- 9. Project Presentation Assessment Assessor's Complete Name: Assessor's Theory Presentation Grade (Average: by Peers) % Assessor's Project Presentation Grade (Average: by Peers) % Assessment Skills Rating Sheet (Average: by Lecturer) % TOTAL AVERAGE %