4. Shallow Foundations

Godbless I Kedes
Godbless I KedesCivil And Building Engineer à Up coming Young Scientists
4.BEARING CAPACITY OF
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
Dr MWAJUMA I. LINGWANDA
The most carefully designed structures can fail if they
are not supported by suitable foundations
Definition of Shallow foundations
▪ Shallow foundations are also called spread foundations
▪ But how shallow is shallow?
▪ The common definition of shallow foundations refers to the case where the
founding depth is less than the breadth
▪ i.e. when 𝑫 < 𝑩 the foundation is shallow
▪ What about wide raft foundations?
▪ The above definition is not acceptable for wide rafts
▪ Therefore, a foundation is shallow if the depth is less than 3 m or less than the
breadth of the foundation
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 2
Types of shallow foundations
• Pad foundations
These are usually provided to support structural columns. They may be circular,
square or rectangular slab section
• Strip foundations
A strip foundation has a length >> than breadth. They are normally provided for
load bearing walls or closely spaced columns where it is not economical to deal
with individual pads CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 3
Types of shallow foundations cont..
• Raft/Mat foundations
Raft foundations are required on soils
of low bearing capacity or where
structural columns are closely spaced
in both directions such that individual
pads would nearly touch each other.
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 4
Foundation design criteria
Three main design criteria must be considered for a shallow foundation
1. Adequate depth
✓ The founding depth i.e. the depth from the surface to its underside should
be sufficient to prevent effects due to changes of ground surface
✓ Sufficient depth to prevent overturning moments when the structure is
subjected to horizontal forces
2. Limiting settlement
✓ The amount of tolerable total and differential settlements depends on
functional and user requirements and also economic factors
✓ Most settlement damage may be classified as architectural damage as they
normally affect finishes.
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 5
Foundation design criteria cont..
3. Factor of safety against shear failure
✓ In foundations, shear failure occurs when soil divides into separate zones which
move partially or fully along slip surfaces
✓ At this point, a plastic yielding condition has developed whereby the shear stress
along the slip surface has reached a limiting value(ultimate limit state)
✓ The principal criteria for design will be satisfying a given factor of safety against
shear failure CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 6
Three principal modes of shear failure
1. General shear failure
➢ This mode of failure occurs in dense or overconsolidated soils of low compressibility
➢ A clearly defined plastic yield slip forms under the footing and develop outwards to the
surface
➢ Heaving of the ground occurs on both sides of the footing
➢ Failure is sudden and often accompanied by severe tilting on one side
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 7
Three principal modes of shear failure cont..
2. Local shear failure
➢ Occurs in compressible soils
➢ A significant vertical movement may take place before any noticeable heaving
➢ Shear planes develop but fail to extend to the ground surface
➢ Very little tilting may take place
➢ The settlement which occurs usually is the principal design criteria
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING
8
Three principal modes of shear failure cont..
3. Punching shear failure
➢ Occurs in weak compressible soils
➢ Considerable vertical movement take place
➢ Slip surfaces restricted to vertical planes adjacent to the sides of the footing
➢ Heaving at the surface is usually absent and may be replaced by a drag down
➢ Normally there will be no tilting
➢ This kind of failure may be observed in highly compressible clays and in loose sands
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 9
Important Definitions
• Total foundation pressure (𝒒) or gross loading intensity
Is the intensity of total pressure on the ground beneath the foundation after the
structure has been erected and fully loaded
• The net bearing pressure (𝒒 𝒏) or the net foundation pressure
Is the net change in total stress experienced by the soil at the base of the foundation
Let 𝝈 𝟎 = the stress removed due to excavation (𝝈 𝟎 = 𝜸𝑫)
𝒒 = Total foundation pressure/ contact pressure at the base of the foundation
Then, 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝒒 − 𝝈 𝟎
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 10
Important Definitions cont..
• The net effective bearing pressure (𝒒 𝒏
´ ) or the net effective foundation pressure
The net foundation pressure expressed in terms of effective stress. When the
water table is above the base of the foundation the net effective bearing
pressure is given by;
𝒒 𝒏
´ = 𝒒 − 𝝈 𝟎
´
Where 𝝈 𝟎
´
= 𝜸𝑫 − 𝜸 𝒘 𝒉 𝒘
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 11
Important definitions cont..
• The ultimate bearing capacity (𝒒 𝒇)
Is the value of the loading intensity at which
the supporting ground fails in shear
• The net ultimate bearing capacity (𝒒 𝒏𝒇)
• Is the value of net loading intensity at which
the supporting ground fails in shear
• LOAD – SETTLEMENT CURVE
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 12
Settlement
Load
0
Important definitions cont..
• The factor of safety against shear failure is defined as the ratio between the net
ultimate bearing capacity and the net bearing pressure
𝑭 =
𝒒 𝒏𝒇
´
𝒒 𝒏
´
=
𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐
´
𝒒 − 𝝈 𝒐
´
For building foundations, the recommended factor of safety is between 3 and 2.5
• Presumed bearing pressure
Is the net loading intensity considered appropriate to the particular type of
ground for preliminary design purposes. The value is based on local experience or
by calculation from strength tests using a factor of safety against shear failure
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 13
Important definitions cont..
• The allowable bearing pressure (𝒒 𝒂)
Is the maximum allowable net loading intensity of a ground in a given case,
taking into consideration the bearing capacity and the estimated amount
and rate of settlement that will occur.
Considering shear failure, allowable design bearing capacity is given by
𝒒 𝒂 =
𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐
´
𝑭
+ 𝝈 𝒐
´
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 14
Simple bearing capacity formula
• Assumptions
i. The footing experiences a bearing
capacity failure
ii. Failure occurs along a circular surface
iii. Undrained conditions prevail, 𝒄 𝒖 > 𝟎, 𝝓 𝒖 = 𝟎
iv. The shear strength of the soil between the ground
and depth D is neglected
v. The soil between the ground and D is considered
as a surcharge and produces a vertical stress = 𝜸𝑫
• Taking moments about point O,
• 𝒒 𝒇 𝑩.
𝑩
𝟐
= 𝒄 𝒖 𝝅𝑩. 𝑩 + 𝜸𝑫𝑩.
𝑩
𝟐
• 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝝅𝒄 𝒖 + 𝜸𝑫
• 𝒒 𝒇 ≈ 𝟔. 𝟐𝟖𝒄 𝒖 + 𝜸𝑫
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 15
Consider a long footing with cross section shown below
Class exercise
With similar assumptions regarding ground conditions as the previous
foundation, derive a simple bearing capacity formula for the following cases
I. The foundation rests on the ground level
II. The foundation rests at a depth D and a long and wide surcharge load due
to soil compacted on each side at the ground level to a height H. The unit
weight of the compacted soil being 𝜸 𝟐
(i) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝝅𝒄 𝒖 (ii) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝝅𝒄 𝒖 + 𝜸𝑫 + 𝜸 𝟐 𝑯
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 16
Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula
• The formula was developed for long foundations (strip foundations) then
extended to square and circular foundations
• A general shear failure is considered
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 17
Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula cont..
• Assumptions
✓ The depth of the foundation is less than or equal to its width (𝑫 ≤ 𝑩)
✓ No sliding occurs between the foundation and the soil
✓ The soil is homogeneous semi infinite mass
✓ The shear strength of the soil is presented by both c and ϕ
✓ Failure is by general shear mode
✓ The soil between the ground surface and a depth D has no shear strength
i.e. it serves only as a surcharge load
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING
18
Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula cont..
• Terzaghi proposed a three-term expression for ultimate bearing capacity of a
long strip footing of breadth B as
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝝈 𝒐 𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸
• 𝒒 𝒇 = ultimate bearing capacity
• 𝒄 = cohesion of soil beneath the foundation
• 𝝈 𝟎 = overburden pressure at the foundation level
• 𝑩 = breadth of the foundation
• 𝜸 = unit weight of the soil beneath the foundation
• 𝑵 𝒄, 𝑵 𝒒 and 𝑵 𝜸 areTerzaghi´s bearing capacity factors which are function of ϕ only
19
Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula cont..
• 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐
𝟒𝟓 +
𝝓
𝟐
• 𝑵 𝒄 =
𝑵 𝒒−𝟏
𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
for ϕ > 0
• 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 for ϕ =0
• 𝑵 𝜸 ≈ 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
• Under undrained conditions, ϕ =0 and c = cu
• 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝟏
• 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕
• 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟎
• 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 𝒖 + 𝝈 𝟎
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 20
Note that
Because of the shape of the failure
surface, the values of 𝑐 and 𝜙 only
need to represent the soil between the
bottom of the footing and a depth B
below the bottom. The soils between
the ground surface and a depth D are
treated simply as overburden.
Bearing capacity factors in chart
21
Example 1
A strip footing is 2.8 m wide and is founded at a depth of 2.4 m in a soil having
the following properties: 𝒄´
= 𝟏𝟐𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐
𝝓´
= 𝟐𝟎 𝒐
𝜸 = 𝟏𝟗𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑
. Determine
the net ultimate bearing capacity.
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 22
Solution to example 1
Sketch the problem and indicate the known parameters (soil properties and
dimensions)
𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝒒´ 𝒇 − 𝝈´ 𝒐
𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝒄´𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸´𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸´𝑫
determine the bearing capacity coefficients
𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐
𝟒𝟓 +
𝝓
𝟐
= 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟎
× 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐
𝟒𝟓 +
𝟐𝟎
𝟐
= 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 23
Solution to example 1 cont..
𝑵 𝒄 =
𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏
𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
=
𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗 − 𝟏
𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟎
= 𝟏𝟒. 𝟖𝟑𝟓
𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟎 = 𝟑. 𝟓𝟑𝟕
Substituting to the net bearing capacity equation
𝒒´ 𝒏 = (𝟏𝟐 × 𝟏𝟒. 𝟖𝟑𝟓) + (𝟏𝟗 × 𝟐. 𝟒 × 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗) + (
𝟏
𝟐
× 𝟐. 𝟖 × 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟑. 𝟓𝟑𝟕) − 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟐. 𝟒
𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝟓𝟗𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 − 𝟒𝟓. 𝟔
𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝟓𝟒𝟓. 𝟐𝟓 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟐
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 24
Example 2
Determine the net ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing of breadth
2.5 m which is to be founded 1.25 m below the surface of a thick layer of
clay having 𝒄 𝒖 = 𝟖𝟖𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 25
Solution to example 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐
𝒒 𝒏 = 𝒄 𝒖 𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸𝑫
Bearing capacity coefficients for 𝜑 = 0;
𝑵 𝒒 = 𝟏 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟎
Substituting the coefficients we have
𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫 − 𝜸𝑫
𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄
𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓. 𝟕 × 𝟖𝟖
𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓𝟎𝟏. 𝟔 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟐
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 26
Example 3
A strip foundation presented in the figure below is required to transmit an
inclusive load of 650kN/m to the supporting soil. Adopting a factor of safety
of 3, determine the breadth of the footing required.
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 27
Solution to example 3
The supported inclusive load is an allowable load with a factor of safety F = 3
𝒒 𝒂 =
𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐
´
𝑭
+ 𝝈 𝒐
´
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸
Since the soil has no cohesion, the ultimate bearing capacity equation reduces to
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸
Bearing capacity coefficients
𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 +
𝝓
𝟐
= 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟎. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 +
𝟑𝟎
𝟐
= 𝟏𝟖. 𝟒𝟎𝟐
𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟏𝟖. 𝟒𝟎𝟐 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟎 = 𝟏𝟖. 𝟎𝟖𝟓
28
Solution to example 3 cont..
𝒒 𝒇 = (𝟏𝟗 × 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟏𝟖. 𝟒𝟎𝟐) + (
𝟏
𝟐
× 𝑩 × 𝟐𝟎 × 𝟏𝟖. 𝟎𝟖𝟓)
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓𝟐𝟒. 𝟒𝟔 + 𝟏𝟖𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝑩
Substituting 𝑞 𝑓 into 𝑞 𝑎 equation..The value of 𝑞 𝑎 given is converted to a stress in ൗ𝑘𝑁
𝑚2
𝟔𝟓𝟎
𝑩
=
𝟓𝟐𝟒. 𝟒𝟔 + 𝟏𝟖𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝑩 − 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟏. 𝟓
𝟑
+ 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟏. 𝟓
1950 = 180.85𝐵2 + 495.69𝐵 + 85.5𝐵
𝟏𝟖𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝑩 𝟐
+ 𝟓𝟖𝟏. 𝟏𝟗𝑩 − 𝟏𝟗𝟓𝟎 = 𝟎
𝑩 = 𝟐. 𝟎𝟓 𝒎
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 29
Effect of water table
• POSITION I:
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫 𝟏 + 𝜸´𝑫 𝟐 𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸
• POSITION II: (water table near the base of the footing)
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸
• POSITION III: (water table far from the base of the footing)
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸
30
Example 4
A strip footing of breadth 1.75 m is required to transmit a net load of 650kN/m to a
compacted sand of the following properties: : 𝒄´ = 𝟎 𝝓´ = 𝟑𝟖 𝒐 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 = 𝟐𝟎. 𝟓𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑.
Assume that the water table may rise to the surface and adopting a factor of safety
of 3, determine the required depth of the footing.
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 31
Solution to example 4
From the definition of factor of safety
𝑭 =
𝒒 𝒏𝒇
´
𝒒 𝒏
´
𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝒄´𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸´𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸´𝑫
Bearing capacity coefficients
𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟖
. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐
𝟒𝟓 +
𝟑𝟖
𝟐
= 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗
𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟖 = 𝟔𝟕. 𝟒
Substituting the known variables and observing the effect
of water table
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 32
Solution to example 4 cont..
𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟐𝟎. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝑫 × 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 +
𝟏
𝟐
× 𝟏. 𝟕𝟓 × 𝟐𝟎. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝟔𝟕. 𝟒 − (𝟐𝟎. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏)𝑫
𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟓𝟏𝟐. 𝟎𝟏𝟓𝑫 + 𝟔𝟑𝟎. 𝟒𝟒
Recall that
𝑭 =
𝒒 𝒏𝒇
´
𝒒 𝒏
´
Substituting we have
𝟑 =
𝟓𝟏𝟐. 𝟎𝟏𝟓𝑫 + 𝟔𝟑𝟎. 𝟒𝟒
ൗ𝟔𝟓𝟎
𝟏. 𝟕𝟓
𝑫 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟒 𝒎 ~𝟏 𝒎 33
Example 5
Determine the design load on a strip footing indicated in the figure below. The soil
characteristic are 𝒄´
= 𝟏𝟎𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐
𝝓´
= 𝟐𝟖 𝒐
𝜸 = 𝟏𝟖𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑
𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟑
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 34
Solution to example 5
𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝒄´𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸´𝑫𝑵 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸´𝑫
Bearing capacity factors
𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐
𝟒𝟓 +
𝝓
𝟐
= 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟖
× 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐
𝟒𝟓 +
𝟐𝟖
𝟐
= 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒
𝑵 𝒄 =
𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏
𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓
=
𝟖. 𝟖𝟒 − 𝟏
𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟖
= 𝟏𝟒. 𝟕𝟒
𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟖 = 𝟕. 𝟓𝟎
𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇
= 𝟏𝟎 × 𝟏𝟒. 𝟕𝟒 + 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟏. 𝟓 + (𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏) × 𝟏 × 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒
+ 𝟎. 𝟓 × 𝟑 × 𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝟕. 𝟓𝟎 − 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟏𝟖 + (𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏) × 𝟏
𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟓𝟒𝟒. 𝟎𝟔 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟐 or 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟏𝟔𝟑𝟐. 𝟏𝟖 Τ𝒌𝑵
𝒎
35
Generalized formula for bearing capacity
• When the assumptions stated by Terzaghi are not fulfilled, the following
expression should be used for ultimate bearing capacity
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 𝒔 𝒄 𝒅 𝒄 𝒍 𝒄 + 𝝈 𝟎 𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 𝒅 𝒒 𝒍 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸 𝒅 𝜸 𝒍 𝜸
𝒔 𝒄, 𝒔 𝒒, 𝒔 𝜸 are shape factors, applied for non continuous footing
𝒅 𝒄, 𝒅 𝒒, 𝒅 𝜸 are depth factors, applied when D > B
𝒍 𝒄, 𝒍 𝒒, 𝒍 𝜸 are load inclination factors, applied when the load is inclined
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 36
Generalized formula for bearing capacity cont..
Some proposed factors
Shape factors:
𝒔 𝒄 = 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐
𝑩
𝑳
𝒔 𝜸 = 𝟏 − 𝟎. 𝟒
𝑩
𝑳
for rectangular footings
𝒔 𝒄 = 𝟏. 𝟑 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏. 𝟐 𝒔 𝜸 = 0.8 for square footings
Depth factors:
𝒅 𝒄= 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐
𝑫
𝑩
𝒅 𝒒 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟏
𝑫
𝑩
𝒅 𝜸= 𝟏
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 37
Example 6
A rectangular footing of breadth 6 m and length 15 m is founded at a depth
of 4.5 m in a fine soil having the following properties:
𝒄 𝒖 = 𝟒𝟎 𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐 𝜸 = 𝟏𝟖𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑
Determine the ultimate bearing capacity of the footing
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 38
Solution to example 6
• Determine 𝒒 𝒇
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 𝒔 𝒄 + 𝝈 𝟎 𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸
Bearing capacity coefficients for 𝜑 = 0;
𝑵 𝒒 = 𝟏 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟎
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 𝒖 𝒔 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝒔 𝒒
𝒔 𝒄 = 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐
𝑩
𝑳
= 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐
𝟔
𝟏𝟓
= 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓. 𝟕 × 𝟒𝟎 × 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖 + 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟒. 𝟓 × 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟑𝟑𝟑. 𝟕𝟐 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟐
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 39
Example 7
A footing 2.25 by 2.25m is located at a depth of 1.5 m in a sand, the shear
strength parameters to be used in design being 𝒄´ = 𝟎, and 𝝓´= 𝟑𝟖 𝒐.
Determine the ultimate bearing capacity
(a) if the water table is well below foundation level and
(b) if the water table is at the surface. (qf = 1515.04 kN/m2)
The unit weight of the sand above the water table is 18 kN/m3; the saturated
unit weight is 20 kN/m3.
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 40
Solution to example 7
(a) Water table well below the
foundation base
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝝈 𝟎 𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸
𝑁𝑞 = 48.9 𝑁𝛾 = 67.4
𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏. 𝟐 𝒔 𝜸 = 0.8
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 +
𝟏
𝟐
× 𝟐. 𝟐𝟓 × 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟔𝟕. 𝟒
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝟔𝟕𝟔. 𝟐𝟒 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟐
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 41
Solution to example 7 cont..
(b)Water table at the surface Bearing capacity as well as shape factors remains the
same as in part (a)
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 − 𝜸 𝒘 𝑫𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 +
𝟏
𝟐
𝑩 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 − 𝜸 𝒘 𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸
𝑞 𝑓
= 20 − 9.81 × 1.5 × 48.9 +
1
2
× 2.25
× 20 − 9.81 × 67.4 × 0.8
𝑞 𝑓 = 896.92 + 618.12
𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟓. 𝟎𝟒 ൗ𝒌𝑵
𝒎 𝟐
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 42
allowable bearing capacity
For a given foundation in a given soil, the allowable design value for the applied
bearing pressure must satisfy the two criteria listed below:
I. An ultimate limit state value (shear strength)
Allowable design bearing capacity:
𝒒 𝒂 =
𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐
´
𝑭
+ 𝝈 𝒐
´
II. A serviceability limit state (settlement)
Allowable design bearing capacity 𝒒 𝒂 = bearing pressure corresponding to a
specific limit value 𝑺 𝑳 of undrained or drained settlement
43
allowable bearing capacity cont..
(a) Immediate or undrained
settlement
𝒒 𝒂 =
𝑺 𝑳 𝑬 𝒖
𝑩(𝟏 − 𝝂 𝟐)𝑰 𝒑
+ 𝝈 𝒐
(b) Consolidation or drained
settlement
𝒒 𝒂 =
𝑺 𝑳
𝒎 𝒗(𝑰+𝟏)𝑯 𝒐
+ 𝝈´ 𝒐
Where
• 𝑞 𝑎 = allowable design bearing capacity
• 𝑆 𝐿 = a limit value of undrained or drained stability
• 𝐸 𝑢 = undrained elastic modulus of the soil
• 𝐵 = least lateral dimension of the foundation
𝜈 = Poisson's ratio for the soil
• 𝐼 𝑝 = influence factor for vertical displacement
• 𝑚 𝑣 = coefficient of volume compressibility for the soil
• 𝐻 𝑜 = original thickness of the compressed layer
• 𝐼 = stress influence coefficient
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING
44
allowable bearing capacity cont..
Allowable bearing capacity and settlements of sands can alternatively be
determined from results of in-situ tests such as standard penetration test and
cone penetration test
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 45
Design process
The following is the usual procedure followed in foundation design
1. Proposing the type, shape and size of foundation using presumed bearing
values. Suggested in BS 8004 for example, for medium dense sand presumed
bearing values are typically 100 – 300 kN/m2 and for stiff clays between 150 –
300 kN/m2
2. Evaluation of the loading conditions and calculation of expected contact
pressure
3. Determination of shear strength and settlement characteristics of the soil
using laboratory or field tests
4. Evaluation of bearing capacity and compare with the expected pressures
5. Adjusting the size and depth of the footing to arrive to a design which
represents both structural and economic efficiency
46
Exercises
1. A strip footing 2.4 m wide is founded at a depth of 2.8 m in a soil having the
following properties: 𝒄´ = 𝟏𝟐 𝐤𝐏𝐚, and 𝝓´= 𝟐𝟎 𝒐, 𝜸 = 𝟏𝟗𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑
Determine (a)The net ultimate bearing capacity
(b) the design bearing capacity adopting a factor of safety of 3
2. A square footing is to be founded to a depth of 2.6 m and will transmit a
uniform load of 2.6 MN. Adopting a factor of safety of 3, determine the required
size of the footing. Soil properties are:
𝒄 𝒖 = 𝟔𝟒 𝐤𝐍/𝒎 𝟐
𝛄 = 𝟏𝟗 𝐤𝐍/𝒎 𝟑
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 47
Exercises
3. A rectangular foundation 10 x 5 m is to be designed, using a factor of safety of 3 to
carry a uniform load of 86.6 MN, in fully drained conditions in the following soil:
𝒄´
= 𝟎, and 𝝓´
= 𝟑𝟓 𝒐
, 𝜸 = 𝟐𝟎 𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑
, 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 = 𝟐𝟐 𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑
a) Determine a suitable founding depth
b) Determine the percentage reduction in load carrying capacity that results from
the ground water level rising
i. To the underside of the footing
ii. To the ground surface
c) Calculate the factor of safety when the 86.6 MN load is applied and the two
conditions in (b) occur
CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 48
1 sur 48

Recommandé

Earth pressure( soil mechanics) par
Earth pressure( soil mechanics)Earth pressure( soil mechanics)
Earth pressure( soil mechanics)Darshil Vekaria
5K vues54 diapositives
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma par
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma ABHISHEK SHARMA
14.7K vues116 diapositives
Coffer dam and its type par
Coffer dam and its typeCoffer dam and its type
Coffer dam and its typeGaurang Kakadiya
59.7K vues58 diapositives
SHALLOW FOUNDATION par
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONSHALLOW FOUNDATION
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONdhara dattani
635 vues64 diapositives
Chapter 3 shallow foundations par
Chapter 3 shallow foundationsChapter 3 shallow foundations
Chapter 3 shallow foundationsKHUSHBU SHAH
19K vues60 diapositives
Lecture 1 introduction & types of foundation par
Lecture 1  introduction & types of foundationLecture 1  introduction & types of foundation
Lecture 1 introduction & types of foundationDr.Abdulmannan Orabi
16.4K vues52 diapositives

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Settlement of shallow foundation par
Settlement of shallow foundationSettlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundationLatif Hyder Wadho
13.6K vues97 diapositives
Bearing capacity_of_soil par
 Bearing capacity_of_soil Bearing capacity_of_soil
Bearing capacity_of_soilShivarajteggi
3.1K vues54 diapositives
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY par
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORYTERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORYSANJEEV Wazir
4.9K vues14 diapositives
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation par
Bearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationArbaz Kazi
1.2K vues53 diapositives
Bearing failure par
Bearing failureBearing failure
Bearing failuregalaly12345
1.8K vues10 diapositives
pre consolidation pressure par
pre consolidation pressurepre consolidation pressure
pre consolidation pressureNachiketa Mithaiwala
8.3K vues7 diapositives

Tendances(20)

TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY par SANJEEV Wazir
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORYTERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
TERZAGHI’S BEARING CAPACITY THEORY
SANJEEV Wazir4.9K vues
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation par Arbaz Kazi
Bearing Capacity of Shallow FoundationBearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation
Arbaz Kazi1.2K vues
SOIL EXPLORATION par serinsara
SOIL EXPLORATIONSOIL EXPLORATION
SOIL EXPLORATION
serinsara2.3K vues
Chapter 4.3 well foundation-final-ppt par DYPCET
Chapter 4.3   well foundation-final-pptChapter 4.3   well foundation-final-ppt
Chapter 4.3 well foundation-final-ppt
DYPCET9K vues
Case study on pile foundation review par Rajankumar416
Case study on pile foundation reviewCase study on pile foundation review
Case study on pile foundation review
Rajankumar4161.2K vues
Raft foundations par hatim ahmed
Raft foundationsRaft foundations
Raft foundations
hatim ahmed21.8K vues
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse... par Make Mannan
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
Make Mannan20.9K vues
Counterfort Retaining Wall par Kaizer Dave
Counterfort Retaining WallCounterfort Retaining Wall
Counterfort Retaining Wall
Kaizer Dave46.2K vues

Similaire à 4. Shallow Foundations

Geotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacity par
Geotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacityGeotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacity
Geotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacityIrfan Malik
17.5K vues78 diapositives
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech) par
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)Irfan Malik
3.4K vues35 diapositives
03 - Bearing Capacity of Soils (1).pptx par
03 - Bearing Capacity of Soils (1).pptx03 - Bearing Capacity of Soils (1).pptx
03 - Bearing Capacity of Soils (1).pptxShaheerRizwan1
1 vue132 diapositives
BEARING CAPASITY OFSOIL.pptx par
BEARING CAPASITY OFSOIL.pptxBEARING CAPASITY OFSOIL.pptx
BEARING CAPASITY OFSOIL.pptxAnuragDavesar
12 vues78 diapositives
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL.pptx par
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL.pptxBEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL.pptx
BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL.pptxJoshuaSteven11
53 vues20 diapositives
4. Types-of Foundations.pdf par
4. Types-of Foundations.pdf4. Types-of Foundations.pdf
4. Types-of Foundations.pdfEmmanuelKiamaMutinda
16 vues42 diapositives

Similaire à 4. Shallow Foundations(20)

Geotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacity par Irfan Malik
Geotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacityGeotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacity
Geotech Engg. Ch#05 bearing capacity
Irfan Malik17.5K vues
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech) par Irfan Malik
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Bearing capacity ch#05(geotech)
Irfan Malik3.4K vues
Foundation (2) par topukuet
Foundation (2)Foundation (2)
Foundation (2)
topukuet2.3K vues
Shallow foundation(by indrajit mitra)01 par Indrajit Ind
Shallow   foundation(by indrajit mitra)01Shallow   foundation(by indrajit mitra)01
Shallow foundation(by indrajit mitra)01
Indrajit Ind7.5K vues
Pile Foundation_Neeraj_RITES.pptx par ShujaMehdi3
Pile Foundation_Neeraj_RITES.pptxPile Foundation_Neeraj_RITES.pptx
Pile Foundation_Neeraj_RITES.pptx
ShujaMehdi33 vues
Lecture 1. bearing capacity of soil par husseinhadi2
Lecture 1. bearing capacity of soilLecture 1. bearing capacity of soil
Lecture 1. bearing capacity of soil
husseinhadi2553 vues
Top schools in delhi ncr par Edhole.com
Top schools in delhi ncrTop schools in delhi ncr
Top schools in delhi ncr
Edhole.com4.1K vues
pilefoundation_16th aug.ppt par FREELANCER
pilefoundation_16th aug.pptpilefoundation_16th aug.ppt
pilefoundation_16th aug.ppt
FREELANCER16 vues
Shear Strength of Soils ( Soil Mechanics ) par pankajdrolia
Shear Strength of Soils ( Soil Mechanics )Shear Strength of Soils ( Soil Mechanics )
Shear Strength of Soils ( Soil Mechanics )
pankajdrolia517 vues

Dernier

ICS3211_lecture 09_2023.pdf par
ICS3211_lecture 09_2023.pdfICS3211_lecture 09_2023.pdf
ICS3211_lecture 09_2023.pdfVanessa Camilleri
115 vues10 diapositives
CONTENTS.pptx par
CONTENTS.pptxCONTENTS.pptx
CONTENTS.pptxiguerendiain
62 vues17 diapositives
The Value and Role of Media and Information Literacy in the Information Age a... par
The Value and Role of Media and Information Literacy in the Information Age a...The Value and Role of Media and Information Literacy in the Information Age a...
The Value and Role of Media and Information Literacy in the Information Age a...Naseej Academy أكاديمية نسيج
58 vues42 diapositives
How to empty an One2many field in Odoo par
How to empty an One2many field in OdooHow to empty an One2many field in Odoo
How to empty an One2many field in OdooCeline George
87 vues8 diapositives
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf par
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdfThe basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdfJonathanCovena1
146 vues1 diapositive
When Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & Cybersex par
When Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & CybersexWhen Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & Cybersex
When Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & CybersexMarlene Maheu
85 vues73 diapositives

Dernier(20)

How to empty an One2many field in Odoo par Celine George
How to empty an One2many field in OdooHow to empty an One2many field in Odoo
How to empty an One2many field in Odoo
Celine George87 vues
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf par JonathanCovena1
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdfThe basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf
The basics - information, data, technology and systems.pdf
JonathanCovena1146 vues
When Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & Cybersex par Marlene Maheu
When Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & CybersexWhen Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & Cybersex
When Sex Gets Complicated: Porn, Affairs, & Cybersex
Marlene Maheu85 vues
JQUERY.pdf par ArthyR3
JQUERY.pdfJQUERY.pdf
JQUERY.pdf
ArthyR381 vues
REPRESENTATION - GAUNTLET.pptx par iammrhaywood
REPRESENTATION - GAUNTLET.pptxREPRESENTATION - GAUNTLET.pptx
REPRESENTATION - GAUNTLET.pptx
iammrhaywood138 vues
Create a Structure in VBNet.pptx par Breach_P
Create a Structure in VBNet.pptxCreate a Structure in VBNet.pptx
Create a Structure in VBNet.pptx
Breach_P78 vues
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH FAMILY AND FRIENDS NATIONAL EDITION - LỚP 4 (CÓ FIL... par Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH FAMILY AND FRIENDS NATIONAL EDITION - LỚP 4 (CÓ FIL...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH FAMILY AND FRIENDS NATIONAL EDITION - LỚP 4 (CÓ FIL...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH FAMILY AND FRIENDS NATIONAL EDITION - LỚP 4 (CÓ FIL...
Pharmaceutical Inorganic chemistry UNIT-V Radiopharmaceutical.pptx par Ms. Pooja Bhandare
Pharmaceutical Inorganic chemistry UNIT-V Radiopharmaceutical.pptxPharmaceutical Inorganic chemistry UNIT-V Radiopharmaceutical.pptx
Pharmaceutical Inorganic chemistry UNIT-V Radiopharmaceutical.pptx
ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks Effectively par PECB
ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks EffectivelyISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks Effectively
ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27005: Managing AI Risks Effectively
PECB 623 vues
Classification of crude drugs.pptx par GayatriPatra14
Classification of crude drugs.pptxClassification of crude drugs.pptx
Classification of crude drugs.pptx
GayatriPatra14101 vues
EIT-Digital_Spohrer_AI_Intro 20231128 v1.pptx par ISSIP
EIT-Digital_Spohrer_AI_Intro 20231128 v1.pptxEIT-Digital_Spohrer_AI_Intro 20231128 v1.pptx
EIT-Digital_Spohrer_AI_Intro 20231128 v1.pptx
ISSIP386 vues
Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November) par Esquimalt MFRC
Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November)Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November)
Monthly Information Session for MV Asterix (November)
Esquimalt MFRC72 vues

4. Shallow Foundations

  • 1. 4.BEARING CAPACITY OF SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Dr MWAJUMA I. LINGWANDA The most carefully designed structures can fail if they are not supported by suitable foundations
  • 2. Definition of Shallow foundations ▪ Shallow foundations are also called spread foundations ▪ But how shallow is shallow? ▪ The common definition of shallow foundations refers to the case where the founding depth is less than the breadth ▪ i.e. when 𝑫 < 𝑩 the foundation is shallow ▪ What about wide raft foundations? ▪ The above definition is not acceptable for wide rafts ▪ Therefore, a foundation is shallow if the depth is less than 3 m or less than the breadth of the foundation CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 2
  • 3. Types of shallow foundations • Pad foundations These are usually provided to support structural columns. They may be circular, square or rectangular slab section • Strip foundations A strip foundation has a length >> than breadth. They are normally provided for load bearing walls or closely spaced columns where it is not economical to deal with individual pads CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 3
  • 4. Types of shallow foundations cont.. • Raft/Mat foundations Raft foundations are required on soils of low bearing capacity or where structural columns are closely spaced in both directions such that individual pads would nearly touch each other. CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 4
  • 5. Foundation design criteria Three main design criteria must be considered for a shallow foundation 1. Adequate depth ✓ The founding depth i.e. the depth from the surface to its underside should be sufficient to prevent effects due to changes of ground surface ✓ Sufficient depth to prevent overturning moments when the structure is subjected to horizontal forces 2. Limiting settlement ✓ The amount of tolerable total and differential settlements depends on functional and user requirements and also economic factors ✓ Most settlement damage may be classified as architectural damage as they normally affect finishes. CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 5
  • 6. Foundation design criteria cont.. 3. Factor of safety against shear failure ✓ In foundations, shear failure occurs when soil divides into separate zones which move partially or fully along slip surfaces ✓ At this point, a plastic yielding condition has developed whereby the shear stress along the slip surface has reached a limiting value(ultimate limit state) ✓ The principal criteria for design will be satisfying a given factor of safety against shear failure CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 6
  • 7. Three principal modes of shear failure 1. General shear failure ➢ This mode of failure occurs in dense or overconsolidated soils of low compressibility ➢ A clearly defined plastic yield slip forms under the footing and develop outwards to the surface ➢ Heaving of the ground occurs on both sides of the footing ➢ Failure is sudden and often accompanied by severe tilting on one side CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 7
  • 8. Three principal modes of shear failure cont.. 2. Local shear failure ➢ Occurs in compressible soils ➢ A significant vertical movement may take place before any noticeable heaving ➢ Shear planes develop but fail to extend to the ground surface ➢ Very little tilting may take place ➢ The settlement which occurs usually is the principal design criteria CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 8
  • 9. Three principal modes of shear failure cont.. 3. Punching shear failure ➢ Occurs in weak compressible soils ➢ Considerable vertical movement take place ➢ Slip surfaces restricted to vertical planes adjacent to the sides of the footing ➢ Heaving at the surface is usually absent and may be replaced by a drag down ➢ Normally there will be no tilting ➢ This kind of failure may be observed in highly compressible clays and in loose sands CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 9
  • 10. Important Definitions • Total foundation pressure (𝒒) or gross loading intensity Is the intensity of total pressure on the ground beneath the foundation after the structure has been erected and fully loaded • The net bearing pressure (𝒒 𝒏) or the net foundation pressure Is the net change in total stress experienced by the soil at the base of the foundation Let 𝝈 𝟎 = the stress removed due to excavation (𝝈 𝟎 = 𝜸𝑫) 𝒒 = Total foundation pressure/ contact pressure at the base of the foundation Then, 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝒒 − 𝝈 𝟎 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 10
  • 11. Important Definitions cont.. • The net effective bearing pressure (𝒒 𝒏 ´ ) or the net effective foundation pressure The net foundation pressure expressed in terms of effective stress. When the water table is above the base of the foundation the net effective bearing pressure is given by; 𝒒 𝒏 ´ = 𝒒 − 𝝈 𝟎 ´ Where 𝝈 𝟎 ´ = 𝜸𝑫 − 𝜸 𝒘 𝒉 𝒘 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 11
  • 12. Important definitions cont.. • The ultimate bearing capacity (𝒒 𝒇) Is the value of the loading intensity at which the supporting ground fails in shear • The net ultimate bearing capacity (𝒒 𝒏𝒇) • Is the value of net loading intensity at which the supporting ground fails in shear • LOAD – SETTLEMENT CURVE CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 12 Settlement Load 0
  • 13. Important definitions cont.. • The factor of safety against shear failure is defined as the ratio between the net ultimate bearing capacity and the net bearing pressure 𝑭 = 𝒒 𝒏𝒇 ´ 𝒒 𝒏 ´ = 𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐 ´ 𝒒 − 𝝈 𝒐 ´ For building foundations, the recommended factor of safety is between 3 and 2.5 • Presumed bearing pressure Is the net loading intensity considered appropriate to the particular type of ground for preliminary design purposes. The value is based on local experience or by calculation from strength tests using a factor of safety against shear failure CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 13
  • 14. Important definitions cont.. • The allowable bearing pressure (𝒒 𝒂) Is the maximum allowable net loading intensity of a ground in a given case, taking into consideration the bearing capacity and the estimated amount and rate of settlement that will occur. Considering shear failure, allowable design bearing capacity is given by 𝒒 𝒂 = 𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐 ´ 𝑭 + 𝝈 𝒐 ´ CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 14
  • 15. Simple bearing capacity formula • Assumptions i. The footing experiences a bearing capacity failure ii. Failure occurs along a circular surface iii. Undrained conditions prevail, 𝒄 𝒖 > 𝟎, 𝝓 𝒖 = 𝟎 iv. The shear strength of the soil between the ground and depth D is neglected v. The soil between the ground and D is considered as a surcharge and produces a vertical stress = 𝜸𝑫 • Taking moments about point O, • 𝒒 𝒇 𝑩. 𝑩 𝟐 = 𝒄 𝒖 𝝅𝑩. 𝑩 + 𝜸𝑫𝑩. 𝑩 𝟐 • 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝝅𝒄 𝒖 + 𝜸𝑫 • 𝒒 𝒇 ≈ 𝟔. 𝟐𝟖𝒄 𝒖 + 𝜸𝑫 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 15 Consider a long footing with cross section shown below
  • 16. Class exercise With similar assumptions regarding ground conditions as the previous foundation, derive a simple bearing capacity formula for the following cases I. The foundation rests on the ground level II. The foundation rests at a depth D and a long and wide surcharge load due to soil compacted on each side at the ground level to a height H. The unit weight of the compacted soil being 𝜸 𝟐 (i) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝝅𝒄 𝒖 (ii) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝝅𝒄 𝒖 + 𝜸𝑫 + 𝜸 𝟐 𝑯 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 16
  • 17. Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula • The formula was developed for long foundations (strip foundations) then extended to square and circular foundations • A general shear failure is considered CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 17
  • 18. Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula cont.. • Assumptions ✓ The depth of the foundation is less than or equal to its width (𝑫 ≤ 𝑩) ✓ No sliding occurs between the foundation and the soil ✓ The soil is homogeneous semi infinite mass ✓ The shear strength of the soil is presented by both c and ϕ ✓ Failure is by general shear mode ✓ The soil between the ground surface and a depth D has no shear strength i.e. it serves only as a surcharge load CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 18
  • 19. Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula cont.. • Terzaghi proposed a three-term expression for ultimate bearing capacity of a long strip footing of breadth B as 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝝈 𝒐 𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 • 𝒒 𝒇 = ultimate bearing capacity • 𝒄 = cohesion of soil beneath the foundation • 𝝈 𝟎 = overburden pressure at the foundation level • 𝑩 = breadth of the foundation • 𝜸 = unit weight of the soil beneath the foundation • 𝑵 𝒄, 𝑵 𝒒 and 𝑵 𝜸 areTerzaghi´s bearing capacity factors which are function of ϕ only 19
  • 20. Terzaghi´s bearing capacity formula cont.. • 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 . 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝝓 𝟐 • 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝑵 𝒒−𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 for ϕ > 0 • 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 for ϕ =0 • 𝑵 𝜸 ≈ 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 • Under undrained conditions, ϕ =0 and c = cu • 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝟏 • 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 • 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟎 • 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 𝒖 + 𝝈 𝟎 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 20 Note that Because of the shape of the failure surface, the values of 𝑐 and 𝜙 only need to represent the soil between the bottom of the footing and a depth B below the bottom. The soils between the ground surface and a depth D are treated simply as overburden.
  • 22. Example 1 A strip footing is 2.8 m wide and is founded at a depth of 2.4 m in a soil having the following properties: 𝒄´ = 𝟏𝟐𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐 𝝓´ = 𝟐𝟎 𝒐 𝜸 = 𝟏𝟗𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑 . Determine the net ultimate bearing capacity. CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 22
  • 23. Solution to example 1 Sketch the problem and indicate the known parameters (soil properties and dimensions) 𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝒒´ 𝒇 − 𝝈´ 𝒐 𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝒄´𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸´𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸´𝑫 determine the bearing capacity coefficients 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 . 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝝓 𝟐 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟎 × 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝟐𝟎 𝟐 = 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 23
  • 24. Solution to example 1 cont.. 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟎 = 𝟏𝟒. 𝟖𝟑𝟓 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟎 = 𝟑. 𝟓𝟑𝟕 Substituting to the net bearing capacity equation 𝒒´ 𝒏 = (𝟏𝟐 × 𝟏𝟒. 𝟖𝟑𝟓) + (𝟏𝟗 × 𝟐. 𝟒 × 𝟔. 𝟑𝟗𝟗) + ( 𝟏 𝟐 × 𝟐. 𝟖 × 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟑. 𝟓𝟑𝟕) − 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟐. 𝟒 𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝟓𝟗𝟎. 𝟖𝟓 − 𝟒𝟓. 𝟔 𝒒´ 𝒏 = 𝟓𝟒𝟓. 𝟐𝟓 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟐 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 24
  • 25. Example 2 Determine the net ultimate bearing capacity of a strip footing of breadth 2.5 m which is to be founded 1.25 m below the surface of a thick layer of clay having 𝒄 𝒖 = 𝟖𝟖𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 25
  • 26. Solution to example 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝒄 𝒖 𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸𝑫 Bearing capacity coefficients for 𝜑 = 0; 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝟏 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟎 Substituting the coefficients we have 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫 − 𝜸𝑫 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓. 𝟕 × 𝟖𝟖 𝒒 𝒏 = 𝟓𝟎𝟏. 𝟔 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟐 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 26
  • 27. Example 3 A strip foundation presented in the figure below is required to transmit an inclusive load of 650kN/m to the supporting soil. Adopting a factor of safety of 3, determine the breadth of the footing required. CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 27
  • 28. Solution to example 3 The supported inclusive load is an allowable load with a factor of safety F = 3 𝒒 𝒂 = 𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐 ´ 𝑭 + 𝝈 𝒐 ´ 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 Since the soil has no cohesion, the ultimate bearing capacity equation reduces to 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 Bearing capacity coefficients 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝝓 𝟐 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟎. 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝟑𝟎 𝟐 = 𝟏𝟖. 𝟒𝟎𝟐 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟏𝟖. 𝟒𝟎𝟐 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟎 = 𝟏𝟖. 𝟎𝟖𝟓 28
  • 29. Solution to example 3 cont.. 𝒒 𝒇 = (𝟏𝟗 × 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟏𝟖. 𝟒𝟎𝟐) + ( 𝟏 𝟐 × 𝑩 × 𝟐𝟎 × 𝟏𝟖. 𝟎𝟖𝟓) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓𝟐𝟒. 𝟒𝟔 + 𝟏𝟖𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝑩 Substituting 𝑞 𝑓 into 𝑞 𝑎 equation..The value of 𝑞 𝑎 given is converted to a stress in ൗ𝑘𝑁 𝑚2 𝟔𝟓𝟎 𝑩 = 𝟓𝟐𝟒. 𝟒𝟔 + 𝟏𝟖𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝑩 − 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟏. 𝟓 𝟑 + 𝟏𝟗 × 𝟏. 𝟓 1950 = 180.85𝐵2 + 495.69𝐵 + 85.5𝐵 𝟏𝟖𝟎. 𝟖𝟓𝑩 𝟐 + 𝟓𝟖𝟏. 𝟏𝟗𝑩 − 𝟏𝟗𝟓𝟎 = 𝟎 𝑩 = 𝟐. 𝟎𝟓 𝒎 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 29
  • 30. Effect of water table • POSITION I: 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫 𝟏 + 𝜸´𝑫 𝟐 𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 • POSITION II: (water table near the base of the footing) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 • POSITION III: (water table far from the base of the footing) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 30
  • 31. Example 4 A strip footing of breadth 1.75 m is required to transmit a net load of 650kN/m to a compacted sand of the following properties: : 𝒄´ = 𝟎 𝝓´ = 𝟑𝟖 𝒐 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 = 𝟐𝟎. 𝟓𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑. Assume that the water table may rise to the surface and adopting a factor of safety of 3, determine the required depth of the footing. CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 31
  • 32. Solution to example 4 From the definition of factor of safety 𝑭 = 𝒒 𝒏𝒇 ´ 𝒒 𝒏 ´ 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝒄´𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸´𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸´𝑫 Bearing capacity coefficients 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟖 . 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝟑𝟖 𝟐 = 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟑𝟖 = 𝟔𝟕. 𝟒 Substituting the known variables and observing the effect of water table CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 32
  • 33. Solution to example 4 cont.. 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟐𝟎. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝑫 × 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 + 𝟏 𝟐 × 𝟏. 𝟕𝟓 × 𝟐𝟎. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝟔𝟕. 𝟒 − (𝟐𝟎. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏)𝑫 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟓𝟏𝟐. 𝟎𝟏𝟓𝑫 + 𝟔𝟑𝟎. 𝟒𝟒 Recall that 𝑭 = 𝒒 𝒏𝒇 ´ 𝒒 𝒏 ´ Substituting we have 𝟑 = 𝟓𝟏𝟐. 𝟎𝟏𝟓𝑫 + 𝟔𝟑𝟎. 𝟒𝟒 ൗ𝟔𝟓𝟎 𝟏. 𝟕𝟓 𝑫 = 𝟎. 𝟗𝟒 𝒎 ~𝟏 𝒎 33
  • 34. Example 5 Determine the design load on a strip footing indicated in the figure below. The soil characteristic are 𝒄´ = 𝟏𝟎𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐 𝝓´ = 𝟐𝟖 𝒐 𝜸 = 𝟏𝟖𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 = 𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟑 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 34
  • 35. Solution to example 5 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝒄´𝑵 𝒄 + 𝜸´𝑫𝑵 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸´𝑵 𝜸 − 𝜸´𝑫 Bearing capacity factors 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 . 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝝓 𝟐 = 𝒆 𝝅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟖 × 𝒕𝒂𝒏 𝟐 𝟒𝟓 + 𝟐𝟖 𝟐 = 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟖 = 𝟏𝟒. 𝟕𝟒 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝑵 𝒒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝝓 = 𝟏. 𝟖 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒 − 𝟏 𝒕𝒂𝒏𝟐𝟖 = 𝟕. 𝟓𝟎 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟏𝟎 × 𝟏𝟒. 𝟕𝟒 + 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟏. 𝟓 + (𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏) × 𝟏 × 𝟖. 𝟖𝟒 + 𝟎. 𝟓 × 𝟑 × 𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏 × 𝟕. 𝟓𝟎 − 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟏𝟖 + (𝟏𝟗. 𝟓 − 𝟗. 𝟖𝟏) × 𝟏 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟓𝟒𝟒. 𝟎𝟔 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟐 or 𝒒´ 𝒏𝒇 = 𝟏𝟔𝟑𝟐. 𝟏𝟖 Τ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 35
  • 36. Generalized formula for bearing capacity • When the assumptions stated by Terzaghi are not fulfilled, the following expression should be used for ultimate bearing capacity 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 𝒔 𝒄 𝒅 𝒄 𝒍 𝒄 + 𝝈 𝟎 𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 𝒅 𝒒 𝒍 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸 𝒅 𝜸 𝒍 𝜸 𝒔 𝒄, 𝒔 𝒒, 𝒔 𝜸 are shape factors, applied for non continuous footing 𝒅 𝒄, 𝒅 𝒒, 𝒅 𝜸 are depth factors, applied when D > B 𝒍 𝒄, 𝒍 𝒒, 𝒍 𝜸 are load inclination factors, applied when the load is inclined CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 36
  • 37. Generalized formula for bearing capacity cont.. Some proposed factors Shape factors: 𝒔 𝒄 = 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐 𝑩 𝑳 𝒔 𝜸 = 𝟏 − 𝟎. 𝟒 𝑩 𝑳 for rectangular footings 𝒔 𝒄 = 𝟏. 𝟑 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏. 𝟐 𝒔 𝜸 = 0.8 for square footings Depth factors: 𝒅 𝒄= 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐 𝑫 𝑩 𝒅 𝒒 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟏 𝑫 𝑩 𝒅 𝜸= 𝟏 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 37
  • 38. Example 6 A rectangular footing of breadth 6 m and length 15 m is founded at a depth of 4.5 m in a fine soil having the following properties: 𝒄 𝒖 = 𝟒𝟎 𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟐 𝜸 = 𝟏𝟖𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑 Determine the ultimate bearing capacity of the footing CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 38
  • 39. Solution to example 6 • Determine 𝒒 𝒇 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝒄𝑵 𝒄 𝒔 𝒄 + 𝝈 𝟎 𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸 Bearing capacity coefficients for 𝜑 = 0; 𝑵 𝒒 = 𝟏 𝑵 𝒄 = 𝟓. 𝟕 𝑵 𝜸 = 𝟎 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓. 𝟕𝒄 𝒖 𝒔 𝒄 + 𝜸𝑫𝒔 𝒒 𝒔 𝒄 = 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐 𝑩 𝑳 = 𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐 𝟔 𝟏𝟓 = 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟓. 𝟕 × 𝟒𝟎 × 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖 + 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟒. 𝟓 × 𝟏. 𝟎𝟖 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟑𝟑𝟑. 𝟕𝟐 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟐 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 39
  • 40. Example 7 A footing 2.25 by 2.25m is located at a depth of 1.5 m in a sand, the shear strength parameters to be used in design being 𝒄´ = 𝟎, and 𝝓´= 𝟑𝟖 𝒐. Determine the ultimate bearing capacity (a) if the water table is well below foundation level and (b) if the water table is at the surface. (qf = 1515.04 kN/m2) The unit weight of the sand above the water table is 18 kN/m3; the saturated unit weight is 20 kN/m3. CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 40
  • 41. Solution to example 7 (a) Water table well below the foundation base 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝝈 𝟎 𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩𝜸𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸 𝑁𝑞 = 48.9 𝑁𝛾 = 67.4 𝒔 𝒒 = 𝟏. 𝟐 𝒔 𝜸 = 0.8 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟏. 𝟓 × 𝟒𝟖. 𝟗 + 𝟏 𝟐 × 𝟐. 𝟐𝟓 × 𝟏𝟖 × 𝟔𝟕. 𝟒 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟐𝟔𝟕𝟔. 𝟐𝟒 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟐 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 41
  • 42. Solution to example 7 cont.. (b)Water table at the surface Bearing capacity as well as shape factors remains the same as in part (a) 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 − 𝜸 𝒘 𝑫𝑵 𝒒 𝒔 𝒒 + 𝟏 𝟐 𝑩 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 − 𝜸 𝒘 𝑵 𝜸 𝒔 𝜸 𝑞 𝑓 = 20 − 9.81 × 1.5 × 48.9 + 1 2 × 2.25 × 20 − 9.81 × 67.4 × 0.8 𝑞 𝑓 = 896.92 + 618.12 𝒒 𝒇 = 𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟓. 𝟎𝟒 ൗ𝒌𝑵 𝒎 𝟐 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 42
  • 43. allowable bearing capacity For a given foundation in a given soil, the allowable design value for the applied bearing pressure must satisfy the two criteria listed below: I. An ultimate limit state value (shear strength) Allowable design bearing capacity: 𝒒 𝒂 = 𝒒 𝒇 − 𝝈 𝒐 ´ 𝑭 + 𝝈 𝒐 ´ II. A serviceability limit state (settlement) Allowable design bearing capacity 𝒒 𝒂 = bearing pressure corresponding to a specific limit value 𝑺 𝑳 of undrained or drained settlement 43
  • 44. allowable bearing capacity cont.. (a) Immediate or undrained settlement 𝒒 𝒂 = 𝑺 𝑳 𝑬 𝒖 𝑩(𝟏 − 𝝂 𝟐)𝑰 𝒑 + 𝝈 𝒐 (b) Consolidation or drained settlement 𝒒 𝒂 = 𝑺 𝑳 𝒎 𝒗(𝑰+𝟏)𝑯 𝒐 + 𝝈´ 𝒐 Where • 𝑞 𝑎 = allowable design bearing capacity • 𝑆 𝐿 = a limit value of undrained or drained stability • 𝐸 𝑢 = undrained elastic modulus of the soil • 𝐵 = least lateral dimension of the foundation 𝜈 = Poisson's ratio for the soil • 𝐼 𝑝 = influence factor for vertical displacement • 𝑚 𝑣 = coefficient of volume compressibility for the soil • 𝐻 𝑜 = original thickness of the compressed layer • 𝐼 = stress influence coefficient CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 44
  • 45. allowable bearing capacity cont.. Allowable bearing capacity and settlements of sands can alternatively be determined from results of in-situ tests such as standard penetration test and cone penetration test CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 45
  • 46. Design process The following is the usual procedure followed in foundation design 1. Proposing the type, shape and size of foundation using presumed bearing values. Suggested in BS 8004 for example, for medium dense sand presumed bearing values are typically 100 – 300 kN/m2 and for stiff clays between 150 – 300 kN/m2 2. Evaluation of the loading conditions and calculation of expected contact pressure 3. Determination of shear strength and settlement characteristics of the soil using laboratory or field tests 4. Evaluation of bearing capacity and compare with the expected pressures 5. Adjusting the size and depth of the footing to arrive to a design which represents both structural and economic efficiency 46
  • 47. Exercises 1. A strip footing 2.4 m wide is founded at a depth of 2.8 m in a soil having the following properties: 𝒄´ = 𝟏𝟐 𝐤𝐏𝐚, and 𝝓´= 𝟐𝟎 𝒐, 𝜸 = 𝟏𝟗𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑 Determine (a)The net ultimate bearing capacity (b) the design bearing capacity adopting a factor of safety of 3 2. A square footing is to be founded to a depth of 2.6 m and will transmit a uniform load of 2.6 MN. Adopting a factor of safety of 3, determine the required size of the footing. Soil properties are: 𝒄 𝒖 = 𝟔𝟒 𝐤𝐍/𝒎 𝟐 𝛄 = 𝟏𝟗 𝐤𝐍/𝒎 𝟑 CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 47
  • 48. Exercises 3. A rectangular foundation 10 x 5 m is to be designed, using a factor of safety of 3 to carry a uniform load of 86.6 MN, in fully drained conditions in the following soil: 𝒄´ = 𝟎, and 𝝓´ = 𝟑𝟓 𝒐 , 𝜸 = 𝟐𝟎 𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑 , 𝜸 𝒔𝒂𝒕 = 𝟐𝟐 𝒌𝑵/𝒎 𝟑 a) Determine a suitable founding depth b) Determine the percentage reduction in load carrying capacity that results from the ground water level rising i. To the underside of the footing ii. To the ground surface c) Calculate the factor of safety when the 86.6 MN load is applied and the two conditions in (b) occur CEB 3319 FOUNDATION ENGINERING 48