Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

HCS321 201790 Week 3

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
HCS321 201830
HCS321 201830
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 11 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Publicité

Similaire à HCS321 201790 Week 3 (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

HCS321 201790 Week 3

  1. 1. HCS321 Week 3 Community Contexts of Child Development
  2. 2. Overview Review It takes a village to raise a child Interconnecting Families, Community and Disadvantage Ecomaps
  3. 3. Review  Family is however we describe or define it, our most effective mechanism for raising children.  Bio-social relationships are critical but so is altruism and reciprocity between members. This is emotional, material and economic in nature.  Genograms are a tool to clarify relationships for people, they can inherit subjectivity of the drawer and viewer.
  4. 4. It takes a village.....  Hilary Rodham Clinton in 1971 used the expression; it takes a (whole) village to raise a child, derived from a proverb of the Igbo and Yoruba people of Nigeria, while working as a human rights lawyer in the United Nations.  What is the village – is it Society, or Community or Neighbourhood?  How does it work?
  5. 5. Interconnecting Family and Community and Poverty "I think we've been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it's the government's job to cope with it…. They're casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual….., and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It's our duty to look after ourselves and then, also to look after our neighbor. ……There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation.” Margaret Thatcher 1987
  6. 6. Family Impoverishment = Community Disadvantage Family • Limits of ability • Limits of opportunity • Limits of motivation • Collapse of resilience Community • Limits of wealth • Limits of resources • Limits of creativity • Loss of Fidelity/Identity
  7. 7. Inversely…. Community  Loss Identity  Loss of amenity  Lack of Fidelity/Altruism  Dislocation of families Family  Isolation from services  Embeddedness of need  Antagonism to desperation  Increase of transience
  8. 8. What does it mean?  Individuals and Families can become entrapped in their need  Their need may go un-noticed or tolerated by the community  The community excludes non-operant families and in doing so displaces them  Families may be broken free of connection and drift, Communities decline.
  9. 9. Ecomapping  Sometimes referred to culturographs  Often used to identify opportunities for social engagement, but also can be used to identify service enmeshment.  Utilise similar symbols to genograms  Can use coloured and distorted lines to highlight relationships in the network. Retrieved from: https://www.smartdraw.com/ecomap/img/ecomap.jpg?bn=1510011096
  10. 10. Examples Retrieved from: http://www.genogramanalytics.com/images/ecomaps/ecomap_ex.jpg Family Community Health Centrelink Police Child Protection Agency Manager CW CHN
  11. 11. Summary  The idea of community is that it is a motivation to support others and to be supported – reciprocity  The level of engagement in our community enables our sense of security and belonging and interest in others  Structured environments like child care centres, schools facilitate that outward engagement but also inward participation.

×