Proceedings available at: http://www.extension.org/67695
Manure generated from concentrated animal feeding operations may serve as a source of steroids in surface water and adversely impact the development of aquatic ecosystems. The objectives of this research were to determine the amount of steroids and metabolites in manure from beef cattle production pens, and runoff from crop production fields.
Effect of Manure Handling and Incorporation on Steroid Movement In Agricultural Fields Fertilized With Beef Cattle Manure
1. Waste of Worth
April, 2013
Denver, CO
Charles A. Shapiro, Sagor Biswas, David D. Tarkalson, William L.
Kranz, David P. Shelton, Terry L. Mader, Daniel D. Snow, Simon J. van
Donk, Shannon L. Bartelt-Hunt, and Tian C. Zhang
Technical assistance: Leslie Johnson and Mike Mainz
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Email: cshapiro@unl.edu
2. Funding provided by US-EPA -2007program
Beef and dairy
Poultry
litter
Poultry
broiler
Beef, dairy, poultry and swine
3. 96% of CAFO cattle
use implants
CONCERN: Potential for
natural and synthetic
steroid hormones in
livestock waste to reach
groundwater and
surface waters
?
7. 1) Quantify hormones in various stages of the manure
pathway in cattle feedlots.
2) Determine the effects of different handling practices of
cattle feedlot wastes on the stability and availability of
hormones.
3) Determine the effects of different land application
strategies on the fate and transport of hormones in runoff
and vadose zone soils.
4) Determine if grasses grown in conservation buffers
assimilate hormones.
8. 8
Meat
Market
Hormone supplements:
36 mg α-zearalanol,
140 mg of TBA and 14 mg
of 17β-estradiol (after 35 days)
0.45 mg of MGA (daily feed, 145 days)
Fresh Manure ~25kg/day
~0.5 mg/day excretion
~ 20 ug/kg maximum
Compost Stockpile
Runoff Holding
Pond
Land
Application
Overland
runoff
Soil Water
Movement
Plant Uptake
Streams, Lak
es
Vadose zone,
Ground water
Animal
Ingestion
9. 96 heifers split between six pens
Half receive implants /feed
supplement
Surface samples, feces and urine
spots collected and analyzed
(7, 45, 125 days)
Feed lot run-off from natural rainfall
events collected using tipping bucket
sampler
Pens scraped and waste stockpiled
or composted
Feeding pen study conducted 2007
and 2008
10. Low concentrations of steroid hormones
detected in feeding pen run-off
Steroids detected in ≥ 80% of treated and control
samples
Synthetic steroids only detected in runoff from
treated groups
Mostly endogenous steroids and possibly mycotoxins
detected in dissolved fraction
Large proportion held in feed-lot surfaces
Seasonal variation observed in metabolites and
concentrations
11. 11
Meat
Market
Livestock
(Heifers)
Hormone Supplements:
36 mg α-zearalanol,
140 mg of TBA and 14 mg of 17β-
estradiol (after 35 days)
0.45 mg of MGA (daily feed)
Manure
Compost Stockpile
Runoff Holding
Pond
Land
Application
Overland
runoff
Soil Water
Movement
Plant Uptake
Streams, Lak
es
Vadose
zone, Ground
water
Animal
Ingestion
12. Feedlot study initiated June
Waste handling study initiated October
Manure from
treated and
untreated cattle
placed in
compost piles
and anaerobic
stockpiles
Piles turned
through Spring
14. To evaluate the effects of:
precipitation (simulation at 1 DAT and 30 DAT)
manure handling (composting vs stockpiling,
treated vs untreated)
tillage (disk, plow and no-till)
-on the presence of steroid hormones in overland
runoff
14
15. Study area: Haskell
Agricultural Laboratory,
Concord
Soil: Nora silty clay loam
(28% sand, 48% silt and
24% clay)
Slope: 8%
Average annual
precipitation: 672 mm
(26 in)
Average annual
temperature: 8 C (47 F)
15
Feedlot
16. Manure application rate:
193 Mg ha-1 stockpiled
159 Mg ha-1 composted
N availability factor: 0.15
N requirement: 170 kg-N
ha-1 for dryland corn
Rainfall intensity:
75 mm hr-1
6 runoff samples
collected at 5 mins
interval after runoff
initiation
16
Experimental Design
22. Lack of detection in the 2008
Ensure sufficient concentrations to
detect effect of treatments
Not used or released by beef cattle
17α-Ethynylestradiol (EE2)
22
23. Manure application
193 Mg ha-1
N availability factor:
0.15
170 kg-N ha-1 N
requirements
Application rate of 7.5
mg m-2
Using a backpack sprayer
with a 3 m boom
RCB with three
replications 23
25. Flow Weighted
Average Concentration
(ng L-1)
Mass
transport
(mg ha-1)
Treatment Pr>F
Tillage 0.0003 0.003
Manure 0.05 0.11
Tillage*Manure 0.83 0.90
Mean
NT-EE2 with Manure 1765 a 110 a
T-EE2 with Manure 62 b 3 b
26. Little steroid remains in
manure after feedlot
Minor benefit from
composting
Runoff from fields affected by
tillage and timing
Interaction between time from
tillage to rainfall affects erosion
and hence,
Size of storm to produce similar
potential losses varies
Little leaching, held in soil
(data not shown)
Livestock
(Heifers)
Manure
Compost Stockpile
Land
Applicati
on
Overland
runoff
Streams,
Lakes
Editor's Notes
What are they studying and where?UC-Berkelye: Beef cattle and Dairy CAFO, Maryland: Poultry litterGerogia: BroilerWisconsin: Cattle, dairy, swine and poultryPurdue: Beef, dairy, poultry and swineAll of them are dealing mostly fate, transport and different BMPs, biological effects, impact on aquatic organisms,
Melengestrol acetate
What isTBA - TreboloneMGA?-Melengestrol acetateMight be good to animate at some point to show where we have numbers, and depending on the presentation, what will be discussed.
From Terry:-Hormonal residues are going to be found in animal waste-Limited statistical differences were found in hormone excretions between treated and control cattle
12 out of 17, TBA was not present and MGA below detection limitU/T: 33.5/ 40.3, C/S: 23.7/51.1Write out here what you want me to say about this slide. What does the yellow mean? What do the circles (pointing out differences).What would EET2 be to be comparable to what we put on?Yellow column: These are the steroids we implanted or fed to the heifers.Violet: Detected but below detection limitRed circle: Detected in all manure samples, 3 whole circle shows concentration of steroids are higher in stockpiled manure than dot red circle where composted manure concentration is higher. Red arrow indicates that both composting has lower concentration than stockpile from both treated and untreated manure.
What more do you have on the literature about tillage, we will need to have some info on runoff/infilitration/erosion by timing of tillage as a background slide since this paper it to a group more interested in tillage than hormones.Dutta et al. (2010) and Jenkins et al. (2009) evaluated the potential impact of poultry litter application on steroid hormone concentrations in subsurface drainage and surface runoff under no‐till and conventional-till/ reduced till management systems. They found significantly less runoff loads of steroid hormones from no‐till than from conventional tillage due low runoff generation.
Tillage record important here, previous crops, rainfall for month up to spreading for both years.Field is in NT treatment over past 5 years.
You will need to explain about the size of the tillage blocks.
Manure and runoff samples were analyzed in the laboratory for 17 steroid hormones and metabolites Runoff samples were analyzed using on-line solid phase extraction (SPE) liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) with atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) source.Microwave-assisted solvent extraction (MASE) was used for manure samples analysis
First one : avg (80-40 min)
Second one: No difference between manure applied and control plotsComparing the 2: no significant diff: only NT and MP of 2nd differ than 1st
This a lead into the second year study? Should be in the title somewhere.2008 rainfall simulation study was conducted seven months after the feedlot runoff study.where estriol was detected in 10% of the samples followed by estrone (9%), progesterone (7%), 4-androstenedione (6%), and 17α-trenbolone, α-zearalanol and α-zearalenol from 5% samples.
Why is soil more than manure?NT= No-till, T= Conventional till, EM= EE2 applied on manure, M= manure, ES= EE2 applied on soil and S= control plot with bare soil