SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
JUN-17-2010 14:45 From:Wheeler&Wheeler. PC               9727714815                      To:9725573431                Page: U3




                                              NO.   _-..:.O_~ ..;...;;;:;..O~_, _
            IN THE MATTER OF
            THE MARRIAGE OF

            SANDRA CARROLL
            AND
            KENNETH CARROLL

                                       ORI(~1NAL PETITION FOR DIVORCE

           J.      Discovery Level

       I           Discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under level 1 of rule 190 of the Texas

       I Rules of Civil Procedure.       No children are involved in this divorce case, and the value of the
       i

       I marital
       J
                   estate is more than zero but not more than $50,000.
       I

       i
       !   2.      Parties
       J


       I
       I           rhi, suit   is brought by Sandra Carroll, Petitioner.              The last three numbers of Sandra

       i Carroll's driver's license number arc 3(,7.          The last three numbers         of Sandra Carroll's   Social
       I
       I Security number are 126.
      I            Kenneth Carroll is Respondent.

           3.      Domicile

                   Respondent    has been a domiciliary of Texas tor the preceding six-month period and a

           resident of this county for the preceding ninety-day period.

           4.      Service

                   No service on Respondent is necessary at this time.

           5.      Protective Order Statement

                   No protective order under title 4 of the Texas Family Code is in effect, and no application

            for a protective order is pending with regard to the parties to this suit.
JUN-17-2010              14:45 From:Wheeler&Wheeler,            PC    9727714815                To: 9725573431
                 I
                 !
                 i
                 I
                 ~.           Dates of Marriage and Separation
                 I




                              The parties were married on or about January 7, 1984 and ceased to live together as

             lhusband and wife on or about July 8, 2009.
             i
             I

             17.              ( irounds for Divorce
             !
             I                The marriage has become insupportable           because of discord or conflict of personalities

             ibetween Petitioner and Respondent that destroys the legitimate ends of the marriage relationship
             I
             I

             iand          prevents any reasonable expectation ofreconeiliation.
             I

             i
             18.               Children of the Marriage

                               There is no child under eighteen years of age           or otherwise entitled to support who was

                     born or adopted of this marriage, and none is expected.
             I
             19.               Division of Communlty Property
             I
                               Petitioner   believes   Petitioner    and Respondent      will enter into an agreement   for the

                     division of their estate.      If such an agreement is made, Petitioner requests the Court to approve

             . the agreement             and divide their estate in a manner consistent        with the agreement.   If such an

         i agreement               is not made, Petitioner requests the Court to divide their estate in a manner that the
         !

         : Court deems just and right" as provided by law.
         i
         I

                     10.       Prayer

                               Petitioner prays that citation and notice issue as required by law and that the Court grant a

                     divorce    WId   all other relief requested in this petition. '

                               Petitioner prays for general relief.

                                                                          Respectfully submitted,


                                                                          JEREMY Q EWERT
                                                                          965 W. Ralph Hall Parkway, Suite 101




         .           i
JUN-17-2010 14:45 From:Wheeler&Wheeler,   PC   9727714815            To:9725573431
       I
       !




                                                Rockwall, Texas 75032
                                                Tel: 214-649-9620
                                                Fax.: 972-771-4815
JUN-17-2010 14:42 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC       9727714815              To: 9725573431             Page: 1/9




             Kenneth Carroll
             Fax: 972 .•
                       557-3431

             Re:     Divorce Paperwork

             Mr. Carroll:

                    Please find enclosed the Petition tor Divorce, the Waiver of Service. and the
             Proposed Decree. Please sign the latter two documents and return to me at your
             convenience if everything meets your approval. Feel free to contact me with any
             questions or concerns. Thank you.




              Jer
              Att    y at Law
              Phone 214.649.9620
              Fax 972.771.4815
JUN-17-2010 14:42 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC           9727714815                 To:9725573431




                                                      NO. 10-10491

          IN THE MATTER OF                                   §       TN THE DISTRICT COURT
          TIlE MARRJAGE OF                                   §
                                                             §
          SANDRA CARROLL                                     §        2SSlh JUDICIAL DISTRICT
          AND                                                §
          KENNETH CARROLL                                    §       DALLAS COUNTY. TEXAS

                                            FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE

                   On                                the Court heard this casco
                        --------------------
         Appearances

                   Petitioner, Sandra Carroll, did not appenr in pets on but has agreed to the terms of this

          order as evidenced by Petitioner's signature below.

                   Respondent, Kenneth Carroll, has made     0.   general appearance and has agreed to the terms

          of this judgment to the extent permitted by law, as evidenced by Respondent's signature below.

          Record

                   The making of a record of testimony was waived by the parties with the consent of the

          Court.

          Jurisdiction and Domicile

                   The Court finds that the pleadings of Petitioner are in due form and contain all the

          allegations, information. and prerequisites required by law. The Court, after receiving evidence,

          finds that it has jurisdiction   of this case and of all the parties and that at least sixty days have

          elapsed since the date the suit was filed. The Court finds that, at the time this suit was filed,

          Petitioner was domiciled in another state or nation and Respondent had been a domiciliary of

          Texas tor the preceding six-month period and was a resident of this county in which the suit was

          filed.   All persons entitled to citation were properly cited.
JUN-17-2010 14:42 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC         9727714815                To:9725573431




         Jury

                 A jury was waived, and questions of fact and oflaw were submitted to the Court.

         Agreement of Parties

                 The Court finds that the parties have entered into a written agreement as contained in this

         decree by virtue of having approved this decree as to both fonn and substance.         To the extent

         permitted by law, the parties stipulate the agreement is enforceable as a contract        The Court

         approves the agreement of the parties as contained in this Final Decree of Divorce.

         Divorce

                   IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that Sandra Carroll, Petitioner, and Kenneth Carroll,

         Respondent, are divorced and that the marriage between them is dissolved on the ground of

         insupportability,

         Child of the Marriage

                   The Court finds that there is no child of the marriage of Petitioner and Respondent now

         under eighteen years of age or otherwise entitled to support and that none is expected.

          Division of Marital Estate

                   The Court finds that no community       property other than personal      effects has been

          accumulated by the parties.

                   IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the personal effects of the parties are awarded to

          the party having possession.

                   Division of Debt

                   Debts to Husband

                   IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the husband, Kenneth Carroll, shall pay, as a part

          of the division of the estate of the parties. and shall indemnify and hold the wife and her property
JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler. PC              9727714815                 To:9725573431




         harmless from any failure to so discharge, these items:

                    H-l.     All debts, charges, liabilities, and other obligations incurred solely by the husband

         from and after July 8, 2009 unless express provision is made in this decree to the contrary.

                    Notice

                    IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that each party shall send to the other party, within

         three days of its receipt, a copy of          any correspondence     from a creditor or taxing authority

         concerning any potential liability of the other party.

                    Attorney's Fees

                    To effect an equitable division of the estate of the parties and as a part of the division.

          each party shall be responsible for his or her own attorney's fees, expenses, and costs incurred as

          a result of legal representation in this case.

                    Treatment/Allocation     ofCommun.i!y Income for Year of Divorce

                    IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that, for the calendar year 2010, each party shall tile

          an individual income tax return in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code.

                    IT IS ORDERED          AND DECREED            that for calendar    year 2010,   each party shall

          indemnify and hold the other          party and his or her property harmless from any tax liability

          associated with the reporting party's individual tax return for that year unless the parties have

          agreed to allocate their tax liability in a manner different from that reflected on their returns.

                    IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that each 'party shall furnish such information to the

          other party as is requested to prepare federal income tax returns for 201.0 within thirty days of

          receipt   or a written   request for the information.   and in no event shall the available information be

          exchanged        later than March 1, 2011.     As requested    information   becomes available after that

          date, it shall be provided within ten days of receipt.
JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC           9727714815                To:9725573431




               IT IS ORDERED ANn DECREED that all payments made to the other party in

        accordance with the allocation provisions for payment of federal income taxes contained in this

        Final Del,TOOof Divorce are not deemed income to the party receiving those payments but are

        part of the property division and necessary for a just and right division of the parties' estate.

        CQurt Costs

                IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that costs of court are to be borne by the party who

        incurred them.

        Discharge from Discovery Retention Requirement

                IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the parties and their respective attorneys are

        discharged from the requirement of keeping and storing the documents produced in this case in

        accordance with role 191.4(d) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

         Decree Acknowledgment

                Petitioner, Sandra Carroll, and Respondent,        Kenneth Carroll, each acknowledge        that

        before signing this Final Decree of Divorce they have read this Final Decree of Divorce fully and

        completely,   have had the opportunity      to ask any questions regarding the same, and fully

        understand that the contents of this Final Decree of Divorce constitute a full and complete

        resolution of this casco     Petitioner and Respondent      acknowledge    that they have voluntarily

        affixed their signatures to this Final Decree of Divorce, believing this agreement to be a just and

        right division of the marital. debt and assets, and state that they have not signed by virtue of any

        coercion, any duress, or any agreement other than those specifically set forth in this Final Decree

        of Divorce.

        Indemnification

                Eaeh party represents and warrants that he or she has not incurred any outstanding debt,
JUN-17-2010   14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler,          PC   9727714815               To: 9725573431




        obligation,   or other liability on which the other party is or may be liable, other than those

        described in this decree.    Each party agrees and IT IS ORDERED           that if any claim, action, or

        proceeding is hereafter initiated seeking to hold the party not assuming a debt, an obligation,          a

        liability, an act, or an omission of the other party liable   tor such debt, obligation, liability, act or

        omission of the other party, that other party will, at his or her sole expense, defend the party not

        assuming the debt, obligation, liability, act, or omission of the other party against any such claim

        or demand, whether or Dot wcll founded, and will indemnify the party not assuming the debt,

         obligation, liability, act, or omission   of the other party and hold him or her harmless from all

         damages resulting    from the claim or demand.

                 Damages, as used in this provision, includes any reasonable loss, cost, expense, penalty,

         and other damage, including without limitation        attorney's   fees and other costs and expenses

         reasonably and necessarily incurred in enforcing this indemnity.

                 IT TS ORDERED that the indemnifying party will reimburse the indemnified party, on

         demand, for any payment made by the indemnified party at any time after the entry of the divorce

         decree to satisfy any Judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction          or in accordance   with a

         bona fide compromise or settlement of claims, demands, or actions for any damages to which this

         indemnity relates.

                 The parties agree and IT IS ORDERED          that each party will give the other party prompt

         written notice of any litigation threatened or instituted against either party that might constitute

         the basis of a claim for indemnity under this decree.

         Clarifying Orders

                 Without affecting    the finality of this Final Decree of Divorce,         this Court expressly

         reserves the right to make orders necessary to clari fy and enforce this decree.
JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC          9727714815              To:9725573431




        Relief Not Granted

                IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that all relief requested in this case and not expressly

        granted is denied.   This is a final judgment, for which let execution and all writs and processes

        necessary to enforce this judgment issue.     This judgment finally disposes of all claims and all

        parties and is appealable.

        Date of 'Judgmen;

        SIGNED on                                         ~




                                                      JUDGE PRESIDING

        APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY:


        JEREMY Q EWERT
        965 W. Ralph Hall Parkway, Suite 101
        Rockwall, Texas 75032
        Tel: 214-649-9620
        Fax: 912-771-48l5


        By:                                                   _
              Jeremy Ewert
              Attorney for Petitioner
              State B81 No. 24045857


         APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO AS TO .BOTH FORM AND SUBSTANCE:



         --------------                             .._--
         Petitioner




         Respondent
JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC            9727714815                  To:9725573431




                                                   NO. 10·10491

        IN THE MATTER OF                                      §     IN THE DISTRICT COURT
        THE MARRIAGE OF                                       §
                                                              §
        SANDRA CARROLL                                        §     255tb J lJDICIAL DISTRICT
        AND                                                   §
        KENNETH CARROLL                                       §      DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS


                                               WAIVER OF SERVICE

               Kenneth Carroll appeared in person before me today and stated under oath:

               "I, Kenneth C8IToll, am the person named as Respondent in this case.

               "I acknowledge that I have been provided a copy of the Original Petition for Divorce filed

       in this case.   I have read and understand the contents of that document.

               "I understand that the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure require, in must instances. that a

       party or respondent be served with citation.         I do not want to be served with citation, and I waive

       the issuance and service of citation.

               "I enter my appearance in this ease for all purposes,

               "I further state that the following information is correct and that my-

               Mailing address is:    13025 Verdant Lane. Balch Springs. Texas           75186

               Telephone number is: 214-476-6850

                Social Security number is: 541-66-4568

               Texas driver's license number is:      ['"         oil]


                "1 further understand that I have a duty to nolif'y the Court if my mailing address changes

       during thi.s proceeding."
t""'-     .J   I   •.•..•


-                .lIhee ler8.Whee ler.
14:44 From .•••




                                                                     Kenneth Carroll

              SIGNED under oath before me on                                                 ~                   _



                                                                     Notary Public, State of Texas



              1, the notary public whose         signature appears above, certify that I am not an attorney in this

    case.




     .

More Related Content

What's hot

Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4
Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4
Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4jamesmaredmond
 
BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent
BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent
BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent Bryan Johnson
 
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...Angela Kaaihue
 
BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent
BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent
BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent Bryan Johnson
 
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.Marcellus Drilling News
 
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et alSc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et aljamesmaredmond
 
Bonnie -ORDER TO DISMISS
Bonnie  -ORDER TO DISMISSBonnie  -ORDER TO DISMISS
Bonnie -ORDER TO DISMISSJRachelle
 
5 30-12 notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors
5 30-12  notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors5 30-12  notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors
5 30-12 notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtorsjamesmaredmond
 
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
SC   Opinion and Order - motion for comtemptSC   Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtemptJRachelle
 
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
 
1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...
1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...
1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...lee_fang
 
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...Putnam Reporter
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Cocoselul Inaripat
 

What's hot (19)

Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4
Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4
Gaggero/Mooring/Walters/Praske/Chatfield/Sulphur County Records/Cases 4
 
Us Supreme Court.DOMA 3.27.2013
Us Supreme Court.DOMA 3.27.2013Us Supreme Court.DOMA 3.27.2013
Us Supreme Court.DOMA 3.27.2013
 
BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent
BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent
BIA reversal 3 Judge James A nugent
 
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
Angela Kaaihue, Motion in Opposition to NECA's Summary Judgement- Hearing Jul...
 
Order Dismissing RICO Darren Chaker
Order Dismissing RICO Darren ChakerOrder Dismissing RICO Darren Chaker
Order Dismissing RICO Darren Chaker
 
BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent
BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent
BIa reveral 5 Judge James A Nugent
 
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
 
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et alSc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
 
Master exhibit
Master exhibitMaster exhibit
Master exhibit
 
Bonnie -ORDER TO DISMISS
Bonnie  -ORDER TO DISMISSBonnie  -ORDER TO DISMISS
Bonnie -ORDER TO DISMISS
 
5 30-12 notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors
5 30-12  notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors5 30-12  notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors
5 30-12 notice of ruling re motion to amend judgment to add judgment debtors
 
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
SC   Opinion and Order - motion for comtemptSC   Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
 
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
 
1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...
1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...
1003 . 3_appendix_-_supp_brief_mtn_re_772_relief_from_rcvrship_order_bukrinsk...
 
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
WV Supreme Court Opinion - Mark V Halburn v. Dolores J Halburn #13-0591 11/13...
 
B245114 cpr marina
B245114 cpr marinaB245114 cpr marina
B245114 cpr marina
 
10000001299
1000000129910000001299
10000001299
 
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
 
Doc.88 1
Doc.88 1Doc.88 1
Doc.88 1
 

Similar to Divorce 2010,

Igor shoplifting charges in court
Igor shoplifting charges in courtIgor shoplifting charges in court
Igor shoplifting charges in courtDocumentsforMila
 
GRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdf
GRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdfGRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdf
GRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdfDianneOne
 
Declaration of Erica
Declaration of EricaDeclaration of Erica
Declaration of EricaBrian Lum
 
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the BlockNominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Blocknlashway
 
Mnaloto vs ca
Mnaloto vs caMnaloto vs ca
Mnaloto vs carjbanqz
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk PowerpointLaw-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpointlawexchange.co.uk
 
Nepomuceno vs ca
Nepomuceno vs caNepomuceno vs ca
Nepomuceno vs carjbanqz
 
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILLCHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILLOluyemisi Dansu
 
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...Earl R. Davis
 
Ajero vs ca no. 3
Ajero vs ca no. 3Ajero vs ca no. 3
Ajero vs ca no. 3rjbanqz
 
Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court
Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court
Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court David Butts Law Firm
 
168849221 usufruct-case
168849221 usufruct-case168849221 usufruct-case
168849221 usufruct-casehomeworkping8
 
Interstate guardianship issues
Interstate guardianship issuesInterstate guardianship issues
Interstate guardianship issuesHnmatt
 
The effect of the high court decision in Stanford
The effect of the high court decision in StanfordThe effect of the high court decision in Stanford
The effect of the high court decision in StanfordBrisbane Family Law Centre
 
Intention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the Rebuttals
Intention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the RebuttalsIntention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the Rebuttals
Intention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the RebuttalsPreeti Sikder
 
2010 Family Law Recent Developments
2010 Family Law Recent Developments2010 Family Law Recent Developments
2010 Family Law Recent Developmentsdavidtracy
 
Intention to create legal relations
Intention to create legal relationsIntention to create legal relations
Intention to create legal relationsPatrick Aboku
 

Similar to Divorce 2010, (20)

Igor shoplifting charges in court
Igor shoplifting charges in courtIgor shoplifting charges in court
Igor shoplifting charges in court
 
GRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdf
GRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdfGRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdf
GRACE J. GARCIA-RECIO vs. REDERICK A. RECIO.pdf
 
Declaration of Erica
Declaration of EricaDeclaration of Erica
Declaration of Erica
 
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the BlockNominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
Nominal Alimony: The Not-So-New Kid on the Block
 
Mnaloto vs ca
Mnaloto vs caMnaloto vs ca
Mnaloto vs ca
 
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk PowerpointLaw-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
 
Nepomuceno vs ca
Nepomuceno vs caNepomuceno vs ca
Nepomuceno vs ca
 
238777944 pfr-case
238777944 pfr-case238777944 pfr-case
238777944 pfr-case
 
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILLCHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
 
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILLCHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF A WILL
 
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...
The Estate of Elizabeth Haynes Urquhart vs. American Regional_ Earl R. Davis ...
 
Ajero vs ca no. 3
Ajero vs ca no. 3Ajero vs ca no. 3
Ajero vs ca no. 3
 
Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court
Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court
Short v. Short Case - Mississippi Supreme Court
 
168849221 usufruct-case
168849221 usufruct-case168849221 usufruct-case
168849221 usufruct-case
 
Interstate guardianship issues
Interstate guardianship issuesInterstate guardianship issues
Interstate guardianship issues
 
The effect of the high court decision in Stanford
The effect of the high court decision in StanfordThe effect of the high court decision in Stanford
The effect of the high court decision in Stanford
 
Intention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the Rebuttals
Intention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the RebuttalsIntention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the Rebuttals
Intention to Create Legal Relations : Presumptions and the Rebuttals
 
2010 Family Law Recent Developments
2010 Family Law Recent Developments2010 Family Law Recent Developments
2010 Family Law Recent Developments
 
Zipagang Order Dusome
Zipagang Order DusomeZipagang Order Dusome
Zipagang Order Dusome
 
Intention to create legal relations
Intention to create legal relationsIntention to create legal relations
Intention to create legal relations
 

Recently uploaded

The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentXsasf Sfdfasd
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationMJDuyan
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphNetziValdelomar1
 
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17Celine George
 
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfHED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxDr. Santhosh Kumar. N
 
How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17
How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17
How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17Celine George
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxKatherine Villaluna
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfMohonDas
 
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxMYDA ANGELICA SUAN
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...CaraSkikne1
 
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education  and Educational PhilosophyPhilosophy of Education  and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education and Educational PhilosophyShuvankar Madhu
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesCeline George
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxiammrhaywood
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice documentThe Singapore Teaching Practice document
The Singapore Teaching Practice document
 
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive EducationBenefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
Benefits & Challenges of Inclusive Education
 
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
UKCGE Parental Leave Discussion March 2024
 
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
How to Use api.constrains ( ) in Odoo 17
 
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a ParagraphPresentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
Presentation on the Basics of Writing. Writing a Paragraph
 
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
How to Add a many2many Relational Field in Odoo 17
 
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdfHED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
HED Office Sohayok Exam Question Solution 2023.pdf
 
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quizPrelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
Prelims of Kant get Marx 2.0: a general politics quiz
 
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptxM-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
M-2- General Reactions of amino acids.pptx
 
How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17
How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17
How to Show Error_Warning Messages in Odoo 17
 
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
CHUYÊN ĐỀ DẠY THÊM TIẾNG ANH LỚP 11 - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 - HK...
 
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptxPractical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
Practical Research 1: Lesson 8 Writing the Thesis Statement.pptx
 
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdfDiploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
Diploma in Nursing Admission Test Question Solution 2023.pdf
 
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptxPatterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
Patterns of Written Texts Across Disciplines.pptx
 
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
5 charts on South Africa as a source country for international student recrui...
 
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdfPersonal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
Personal Resilience in Project Management 2 - TV Edit 1a.pdf
 
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education  and Educational PhilosophyPhilosophy of Education  and Educational Philosophy
Philosophy of Education and Educational Philosophy
 
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 SalesHow to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
How to Manage Cross-Selling in Odoo 17 Sales
 
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17How to Solve Singleton Error in the  Odoo 17
How to Solve Singleton Error in the Odoo 17
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -- FANDOM -- JENKINS.pptx
 

Divorce 2010,

  • 1. JUN-17-2010 14:45 From:Wheeler&Wheeler. PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 Page: U3 NO. _-..:.O_~ ..;...;;;:;..O~_, _ IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF SANDRA CARROLL AND KENNETH CARROLL ORI(~1NAL PETITION FOR DIVORCE J. Discovery Level I Discovery in this case is intended to be conducted under level 1 of rule 190 of the Texas I Rules of Civil Procedure. No children are involved in this divorce case, and the value of the i I marital J estate is more than zero but not more than $50,000. I i ! 2. Parties J I I rhi, suit is brought by Sandra Carroll, Petitioner. The last three numbers of Sandra i Carroll's driver's license number arc 3(,7. The last three numbers of Sandra Carroll's Social I I Security number are 126. I Kenneth Carroll is Respondent. 3. Domicile Respondent has been a domiciliary of Texas tor the preceding six-month period and a resident of this county for the preceding ninety-day period. 4. Service No service on Respondent is necessary at this time. 5. Protective Order Statement No protective order under title 4 of the Texas Family Code is in effect, and no application for a protective order is pending with regard to the parties to this suit.
  • 2. JUN-17-2010 14:45 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To: 9725573431 I ! i I ~. Dates of Marriage and Separation I The parties were married on or about January 7, 1984 and ceased to live together as lhusband and wife on or about July 8, 2009. i I 17. ( irounds for Divorce ! I The marriage has become insupportable because of discord or conflict of personalities ibetween Petitioner and Respondent that destroys the legitimate ends of the marriage relationship I I iand prevents any reasonable expectation ofreconeiliation. I i 18. Children of the Marriage There is no child under eighteen years of age or otherwise entitled to support who was born or adopted of this marriage, and none is expected. I 19. Division of Communlty Property I Petitioner believes Petitioner and Respondent will enter into an agreement for the division of their estate. If such an agreement is made, Petitioner requests the Court to approve . the agreement and divide their estate in a manner consistent with the agreement. If such an i agreement is not made, Petitioner requests the Court to divide their estate in a manner that the ! : Court deems just and right" as provided by law. i I 10. Prayer Petitioner prays that citation and notice issue as required by law and that the Court grant a divorce WId all other relief requested in this petition. ' Petitioner prays for general relief. Respectfully submitted, JEREMY Q EWERT 965 W. Ralph Hall Parkway, Suite 101 . i
  • 3. JUN-17-2010 14:45 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 I ! Rockwall, Texas 75032 Tel: 214-649-9620 Fax.: 972-771-4815
  • 4. JUN-17-2010 14:42 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To: 9725573431 Page: 1/9 Kenneth Carroll Fax: 972 .• 557-3431 Re: Divorce Paperwork Mr. Carroll: Please find enclosed the Petition tor Divorce, the Waiver of Service. and the Proposed Decree. Please sign the latter two documents and return to me at your convenience if everything meets your approval. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Thank you. Jer Att y at Law Phone 214.649.9620 Fax 972.771.4815
  • 5. JUN-17-2010 14:42 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 NO. 10-10491 IN THE MATTER OF § TN THE DISTRICT COURT TIlE MARRJAGE OF § § SANDRA CARROLL § 2SSlh JUDICIAL DISTRICT AND § KENNETH CARROLL § DALLAS COUNTY. TEXAS FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE On the Court heard this casco -------------------- Appearances Petitioner, Sandra Carroll, did not appenr in pets on but has agreed to the terms of this order as evidenced by Petitioner's signature below. Respondent, Kenneth Carroll, has made 0. general appearance and has agreed to the terms of this judgment to the extent permitted by law, as evidenced by Respondent's signature below. Record The making of a record of testimony was waived by the parties with the consent of the Court. Jurisdiction and Domicile The Court finds that the pleadings of Petitioner are in due form and contain all the allegations, information. and prerequisites required by law. The Court, after receiving evidence, finds that it has jurisdiction of this case and of all the parties and that at least sixty days have elapsed since the date the suit was filed. The Court finds that, at the time this suit was filed, Petitioner was domiciled in another state or nation and Respondent had been a domiciliary of Texas tor the preceding six-month period and was a resident of this county in which the suit was filed. All persons entitled to citation were properly cited.
  • 6. JUN-17-2010 14:42 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 Jury A jury was waived, and questions of fact and oflaw were submitted to the Court. Agreement of Parties The Court finds that the parties have entered into a written agreement as contained in this decree by virtue of having approved this decree as to both fonn and substance. To the extent permitted by law, the parties stipulate the agreement is enforceable as a contract The Court approves the agreement of the parties as contained in this Final Decree of Divorce. Divorce IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that Sandra Carroll, Petitioner, and Kenneth Carroll, Respondent, are divorced and that the marriage between them is dissolved on the ground of insupportability, Child of the Marriage The Court finds that there is no child of the marriage of Petitioner and Respondent now under eighteen years of age or otherwise entitled to support and that none is expected. Division of Marital Estate The Court finds that no community property other than personal effects has been accumulated by the parties. IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the personal effects of the parties are awarded to the party having possession. Division of Debt Debts to Husband IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the husband, Kenneth Carroll, shall pay, as a part of the division of the estate of the parties. and shall indemnify and hold the wife and her property
  • 7. JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler. PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 harmless from any failure to so discharge, these items: H-l. All debts, charges, liabilities, and other obligations incurred solely by the husband from and after July 8, 2009 unless express provision is made in this decree to the contrary. Notice IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that each party shall send to the other party, within three days of its receipt, a copy of any correspondence from a creditor or taxing authority concerning any potential liability of the other party. Attorney's Fees To effect an equitable division of the estate of the parties and as a part of the division. each party shall be responsible for his or her own attorney's fees, expenses, and costs incurred as a result of legal representation in this case. Treatment/Allocation ofCommun.i!y Income for Year of Divorce IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that, for the calendar year 2010, each party shall tile an individual income tax return in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code. IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that for calendar year 2010, each party shall indemnify and hold the other party and his or her property harmless from any tax liability associated with the reporting party's individual tax return for that year unless the parties have agreed to allocate their tax liability in a manner different from that reflected on their returns. IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that each 'party shall furnish such information to the other party as is requested to prepare federal income tax returns for 201.0 within thirty days of receipt or a written request for the information. and in no event shall the available information be exchanged later than March 1, 2011. As requested information becomes available after that date, it shall be provided within ten days of receipt.
  • 8. JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 IT IS ORDERED ANn DECREED that all payments made to the other party in accordance with the allocation provisions for payment of federal income taxes contained in this Final Del,TOOof Divorce are not deemed income to the party receiving those payments but are part of the property division and necessary for a just and right division of the parties' estate. CQurt Costs IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that costs of court are to be borne by the party who incurred them. Discharge from Discovery Retention Requirement IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that the parties and their respective attorneys are discharged from the requirement of keeping and storing the documents produced in this case in accordance with role 191.4(d) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Decree Acknowledgment Petitioner, Sandra Carroll, and Respondent, Kenneth Carroll, each acknowledge that before signing this Final Decree of Divorce they have read this Final Decree of Divorce fully and completely, have had the opportunity to ask any questions regarding the same, and fully understand that the contents of this Final Decree of Divorce constitute a full and complete resolution of this casco Petitioner and Respondent acknowledge that they have voluntarily affixed their signatures to this Final Decree of Divorce, believing this agreement to be a just and right division of the marital. debt and assets, and state that they have not signed by virtue of any coercion, any duress, or any agreement other than those specifically set forth in this Final Decree of Divorce. Indemnification Eaeh party represents and warrants that he or she has not incurred any outstanding debt,
  • 9. JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To: 9725573431 obligation, or other liability on which the other party is or may be liable, other than those described in this decree. Each party agrees and IT IS ORDERED that if any claim, action, or proceeding is hereafter initiated seeking to hold the party not assuming a debt, an obligation, a liability, an act, or an omission of the other party liable tor such debt, obligation, liability, act or omission of the other party, that other party will, at his or her sole expense, defend the party not assuming the debt, obligation, liability, act, or omission of the other party against any such claim or demand, whether or Dot wcll founded, and will indemnify the party not assuming the debt, obligation, liability, act, or omission of the other party and hold him or her harmless from all damages resulting from the claim or demand. Damages, as used in this provision, includes any reasonable loss, cost, expense, penalty, and other damage, including without limitation attorney's fees and other costs and expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in enforcing this indemnity. IT TS ORDERED that the indemnifying party will reimburse the indemnified party, on demand, for any payment made by the indemnified party at any time after the entry of the divorce decree to satisfy any Judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with a bona fide compromise or settlement of claims, demands, or actions for any damages to which this indemnity relates. The parties agree and IT IS ORDERED that each party will give the other party prompt written notice of any litigation threatened or instituted against either party that might constitute the basis of a claim for indemnity under this decree. Clarifying Orders Without affecting the finality of this Final Decree of Divorce, this Court expressly reserves the right to make orders necessary to clari fy and enforce this decree.
  • 10. JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 Relief Not Granted IT IS ORDERED AND DECREED that all relief requested in this case and not expressly granted is denied. This is a final judgment, for which let execution and all writs and processes necessary to enforce this judgment issue. This judgment finally disposes of all claims and all parties and is appealable. Date of 'Judgmen; SIGNED on ~ JUDGE PRESIDING APPROVED AS TO FORM ONLY: JEREMY Q EWERT 965 W. Ralph Hall Parkway, Suite 101 Rockwall, Texas 75032 Tel: 214-649-9620 Fax: 912-771-48l5 By: _ Jeremy Ewert Attorney for Petitioner State B81 No. 24045857 APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO AS TO .BOTH FORM AND SUBSTANCE: -------------- .._-- Petitioner Respondent
  • 11. JUN-17-2010 14:43 From:Wheeler&Wheeler, PC 9727714815 To:9725573431 NO. 10·10491 IN THE MATTER OF § IN THE DISTRICT COURT THE MARRIAGE OF § § SANDRA CARROLL § 255tb J lJDICIAL DISTRICT AND § KENNETH CARROLL § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS WAIVER OF SERVICE Kenneth Carroll appeared in person before me today and stated under oath: "I, Kenneth C8IToll, am the person named as Respondent in this case. "I acknowledge that I have been provided a copy of the Original Petition for Divorce filed in this case. I have read and understand the contents of that document. "I understand that the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure require, in must instances. that a party or respondent be served with citation. I do not want to be served with citation, and I waive the issuance and service of citation. "I enter my appearance in this ease for all purposes, "I further state that the following information is correct and that my- Mailing address is: 13025 Verdant Lane. Balch Springs. Texas 75186 Telephone number is: 214-476-6850 Social Security number is: 541-66-4568 Texas driver's license number is: ['" oil] "1 further understand that I have a duty to nolif'y the Court if my mailing address changes during thi.s proceeding."
  • 12. t""'- .J I •.•..• - .lIhee ler8.Whee ler. 14:44 From .••• Kenneth Carroll SIGNED under oath before me on ~ _ Notary Public, State of Texas 1, the notary public whose signature appears above, certify that I am not an attorney in this case. .