SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Welcome to Sify.com                                                                 http://sify.com/printer_friendly.php?id=14381400&ctid=2&lid=1




                                                                                                                                                  PTI
         CJI rules out declaration of assets by judges
         Sunday, 04 February , 2007, 12:21




         New Delhi: Holding that there was no limit to judicial review, Supreme Court Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan has
         ruled out the question of having any compulsory annual declaration of wealth and assets by judges of the apex
         court and high courts.

         No self-respecting judge would accept the idea of such compulsory declaration or have any committee of lay
         persons to probe the conduct of the judiciary, Justice Balakrishnan maintained in an interview to Karan Thapar for
         CNN-IBN programme 'Devil's Advocate', according to a press release of the channel.

         Welcoming the proposed National Judicial Council intended for enforcing judicial accountability, the Chief Justice,
         however, rejected the idea of involving any lay persons in the council.

         "It is a question of independence of the judiciary. If any other person conducts such an inquiry about any judge, it
         will cause serious encroachment into the independence of the judiciary. I personally believe if anyone else
         inquires into the allegations against the judges and imposes punishment, I don't think any self-respecting judge
         would like it," Justice Balakrishnan observed.


              "© 2004 sify.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed."




1 of 1                                                                                                                                       4/26/08 2:19 PM

More Related Content

More from JudicialReform13

Contempt of justice_outlook
Contempt of justice_outlookContempt of justice_outlook
Contempt of justice_outlookJudicialReform13
 
Completely collaspsed system
Completely collaspsed systemCompletely collaspsed system
Completely collaspsed systemJudicialReform13
 
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhallaComplaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhallaJudicialReform13
 
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsCnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsJudicialReform13
 
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiCji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiJudicialReform13
 
Cjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentCjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentJudicialReform13
 
Cjar complaint against_rebello
Cjar complaint against_rebelloCjar complaint against_rebello
Cjar complaint against_rebelloJudicialReform13
 
Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1JudicialReform13
 
Cic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsCic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsJudicialReform13
 
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumChief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumJudicialReform13
 

More from JudicialReform13 (20)

Contempt power some_quest
Contempt power some_questContempt power some_quest
Contempt power some_quest
 
Contempt of justice_outlook
Contempt of justice_outlookContempt of justice_outlook
Contempt of justice_outlook
 
Contempt article pb
Contempt article pbContempt article pb
Contempt article pb
 
Completely collaspsed system
Completely collaspsed systemCompletely collaspsed system
Completely collaspsed system
 
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhallaComplaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
 
Coja resolution 22.9.01
Coja resolution 22.9.01Coja resolution 22.9.01
Coja resolution 22.9.01
 
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsCnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
 
Cjirefuted
CjirefutedCjirefuted
Cjirefuted
 
Cji silence
Cji silenceCji silence
Cji silence
 
Cji recomends impreach_ie
Cji recomends impreach_ieCji recomends impreach_ie
Cji recomends impreach_ie
 
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiCji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
 
Cjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentCjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_president
 
Cjar complaint against_rebello
Cjar complaint against_rebelloCjar complaint against_rebello
Cjar complaint against_rebello
 
Cjar brochure
Cjar brochureCjar brochure
Cjar brochure
 
Cja comments on bill
Cja   comments on billCja   comments on bill
Cja comments on bill
 
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
 
Cic decision hc_rtifees_
Cic decision hc_rtifees_Cic decision hc_rtifees_
Cic decision hc_rtifees_
 
Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1
 
Cic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsCic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointments
 
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumChief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
 

Cji rules out_declaration_of_assests

  • 1. Welcome to Sify.com http://sify.com/printer_friendly.php?id=14381400&ctid=2&lid=1 PTI CJI rules out declaration of assets by judges Sunday, 04 February , 2007, 12:21 New Delhi: Holding that there was no limit to judicial review, Supreme Court Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan has ruled out the question of having any compulsory annual declaration of wealth and assets by judges of the apex court and high courts. No self-respecting judge would accept the idea of such compulsory declaration or have any committee of lay persons to probe the conduct of the judiciary, Justice Balakrishnan maintained in an interview to Karan Thapar for CNN-IBN programme 'Devil's Advocate', according to a press release of the channel. Welcoming the proposed National Judicial Council intended for enforcing judicial accountability, the Chief Justice, however, rejected the idea of involving any lay persons in the council. "It is a question of independence of the judiciary. If any other person conducts such an inquiry about any judge, it will cause serious encroachment into the independence of the judiciary. I personally believe if anyone else inquires into the allegations against the judges and imposes punishment, I don't think any self-respecting judge would like it," Justice Balakrishnan observed. "© 2004 sify.com India Limited. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed." 1 of 1 4/26/08 2:19 PM