4. ARTICLE DETAIL
Author- Feng-Bin Lu, En-De Hu, Lan-Man Xu, et al.,
Journal- Gastroentrology & Hepatology
Published in the Year- 2 April, 2018
Volume and Issue ā 12 (2018)
Impact factor- 4.029
5. Introduction
ļ± NAFLD can induce fibrosis process and gradually develop into
cirrhosis, liver cancer, and its complications. In addition, NAFLD
is significantly associated with metabolic diseases, which can
lead to cardiovascular events.
ļ± The current global prevalence of NAFLD is 25.24%.
ļ±Over the past several decades, with change in diet and activity
patterns, the global prevalence of obesity gradually increased to
12% in 2008
6. CONT...
ļ± In Asia, a considerable portion of NAFLD (8ā20%) had been reported
to develop at lower BMI.
ļ±Obese NAFLD had a higher fibrosis score, higher NAFLD activity score
(NAS), and the risk of NASH than lean NAFLD (BMI < 25 kg/m2).
(Sookoian S, 2018)
7. Need of the study
ā¢ A number of researches have explored the association between obesity
and NAFLD liver function, histopathology, complications, genetic factors,
and prognosis, but the results were conflicting and inconclusive. (. Alam S,
Gupta UD, Alam M, et al. 2014)
ā¢ The metabolism-related serological indicators of obese NAFLD patients
were significantly higher than those of lean NAFLD patients (BMI < 25
kg/m2), the difference of the risk of metabolic complications was still
unknown, so this study will helpful in identifying the risk.
8. cont...
ā¢Few studies have evaluated the differential role of
rs738409 in nonobese versus obese NAFLD patients, but
their results were not consistent. Therefore, by meta-
analysis, comparing the G allele of PNPLA3 rs738409 in
nonobese and obese NAFLD is of great importance.
9. Objective
ļ¶The objective of this study is to compare the clinical features between
nonobese NAFLD and obese NAFLD in order to discover the relationship
between obesity and NAFLD liver function, histopathology, complications,
genetic factors, and prognosis.
10. Methodology
ā¢ Research Approach- Quantitative
ā¢ Research Design- A systematic review
(Meta Analysis of randomized controlled trials)
ā¢ Database Sites- PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane
ā¢ Total studies selected- 13 publications including 12 cross-sectional and 1 cohort
ā¢ Study population:- NAFLD patients (obese and non obese patients)
ā¢ Sample Size: 11,043 participants from 7 countries
11. Operational definition
ā¢ Hypertension : It was considered present in patients on treatment or hypertension or/and
when a systolic blood pressure ā„140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure ā„90 mmHg;
ā¢ Diabetes mellitus: It was diagnosed when fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was ā„126
mg/dL and/or receiving treatment for diabetes mellitus;
ā¢ Hypertriglyceridemia: It was diagnosed as serum triglyceride ā„150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L);
ā¢ Metabolic syndrome : It was defined according to the ethnic-specific criteria by the
International Diabetes Federation.
12. Search Strategy
ā¢ The search terms were conducted as follows: (ānonobeseā OR
ānonobeseā OR āleanā OR āobeseā) AND (((((((((ānon-alcoholic fatty liver
diseaseā) OR ānon alcoholic fatty liver diseaseā) OR āfatty liverā) OR
ānonalcoholic fatty liver diseaseā) OR ānonalcoholic fatty liverā) OR ānon-
alcoholic steatohepatitisā) OR āNAFLDā) OR āNASHā)) AND (cohort OR
prospective OR longitudinal OR caseontrol OR follow-up).
14. Identification Articles identified through database searching 13 publications
including 12 cross-sectional
and 1 cohort from 7 countries (n=11,043)
Liver biopsy was
available in 1256
NAFLD patients
(330 nonobese and
926 obese patients)
USG was available in
9855 NAFLD patients .
(4478 nonobese and 5377
obese patients)
H-MRS was available in 262
(135 nonobese and 127
obese patients)
Screening
Quality of included studies was evaluated by the NewcastleāOttawa
Scale (NOS)
ā¢ Selection of the study groups (0ā4 stars),
ā¢ Comparabilityof cases and controls (0ā2 stars),
ā¢ Cohorts, and ascertainmentof exposure/outcome (0ā3 stars).
ā¢ A study awarded 6 stars or more is considered as a high-quality study
Excluded
n = 330
15. If two articles came from the same study or population,
the article with higher quality was included
From each study, the following characteristics were extracted:
author name, publication year,study design, region, selected
population characteristics (such asBMI, mean age, sex, liver
function, liver histopathology, complications,prognosis), diagnostic
method, and number of NAFLD
Eligibility
Included
17. Inclusion Criteria
(1) USG, CT, MRI, or liver biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of NAFLD after
the exclusion of other known causes;
(2) The studies provided sufficient information for comparison between
nonobese NAFLD and obese NAFLD. Obesity defined according to
ethnic-specific BMI cutoffs: for adult Asians, BMI ā„ 25 defined as obesity;
for non-Asians, BMI ā„ 30 defined as obesity; and
(3) Data were available in English.
18. Exclusion Criteria
(1) The diagnosis of NAFLD did not exclude other causes of liver
disease;
(2) Lack of specific information for patients with NAFLD;
(3) The study was carried out in population with preexisting
disease, such as human immunodeficiency virus coinfected;
(4) The study was carried out in children;
19. Cont...
(5) Diagnosis of NAFLD by abnormal liver function;
(6) The study diagnosed NAFLD postmortem; and
(7) Abstracts or unpublished data.
20. TOOL
NewcastleāOttawa Scale (NOS)
The NOS for observational studies is based on:
ā¢ Assessing selection of the study groups (0ā4 stars),
ā¢ Comparability of cases and controls (0ā2 stars), or
ā¢ Cohorts, and ascertainment of exposure/outcome (0ā3 stars).
ā¢ A study awarded 6 stars or more is considered as a high-quality study.
21. DATA ANALYSIS
ā¢ Analyses were performed using STATA, version 12.0 (STATA,College
Station, TX, USA).
ā¢ The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) was used
as the measure of the relationship between obesity and NAFLD liver
function, liver histopathology, or complications.
ā¢ The OR was calculated for bivariate analysis and the continuous
variable analysis was performed by estimating SMD.
22. CONT...
ā¢ Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by Cochranās Q and I2
statistics.
ļ¼For Cochranās Q statistic, substantial heterogeneity was defined as P <
0.1.
ļ¼The I2 value of 25%, 50%, and 75% indicates low, moderate, or high
heterogeneity, respectively.
ļ¼fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled OR or
SMD.
27. ļ¼ By meta-regression analysis, it was found that geographic
regions (Japan and Korea vs. othercountries) were associated
with significant heterogeneity.
(P < 0.001 for ALT and P = 0.001 for AST)
ļ¼ No evidence of publication bias (P = 0.063 forALT; P = 0.082
for AST)
ļ¼ The results were robust
28. Meta-analysis between obesity and NAFLD liver
inflammation
ļ¶Obesity can aggravate HS in NAFLD, with moderate heterogeneity
across studies.
ļ¶No matter which study was excluded, the results were robust.
ļ¶No publication bias was found by Eggerās test (P = 0.345).
SMD: 0.40; 95%CI: 0.25ā0.55;
P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%
29. ļ§ There was significant difference in NAS between nonobese
NAFLD and obese NAFLD .
ļ§ The relationship between obesity and NAS in NAFLD was
controversial and need further research.
ļ§ No publication bias was found by Eggerās test (P = 0.377).
(SMD: 0.42; 95%CI: 0.27ā0.57;
P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%).
30. ļ No significant difference in the prevalence of NASH between
nonobese NAFLD and obese NAFLD.
ļ The result was unstable.
ļ No publication bias was discovered by Eggerās test(P = 0.346)
(OR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.15ā2.61;
P = 0.009;I2 = 11.2%)
31. Meta-analysis between obesity and NAFLD liver
fibrosis
ā¢ Obesity was significantly associated with liver fibrosis in
patients with NAFLD.
ā¢ The result of metaanalysis was robust
ā¢ No publication bias wasfound by Eggerās test (P = 0.519)
32. ļ§ There was no correlation between obesity and liver advanced fibrosis
in NAFLD .
ļ§ The sensitivity analysis also showed that the result of meta-analysis
was unstable .
ļ§ No publication bias was discoveredby Eggerās test (P = 0.230).
33. Meta-analysis between obesity and NAFLD
complications
OR: 1.67; 95%CI: 1.32ā2.11; P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%
ļÆHeterogeneity was significantly reduced after Vos et al.ās
study was removed,
ļÆThe result of meta-analysis was robust.
ļÆNo publication bias was found by Eggerās test (P = 0.272).
34. ā¢ Heterogeneity was significantly reduced after Kumar et
al.ās study was removed the result of meta-analysis was
robust .
ā¢ No publication bias was found by Eggerās test (P = 0.233).
OR: 2.20; 95%CI: 1.69ā2.87;
P < 0.001;I2 = 0.0%
35. Meta-analysis between obesity and NAFLD PNPLA3
rs738409 genetic polymorphism
ā¢ Obesity is associated with the occurrence of
hypertriglyceridemia in NAFLD.
ā¢ Result was unstable.
ā¢ No publication bias was found by Eggerās
test (P = 0.823).
OR: 1.66; 95%CI: 1.49ā1.84; P < 0.001;
I2 = 0.0%
36. ļ¶Obesity is associated with the occurrence
of metabolic syndrome in NAFLD.
ļ¶The result of meta-analysis was robust .
ļ¶No publication bias was found by Eggerās
test (P = 0.233).
OR: 2.20; 95%CI: 1.69ā2.87; P < 0.001;
I2 = 0.0%
37. ļÆNonobese NAFLD subjects have more frequent of the G allele of
PNPLA3 rs738409 than those with obese NAFLD, suggesting
PNPLA3 rs738409 was strongly associated with the development
and progression of nonobese NAFLD
ļÆHeterogeneity was significantly reduced after Honda et al.ās study
was removed.
ļÆ The result of meta-analysis was robust.
ļÆNo publication bias was found by Eggerās test (P = 0.508)
OR: 0.51; 95%CI: 0.37ā0.72; P <
0.001;I2 = 15.4%
38. Obesity and NAFLD prognosis
ā¢ After 49 months of follow-up for 77 nonobese and 235 obese patients with NAFLD,(
Leung et al., 2017) found that more clinical events (most of them are cardiovascular
events) occurred among obese patients with NAFLD suggesting nonobese NAFLD may
have a better prognosis than obese NAFLD.
ā¢ By using the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and
linked mortality data to assess the association of obesity with overall and liver-specific
mortality in patients with NAFLD, Stepanova et al. and Otgonsuren et al. showed that
obesity could be independent predictors of liver-related mortality in NAFLD.
39. Obesity and NAFLD prognosis
ā¢ A retrospective multiethnicity cohort study of 1090 patients with biopsy-
proven NAFLD (published in abstract form), subjects with BMI < 25
kg/m2 had higher mortality (follow-up of 133 Ā± 81.3 months) than obese
NAFLD.
40. RESULT
There was no significant difference in the risk of NASH and liver advanced fibrosis
between nonobese NAFLD and obese NAFLD, which may support the hypothesis
that obese and nonobese NAFLD are likely to gradually progress to NASH and liver
advanced fibrosis, and they all should be considered as potential population for
pharmacologic treatment [according to European guide_x0002_lines for the
management of NAFLD, pharmacotherapy should be reserved for patients with
significant fibrosis (F > 2)]
41. CONCLUSION
ā¢ Obese NAFLD has a higher level of transaminase, higher degree of
HS and increased risk of liver fibrosis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus,
and metabolic syndrome than those with nonobese NAFLD. Moreover,
obesity may also increase the NAS and the risk of hypertriglyceridemia
in NAFLD. All of these results supported that obesity could predict a
worse long-term prognosis in NAFLD patients.
42. CONT...
ā¢ It was found that there no correlation between obesity and liver
advanced fibrosis or NASH in patients with NAFLD, indicating that
obesity may not be an independent factor for NASH and advanced
fibrosis in NAFLD.
ā¢ Nonobese NAFLD subjects have more frequent of the G allele of
PNPLA3 rs738409 than those with obese NAFLD, suggesting that
compared to obese NAFLD, PNPLA3 rs738409 may be more relevant
to the developmentand progression of nonobese NAFLD.
43. DISCUSSION
PRESENT STUDY SIMILAR STUDY DISSIMILAR STUDY
In this study, it was suggested that obese
NAFLD have a higher level of transaminase,
higher degree of HS, higher NAS and increased
risk of liver fibrosis, hypertension, diabetes
mellitus, hyper triglyceridemia, and metabolic
syndrome than those with nonobese NAFLD.
In contrast, nonobese NAFLD subjects have
more frequent of the G allele of PNPLA3 than
those with obese NAFLD.
There was no correlation between obesity and
liver advanced fibrosis or NASH inpatients with
NAFLD.
Not mentioned Not mentioned
44. PRESENT STUDY SIMILAR STUDY DISSIMILAR STUDY
In this study, it is found that obese NAFLD has
a higher NAS and increased risk of
hypertriglyceridemia than nonobese NAFLD,
and there was no correlation between obesity
and NASH or liver advanced fibrosis in patients
with NAFLD.
In this study, it is found that by comparing
blood cholesterol levels, there was no
significant difference in blood cholesterol
levels between obese and nonobese NAFLD (P
= 0.051).
In this study, it is found that there was
substantial heterogeneity across those
included studies. By meta-regression analysis,
geographic regions were identified as possible
sources of heterogeneity when assessingthe
relationship between obesity and liver
function of NAFLD.
Not mentioned
According to the Vos et al.ās research
(European population) compare the risk of
hypertension, it was considered as a
possible source of heterogeneity, which may
be related to regional difference of included
participants.
Not mentioned
According to the Alam et
al.ās study, it was found that
heterogeneity established by
gender differences, in which
the proportion of males in
nonobese NAFLD is higher
than that in obese NAFLD.
45. PRESENT STUDY SIMILAR STUDY DISSIMILAR STUDY
In this study, it is found that obese
NAFLD has a higher level of
transaminase than those with
nonobese NAFLD, which may be
associated with a higher BMI or
prevalence of diabetes mellitus in obese
NAFLD patients.
Honda et al. have
reported that the
factors associated with
increased AST and ALT
were different in
nonobese and obese
NAFLD
According to the Honda et al.ās study (the proportion
of males in NAFLD patients was smallest) was also
considered as possible source of heterogeneity when
comparing the risk of hypertriglyceridemia or the
frequent of the G allele of PNPLA3 rs738409 between
nonobese NAFLD and obese NAFLD.
According to the Kumar et al.ās study (the average age
of included population was smallest) was identified as
possible sources of heteroge_x0002_neity in the
meta-analysis to compare the risk of
metabolicsyndrome, which may be related to the
average age difference of the included population.
Not mentioned
46. PRESENT STUDY SIMILAR STUDY DISSIMILAR STUDY
In this study, it is found that nonobese
NAFLD subjects have more frequent of the G
allele of PNPLA3 rs738409 than those with
obese NAFLD, suggesting PNPLA3 rs738409
was strongly associated with the
development and progression of nonobese
NAFLD.
According to the Peverill W et al, 2014 it
was found that the ātwo hits thesisā might
be applied to explain above phenomenon,
with obesity as the āfirst hitā and oxidative
stress, adipokines or metabolic
abnormalities as the āsecond hit,ā which
may lead to NASH or liver advanced
fibrosis
Not mentioned
According to the Tilg H et
al.,2010āmultiple
parallel hits thesis,ā which holds that there
are many parallel hits that lead to NASH
and liver advance fibrosis, also supports
our results.
47. PRESENT STUDY SIMILAR STUDY DISSIMILAR STUDY
In this study, showed that that
obesity can aggravate the severity
of NAFLD, suggesting that obesity
could predict a worse long term
prognosis in NAFLD. In addition,
weight loss may be helpful to
prevent or delay the progression of
NAFLD.
According to Kim HK, Park JY,
Lee KU, et al. 2009 weight loss
can improve NAFLD and its
metabolic abnormalities
According to Chalasani N,
Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et
al.2018 Weight loss is also
recommended by the latest
guidelines to reduce steatosis
in NAFLD.
48. Strength
According to author According to presenter
ā¢ NOT MENTIONED. ā¢ Methodology of selecting article was
carried out in a very understanding
way.
ā¢ Tried to include all the article of good
quality.
ā¢ Tables are well explained
ā¢ Included experts commentery and key
issues helped in better understanding
of the key aspects of the study.
49. Limitation
According to author According to presenter
1. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies, which
might be attributed to the different source of populations
and geographic regions.
2. The clinical study of NAFLD patients (especially nonobese
NAFLD) with liver biopsy is limited. Hepatic pathological
information, which may affect the reliability of the
results.Sensitivity analysis also suggested that the results of
comparison of the risk of NASH and liver advanced fibrosis
between obese and nonobese NAFLD are unstable, so
further studies are needed to confirm these results.
3. All included studies were observational, we cannot exclude
the residual confounding factors to improve the accuracy of
the results.
ā¢ One Figure has mentioned in the study
but not present in the article.
ā¢ Not mentioned the number of excluded
population.
50. Limitation
According to author According to presenter
ā¢ Studies did not provide complete information, such as
weight changes, medication, lifestyle, etc.,which will affect
the disease of NAFLD.
ā¢ This meta-analysis included 12 studies from Asia and 1
study from Europe; additional investigations in other
continents are warrant.
ā¢ Other genetic information (except PNPLA3 rs738409)
which is involved in the progression of NAFLD, such as
TM6SF2, is limited.
ā¢ Liver cirrhosis is significantly associated with the prognosis
of NAFLD, but we did not analyze the relation between
obesity and NAFLDācirrhosis due to lack of related data.
51. EXPERT COMMENTARY
Other Studies Present study
ā¢ As a common cause of chronic liver disease, NAFLD is
a serious threat to human health, and its
pathogenesis has not been elucidated. Obesity has
been considered as an important risk factor for
NAFLD (Li L, Liu DW, Yan HY, et al., 2016).
ā¢ Meta-analysis have confirmed that the metabolism-
related serological indicators of obese NAFLD
patients were significantly higher than those of lean
NAFLD patients (BMI < 25 kg/m2), but the difference
of the risk of metabolic complications was still
unknown (Sookoian S et al., 2017)
ā¢ This meta-analysis indicated that for NAFLD
patients, obesity could predict a worse long-
term prognosis, which further supported the
importance of weight loss in patients with
NAFLD.
ā¢ The comparison of genetic polymorphisms also
showed that PNPLA3 rs738409 may be more
relevant to the progression of nonobese NAFLD
when compared to obese NAFLD, indicating
pathogenesis or risk factors for progression of
NAFLD might be different between obese and
nonobese
52. Five-year view
ā¢ Regarding the impact of obesity on the incidence of liver cancer
and mortality in patients with NAFLD, the number of studies is
small and the results are inconsistent, suggesting that large-
sample, long-term follow-up cohort studies based on liver
biopsy are needed to further analyze the impact of obesity on
the prognosis of NAFLD.
53. Key issues
ā¢ Obesity and NAFLD are two major global issues. NAFLD can occur not
only in the obese population, but also in nonobese people.
ā¢ This study fully compared the clinical features (liver function,
histopathology, complications, genetic factors and prognosis) between
non-obese NAFLD and obese NAFLD according to ethnic-specific BMI
cut-off points to define obesity (BMI<25 kg/m2 for Asians and BMI<30
kg/m2 for non-Asains).
54. CONT...
ā¢ Non-obese NAFLD subjects have more frequent of the G allele of PNPLA3
rs738409 than those with obese NAFLD, indicating that compared to
obese NAFLD, PNPLA3 rs738409 may be more relevant to the
development and progression of non-obese NAFLD.
ā¢ There was no correlation between obesity and liver advanced fibrosis or
NASH in patients with NAFLD, suggesting that obesity may not be an
independent factor for the development of NASH and advanced fibrosis in
NAFLD patients and NAFLD should be considered as potential population
for pharmacologic treatment regardless of obesity.
55. Funding
ā¢ National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570514 and
81500477);
ā¢ Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY15H030017 and
ā¢ LQ15H030006); Public Welfare Science and Technology Project of
ā¢ Wenzhou (Y20150014); Medical Award Fund, Beijing, China.
56. References
1. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty
liver disease: practice guidance from theAmerican association for the study of liver diseases.
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2018;67(1):328-357.
ā¢ā¢ The guideline provides a recognized definition and management of NAFLD.10 F.-B. LU ET AL.
2. Wong VW, Wong GL, Yip GW, et al. Coronary artery disease and cardiovascular outcomes in
patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2011;60(12):1721.
3. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, et al. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-
meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.).
2016;64(1):73ā84.
57. Take home message
ā¢ As we know that obesity is the main
cause of NAFLD.
ā¢ We should do exercise regularly and
avoid junk food on regular basis.
ā¢ We should maintain a healthy life style
by taking healthy and balance diet.