SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
ECONOMIC FREEDOM & RECOVERY
FROM RECESSION KEVIN
DUNCAN
JADYN
NAYLOR
INTRO
We examine whether economic freedom helped
or hindered the ability of a state’s economy to
recover from the Great Recession. We expect
states with greater economic freedom to recover
from the financial crisis quicker than their
counterparts.
METHOD
We test our hypothesis by examining the
degree to which the Fraser Institute’s
economic freedom rankings correlated
with various indicators of economic health
in each state using a fixed effects time
series regression analysis.
RESULTS
Our model provides evidence against the
government's faith in Keynesian economic
theories, theories which encourage
government manipulation of currency and
interest rates to counteract fluctuations in
the economy.
CONCLUSION
While trust in markets to correct themselves is all
but nonexistent at the federal level, our results act
as a first level empirical test to show that this
distrust is unjustified.
Economic freedom correlates with better economic
health through a recession because prices and
other economic indicators are less distorted. This
allows actors in the economy to make more sound
economic decisions.
“The freest economies operate with
minimal government interference,
relying upon personal choice and
markets to answer basic economic
questions such as what is to be
produced, how it is to be produced,
how much is produced, and for whom
production is intended.”
Retrieved from the Fraser Institute’s
Economic Freedom of North America
GDP
Jobs
Linear (GDP)
Linear (Jobs)
RECOVERY TIME BY ECONOMIC FREEDOM SUMMARYREGRESSION
ANALYSIS
5th Quintile
LEAST FREE
4th Quintile
1st Quintile
MOST FREE
2nd Quintile
3rd Quintile
Randy Simmons
Utah State University
Economics and Finance
randy.simmons@usu.edu
Ryan Yonk
Utah State University
Economics and Finance
ryan@strata.org
1ST
QUINTILE
MOST FREE
2ND
QUINTILE3RD
QUINTILE
MONTHS
4TH
QUINTILE5TH
QUINTILE
LEAST FREE
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
THE DIFFERENCE IN GDP RECOVERY
BETWEEN THE MOST FREE QUINTILE
AND THE LEAST FREE QUINTILE IS ABOUT
35 MONTHS OR ALMOST 3 YEARS
15 OF THE STATES WITH GREATER
ECONOMIC FREEDOM HAD PRIVATE
SECTOR JOB RECOVERY, COMPARED TO
ONLY 1 OF THE LEAST FREE STATES.
THE LEAST FREE STATES HAD AN
AVERAGE DROP IN GDP OF 5.2% WHERE
THE MOST FREE DROPPED ONLY 3.9%
THE AVERAGE GDP RECOVERY ACROSS
ALL STATES WAS 32.27 MONTHS
THE AVERAGE PRIVATE SECTOR JOB
RECOVERY ACROSS ALL STATES WAS
NEARLY 65 MONTHS
UTAH RECOVERED ALMOST A YEAR
QUICKER THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE
IN TERMS OF GDP AND 7 MONTHS
QUICKER IN TERMS OF JOBS.
.1
$7.5
BILLION
44
MILLION
JOBS
INCREASE IN A
STATE’S
ECONOMIC
FREEDOM
RANKING
LED TO AN
AVERAGE
OUR MODEL
SHOWED THAT A
INCREASE IN GDP
AND CREATED
C
M
Y
CM
MY
CY
CMY
K
Kevin & Jadyn.pdf 1 4/7/15 2:43 PM

More Related Content

Similar to Kevin & Jadyn-2

The Trump Era, Implications for Investors
The Trump Era, Implications for InvestorsThe Trump Era, Implications for Investors
The Trump Era, Implications for Investorsgjohnsen
 
Introduction to Public Finance.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance.pptIntroduction to Public Finance.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance.pptShahid Amin
 
Introduction to Public Finance for Government.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance for Government.pptIntroduction to Public Finance for Government.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance for Government.pptRasulShaban1
 
Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...
Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...
Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...AJHSSR Journal
 
A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...
A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...
A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...Alexander Decker
 
11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...
11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...
11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...Alexander Decker
 
Qasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.ppt
Qasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.pptQasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.ppt
Qasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.pptFazalHayat12
 
discussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view point
discussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view pointdiscussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view point
discussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view pointhuttenangela
 
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATIONTHE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATIONpaperpublications3
 
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATIONTHE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATIONpaperpublications3
 
Submitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of Corruption
Submitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of CorruptionSubmitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of Corruption
Submitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of CorruptionNnedimpka Aririele
 
Introduction of macroeconomics - Inflation
Introduction of macroeconomics - InflationIntroduction of macroeconomics - Inflation
Introduction of macroeconomics - Inflationdiddy98
 
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)inventionjournals
 
Unit-IV Introduction.pptx
Unit-IV Introduction.pptxUnit-IV Introduction.pptx
Unit-IV Introduction.pptxDRUVAKIRAN
 
Study of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdf
Study of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdfStudy of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdf
Study of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdfabhishekverma489234
 

Similar to Kevin & Jadyn-2 (19)

The Fed and Fiscal Policy
The Fed and Fiscal PolicyThe Fed and Fiscal Policy
The Fed and Fiscal Policy
 
The Trump Era, Implications for Investors
The Trump Era, Implications for InvestorsThe Trump Era, Implications for Investors
The Trump Era, Implications for Investors
 
Introduction to Public Finance.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance.pptIntroduction to Public Finance.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance.ppt
 
Introduction to Public Finance for Government.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance for Government.pptIntroduction to Public Finance for Government.ppt
Introduction to Public Finance for Government.ppt
 
Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...
Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...
Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Dominance and the Conduct of Monetary Policy in ...
 
A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...
A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...
A trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure and...
 
11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...
11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...
11.a trivariate causality test among economic growth, government expenditure ...
 
dddeve34
dddeve34dddeve34
dddeve34
 
Qasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.ppt
Qasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.pptQasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.ppt
Qasrim Masheed M.Phil Economics Defence Presentation.ppt
 
Q3 2016 hr
Q3 2016 hrQ3 2016 hr
Q3 2016 hr
 
discussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view point
discussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view pointdiscussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view point
discussion 1There are essentially polar opposite view point
 
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATIONTHE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
 
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATIONTHE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
THE CHALLENGE OF INFLATION AND ITS CONSUMPTION RELATION
 
Submitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of Corruption
Submitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of CorruptionSubmitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of Corruption
Submitted Econometric Analysis of the Effects of Corruption
 
Introduction of macroeconomics - Inflation
Introduction of macroeconomics - InflationIntroduction of macroeconomics - Inflation
Introduction of macroeconomics - Inflation
 
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)
International Journal of Business and Management Invention (IJBMI)
 
ch3
ch3ch3
ch3
 
Unit-IV Introduction.pptx
Unit-IV Introduction.pptxUnit-IV Introduction.pptx
Unit-IV Introduction.pptx
 
Study of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdf
Study of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdfStudy of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdf
Study of Economics _ Microeconomics and Macroeconomics.pdf
 

Kevin & Jadyn-2

  • 1. ECONOMIC FREEDOM & RECOVERY FROM RECESSION KEVIN DUNCAN JADYN NAYLOR INTRO We examine whether economic freedom helped or hindered the ability of a state’s economy to recover from the Great Recession. We expect states with greater economic freedom to recover from the financial crisis quicker than their counterparts. METHOD We test our hypothesis by examining the degree to which the Fraser Institute’s economic freedom rankings correlated with various indicators of economic health in each state using a fixed effects time series regression analysis. RESULTS Our model provides evidence against the government's faith in Keynesian economic theories, theories which encourage government manipulation of currency and interest rates to counteract fluctuations in the economy. CONCLUSION While trust in markets to correct themselves is all but nonexistent at the federal level, our results act as a first level empirical test to show that this distrust is unjustified. Economic freedom correlates with better economic health through a recession because prices and other economic indicators are less distorted. This allows actors in the economy to make more sound economic decisions. “The freest economies operate with minimal government interference, relying upon personal choice and markets to answer basic economic questions such as what is to be produced, how it is to be produced, how much is produced, and for whom production is intended.” Retrieved from the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of North America GDP Jobs Linear (GDP) Linear (Jobs) RECOVERY TIME BY ECONOMIC FREEDOM SUMMARYREGRESSION ANALYSIS 5th Quintile LEAST FREE 4th Quintile 1st Quintile MOST FREE 2nd Quintile 3rd Quintile Randy Simmons Utah State University Economics and Finance randy.simmons@usu.edu Ryan Yonk Utah State University Economics and Finance ryan@strata.org 1ST QUINTILE MOST FREE 2ND QUINTILE3RD QUINTILE MONTHS 4TH QUINTILE5TH QUINTILE LEAST FREE 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 THE DIFFERENCE IN GDP RECOVERY BETWEEN THE MOST FREE QUINTILE AND THE LEAST FREE QUINTILE IS ABOUT 35 MONTHS OR ALMOST 3 YEARS 15 OF THE STATES WITH GREATER ECONOMIC FREEDOM HAD PRIVATE SECTOR JOB RECOVERY, COMPARED TO ONLY 1 OF THE LEAST FREE STATES. THE LEAST FREE STATES HAD AN AVERAGE DROP IN GDP OF 5.2% WHERE THE MOST FREE DROPPED ONLY 3.9% THE AVERAGE GDP RECOVERY ACROSS ALL STATES WAS 32.27 MONTHS THE AVERAGE PRIVATE SECTOR JOB RECOVERY ACROSS ALL STATES WAS NEARLY 65 MONTHS UTAH RECOVERED ALMOST A YEAR QUICKER THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE IN TERMS OF GDP AND 7 MONTHS QUICKER IN TERMS OF JOBS. .1 $7.5 BILLION 44 MILLION JOBS INCREASE IN A STATE’S ECONOMIC FREEDOM RANKING LED TO AN AVERAGE OUR MODEL SHOWED THAT A INCREASE IN GDP AND CREATED C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Kevin & Jadyn.pdf 1 4/7/15 2:43 PM