SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  21
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Cover Page 

 




    Notation Evolution and 
          Revolution 
 

Author: Jeffrey G. Long (jefflong@aol.com) 

Date: January 16, 1993 

Forum: Talk presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Evolutionary 
Systems, sponsored by the Washington Evolutionary Systems Society. 
 

                                Contents 
Page 1: Proposal and Bio 

Pages 2‐20: Slides intermixed with text for presentation 

 


                                  License 
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial 
3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit 
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative 
Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. 




                                Uploaded June 19, 2011 
Submitted for the
                                      WESS Interdisciplinary Conference
                                         on Evolutionary Systems
                                             January 16, 1993


                          Notational Evolution & Revolution
                                           Jeffrey G. Long
                                         133-1/2 11th Street,
                                        Washington, DC 20003
                                           (202) 547-0268


This brief presentation will discuss the nature of notational evolution and revolution through analysis
of four notational evolutions:

   the switch from neumatic musical notation to staff musical notation
   the switch from tallies to Roman numerals to Arabic numerals
   the switch from barter to commodity trading to money
   the switch from internal temporal clues to external temporal clues to abstract time.

From historical data the presentation will offer several hypotheses regarding the nature of notational
systems and their evolution in general, including:

   the philosophical and technological nature of notations
   the distinction between notational evolution and revolution
   the limitations of a notation that eventually force creation of new notations
   the broad technical and social consequences of introducing new notations.

Key conclusions of the talk will include the following:

   notational systems do not merely represent certain abstractions, they invent them; notational
    systems are intellectual toolsets that society creates to empower it in dealing with a complex
    world

   we declare the existence of number, note, time, and money as a result of notational revolutions
    that are really intellectual revolutions with broad social consequences.

   our society must develop a revolutionary new notational system focused on representing complex
    "rules" if it is ever to understand complex systems.

Key questions the listener might consider in advance include:

   what do I think of the importance of notation?
   does society already have all the notations it needs for science, or might new ones be necessary?
   in what sense do number, note, time, and money "exist"?
Notational Evolution & Revolution
                     A Brief Overview




                      Jeffrey G. Long



                    voice: (202) 547-0268
              e-mail: JeffLong@AOL.COM
  letter: 133-1/2 11th Street, S.E., Washington, DC 20003




                        Presented at the
                WESS Interdisciplinary Conference
                   on Evolutionary Systems
                       January 16, 1993
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 1: Cover Page
I appreciate this chance to share some ideas with you.

I've been interested for 20 years now in developing a new way to understand complex systems,
because I think mathematics and our other primary notational systems have severe fundamental
limitations in what they can represent.

I've concluded from my work to date that the NOTATION we use is the limitation on our ability to
understand the world around us.

Today I hope to demonstrate WHY I believe that, through four examples that contrast notational
EVOLUTION with notational REVOLUTION.

This is work-in-progress, not final conclusions. I still have a long way to go. If want to talk more,
please contact me as shown on the slide.




                                              Page 3 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  




                                Standard Definition of Notation
                       the use of a system of signs or symbols to represent
                             words, phrases, numbers, quantities, etc.
                    (Webster's New World Dictionary, Second College Edition, 1984)




"For the purpose of determining logical structure it is, for instance, a matter of

complete indifference whether we represent certain features of states of affairs

by spatial arrangement rather than by sounds or shapes. Hence the unimportance

in theory of attempts to 'improve' symbolism: tokens of any properties

whatsoever can be used as the material for a complete language."


                              -- Max Black, Language and Philosophy, 1949, page 160




                                              Page 4 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 2: Standard Definition
I understand that most people think notation is irrelevant. Looking at the dictionary definition, it's
easy to see why they feel this way.

ONE dictionary defines notation as "The use of a system of signs or symbols to represent words,
phrases, numbers, quantities, etc."

Notation is thus mere ABBREVIATION; key concepts exist OUTSIDE the notation, in LANGUAGE.
This premise is widely held, and is stated fairly clearly by the philosopher of mathematics Max Black.

I hope to persuade you to consider the possibility that notation is very different than language, and that
it can express concepts that are INEFFABLE in common language. The notation is the limitation.




                                                Page 5 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


          1. Notation "A" is Invented, Based on Analogy

          2. Notation "A" Evolves Towards Greater Simplicity & Scope

          3. Notation "A" Hits "Complexity Barrier"; Progress Stops

          4. Notation "B" is Invented, Based on Abstraction "X"

          5. Notation "B" Evolves Towards Greater Simplicity & Scope

          6. Notation "B" Hits "Complexity Barrier"; Progress Stops

          7. Notation "C" is Invented, Based on Abstraction "Y"

          8. Notation "C" Evolves Towards Greater Simplicity & Scope

          9. Notation "C" Hits "Complexity Barrier"; Progress Stops




Cyclical Process of "Notational Fulfillment"



                                   Page 6 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 3: Notational Fulfillment
I believe that we can understand the TRUE nature of notation by looking at how notations
progressively change over long periods of time.

1. A new notation is invented, and this FIRST GENERATION notation is based on ANALOGY with
what it represents

2. This notation EVOLVES through improvement of PRAXIS, e.g.

          A. symbols are streamlined for greater ease of use

          B. new symbols are introduced, e.g. lower case, punctuation

          C. new and better media is used [e.g. clay -> papyrus -> paper]

          D. there's a consensus on general standards for the notational system.

This process is generally what people think of when they think of notational evolution, e.g. the shape
of letters, the introduction of a new punctuation mark, etc. But this is NOT where notation gets its
enormous power.

3. In spite of all refinements, the notation hits what I call the "Complexity Barrier".

          A. No amount of effort seems to overcome the barrier

          B. Progress comes, if at all, by personal insight, not analysis

4. Somehow a NEW notation is created, based on a revolutionary new ABSTRACTION that never
existed before

          A. Characteristics:

                    1. Solves a broad class of problems with far less effort

                    2. Accessible to more people

                  3. Accepted only grudgingly by elite because it changes the
          power distribution in society

         B. This is what I call a Second Generation Notation. While the first generation was
based on ANALOGY, the second and subsequent generations are based on far more powerful
insights into the nature of        what must be represented.

         C. An ONTOLOGICAL INVENTION is the creation of something truly new in the world,
that we subsequently treat as "real"

                    1. Money

                    2. Numbers


                                                  Page 7 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


                    3. Time

5. Now this notation, too, goes through the same KIND of evolutionary refinement that its
predecessor did, but eventually it hits its OWN complexity barrier.




                                        Page 8 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  




                                       (Ideogram)


                                               (Phonogram)



    spoken word:                   written word:
         MAN                       "M - A - N"




New Ontological Invention: Letters
Slide 4: First Example = Letters

                                Page 9 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


The things that are in the "real world" are shown without boxes, while the ONTOLOGICAL
INVENTIONS (i.e. NOTATIONS) are in rounded-edge boxes.

We could spend a lot of time debating dates, but the dates are not as important as the precedence
sequence

1. In writing, there's something in the "real world" that we want to represent, such as this man.

2. First generation was PICTOGRAMS that represented by ANALOGY (circa 3400 BC).

3. These evolved to be able to represent ideas and actions through the use of IDEOGRAMS (where
ideas are communicated through clever combinations of symbols) and PHONOGRAMS (where
concepts are hinted at by symbols that represent something that evokes a particular sound) (circa 2800
BC).

4. This worked pretty well in ancient society, but eventually they hit the COMPLEXITY BARRIER:
several thousand symbols are needed to convey the concepts of even an ancient culture.

5. Continuing on that path of adding new symbols or simplifying existing symbols would have been
fruitless: you can imagine what a Shakespeare play might be like if every symbol was subject to
personal interpretation. Further, the printing press, originally invented by the Chinese long before the
western world had it, was useless when there were thousands of symbols to deal with and low print
volumes were required.

6. The Revolution occurred when someone noticed that there were a limited number of SOUNDS we
make in human speech, and they designed SYMBOLS to represent those SOUNDS (first alphabet,
circa 1500 BC).

7. With this new approach, and after the invention of vowels by the Greeks (circa 776 BC), we were
able to represent the >50,000 words known by the average adult with only 26 letters.

8. Thus the SCOPE of what could be represented was greatly increased, while the NUMBER of
SYMBOLS greatly decreased. This is a classic notational revolution.

9. But it required that we create a new entity in the world: LETTERS. WRITING is a notational
SYSTEM built upon LETTERS as NOTATIONS, and it defines a number of RULES regarding the
proper use of this notation.

10. As the result of this ontological invention, society was able to create a collective memory that
superseded the fragile memory of the oral tradition that preceded it. This was, literally, the beginning
of "history".




                                               Page 10 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  




            six things
                      seven things

                              eight things




New Ontological Invention: Number


                                             Page 11 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 5: Second Example = Numbers
1. Again, there's something in the "real world" that we want to represent, such as how many spikes we
see or how many ovals we see.

2. The first generation of quantitative notation was TALLIES that represented by ANALOGY (circa
30,000 BC). These were based on the idea of a 1:1 CORRESPONDENCE.

3. These evolved to be able to represent larger numbers more easily through the use of ROMAN
NUMERALS, where (e.g.) a "V" could represent five "IIIII" (circa 500 BC).

4. This worked pretty well in ancient society, where commerce required mainly just the basic
operations of arithmetic. But eventually they hit the COMPLEXITY BARRIER: many important
concepts could not be represented (e.g. irrational numbers), and working with large numbers was often
cumbersome.

5. Continuing on that path of adding new symbols or simplifying existing symbols would have been
fruitless: we could never send a man to the moon using Roman Numerals.

6. The Revolution occurred when someone noticed that there were commonalities among certain
groups of (say) seven things, if you eliminated everything about them but the quantity of their
members. This "set of all sets of seven things" was identified by the arbitrary ideogram "7" (circa
1202 in the West).

7. With this new approach, and the additional convention that the value of each symbol was defined
absolutely by its location from the decimal place rather than by the symbols surrounding it, society
was able to perform mental arithmetic and to do more complex operations without an abacus.

8. Thus the SCOPE of what could be represented was greatly increased, as well as the NUMBER and
TYPE of OPERATIONS. This too is a classic notational revolution.

9. But it required that we create a new entity in the world: NUMBERS. MATHEMATICS is a
notational SYSTEM built upon NUMBERS as NOTATIONS, and it defines a number of RULES
regarding the proper use of this notation.

10. As the result of this ontological invention, society was able to create a better way to describe
certain aspects of the behavior of the world. Thus mathematics became the "language of science".




                                             Page 12 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  




                                                440




New Ontological Invention: Notes


                                Page 13 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 6: Third Example = Notes
1. Again, there's something in the "real world" that we want to represent, such as certain musical
sounds. To understand music we have to realize that a note played on an instrument does not typically
just generate one pitch or sound vibration, it generates a number of these. These are called
OVERTONES, and they form the TIMBRE or character of each different instrument. These
overtones are very important to music.

2. The first generation notation was NEUMES that represented by ANALOGY (circa 900 AD). So

          A. actus (later virga) indicated raising of voice

          B. gravis (later punctum) indicated lowering of voice

          C. these were fine for monophonic music (singing in unison)

3. These evolved to be able to represent pitch better through the use of HEIGHTENED NEUMES
(where relative spacing indicated pitch) and LIGATURES (where the broader part of a line indicated
pitch). Later (circa 1260) MENSURAL NOTATION was better able to indicate the DURATION of
each note:

          A. four symbols

          B. each was 3x duration of the previous (perfect) or 2x (imperfect)

4. But eventually they hit the COMPLEXITY BARRIER: they were unable to communicate enough
information for multiple simultaneous pitches, for coordinating the timing of diverse themes, or of
providing a basis for tuning multiple instruments

5. Continuing on that path of adding new symbols or simplifying existing symbols would have been
fruitless: no extension of that approach would have permitted polyphonic music such as a Beethoven
symphony

6. The Revolution occurred when someone decided to represent the INPUT to the instrument rather
than its OUTPUT (circa 1000 AD).

7. By this device, after several hundred years of evolution, we are now able to represent a wide range
of pitches for a wide range of instruments, and to coordinate their pitch, timing, and volume. We can
do POLYPHONIC music of great complexity.

8. Thus the PRECISION and SCOPE of what could be represented was greatly increased. Music
could be edited and COMPOSED before it was PERFORMED, unlike jazz (composed on the spot),
folk music (memorized, traditional), or plainsong (written but very simple).

9. But it required that we create a new entity in the world: NOTES. Musical composition, the
notational SYSTEM built upon NOTES as notations, added a number of other rules about the proper
use of this notation.

10. As the result of this ontological invention, composers were able to write polyphonic music down
and then edit and refine it, and were able to create simultaneous complex sets of instructions to a


                                                Page 14 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  

variety of musicians. This permitted, ultimately, the creation of complex symphonic and other scores.
If you listen to Gregorian chants and then listen to a Beethoven symphony, you'll really FEEL the
power of this.




                                             Page 15 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  




                                                        Salt


     ATTRIBUTES:
     companionship                              $20
     food  (value)




                                 Twenty
                                          Dollars




                                 Pay to the order of:




New Ontological Invention: Dollar


                                Page 16 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 7: Last Example = Dollars
1. This is a little different slide, showing the PRE-NOTATIONAL situation at the top. If you want to
trade your duck for my cat, we may agree on a BARTER arrangement. A duck and a cat are roughly
commensurable, partly because they're both animals and they both have some real and obvious values
to somebody; so it is fairly easy to make that trade. But as you offer things that are less and less
commensurable, it gets harder to make a trade.

2. The first generation of notation was COMMODITY MONEY that represented a certain REAL (i.e.
practical) VALUE by ANALOGY. Examples include cattle and salt.

3. Like all notations, commodity money evolved over time.

4. But eventually it hit a COMPLEXITY BARRIER: these items were awkward to divide and/or
measure, perishable, and inconvenient logistically. Sometimes one had to trade with a third person to
make a deal happen (explain). Commerce was still very difficult, and the more complex an economy
got the more problems were caused by commodity money.

5. Continuing on that path would have been fruitless: we can hardly imagine what the New York
Stock Exchange or our economy in general might be like if every transaction was paid for by
weighing salt or some other physical commodity.

6. The Revolution occurred when someone noticed that VALUE could exist INDEPENDENTLY of
any object, by COMMON CONSENT. They set out to designate arbitrary objects as commonly
accepted SYMBOLS of DECLARED VALUE. The intrinsic PRACTICAL VALUE of these objects
was nowhere near their DECLARED VALUE, and was often basically zero. Examples include
cowrie seashells, wampum beads, gold and silver. The only criteria for symbols was that the objects
be:

          A. known to many people

          B. recognizable in value

          C. scarce

          D. portable (at least not too bulky)

          E. physically stable over time (preferably imperishable)

          F. easily sub-divided.

7. Eventually, precious metals won this contest. But those tokens of value were subject to dilution,
counterfeiting, unfair scales, and other problems, so they evolved into other equally value-less forms.
TRANSFERRABLE RECEIPTS were used in the Middle Ages, and then FIDUCIARY MONEY was
used in the West circa 1676.

From 1825 through 1875 in the United States there was a major political debate between the "paper
money men" and the "gold bugs" about how abstract value should be represented in America.
America ended up being the birthplace of widespread use of paper money in the Western world. This
paper money was backed by gold, an equally worthless commodity.


                                                 Page 17 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Eventually we ended up with FIAT MONEY (circa 1934), not based on the gold standard, to enable
governments to print money as desired, independently of their actual gold reserves. and thereby
control aspects of their economy through monetary policy.

8. Thus VALUE-IN-THE-ABSTRACT came to be REAL, and could be traded like a real duck for
my cat. Since in principle anything could be traded for this symbol, the BREADTH of what could be
readily traded was greatly increased, and this EASE OF USE encouraged more commercial activity.
Once governments understood the power of this notation, they regulated it and then completely took it
over so THEY could control its abuse.

9. Again we created a new entity in the world: DOLLARS (or their equivalent). ACCOUNTING, the
notational SYSTEM built upon DOLLARS as notations, provides rules for the proper use of this
notation.

10. As the result of this ontological invention, society was able to divide work more readily into
specialized categories, for there was now a common denominator that could be used in any
commercial activity. This was the beginning of "commerce" as we know it today.




                                             Page 18 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  




                               Conclusion

1. Notational evolution enhances praxis. Notational revolution invents new
   abstractions, and provides a calculus for computation and communication
   using these new and powerful constructs.


2. Wannabe notations are that way because they have failed to distill the
   "essence" of the domain they purport to deal with. Notation is not mere
   abbreviation, but is instead the limitation on our ability to understand the
   universe.

3. We have hit the "complexity barrier" in dealing with complex systems and
   need a major new notation.




                                   Page 19 of 20
Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993]


Notational Evolution & Revolution  


Slide 7: Conclusions

Questions?




                                Page 20 of 20

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Notational evolution and revolution

A metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricks
A metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricksA metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricks
A metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricksJeff Long
 
Ten lessons from a study of ten notational systems
Ten lessons from a study of ten notational systemsTen lessons from a study of ten notational systems
Ten lessons from a study of ten notational systemsJeff Long
 
Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2
Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2
Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2Heiner Benking
 
Resistance and the problem of - Ortner
Resistance and the problem of - Ortner Resistance and the problem of - Ortner
Resistance and the problem of - Ortner Laura Calle
 
Bias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRIN
Bias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRINBias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRIN
Bias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRINDiana Carroll
 
Essays On Postmodernism.pdf
Essays On Postmodernism.pdfEssays On Postmodernism.pdf
Essays On Postmodernism.pdfKristen Marie
 
Causes of language change
Causes of language changeCauses of language change
Causes of language changeKaleem Ullah
 
Answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spe
Answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English speAnswer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spe
Answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English speElbaStoddard58
 
Notational systems and abstractions
Notational systems and abstractionsNotational systems and abstractions
Notational systems and abstractionsJeff Long
 
201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)
201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)
201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)Stefano Lariccia
 
Linguistic Research Questions
Linguistic Research QuestionsLinguistic Research Questions
Linguistic Research QuestionsDeep Jones
 
Arc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fu
Arc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fuArc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fu
Arc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fu东方 付
 
Directions Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docx
Directions Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docxDirections Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docx
Directions Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docxkimberly691
 
Failing to Fail Better: A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...
Failing to Fail Better:  A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...Failing to Fail Better:  A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...
Failing to Fail Better: A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...Rolin Moe
 
Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"
Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"
Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"Heiner Benking
 
The evolution of symbol systems and society
The evolution of symbol systems and societyThe evolution of symbol systems and society
The evolution of symbol systems and societyJeff Long
 
The Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen Essay
The Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen EssayThe Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen Essay
The Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen EssayTammy Moncrief
 
Examples Of Critical Discourse Analysis
Examples Of Critical Discourse AnalysisExamples Of Critical Discourse Analysis
Examples Of Critical Discourse AnalysisRenee Campbell
 
Arc 211 american diversity and design jiacheng liu
Arc 211 american diversity and design  jiacheng liuArc 211 american diversity and design  jiacheng liu
Arc 211 american diversity and design jiacheng liujiacheng Liu
 

Similaire à Notational evolution and revolution (20)

A metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricks
A metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricksA metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricks
A metaphsical system that includes numbers rules and bricks
 
Ten lessons from a study of ten notational systems
Ten lessons from a study of ten notational systemsTen lessons from a study of ten notational systems
Ten lessons from a study of ten notational systems
 
Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2
Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2
Gyc 2010-benking-copen vegan-alliance-collage-for-gyc-part-2
 
Resistance and the problem of - Ortner
Resistance and the problem of - Ortner Resistance and the problem of - Ortner
Resistance and the problem of - Ortner
 
Bias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRIN
Bias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRINBias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRIN
Bias Essay. The rule against bias - a problem-based essay - GRIN
 
Essays On Postmodernism.pdf
Essays On Postmodernism.pdfEssays On Postmodernism.pdf
Essays On Postmodernism.pdf
 
Causes of language change
Causes of language changeCauses of language change
Causes of language change
 
Answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spe
Answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English speAnswer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spe
Answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English spe
 
Notational systems and abstractions
Notational systems and abstractionsNotational systems and abstractions
Notational systems and abstractions
 
201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)
201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)
201203021 comphumanities 2012 lm (nlp)
 
Linguistic Research Questions
Linguistic Research QuestionsLinguistic Research Questions
Linguistic Research Questions
 
Arc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fu
Arc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fuArc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fu
Arc 211 american diversity and design dongfang fu
 
Directions Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docx
Directions Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docxDirections Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docx
Directions Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete senten.docx
 
Failing to Fail Better: A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...
Failing to Fail Better:  A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...Failing to Fail Better:  A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...
Failing to Fail Better: A Discursive Analysis of Positive Failure in Educati...
 
Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"
Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"
Google Humboldt Ritter Institute Internet&Society -"white"-presentation "pitch"
 
The evolution of symbol systems and society
The evolution of symbol systems and societyThe evolution of symbol systems and society
The evolution of symbol systems and society
 
Noam Chomsky Controversy
Noam Chomsky ControversyNoam Chomsky Controversy
Noam Chomsky Controversy
 
The Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen Essay
The Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen EssayThe Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen Essay
The Rights And Nation By Gerald Friesen Essay
 
Examples Of Critical Discourse Analysis
Examples Of Critical Discourse AnalysisExamples Of Critical Discourse Analysis
Examples Of Critical Discourse Analysis
 
Arc 211 american diversity and design jiacheng liu
Arc 211 american diversity and design  jiacheng liuArc 211 american diversity and design  jiacheng liu
Arc 211 american diversity and design jiacheng liu
 

Plus de Jeff Long

Four ways to represent computer executable rules
Four ways to represent computer executable rulesFour ways to represent computer executable rules
Four ways to represent computer executable rulesJeff Long
 
Case study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational dataCase study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational dataJeff Long
 
Case study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational dataCase study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational dataJeff Long
 
Managing and benefiting from multi million rule systems
Managing  and benefiting from multi million rule systemsManaging  and benefiting from multi million rule systems
Managing and benefiting from multi million rule systemsJeff Long
 
Applying a new software development paradigm to biology
Applying a new software development paradigm to biologyApplying a new software development paradigm to biology
Applying a new software development paradigm to biologyJeff Long
 
Towards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisis
Towards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisisTowards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisis
Towards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisisJeff Long
 
Notational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitives
Notational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitivesNotational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitives
Notational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitivesJeff Long
 
Understanding complex systems
Understanding complex systemsUnderstanding complex systems
Understanding complex systemsJeff Long
 
The hunt for new abstractions
The hunt for new abstractionsThe hunt for new abstractions
The hunt for new abstractionsJeff Long
 
Issues in the study of abstractions
Issues in the study of abstractionsIssues in the study of abstractions
Issues in the study of abstractionsJeff Long
 
Automated identification of sensitive information
Automated identification of sensitive informationAutomated identification of sensitive information
Automated identification of sensitive informationJeff Long
 
Mathematics rules and scientific representations
Mathematics rules and scientific representationsMathematics rules and scientific representations
Mathematics rules and scientific representationsJeff Long
 
Notational engineering
Notational engineeringNotational engineering
Notational engineeringJeff Long
 
The evolution of abstractions
The evolution of abstractionsThe evolution of abstractions
The evolution of abstractionsJeff Long
 
The nature of notational engineering
The nature of notational engineeringThe nature of notational engineering
The nature of notational engineeringJeff Long
 
The co evolution of symbol systems and society
The co evolution of symbol systems and societyThe co evolution of symbol systems and society
The co evolution of symbol systems and societyJeff Long
 
New ways to represent complex systems and processes
New ways to represent complex systems and processesNew ways to represent complex systems and processes
New ways to represent complex systems and processesJeff Long
 
Representing emergence with rules
Representing emergence with rulesRepresenting emergence with rules
Representing emergence with rulesJeff Long
 
Towards a new metaphysics of complex processes
Towards a new metaphysics of complex processesTowards a new metaphysics of complex processes
Towards a new metaphysics of complex processesJeff Long
 

Plus de Jeff Long (19)

Four ways to represent computer executable rules
Four ways to represent computer executable rulesFour ways to represent computer executable rules
Four ways to represent computer executable rules
 
Case study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational dataCase study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational data
 
Case study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational dataCase study of rules as relational data
Case study of rules as relational data
 
Managing and benefiting from multi million rule systems
Managing  and benefiting from multi million rule systemsManaging  and benefiting from multi million rule systems
Managing and benefiting from multi million rule systems
 
Applying a new software development paradigm to biology
Applying a new software development paradigm to biologyApplying a new software development paradigm to biology
Applying a new software development paradigm to biology
 
Towards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisis
Towards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisisTowards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisis
Towards a new paradigm to resolve the software crisis
 
Notational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitives
Notational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitivesNotational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitives
Notational engineering and the search for new intellectual primitives
 
Understanding complex systems
Understanding complex systemsUnderstanding complex systems
Understanding complex systems
 
The hunt for new abstractions
The hunt for new abstractionsThe hunt for new abstractions
The hunt for new abstractions
 
Issues in the study of abstractions
Issues in the study of abstractionsIssues in the study of abstractions
Issues in the study of abstractions
 
Automated identification of sensitive information
Automated identification of sensitive informationAutomated identification of sensitive information
Automated identification of sensitive information
 
Mathematics rules and scientific representations
Mathematics rules and scientific representationsMathematics rules and scientific representations
Mathematics rules and scientific representations
 
Notational engineering
Notational engineeringNotational engineering
Notational engineering
 
The evolution of abstractions
The evolution of abstractionsThe evolution of abstractions
The evolution of abstractions
 
The nature of notational engineering
The nature of notational engineeringThe nature of notational engineering
The nature of notational engineering
 
The co evolution of symbol systems and society
The co evolution of symbol systems and societyThe co evolution of symbol systems and society
The co evolution of symbol systems and society
 
New ways to represent complex systems and processes
New ways to represent complex systems and processesNew ways to represent complex systems and processes
New ways to represent complex systems and processes
 
Representing emergence with rules
Representing emergence with rulesRepresenting emergence with rules
Representing emergence with rules
 
Towards a new metaphysics of complex processes
Towards a new metaphysics of complex processesTowards a new metaphysics of complex processes
Towards a new metaphysics of complex processes
 

Dernier

Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdfPedro Manuel
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPathCommunity
 
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Will Schroeder
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioChristian Posta
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Adtran
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding TeamAdam Moalla
 
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Commit University
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-pyJamie (Taka) Wang
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UbiTrack UK
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7DianaGray10
 
Videogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdf
Videogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdfVideogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdf
Videogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdfinfogdgmi
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAshyamraj55
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8DianaGray10
 
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK GuideIEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK GuideHironori Washizaki
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxGDSC PJATK
 
Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024
Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024
Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024Alexander Turgeon
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IES VE
 
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfUiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfDianaGray10
 
100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization
100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization
100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimizationarrow10202532yuvraj
 

Dernier (20)

Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
 
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
 
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
 
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
20230202 - Introduction to tis-py
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
 
Videogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdf
Videogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdfVideogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdf
Videogame localization & technology_ how to enhance the power of translation.pdf
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 8
 
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK GuideIEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
 
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptxCybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
Cybersecurity Workshop #1.pptx
 
Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024
Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024
Valere | Digital Solutions & AI Transformation Portfolio | 2024
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
 
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfUiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
 
100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization
100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization
100+ ChatGPT Prompts for SEO Optimization
 
201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1201610817 - edge part1
201610817 - edge part1
 

Notational evolution and revolution

  • 1. Cover Page    Notation Evolution and  Revolution    Author: Jeffrey G. Long (jefflong@aol.com)  Date: January 16, 1993  Forum: Talk presented at the Interdisciplinary Conference on Evolutionary  Systems, sponsored by the Washington Evolutionary Systems Society.    Contents  Page 1: Proposal and Bio  Pages 2‐20: Slides intermixed with text for presentation    License  This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial  3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative  Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.  Uploaded June 19, 2011 
  • 2. Submitted for the WESS Interdisciplinary Conference on Evolutionary Systems January 16, 1993 Notational Evolution & Revolution Jeffrey G. Long 133-1/2 11th Street, Washington, DC 20003 (202) 547-0268 This brief presentation will discuss the nature of notational evolution and revolution through analysis of four notational evolutions:  the switch from neumatic musical notation to staff musical notation  the switch from tallies to Roman numerals to Arabic numerals  the switch from barter to commodity trading to money  the switch from internal temporal clues to external temporal clues to abstract time. From historical data the presentation will offer several hypotheses regarding the nature of notational systems and their evolution in general, including:  the philosophical and technological nature of notations  the distinction between notational evolution and revolution  the limitations of a notation that eventually force creation of new notations  the broad technical and social consequences of introducing new notations. Key conclusions of the talk will include the following:  notational systems do not merely represent certain abstractions, they invent them; notational systems are intellectual toolsets that society creates to empower it in dealing with a complex world  we declare the existence of number, note, time, and money as a result of notational revolutions that are really intellectual revolutions with broad social consequences.  our society must develop a revolutionary new notational system focused on representing complex "rules" if it is ever to understand complex systems. Key questions the listener might consider in advance include:  what do I think of the importance of notation?  does society already have all the notations it needs for science, or might new ones be necessary?  in what sense do number, note, time, and money "exist"?
  • 3. Notational Evolution & Revolution A Brief Overview Jeffrey G. Long voice: (202) 547-0268 e-mail: JeffLong@AOL.COM letter: 133-1/2 11th Street, S.E., Washington, DC 20003 Presented at the WESS Interdisciplinary Conference on Evolutionary Systems January 16, 1993
  • 4. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 1: Cover Page I appreciate this chance to share some ideas with you. I've been interested for 20 years now in developing a new way to understand complex systems, because I think mathematics and our other primary notational systems have severe fundamental limitations in what they can represent. I've concluded from my work to date that the NOTATION we use is the limitation on our ability to understand the world around us. Today I hope to demonstrate WHY I believe that, through four examples that contrast notational EVOLUTION with notational REVOLUTION. This is work-in-progress, not final conclusions. I still have a long way to go. If want to talk more, please contact me as shown on the slide. Page 3 of 20
  • 5. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Standard Definition of Notation the use of a system of signs or symbols to represent words, phrases, numbers, quantities, etc. (Webster's New World Dictionary, Second College Edition, 1984) "For the purpose of determining logical structure it is, for instance, a matter of complete indifference whether we represent certain features of states of affairs by spatial arrangement rather than by sounds or shapes. Hence the unimportance in theory of attempts to 'improve' symbolism: tokens of any properties whatsoever can be used as the material for a complete language." -- Max Black, Language and Philosophy, 1949, page 160 Page 4 of 20
  • 6. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 2: Standard Definition I understand that most people think notation is irrelevant. Looking at the dictionary definition, it's easy to see why they feel this way. ONE dictionary defines notation as "The use of a system of signs or symbols to represent words, phrases, numbers, quantities, etc." Notation is thus mere ABBREVIATION; key concepts exist OUTSIDE the notation, in LANGUAGE. This premise is widely held, and is stated fairly clearly by the philosopher of mathematics Max Black. I hope to persuade you to consider the possibility that notation is very different than language, and that it can express concepts that are INEFFABLE in common language. The notation is the limitation. Page 5 of 20
  • 7. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   1. Notation "A" is Invented, Based on Analogy 2. Notation "A" Evolves Towards Greater Simplicity & Scope 3. Notation "A" Hits "Complexity Barrier"; Progress Stops 4. Notation "B" is Invented, Based on Abstraction "X" 5. Notation "B" Evolves Towards Greater Simplicity & Scope 6. Notation "B" Hits "Complexity Barrier"; Progress Stops 7. Notation "C" is Invented, Based on Abstraction "Y" 8. Notation "C" Evolves Towards Greater Simplicity & Scope 9. Notation "C" Hits "Complexity Barrier"; Progress Stops Cyclical Process of "Notational Fulfillment" Page 6 of 20
  • 8. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 3: Notational Fulfillment I believe that we can understand the TRUE nature of notation by looking at how notations progressively change over long periods of time. 1. A new notation is invented, and this FIRST GENERATION notation is based on ANALOGY with what it represents 2. This notation EVOLVES through improvement of PRAXIS, e.g. A. symbols are streamlined for greater ease of use B. new symbols are introduced, e.g. lower case, punctuation C. new and better media is used [e.g. clay -> papyrus -> paper] D. there's a consensus on general standards for the notational system. This process is generally what people think of when they think of notational evolution, e.g. the shape of letters, the introduction of a new punctuation mark, etc. But this is NOT where notation gets its enormous power. 3. In spite of all refinements, the notation hits what I call the "Complexity Barrier". A. No amount of effort seems to overcome the barrier B. Progress comes, if at all, by personal insight, not analysis 4. Somehow a NEW notation is created, based on a revolutionary new ABSTRACTION that never existed before A. Characteristics: 1. Solves a broad class of problems with far less effort 2. Accessible to more people 3. Accepted only grudgingly by elite because it changes the power distribution in society B. This is what I call a Second Generation Notation. While the first generation was based on ANALOGY, the second and subsequent generations are based on far more powerful insights into the nature of what must be represented. C. An ONTOLOGICAL INVENTION is the creation of something truly new in the world, that we subsequently treat as "real" 1. Money 2. Numbers Page 7 of 20
  • 9. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   3. Time 5. Now this notation, too, goes through the same KIND of evolutionary refinement that its predecessor did, but eventually it hits its OWN complexity barrier. Page 8 of 20
  • 10. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   (Ideogram) (Phonogram) spoken word: written word: MAN "M - A - N" New Ontological Invention: Letters Slide 4: First Example = Letters Page 9 of 20
  • 11. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   The things that are in the "real world" are shown without boxes, while the ONTOLOGICAL INVENTIONS (i.e. NOTATIONS) are in rounded-edge boxes. We could spend a lot of time debating dates, but the dates are not as important as the precedence sequence 1. In writing, there's something in the "real world" that we want to represent, such as this man. 2. First generation was PICTOGRAMS that represented by ANALOGY (circa 3400 BC). 3. These evolved to be able to represent ideas and actions through the use of IDEOGRAMS (where ideas are communicated through clever combinations of symbols) and PHONOGRAMS (where concepts are hinted at by symbols that represent something that evokes a particular sound) (circa 2800 BC). 4. This worked pretty well in ancient society, but eventually they hit the COMPLEXITY BARRIER: several thousand symbols are needed to convey the concepts of even an ancient culture. 5. Continuing on that path of adding new symbols or simplifying existing symbols would have been fruitless: you can imagine what a Shakespeare play might be like if every symbol was subject to personal interpretation. Further, the printing press, originally invented by the Chinese long before the western world had it, was useless when there were thousands of symbols to deal with and low print volumes were required. 6. The Revolution occurred when someone noticed that there were a limited number of SOUNDS we make in human speech, and they designed SYMBOLS to represent those SOUNDS (first alphabet, circa 1500 BC). 7. With this new approach, and after the invention of vowels by the Greeks (circa 776 BC), we were able to represent the >50,000 words known by the average adult with only 26 letters. 8. Thus the SCOPE of what could be represented was greatly increased, while the NUMBER of SYMBOLS greatly decreased. This is a classic notational revolution. 9. But it required that we create a new entity in the world: LETTERS. WRITING is a notational SYSTEM built upon LETTERS as NOTATIONS, and it defines a number of RULES regarding the proper use of this notation. 10. As the result of this ontological invention, society was able to create a collective memory that superseded the fragile memory of the oral tradition that preceded it. This was, literally, the beginning of "history". Page 10 of 20
  • 12. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   six things seven things eight things New Ontological Invention: Number Page 11 of 20
  • 13. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 5: Second Example = Numbers 1. Again, there's something in the "real world" that we want to represent, such as how many spikes we see or how many ovals we see. 2. The first generation of quantitative notation was TALLIES that represented by ANALOGY (circa 30,000 BC). These were based on the idea of a 1:1 CORRESPONDENCE. 3. These evolved to be able to represent larger numbers more easily through the use of ROMAN NUMERALS, where (e.g.) a "V" could represent five "IIIII" (circa 500 BC). 4. This worked pretty well in ancient society, where commerce required mainly just the basic operations of arithmetic. But eventually they hit the COMPLEXITY BARRIER: many important concepts could not be represented (e.g. irrational numbers), and working with large numbers was often cumbersome. 5. Continuing on that path of adding new symbols or simplifying existing symbols would have been fruitless: we could never send a man to the moon using Roman Numerals. 6. The Revolution occurred when someone noticed that there were commonalities among certain groups of (say) seven things, if you eliminated everything about them but the quantity of their members. This "set of all sets of seven things" was identified by the arbitrary ideogram "7" (circa 1202 in the West). 7. With this new approach, and the additional convention that the value of each symbol was defined absolutely by its location from the decimal place rather than by the symbols surrounding it, society was able to perform mental arithmetic and to do more complex operations without an abacus. 8. Thus the SCOPE of what could be represented was greatly increased, as well as the NUMBER and TYPE of OPERATIONS. This too is a classic notational revolution. 9. But it required that we create a new entity in the world: NUMBERS. MATHEMATICS is a notational SYSTEM built upon NUMBERS as NOTATIONS, and it defines a number of RULES regarding the proper use of this notation. 10. As the result of this ontological invention, society was able to create a better way to describe certain aspects of the behavior of the world. Thus mathematics became the "language of science". Page 12 of 20
  • 14. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   440 New Ontological Invention: Notes Page 13 of 20
  • 15. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 6: Third Example = Notes 1. Again, there's something in the "real world" that we want to represent, such as certain musical sounds. To understand music we have to realize that a note played on an instrument does not typically just generate one pitch or sound vibration, it generates a number of these. These are called OVERTONES, and they form the TIMBRE or character of each different instrument. These overtones are very important to music. 2. The first generation notation was NEUMES that represented by ANALOGY (circa 900 AD). So A. actus (later virga) indicated raising of voice B. gravis (later punctum) indicated lowering of voice C. these were fine for monophonic music (singing in unison) 3. These evolved to be able to represent pitch better through the use of HEIGHTENED NEUMES (where relative spacing indicated pitch) and LIGATURES (where the broader part of a line indicated pitch). Later (circa 1260) MENSURAL NOTATION was better able to indicate the DURATION of each note: A. four symbols B. each was 3x duration of the previous (perfect) or 2x (imperfect) 4. But eventually they hit the COMPLEXITY BARRIER: they were unable to communicate enough information for multiple simultaneous pitches, for coordinating the timing of diverse themes, or of providing a basis for tuning multiple instruments 5. Continuing on that path of adding new symbols or simplifying existing symbols would have been fruitless: no extension of that approach would have permitted polyphonic music such as a Beethoven symphony 6. The Revolution occurred when someone decided to represent the INPUT to the instrument rather than its OUTPUT (circa 1000 AD). 7. By this device, after several hundred years of evolution, we are now able to represent a wide range of pitches for a wide range of instruments, and to coordinate their pitch, timing, and volume. We can do POLYPHONIC music of great complexity. 8. Thus the PRECISION and SCOPE of what could be represented was greatly increased. Music could be edited and COMPOSED before it was PERFORMED, unlike jazz (composed on the spot), folk music (memorized, traditional), or plainsong (written but very simple). 9. But it required that we create a new entity in the world: NOTES. Musical composition, the notational SYSTEM built upon NOTES as notations, added a number of other rules about the proper use of this notation. 10. As the result of this ontological invention, composers were able to write polyphonic music down and then edit and refine it, and were able to create simultaneous complex sets of instructions to a Page 14 of 20
  • 16. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   variety of musicians. This permitted, ultimately, the creation of complex symphonic and other scores. If you listen to Gregorian chants and then listen to a Beethoven symphony, you'll really FEEL the power of this. Page 15 of 20
  • 17. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Salt ATTRIBUTES: companionship $20 food (value) Twenty Dollars Pay to the order of: New Ontological Invention: Dollar Page 16 of 20
  • 18. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 7: Last Example = Dollars 1. This is a little different slide, showing the PRE-NOTATIONAL situation at the top. If you want to trade your duck for my cat, we may agree on a BARTER arrangement. A duck and a cat are roughly commensurable, partly because they're both animals and they both have some real and obvious values to somebody; so it is fairly easy to make that trade. But as you offer things that are less and less commensurable, it gets harder to make a trade. 2. The first generation of notation was COMMODITY MONEY that represented a certain REAL (i.e. practical) VALUE by ANALOGY. Examples include cattle and salt. 3. Like all notations, commodity money evolved over time. 4. But eventually it hit a COMPLEXITY BARRIER: these items were awkward to divide and/or measure, perishable, and inconvenient logistically. Sometimes one had to trade with a third person to make a deal happen (explain). Commerce was still very difficult, and the more complex an economy got the more problems were caused by commodity money. 5. Continuing on that path would have been fruitless: we can hardly imagine what the New York Stock Exchange or our economy in general might be like if every transaction was paid for by weighing salt or some other physical commodity. 6. The Revolution occurred when someone noticed that VALUE could exist INDEPENDENTLY of any object, by COMMON CONSENT. They set out to designate arbitrary objects as commonly accepted SYMBOLS of DECLARED VALUE. The intrinsic PRACTICAL VALUE of these objects was nowhere near their DECLARED VALUE, and was often basically zero. Examples include cowrie seashells, wampum beads, gold and silver. The only criteria for symbols was that the objects be: A. known to many people B. recognizable in value C. scarce D. portable (at least not too bulky) E. physically stable over time (preferably imperishable) F. easily sub-divided. 7. Eventually, precious metals won this contest. But those tokens of value were subject to dilution, counterfeiting, unfair scales, and other problems, so they evolved into other equally value-less forms. TRANSFERRABLE RECEIPTS were used in the Middle Ages, and then FIDUCIARY MONEY was used in the West circa 1676. From 1825 through 1875 in the United States there was a major political debate between the "paper money men" and the "gold bugs" about how abstract value should be represented in America. America ended up being the birthplace of widespread use of paper money in the Western world. This paper money was backed by gold, an equally worthless commodity. Page 17 of 20
  • 19. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Eventually we ended up with FIAT MONEY (circa 1934), not based on the gold standard, to enable governments to print money as desired, independently of their actual gold reserves. and thereby control aspects of their economy through monetary policy. 8. Thus VALUE-IN-THE-ABSTRACT came to be REAL, and could be traded like a real duck for my cat. Since in principle anything could be traded for this symbol, the BREADTH of what could be readily traded was greatly increased, and this EASE OF USE encouraged more commercial activity. Once governments understood the power of this notation, they regulated it and then completely took it over so THEY could control its abuse. 9. Again we created a new entity in the world: DOLLARS (or their equivalent). ACCOUNTING, the notational SYSTEM built upon DOLLARS as notations, provides rules for the proper use of this notation. 10. As the result of this ontological invention, society was able to divide work more readily into specialized categories, for there was now a common denominator that could be used in any commercial activity. This was the beginning of "commerce" as we know it today. Page 18 of 20
  • 20. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Conclusion 1. Notational evolution enhances praxis. Notational revolution invents new abstractions, and provides a calculus for computation and communication using these new and powerful constructs. 2. Wannabe notations are that way because they have failed to distill the "essence" of the domain they purport to deal with. Notation is not mere abbreviation, but is instead the limitation on our ability to understand the universe. 3. We have hit the "complexity barrier" in dealing with complex systems and need a major new notation. Page 19 of 20
  • 21. Jeffrey G. Long [1/16/1993] Notational Evolution & Revolution   Slide 7: Conclusions Questions? Page 20 of 20