John Nash was a mathematician who developed paranoid schizophrenia. He was admitted to a psychiatric hospital after exhibiting erratic behavior due to believing he was part of a secret government mission. At the hospital, he realized the mission and some people he knew were hallucinations. He was prescribed medication but stopped taking it due to side effects, which caused a relapse in his psychosis. The case study provides details on Nash's history and current symptoms and mental status exam.
Clinical Psychology Case Formulation and Treatment Planning: A PrimerJames Tobin, Ph.D.
The aim of this primer is to support the learning of clinical case conceptualization and treatment planning for graduate students in clinical psychology, other trainees in the mental health professions, and early-career psychologists and mental health workers.
Clinical Psychology Case Formulation and Treatment Planning: A PrimerJames Tobin, Ph.D.
The aim of this primer is to support the learning of clinical case conceptualization and treatment planning for graduate students in clinical psychology, other trainees in the mental health professions, and early-career psychologists and mental health workers.
CASE of CARLOS R.INTAKE DATE May 2019IDENTIFYINGDEMOGRAP.docxjasoninnes20
CASE of CARLOS R.
INTAKE DATE: May 2019
IDENTIFYING/DEMOGRAPHIC DATA: Carlos is a 7 year old male in the third grade. He lives in Houston, Texas with his parents. He is the only child to two parents, both of whom have completed post-graduate education. His parents are originally from Guatemala and relocated to the United States when Carlos was 6 months old for job opportunities. Carlos is an intelligent and caring young boy who presents with significant potential to excel academically.
CHIEF COMPLAINT/PRESENTING PROBLEM: Carlos was referred for an evaluation becausehis parents and teacher indicate that Carlos is restless, and often requires reminders to help him stay on task. He is described as "constantly running around" and presenting with difficulties listening and following instructions.
HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: Carlos enjoys spending time with his friends, and participating in physical activities such as swimming, running and skating. He also enjoys participating in social events, and is often invited to play dates and birthday parties. While Carlos interacts well with peers his own age, his parents believe he is easily led and influenced by others. Carlos does get upset when he does not receive recognition or feels that he has been ignored. His teacher notes that he sometimes acts 'socially immature', and that he often demonstrates attention-seeking behavior.
Carlos has difficulty focusing and sitting still in class. He is able to 'hyper focus' on some activities of interest however he often has difficulty sustaining his attention at school. Carlos has been known to blurt out answers and interrupts other students in the classroom. His mother reports difficulties at home with following routines and remembering instructions. His parents describe emotional reactivity as well as confrontational behaviors demonstrated both at home and at school. His teacher notes that Carlos is defiant towards listening to instructions, but generally interacts well with his peers. He is easily frustrated and emotionally impulsive - Carlos has had several incidents of hitting, crying outbursts, and inappropriate behavior. Behavioral concerns with aggression, lying, arguments, and disruptive behavior were noted in his pre-school program at age 4. Each school year since teachers have reported incidents in the classroom.
PAST PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: This is the first evaluation for Carlos.It is noteworthy that he did not know his address or home phone number, could not print his surname, and recognized only a few pre-primer words.
SUBSTANCE USE HISTORY: None reported
PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: Carlos has been vaccinated with all the needed vaccinations to attend school. There is no noteworthy illnesses to report.
FAMILY MEDICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC HISTORY: Carlos’ parents report some history of mental illness in the family. His maternal grandmother was diagnosed with depression. Carlos has always had challenges falling asleep, and sometimes find ...
Peter's chapter in this compendium of personal narratives starts with his difficult upbringing, the onset of paranoia, a suicide attempt, effective medication, and positive aspects of psychosis.
Gordon McManus Ch 8 & 9 'From Communism to Schizophrenia'Andrew Voyce MA
Summary of two chapters in Gordon's book written by Peter Chadwick. Peter writes of male stereotyping and stigma, also alienation, the social construct of reality, statistics and the cost of mental illness. He also writes on psychotic episodes.
To prepare Use a differential diagnosis process and analysis maryettamckinnel
To prepare:
Use a differential diagnosis process and analysis of the Mental Status Exam in "The Case of L" to determine if the case meets the criteria for a clinical diagnosis.
Questions:
Provide the full DSM-5 diagnosis. Remember, a full diagnosis should include the name of the disorder, ICD-10-CM code, specifiers, severity, and the Z codes (other conditions that may need clinical attention).
Explain the full diagnosis, matching the symptoms of the case to the criteria for any diagnoses used.
Identify 2-3 of the close differentials that you considered for the case and have ruled out. Concisely explain why these conditions were considered but eliminated.
Identify the assessments you recommend to validate treatment. Explain the rationale behind choosing the assessment instruments to support, clarify, or track treatment progress for the diagnosis.
Explain your recommendations for initial resources and treatment. Use scholarly resources to support your evidence-based treatment recommendations.
Explain how you took cultural factors and diversity into account when making the assessment and recommending interventions.
Identify client strengths, and explain how you would utilize strengths throughout treatment.
Identify specific knowledge or skills you would need to obtain to effectively treat this client, and provide a plan on how you will do so.
These questions are based on the following case:
The Case of L Presenting Problem Client presented in the emergency room (ER) having been brought in the previous night by her parents. Following an argument with her parents, L cut her right wrist. L's mother reported that L started screaming rapidly and became physically violent toward her prior to cutting her own wrist. Psychological Data L is a 17-year-old Hispanic female who resides in Pennsylvania with her mother, father, and older sister. She is in 11th grade at the local public school. L appeared to be of average to above-average intelligence, as she was able to respond to numerous questions in an articulate and intelligent manner. She was well versed about world history and current affairs. Her mother confirmed that she has done well in school, maintaining a B+ average and participating in various school activities (e.g., chorus, school paper) until last year. L slowly dropped out of many activities she liked in the past. Her mother noticed about 8 months ago that L had also begun having difficulty doing schoolwork. Erratic behavior arose during episodes when L also became irritable and explosive. During these repeated episodes, she became quite defiant, cut classes, had to be placed in school detention, and had even assaulted the principal. L has numerous friends and believed she can relate to all types of people. She has a boyfriend who adores her, but she said she doesn't feel the same about him. The school counselor confirmed that L is outgoing, popular, and smart; but during these episodes she became another person, one who is very ...
They are among us. One in every one hundred individuals could meet the criteria for psychopath. Just think how many might have strong tendencies but don\'t pass the litmus test. It is scary. Learn more and be prepared. Dr. Dorothy McCoy
Be sure to include in your reply specific commentary examining tcameroncourtney45
Be sure to include in your reply specific commentary examining the uses and applications of applied behavioral science as discussed by your classmate. Ask questions that might help to further your understanding of the applications of applied behavioral science and take the discussion to a deeper level. Do you agree with your peer’s rationale as to how a forensic psychologist might help? Why, or why not? What other similarities and differences might you share about the actual work of forensic psychologists and the way it is presented in popular media such as television and the movies?
#1
Candace Lyons
WednesdayJan 17 at 2:44pm
Manage Discussion Entry
Briefly describe this person/character, including the medium (real life, television, movie, book, etc.) from which he or she comes, why you selected him or her, his or her background, and the background of the crimes he or she committed.
Aileen Wuornos was a real-life female serial killer. As a child, her father was convicted of sexually abusing children and killed himself in prison. At one point he was diagnosed as schizophrenic. Wuornus was abandoned by her mother at four years old and forced to live with her abusive grandparents. After having a baby at 14 she was kicked out of her grandparent’s home and lived on the streets as a prostitute. Wuornos was convicted of six life sentences for killing men she accused of either raping her or attempting to rape her.
Based on your reading this week, define, in your own words, forensic psychology as a specific example of applied behavioral science, and describe how forensic psychology could have been helpful in this case.
“Forensic psychology is a field of study that applies scientific psychological knowledge to legal issues pertaining to criminal offenders and the criminal justice system. Identify trends in forensic psychology that would prove helpful” (McCarthy et al, 2016, section 6.1). I would define it as the application and education of reliable scientific psychology in the criminal justice system. Forensic psychologist can evaluate human behaviors and based on scientifically reliable assessments determine the dangerousness to a person’s self or society at large. The can also look for common diagnosis to determine if a person is fit to stand trial. In the case of Wuornus, a forensic psychologist could have examined her RAP sheet to determine if she was a threat to society. She was arrested for several crimes, including armed robbery and assault. In the biosocial age, criminologist now have access to genetic and brain imaging data. I think it would have been worth assessing her for schizophrenia. She stated that the men she killed either raped her or attempted to rape her until she was executed. Paranoia is common in schizophrenics and some believed she was convinced that she was raped or about to be raped. In her mind the murders were justified.
Discuss why profiling is or is not a science.
Profiling can never be an exact science because o ...
430 Chapter 17 Death and DyingCase 17-1When Parents Refu.docxdomenicacullison
430 Chapter 17 Death and Dying
Case 17-1
When Parents Refuse to Give Up1
Nine-year-old Yusef Camp began experiencing symptoms soon after eating a pickle bought
from a street vendor. He felt dizzy and fell down, he could not use his legs, and he began
to scream. By 10:00 p.m., he was hallucinating and was transported to the DC General
Hospital by ambulance. He went into convulsions. His stomach was pumped, and they
found traces of marijuana and possibly PCP. He soon stopped breathing, and by the next
morning, brain scans showed no activity.
Four months later, Yusef’s condition had not changed. The physicians believed his brain
was not functioning and wanted to pronounce him dead based on brain criteria. Several
difficulties were encountered, however. First, there was some disagreement among the
medical personnel over whether his brain function had ceased completely. Second, at that
time the District of Columbia had no law authorizing death pronouncement based on
brain criteria. It was not clear that physicians could use death as grounds for stopping
treatment. Most important, Ronald Camp, the boy’s father, protested vigorously any sug-
gestion that treatment be stopped. A devout Muslim, he said, “I could walk up and say
unplug him; but for the rest of my life I would be thinking, was I too hasty? Could he have
recovered if I had given it another 6 months or a year? I’m leaving it in Almighty God’s
hand to let it take whatever flow it will.”
The nurses involved in Yusef’s care faced several problems. Maggots were found
growing in Yusef’s lungs and nasal passages. His right foot and ankle became gangre-
nous. He showed no response to noises or painful stimuli. The nurses had the responsi-
bility not only for maintaining the respiratory tract and the gangrenous limb, but also for
providing the intensive nursing care needed to maintain Yusef in debilitated condition
on life support systems. Had the aggressive care been serving any purpose, they would
have been willing to provide it no matter how repulsive the boy’s condition was and in
spite of there being many other patients desperately needing their attention. However,
some of the nurses caring for Yusef were convinced that they were doing no good what-
soever for the boy. They believed they were only consuming enormous amounts of time
and hospital resources in what appeared to be a futile effort. In the process, other
patients were not getting as much care as would certainly be of benefit to them. Could
the nurses or the physicians argue that care should be stopped because he was dead?
Could they overrule the parents’ judgment about the usefulness of the treatment even
if he were not dead? Could they legitimately take into account the welfare of the other
patients and the enormous costs involved when deciding whether to limit their atten-
tion to Yusef?
1Weiser, B. (1980, September 5). Boy, 9, may not be “brain dead,” new medical examiner
shows. Washington Post, .
On Being Sane in Insane Placesby David L. RosenhanIf sanit.docxvannagoforth
On Being Sane in Insane Places
by David L. Rosenhan
If sanity and insanity exist, how shall we know them?
The question is neither capricious nor itself insane. However much we may be personally convinced that we can tell the normal from the abnormal, the evidence is simply not compelling. It is commonplace, for example, to read about murder trials wherein eminent psychiatrists for the defense are contradicted by equally eminent psychiatrists for the prosecution on the matter of the defendant's sanity. More generally, there are a great deal of conflicting data on the reliability, utility, and meaning of such terms as "sanity," "insanity," "mental illness," and "schizophrenia" [1]. Finally, as early as 1934, {Ruth} Benedict suggested that normality and abnormality are not universal. [2] What is viewed as normal in one culture may be seen as quite aberrant in another. Thus, notions of normality and abnormality may not be quite as accurate as people believe they are.
To raise questions regarding normality and abnormality is in no way to question the fact that some behaviors are deviant or odd. Murder is deviant. So, too, are hallucinations. Nor does raising such questions deny the existence of the personal anguish that is often associated with "mental illness." Anxiety and depression exist. Psychological suffering exists. But normality and abnormality, sanity and insanity, and the diagnoses that flow from them may be less substantive than many believe them to be.
At its heart, the question of whether the sane can be distinguished from the insane (and whether degrees of insanity can be distinguished from each other) is a simple matter: Do the salient characteristics that lead to diagnoses reside in the patients themselves or in the environments and contexts in which observers find them? From Bleuler, through Kretchmer, through the formulators of the recently revised Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association, the belief has been strong that patients present symptoms, that those symptoms can be categorized, and, implicitly, that the sane are distinguishable from the insane. More recently, however, this belief has been questioned. Based in part on theoretical and anthropological considerations, but also on philosophical, legal, and therapeutic ones, the view has grown that psychological categorization of mental illness is useless at best and downright harmful, misleading, and pejorative at worst. Psychiatric diagnoses, in this view, are in the minds of observers and are not valid summaries of characteristics displayed by the observed. [3-5]
Gains can be made in deciding which of these is more nearly accurate by getting normal people (that is, people who do not have, and have never suffered, symptoms of serious psychiatric disorders) admitted to psychiatric hospitals and then determining whether they were discovered to be sane and, if so, how. If the sanity of such pseudopatients were always detected, there would ...
1. Case Study 1
Running Head: CASE STUDY
Case Study: Movie “A Beautiful Mind”
Jeffery W. Belford
Queens College
Case Study: Movie “A Beautiful Mind”
2. Case Study 2
Brief Description of Movie
A Beautiful Mind is a movie based on the real life story of the famed mathematician John
Nash and his lifelong struggles with his mental illness. Nash enrolled as a graduate student at
Princeton in 1948. He was a recipient of the prestigious Carnegie Prize for mathematics. He
became obsessed to find his own unique and original mathematical theory. In the mean time, his
roommate, Charles, became his best friend. After successfully developing his own theory, known
as game theory, he became a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Here
he met his wife Alicia (in his class), and they got married shortly thereafter.
One day he runs into his former roommate Charles and his young niece Marcee. While he
was working for the Pentagon deciphering complex encryption, he encounters a mysterious
secret agent by the name of William Parcher. Parcher gives him a new assignment to look for
patterns in magazines and newspapers possibly from the Soviets. He was ordered to write a
report of his findings and place them in a specified mailbox. As this secret assignment is going
on, he becomes increasingly paranoid and begins to behave erratically.
After observing this erratic behavior, his wife, Alicia contacts (informs) a doctor at a
psychiatric hospital. Nash was admitted. While in the hospital, he continues to believe that the
Soviets were trying to extract information from him, and that the workers at the psychiatric
facility were Soviet kidnappers. However, after he is confronted with his own documents which
were sitting in the mailbox and never opened, he finally realized that he has been hallucinating.
He came to realize that the secret agent William Parcher, and Nash's friend Charles and his niece
Marcee were all part of his hallucinations. After numerous shock therapies, Nash is released with
antipsychotic medication.
3. Case Study 3
However, the side effects of the antipsychotic medication affect his sexual relationship
with his wife and, his intellectual capacity. This leads him to stop taking his medication causing
a relapse of his psychosis, which almost cost the life of his infant son. He withdraws from
society until the 1970s. Subsequently, he tries to return to reality by going back to teaching at
Princeton. He eventually earns the privilege of teaching again with the help of his former
colleague. Over the years, he has learned how to distinguish his hallucination/delusion from
reality, check to ensure that any new acquaintances are in fact real people, and not hallucinations.
He is honored by his fellow professors for his achievements in mathematics, and goes on to win
the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his revolutionary work on game theory.
Date of Intake: September 5, 1960 when John Nash was first relapsed after non adherent to
his antipsychotic medication.
Biographical Data
Initials: J.N. Date of Birth: 6/13/1928 Gender: Male
Marital status: Married Ethnicity: Caucasian Occupation: Unemployed
Source & reliability - self; reliable
C/C: "I stopped taking my medication for a while. Now I’m having hallucinations and am
paranoid again."
Identification, Chief Complaint and Reasonfor Referral:
Mr. J.N. was referred by his psychiatrist where he was previously diagnosed for paranoid
type schizophrenia. His psychiatrist did not feel an admission was warranted and referred him to
the mental health outpatient clinic. Mr. J.N complains of recurring auditory and visual
4. Case Study 4
hallucinations with paranoia. He states that “I just can’t distinguish what’s real and what are
hallucinations.” He expressed feelings of hopelessness and guilt towards his family especially his
wife. He identified having difficulties with his memory/intellectual capacity and low sexual
libido as main reason why he stopped taking medication.
History of Present Illness:
Mr. J.N is a 32-year-old former college professor. He has been having recurrent auditory
and visual hallucinations with paranoia after stopping his psychotropic medication due to side
effects. He was referred to the mental health outpatient clinic by his psychiatrist. His psychiatrist
did not feel an admission was warranted since Mr. J.N. was not suicidal or homicidal.
He claims that he has been having hallucinations since he went to college. He did not
realize his delusion/hallucinations until last year when his wife called psychiatrist and admitted
him for his erratic behavior.
Mr.J.N. is recurrently seeing and hearing three figures; Charles who was thought to be his
roommate in college, Charles' young niece Marcee, and William Parcher who is a secret
government agent. He claims that he has been perceived them as real people until his first
admission last year. He continues to see and hear them even when he is on psychotropic
medication but is able to distinguish it from reality and not to react to it.
Mr. J.N. stopped taking his medication when it interferes with his memory/intellectual
capacity and sexual libido. He is a highly motivated scholar who places utmost importance on his
scholarly work and intends to go back to his work as college professor. He is also worried that
his marriage is falling apart due to his inability to perform sexual intercourse with his wife. He is
5. Case Study 5
currently not working and is dependent on savings and income of his wife. He perceives that his
marriage at this point is in jeopardy.
Past Psychiatric History
He reports that he has been having auditory and visual hallucinations since he was in
college. He was diagnosed with paranoid type schizophrenia last year. He stopped taking his
medication when it interferes with his memory/intellectual capacity and sexual libido.
History of Substance Abuse
He identifies himself as social drinker. He used to drink regularly when he was in college
but has not had alcohol recently. He denies any use of illicit drugs.
Past Social and Developmental History
Education
He attended Carnegie Institute of Technology and graduated in 1948 with bachelors and
master’s degrees in mathematics. Then he enrolled as a graduate student at Princeton in same
year with scholarship. He reported his academic performance was excellent although he did not
attend most of his class. After successfully developing his own mathematical theory, known as
game theory, he became a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He had
been teaching as a faculty until last year when he was admitted to psychiatric inpatient unit for
the first time.
Family History
6. Case Study 6
Mr. J.N. grew up in Bluefield, West Virginia. His father was an electrical engineer for the
electric power company. His mother had been a schoolteacher before she married then became a
housewife. Both parents were very supportive for their son's education, providing him with
encyclopedias and even allowing him to take advanced mathematics courses at a local college
while still in high school. He reports no known family history of medical or mental illness.
He met his wife as his student at MIT. They got married in 1957, and had good
relationship until his first inpatient admission last year. He reports that he has not been able to
perform sexual intercourse with his wife due to the side effects of his psychotropic medication.
He is currently not working and is dependent on savings and income of his wife. He perceives
that his marriage at this point is in jeopardy and wants to restore his relationship with his wife.
Occupational History
Mr. J.N. was a professor, teaching mathematics at the MIT. He also worked contract for
the Pentagon deciphering the complex encryption. He had been teaching as a faculty until last
year when he was admitted to psychiatric inpatient unit for the first time. He is currently not
working and is dependent on savings and income of his wife.
Social History
Mr. J.N. identifies himself as isolative, avoids any social contact as much as possible. He
stays home most of the day, doing errands including taking care of his infant son. He cut off the
contact with his colleagues since his diagnosis for paranoid type schizophrenia. He reports that
he feels ashamed, and perceives himself as a failure often. He also reports feeling guilt toward
his wife since he can no longer function as a good husband.
7. Case Study 7
Client’s Strengths
Mr. J.N. kept his appointment and is actively seeking help at this time. He has insight into
his problems. He wants to restore his relationship with his wife and is willing to take medication
in order for him to get better. He hopes the new medication will work without debilitating side
effects on his cognition and sexual libido.
Medical History
No known medical illness
Review of Systems
Vital Signs: BP: 110/80, Pulse: 80, Respirations: 18, Temperature: 98.6, Pain: 0
General: Weight: 196 lbs., Height: 71 inches, Body Mass Index (BMI): 27.4, no recent weight
gains/losses
Skin: No rashes/lesions/ itchy. Mid-dry skin whole body. No hair, nails, or skin changes.
HEENT:
Head: no neurologic illness/ headache/ head injury.
Eyes: reports 20/20 vision
Ears: hearing good. no tinnitus/ vertigo/ infections/ drainages.
Nose: no cold/fever.
Throat/ mouth: no bleeding/ sore/ hoarseness. last dental visit 2 months ago
8. Case Study 8
Neck: no lumps, goiter, pain, or swollen glands
Breasts: no pain or discharge
Respiratory: no cough/ wheezing/occasional sputum.
Cardiovascular: V/S WNL, no murmurs/chest pain/palpitations/edema. No dyspnea, orthopnea,
chest pain, palpitations. Last EKG, 1959; unremarkable
Gastrointestinal: good appetite. no pain/ nausea/ vomiting. Regular bowel movements, stool
color and size normal, no bleeding, sometimes excessive belching and passing of gas, no pain
jaundice or liver problems
Urinary: no dysuria/ hematuria/ painful urination.
Genital: no pain/sore/ lesions, has not been sexually active due to the side effects of
antipsychotic medication
Peripheral Vascular: none
Musculoskeletal: no muscle or joint pain/ swelling
Neurologic: no neurologic problems/ seizures/ motor, sensory loss
Hematologic: no anemia/ bleeding
Endocrine: no known thyroid problems-TFT is within normal limit, tolerates temperature
changes.
Medications: He has not taken his psychotropic medication for a while, which is unknown at
this time.
9. Case Study 9
Primary Care Provider: He has been seeing a psychiatrist from his inpatient admission last
year, who made the initial referral.
Allergies: He denies known allergies.
Mental Status Examination
Appearance and Behavior: Mr. J.N. dressed appropriately. He appears to be the stated age. He
is quiet but focusing on interview. He is cooperative and reasonable.
Mood and Affect: Mood appears to be depressed. His affect is constricted.
Speech and Thought Process: His speech is normal with appropriate rate and volume. He had
no loose associations, tangential thought, thought blocking or other signs of thought disorder.
Thought Content and Perception: He is recurrently seeing and hearing three figures; Charles
who was thought to be his roommate in college, Charles' young niece Marcee, and William
Parcher who is a secret government agent. He claims that he has been perceived them as real
people until his first admission last year. He continues to see and hear them even when he is on
psychotropic medication but is able to distinguish it from reality and not to react to it. But since
he stopped taking his medication, it became more difficult to distinguish it from reality and
greatly interferes with his life.
Cognitive and Intellectual Functioning: He stopped taking his medication when it interferes
with his memory/intellectual capacity. It was unacceptable for him since he intended to go back
to his work as a college professor. He reports no cognitive/intellectual problem since he stopped
taking psychotropic medication. His memory is intact, and he was able to recall dates with
10. Case Study 10
regards to his work history. There was no evidence of gross cognitive dysfunction during the
interview. He has insight into his problems and is goal directed to manage his mental illness.
Mini-mental Status Exam: He scored a 30, no cognitive impairment.
Hamilton Depression Scale: He scored 12 which would indicate mild depression.
Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): He scored 65 both high on positive and negative
symptoms.
DSM-IV Diagnosis:
Axis I: 295.3 - Schizophrenia, Paranoid Type
Axis II: None
Axis III: None
Axis IV: 1- Marital problem, client has been unable to have sexual relationship with his
wife for a while due to the side effects of psychotropic medication
2- Financial stressors related to unemployment
Axis V: GAF 43
Narrative Summary and Formulation
Mr. J.N. is a 32yr old white, married male former college professor. He was referred by
his psychiatrist where he was previously diagnosed for paranoid type schizophrenia. He kept his
appointment today and appears motivated for treatment. He is currently married to his wife for 3
years and has an infant son. He has no family history of significant medical or mental illness. He
11. Case Study 11
has been having recurrent auditory and visual hallucinations with paranoia after stopping his
psychotropic medication due to side effects. He expressed feelings of hopelessness and guilt
towards his family especially his wife.
He claims that he has been having hallucinations since he went to college. He did not
realize his delusion/hallucinations until last year when his wife called psychiatrist and admitted
him for his erratic behavior. Mr.J.N. is recurrently seeing and hearing three figures; Charles who
was thought to be his roommate in college, Charles' young niece Marcee, and William Parcher
who is a secret government agent. He claims that he has been perceived them as real people
until his first admission last year. He continues to see and hear them even when he is on
psychotropic medication but is able to distinguish it from reality and not to react to it. But since
he stopped taking his medication, it became more difficult to distinguish it from reality and
greatly interferes with his life.
Mr. J.N. stopped taking his medication when it interferes with his memory/intellectual
capacity and sexual libido. He is a highly motivated scholar who places utmost importance on his
scholarly work and intends to go back to his work as college professor. He is also worried that
his marriage is falling apart due to his inability to perform sexual intercourse with his wife. He is
currently not working and is dependent on savings and income of his wife. He perceives that his
marriage at this point is in jeopardy.
Mr. J.N. identifies himself as isolative, avoids any social contact as much as possible. He
stays home most of the day, doing errands including taking care of his infant son. He cut off the
contact with his colleagues since his diagnosis for paranoid type schizophrenia. He reports that
12. Case Study 12
he feels ashamed, and perceives himself as a failure often. He also reports feeling guilt toward
his wife since he can no longer function as a good husband.
Mr. J.N. kept his appointment and is actively seeking help at this time. He has insight into
his problems and is goal directed to manage his mental illness. He wants to restore his
relationship with his wife and is willing to take medication in order for him to get better. He
hopes the new medication will work without debilitating side effects on his cognition and sexual
libido.
Treatment Plan
Medication
Risperdal 1mg bid p.o. as starting dose for two days. Then increase dose to 2mg bid p.o.
Risperdal relieve the psychotic symptoms including hallucinations and manic episode.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis (CBTp)
Cognitive behavioral therapy for schizophrenia (CBTp) is an evidence based practice
based on the work by Aaron T. Beck, MD. Initially, CBTp research focused on adjunctive
treatment for patients with medication resistant positive symptoms; however, more recent studies
have expanded to include areas such as the treatment of negative symptoms, comorbid disorders
and the use of a group modality. Several randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses have
established CBTp as an effective treatment for the symptoms associated with schizophrenia
(Draper et al, 2010). Client will be seen weekly for therapy.
13. Case Study 13
Family Therapy
The patient will initially benefit from couple counseling. The goal will be to restore
client’s relationship with his wife. Also psychoeducation for his wife will be offered. Research
findings support family psychoeducation as evidence-based treatment for serious mental illnesses
and benefits for families. Because major psychiatric disorders frequently are long term with
episodic crises, caregivers have ongoing needs for support (Lefley, 2010).
Administer Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) after 4 weeks
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a medical scale used for
measuring symptom reduction of schizophrenia patients. It is also widely used in the study of
psychosis. The name refers to the syndrome of positive symptoms, meaning those symptoms of
disease that manifest as the presence of traits, and the syndrome of negative symptoms, meaning
those symptoms that manifest as the absence of traits and a series of general symptoms for
patients with different psychosis. The scale has seven positive-symptom items, seven negative-
symptom items and 16 general psychopathology symptom items. Each item is scored on the
same seven-point severity scale (PANSS, 2012).
Intervention
Risperdal 1mg bid p.o. as starting dose for two days. Then increase dose to 2mg bid p.o.
Risperdal relieve the psychotic symptoms including hallucinations and manic episode. Compare
to conventional agent, atypical antipsychotics are known for less risk for EPS/TD, more effective
against negative symptoms, and potential effects on cognitive function thus improve outcomes
and prognosis (Risperidone, 2012).
14. Case Study 14
Outcome
He began to see the effects of the medication in a couple of weeks. He reports less
auditory hallucinations, and visual hallucinations are almost gone. After 4 weeks, symptoms
continue to improve without any adverse effect on his cognition and libido. He did not report any
side effects from Risperdal.
Intervention
Antipsychotic medications are frequently helpful in reducing psychotic symptoms and
relapse; however, many clients continue to experience persistent distress and disabilities. Almost
50% have persistent psychotic symptoms even when adhering to pharmacological treatment
(Dickerson, 2000). Many people with schizophrenia have residual symptoms and disabilities that
persist throughout their lives.
There is accumulating evidence from controlled clinical trials that CBT is effective in
reducing psychotic symptoms, increasing adherence to medication, improving response of
chronic residual symptoms and as an adjunct to inpatient treatment (Beck & Rector, 2001).
Mr. J.N was seen initially twice a week for 60 minutes for the first two weeks of
treatment. He was later seen weekly for 60 minutes. The CBTp consists of 14 sessions in 12
weeks. The emphasis of the sessions was to help him understand his mental illness, how it affects
his life/relationship and to assist him in making changes. He was engaging and eager to make
changes.
15. Case Study 15
The beginning sessions focused on gathering information to formulate an interpersonal
inventory, and identify goals based on client’s problem list. The client and I agree that the
priority is to distinguish his delusion from reality because it will have most beneficial effect on
other problems when it is resolved. As the session continues, we try to analyze his hallucinations,
such as its contents, frequency, and how it affects his mood. Also we try to evaluate how he
interprets these stimuli, which caused paranoia in the past. Client is constantly challenged for the
evidence for his delusion, and encouraged to use reasoning process. Most sessions consist of
discussing the negative effect of his current way of thinking then going over alternative views
that can positively impact on his functional level and relationship. We discuss how his cognition
plays a role in his symptom management then continue to work on creating new balanced
thoughts.
Outcome
As the sessions progress, he begins to focus on changing the way he thinks. With the help
of antipsychotic medication, his hallucinations are much less to the level that he can ignore them
most of the day. He was able to distinguish his delusion from reality. He starts to explore his own
ways to validate the reality from hallucination, such as checking to ensure that any new
acquaintances are in fact real people. The CBTp enabled him to reason his delusion, and distract
him from hallucinations. He is much more positive regarding current condition and has hopes for
his future.
Intervention
Initially couple therapy is offered. The client agrees early in treatment to have his wife
come in. His wife participates for two sessions, discussing how they feel about their relationship.
16. Case Study 16
His wife acknowledges and agrees with him regarding how his mental illness affects their
relationship.
She is also offered family psychoeducation (FPE). Family psychoeducation (FPE) is one
of six evidence-based practices endorsed by the Center for Mental Health Services for
individuals suffering from chronic mental illnesses. Multiple family group psychoeducation
(MFG) has been shown to be an effective component of FPE in reducing symptom relapses and
rehospitalizations for individuals with schizophrenia. It allows family members to increase their
understanding of the biology of the disorder, learn ways to be supportive, reduce stress in the
environment and in their own lives, and develop a broader social network (Jewell et al, 2009).
Outcome
The client reports good relationship with his wife since attending couple therapy. Both
share mutual agreement/respect for each other and accept the effects of his mental illness. He
was able to have sexual relationship since he does not experience any side effects from his new
antipsychotic medication. His wife reports that FPE was very helpful in order for her to better
understand her husband’s illness. She also reports beneficial relationship with other families in
group, sharing story and information.
Summary of Treatment
Mr. J.N. benefited from medication and CBTp. He is responding well to atypical
antipsychotic without any side effects. In CBTp, he is encouraged to identify his own delusional
or paranoid beliefs and to explore how these beliefs negatively impact his life. He was engaged
in experiments to test these beliefs.
17. Case Study 17
Treatment focuses on thought patterns that cause distress and also on developing more
realistic interpretations of events. Delusions are treated by developing an understanding of the
kind of evidence that a person uses to support their beliefs and encouraging him to recognize
evidence that may have been overlooked.
He was retested with PANSS, and scored 34 showing improvement on both positive and
negative symptoms. Mr. J.N. benefited from treatment and continues to be seen in therapy.
18. Case Study 18
References
Beck, A., & Rector, N. (2001). Cognitive therapy of schizophrenia: A new therapy for the new
millenium. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 54, 291-300.
Dickerson, F. (2000). Cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for schizophrenia: A review of recent
empirical studies. Schizophrenia Research, 43, 71-90.
Draper, M. L., Velligan, D. I., & Tai, S. (2010). Cognitive behavioral therapy for schizophrenia:
A review of recent literature and meta-analyses. Minerva Psichiatrica, 51(2), 85-94.
Jewell, T. C., Downing, D., & McFarlane, W. R. (2009). Partnering with families: Multiple
family group psychoeducation for schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(8),
868-878. doi: 10.1002/jclp.v65:810.1002/jclp.20610
Lefley, H. P. (2010). Treating difficult cases in a psychoeducational family support group for
serious mental illness. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 21(4), 253-268. doi:
10.1080/08975353.2010.529014
Lincoln, T. M., Ziegler, M., Mehl, S., Kesting, M., Lüllmann, E., Westermann, S., & Rief, W.
(2012). Moving from efficacy to effectiveness in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis:
A randomized clinical practice trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(4),
674-686. doi: 10.1037/a0028665
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). (2012).
http://www.panss.org/home/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=5&Item
id=9
19. Case Study 19
Risperidone. (2012). PubMed Health.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000944/
Small, N., Harrison, J., & Newell, R. (2010). Carer burden in schizophrenia: Considerations for
nursing practice. Mental Health Practice, 14(4), 22-25.
Wykes, T., Steel, C., Everitt, B., & Tarrier, N. (2008). Cognitive behavior therapy for
schizophrenia: Effect sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigor. Schizophrenia
Bulletin, 34(3), 523-537. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm114