1. NativeScript
VS React
Native for
Native App
Development
in 2022
www.bacancytechnology.com

2. Quick
Summary

3. Today, JavaScript developers get a wide
range of options to build mobile
applications. This is where cross-
platform mobile development enters.
Currently, it is a tedious challenge to
decide the best framework for
developing mobile apps. Although native
mobile development is the most
preferred one, it is time-consuming.
However, the benefits that it offers are
incredible. With fast operating speed,
updated SDKs, seamless app
performance, and high responsive UIs,
one can always overlook the time factor.
Isn’t it? Today in this guide, we will focus
and compare the two brilliant
frameworks: NativeScript Vs React
Native that is used in native mobile
development.
Keep reading!

4. Introduction

5. For business owners, the entire concept
of building an application for their
businesses is definitely an excellent
idea. But, before building an application,
there are a series of activities and
decisions that business owners need to
make. When it comes to developing an
app, having a dilemma between Native
apps and Hybrid apps has always been
around the corner.
In this internet age where applications
are everywhere and digital marketing is
the ideal form of advertising, knowing
the difference between Native and
hybrid apps is the first and foremost
step to figuring out what kind of app
would help your business reach heights.
The next step will be to find out the best
framework to build a native app:
Nativescript vs React Native.

6. Hence, before heading onto building
applications, we have come up with this
guide that discusses the basics of hybrid
and native apps briefly.

7. How are
Native
Applications
Different
from Hybrid
Applications?

9. Generally, Native applications are
smartphone apps that are specifically
built for certain operating systems:
Android or iOS. This is exactly what
strikes most minds while thinking of
mobile apps. They are usually
downloaded from Google Play or App
Store and installed on a device/system.
What makes native apps different from
hybrid apps is that they are developed
and built for particular devices. For
example, let’s take Android apps and iOS
apps. Android apps are built with Java
while the apps for iPhone are using Swift
or Objective-C.
Native applications

10. Here, the advantage of choosing native
apps over hybrid apps is that it is the
most reliable and fastest approach when
it comes to user experience. Built with
the operating system’s SDKs, native apps
can interact with all the device features
including camera, microphone, device
storage, GPS, etc.

11. Hybrid applications comprise both
Native and Web app features. One can
access a hybrid app through a Web
browser and can be downloaded from
app stores. Hybrid applications are
written in JavaScript and HTML5 for
web apps. In other terms, hybrid
applications are web pages wrapped in
a mobile app that uses a WebView.
However, these apps have access to the
built-in features and capacities of the
device. Hybrid applications are built
with cross-platform frameworks like
Ionic, React, Xamarin, and Sencha.
Hybrid applications

12. One advantage of hybrid applications is
that they are highly faster and easier to
develop as compared to a native
application. Besides, they require lower
maintenance than native apps.
However, the hybrid apps’ speed and
performance depend on your browser.
Eventually, this denotes that hybrid
apps fail to perform as fast as a typical
native app.

13. Why are
Native Apps
Better than
Hybrid Apps?

14. The Hybrid Vs Native app debate is
quite conducive to discussing our
topic comprehensively. Below is a
chart that depicts the major
differences between Native
applications and Hybrid applications.
The chart states why native
applications are better as compared to
hybrid applications in terms of
performance, response, speed,
following, development timeline, app
ecosystem, and feature set.

15. Field Of
Difference
Hybrid
Applications
Native
Applications
Brief They are
created to
work on
more than 1
platform or
operating
system.
Hybrid apps
are built
with a mix of
languages
like Java and
HTML5.
They are
built to
work on
one
operating
system
only.
Native
apps are
built by
implement
ing Swift,
Java,
Objective-
C.

16. Performance Although
Hybrid apps
are slower
than their
native
counterpart
s, they
perform on
the basis of
the user
interface.
An
incredible
user
experience
is
guaranteed
as the
performanc
e of native
apps is
unmatched.
In addition,
native apps
are better,
faster, and
have
expressive
UIs.

17. Development
Timeline
Moderate Longer
timeline
(ranging
anywhere
from 3-6
months for
MVP)
Program-
ming
Languages
Web
technologies:
CSS, HTML,
JavaScript
Native
only:
Kotlin or
Java:
Swift,
Android,
or
Objective
C: iOS.

18. Frameworks
And Tools
PhoneGap
and Apache
Cordova,
Native JS,
React
Native,
Xamarin,
Ionic,
TypeScript.
It uses 3rd
party plug-
ins,
libraries,
and APIs
that may be
unreliable.
OS offers
APIs.
Access to
native tools
is
supported
by the
system.

19. Feature Set Moderate
access.
Several
APIs are
closed for
hybrid
mobile
application
s. (eg:
accelerom
eter,
gyroscope)
Wide
access.
Any device
APIs used.
Provides
solutions
for certain
unique
features.
(eg: VR,
AR, IoT,
etc.)
App
Ecosystem
Restricted to
framework
and is
available to
3rd party
services
SDKs and
other tools
for any
sort of
technical
implement
ation

20. Hybrid App
VS
Native App: Quick Facts

21. Frameworks
Used to Build
Native Mobile
Applications

22. As per Statista, 218 billion mobile
application downloads were recorded in
2020. This indicates that the demand for
efficient, reliable, fast, and high-
performing mobile apps is quite evident.
To build native mobile apps, two
frameworks that have gained massive
recognition are React Native and
NativeScript.

23. NativeScript
VS React
Native:
Introduction
to
Developing
Native Apps

25. NativeScript is an open-source framework
used to build native mobile applications on
iOS and Android platforms. Under a rule, it
implements CSS and JavaScript to render
the UIs to ensure a native-like experience.
NativeScript generally attracts users with
its personalized tech stack. NativeScript is
built with JavaScript or TypeScript.
(basically any JavaScript-related language).
NativeScript supports frameworks
including Vue.js and Angular. Back in 2017,
Progress Software EAD (previously Telerik)
helped and assisted this framework to
come up in the world. As of now, it holds
166 contributors on GitHub.
NativeScript

26. Furthermore, NativeScript developers can
re-purpose third-party libraries from
Maven, CocoaPods, and npm.js without the
need to use wrappers.

27. As a whole, React Native is a free, open-
source framework used to build cross-
platform applications. Considering the
technicalities, React Native adopts
JavaScript as its primary language of
development and the React library as its
component source. Back in 2015, React
Native hit the mobile development world
brilliantly. The first hit was when Facebook
released the iOS version of React Native.
And second in September when the Android
version was available on GitHub.
React Native

28. Targeting the community, React
Native has more than 2083
contributors and is backed by
Facebook as well. Typically,
Facebook created React Native
as an open-source framework
based on JavaScript. With React
Native, developers can build
native mobile applications for
both iOS and Android platforms.

29. Planning to hire React Native
expert to build a
visually appealing, user-friendly,
and scalable cross-platform mobile
app?
Get in touch with us to save 40% on
your development cost. Our React
Native developers
have mastered the fundamentals of
successful product delivery.

30. NativeScript
VS React
Native: Pros
and Cons
Every popular application is balanced
by the features and performance it
offers. Let’s look into the strengths
and weaknesses of the popular
frameworks, NativeScript Vs React
Native.

31. It uses Command Line Interface
(CLI).
Supports present/existing native
libraries.
Cross-platform application
development: Once written can run
everywhere.
NativeScript keeps updating its
features and version to comply with
the existing/upcoming mobile OS
versions.
The knowledge of CSS, JS, and XML
builds a robust starting point for
building applications with
NativeScript.
The app feels native on every device
and platform.
Strong Sides of
NativeScript

32. Does not support DOM or HTML.
This refrains developers to use some
libraries like jQuery.
The community keeps building
resources and documentation.
Debugging in NativeScript is harder
than in React Native. One needs to
do it on an emulator or a device.
With NativeScript, you must know
the APIs of Android and iOS to
access the particular platform
features and the device hardware.
Few UI components are paid and not
free of charge.
Limitations of NativeScript
to Deal With

33. Has a massive community and is
backed with Facebook support.
Enables building a cross-platform
application with a rich native
experience in defiance of the platform
device and type.
It employs Virtual DOM to enhance
application performance.
Applications can be updated without
App Store/Play Market approval.
React Native’s auto-reload option
determines and spot the changes
immediately without app
recompilation.
React and JavaScript as a core makes
the learning curve highly
straightforward as compared to
NativeScript.
Strong Sides of React
Native

34. React Native works smoother on
iOS than Android.
Device-related issues might take
more fixing time.
Applications employ more device
memory.
In case your app requires onboard
hardware or a device camera, you
need to add a few platform-specific
modules.
Limitations of React
Native to Deal with

35. NativeScript
VS React
Native: Brief
Comparison

36. Choosing one framework between two
JS-based frameworks is not a child’s
play. Both being cross-platforms,
deliver quite similar benefits. However,
there are some fields where React
Native steals the show. Below is a brief
comparison of the major aspects of both
the frameworks including the
performance, learning curve,
popularity, and development
community.

37. NativeScript VS React
Native: Performance
To begin with, both frameworks offer
native app performance. Both have a high
loading time. However, here is where
React Native enters the stage.
NativeScript delivers slow rendering. To
be very honest, in a world that counts
every second, slow rendering is
something unacceptable. Here is exactly
where React Native comes to play.
Rendering dynamic elements, React
Native renders apps using native SDKs.
All thanks to the Virtual DOM. DOM
turns React Native into a highly
performant framework.

38. Difference 1: React Native
inclines towards the native
performance more than
NativeScript.
Difference 2: React Native uses
the Virtual DO and hence
delivers faster UI rendering
compared to NativeScript.

39. NativeScript VS React
Native: Learning Curve
No developer having mere JS experience
can handle NativeScript and React Native.
Let’s think this way. Initially, developers
with an Angular background will find
NativeScript easier, to begin with. On the
other hand, programmers having a React
background will find the transition to React
Native easier.

40. One thing to note is, both platforms take
advantage of JavaScript. This is an
excellent opportunity for front-end
developers. Perceiving these
frameworks is relatively easier at such
times.
Coming to the difference, picking React
Native indicates that all you require is
JavaScript, while NativeScript offers you
support with its declarative coding style.

41. Connect now to develop a robust,
reliable, and scalable React Native
mobile app. We are the prominent
React Native development company
and the most-preferred
development partner for decision-
makers.
Want to develop an
interactive cross-
platform app from
scratch?

42. NativeScript VS React
Native: Development
Community
Being used among 42% of programmers,
React Native holds a wider community of
developers as compared to NativeScript
with 11% of the programmer community.
In addition, React Native is highly
popular as tech giants like Instagram and
Tesla chose this framework to build their
applications over PhoneGap or
NativeScript.

43. While choosing the ideal framework,
pondering on community support is
crucial. It might look surprising but
NativeScript has been here way longer
than React Native. While NativeScript
was initially released in 2014, React
Native was released on March 26, 2015.
Although the one-year difference might
look like an advantage, the rising
number of React Native usage is
extensively higher than NativeScript. As
of the publish date, NativeScript records
under 7k downloads weekly while React
Native records 533k downloads on npm
weekly.

44. Speaking of contributors, NativeScript
holds 208 contributors on GitHub
while React Native wins this battle
here with more than 2200 contributors.
In fact, React Native is used by 720k
developers on GitHub while
NativeScript is used by more than 3.5k
developers.
These margins indicate the wide
adoption of React Native in the
developer community that impacts the
number of third-party libraries,
answers, and bug fixes on
StackOverflow. All in all, React Native
takes the win here.

45. NativeScript VS React
Native: Popularity
Built on JavaScript, both React Native
and NativeScript are quite popular. The
competition is always neck to neck.
Back in 2019, as per the StackOverflow
survey, JavaScript has been accounted
as the most popular technology.

47. Speaking of web frameworks,
React.js has overpowered
Angular.js/Angular and Vue.js. Turns
out, developers prefer React.js more.

48. Simultaneously, React Native stands at
10.5% amongst all the respondents.
The results are here. React Native
gathers more attention besides sharing
higher popularity than NativeScript.

49. To sum up, when you choose React
Native for your mobile application
development, it gets easier for you to,
Find and hire developers
Obtain unconditional help from the
entire online community
Search learning resources or
components

50. Thank You
www.bacancytechnology.com