1.
Employment Law Update
Laura Friedel
November 9, 2017

2.
Agenda
• Overtime update
• Minimum Wage developments
• Sexual Orientation and Title VII
• Other EEOC updates
• Independent Contractor & Joint Employer standards
• NLRB update
• Immigration update
• Arbitration Agreements and Waiver of Class Claims
• Pregnancy Accommodation developments
• Paid Leave update
• Restrictive Covenant Agreement update
• Pay History laws
• Medical Marijuana
2

3.
Overtime Update
What a difference a year makes…..
• Obama administration regulations
stayed just before effective date,
and are now dead.
• Trump DOL has asked for public
comment, so regulatory process
is in motion.
• For now, 2004 Regulations
remain in place.
3

4.
Minimum Wage Developments
States and localities continue to raise minimum wage….
• Chicago → $11/hr
• Cook County (if municipality hasn’t opted out) → $10/hr
• New York State → $9.70/hr
• NYC → $11/hr (large employers) or $10.50/hr (small employers)
• Washington, DC → $12.50/hr
But some stepping back….
St. Louis’ minimum wage of $10/hr (which was on track to increase to
$11/hr) was invalidated by Missouri state law, resulting in decrease of
minimum wage in St. Louis from $10/hr to $7.70/hr.
4

5.
Sexual Orientation and Title VII
• 2015 EEOC began to assert that
Title VII covers sexual orientation
• All 11 U.S. Circuit Courts
previously had held not covered
5
• Hively v. Ivy Tech Comm. College (April 4, 2017) –
full panel of 7th Cir. breaks ranks
- Form of sex stereotyping
- Associational discrimination
• September 26, 2017 – 2d Cir. heard argument en
banc in Zarda v. Altitude Express
- DOJ files amicus brief opposing protection under Title VII –
conflict with EEOC

6.
Gender Identity and Title VII
• Roberts v. Clark County Sch. Dist. (October 4, 2016)
– district court in Nevada agrees with EEOC
• Blatt v. Cabela’s Retail (May 18, 2017) – district
court in Pennsylvania holds gender dysphoria
possible disability protected by ADA
6
• EEOC also takes
position that Title VII
protects against
discrimination based on
gender identity

7.
Examples of Discrimination - EEOC
• Failing to hire an applicant because she is a
transgender woman.
• Firing an employee because he is planning or has
made a gender transition.
• Denying an employee equal access to a
common restroom corresponding to the employee's
gender identity.
• Harassing an employee because of a gender
transition, such as by intentionally and
persistently failing to use the name and gender
pronoun that correspond to the gender identity with
which the employee identifies, and which the
employee has communicated to management and
employees.
7

8.
Other EEOC Developments
Pay Reporting
• 2016 EEOC announces plan to begin requiring pay
data reporting as part of EEO-1 in March 2018
• April 29, 2017 – EEOC Chair Victoria Lipnic
announced review of requirements by OMB
- “The poster child for the kind of regulation that the President
campaigned against”
• Prior EE0-1 form (without pay data) remains in effect.
• Deadline still March 2018.
8

9.
DOL Withdraws Key Guidances
Independent Contractor Guidance
• Guidance issued in July 2015 changed analysis and
made it much harder to establish independent
contractor status.
• Withdrawn on June 7th
• Where are we now?
- Prior DOL standards stand
- IRS, Common Law, ABC Tests still in place
- Higher state standards apply
9
Key Takeaway:
Withdrawal of guidance doesn’t materially alter overall risk of
independent contractor being deemed to be misclassified!

10.
DOL Withdraws Key Guidances
Joint Employer Guidance
• Guidance issued in January 2016 expanded
situations where both related companies and
unrelated companies that work together would be
considered joint employers.
• Withdrawn on June 7th
• Where are we now?
- Existing law on joint employer status remains
- Staffing agency employees still considered joint employees
- Depending on management structure, sister company
employees may be considered joint employees
10

11.
NLRB Gets Ready to Change Course
• Two new members of NLRB (William J. Emmanuel
and Marvin E. Kaplan) confirmed in October. With
Chair Philip Miscimarra, this gives NLRB a
Republican majority for first time in 8 years.
• Peter Robb (management-side labor lawyer)
expected to be confirmed this week. Expect to see
changes starting now that he’s been confirmed.
• Regional personnel will adhere to existing
standards, even if writing is on the wall.
11

12.
Likely Changes from NLRB
• Joint employment standard (also at D.C. Circuit)
• Micro bargaining units
• Ambush elections
• Class action waiver (also being addressed at
Supreme Court)
• Use of employer email
• Scrutiny of employer handbook policies
12

13.
New Form I-9
• New Form I-9 has been issued
• Changes are minimal
• Adds some acceptable forms of identification
• Separate paper and electronic versions
• Make sure using form that has “07/17/17” in the footer and
“Expires 08/31/2019” in header
• Must use new form as of September 18th
• New document is available at https://www.uscis.gov/i-9.
13

14.
Arbitration Agreements and
Class Action Waivers
• January 2012 – NLRB decides D.R. Horton case
• Most federal circuit courts disagreed (2nd, 5th, 8th)
• May 2016 – 7th Circuit becomes first circuit court to agree
with NLRB – Epic Systems v. Lewis
• Two more courts agree with NLRB - 9th Circuit in August
2016 (Ernst & Young v. Morris) and 6th Circuit in June
2017 (NLRB v. Alternative Entertainment)
• Supreme Court heard argument in October 2017
• Decision expected later this year or early 2018
14

15.
Pregnancy Accommodation Developments
• EEOC enforcement guidance
in 2015 addressing
requirements under ADA and
Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
• July 27, 2017, Massachusetts
passes Pregnant Workers
Fairness Act
15
• Last four months, Connecticut, Nevada, Vermont, and
Washington State have passed similar laws
• Total count now 22 states and District of Columbia
• Illinois Pregnancy Accommodation Act went into effect
on January 1, 2015

16.
Pregnancy Accommodation Developments
Locations with provisions for pregnancy accommodation as of August 2017
Source: Department of Labor
https://www.dol.gov/wb/maps/
16

17.
Leave as Accommodation under ADA
Severson v. Heartland Woodcraft, Inc.,
(7th Cir. 9/20/17)
• Question posed: does the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
require that employee be given additional time off as an
accommodation?
• EEOC has said yes. Courts previously have skirted the issue, not
providing much guidance.
• In Severson, the Seventh Circuit rejected the EEOC’s position
- denied the employee’s claim that he should have been allowed an additional 2-3
months of leave
- flies in the face of EEOC’s position on “maximum leave” policies
17
“[the ADA] is an anti-discrimination statute, not a medical
leave entitlement….”

18.
Paid Leave
• Chicago Paid Sick Leave Ordinance
• Went into effect July 1st
• Not too complicated on face, but complicated when you dig in
• Issues our clients are seeing
• Existing generous policies not meeting technical requirements
• Carry-over requirement even if frontloading full amount employee is permitted
to take
• How to handle new hires when frontloading
• Part-time / temporary employees and interns
• For FMLA-covered employers, whether to create separate category of time
• Multiple locations and employees who work from home
• Cook County Earned Sick Leave Ordinance
• Went into effect July 1st
• Home-Rule Municipalities had right to opt-out – vast majority did
• For those staying in, same issues as Chicago Ordinance
18

19.
• New York State Paid Family Leave
• Effective January 1, 2018
• Must include in handbook/policies
• Similar to unemployment compensation system, but added to
employer’s existing disability insurance policy
• Most employees eligible after 26 weeks
• Starts at 8 weeks @ 50% pay – going to 12 weeks @ 67% pay
• Can be used for maternity/paternity or other family member care
• Employers are required to carry a disability insurance policy
• Premium is fully funded by employees
• Could start deducting from pay July 1st
• Must include in handbook/policies
Federal Standard to bring consistency?
Paid Leave
19

20.
Restrictive Covenant Developments
• Illinois - Does the 2-year, bright-line standard under Fifield
apply in federal court? Probably not.
• California – Choice of law/venue statute
- Governs contracts that are entered into from Jan. 1, 2017
forward
- Can’t require employee to adjudicate claim outside of CA
- Can’t deprive employee of substantive protections of CA law
- All employees who “primarily” reside and work in CA
- Voidable at option of employee
- Can get attorneys’ fees
- Does not apply to employee represented by counsel in
negotiating employment agreement
20

21.
Restrictive Covenant Developments
• Bankers Life v. American Senior Benefits (Illinois 1st
Dist. – June 2017)
- Former employee sent three former coworkers requests to
become LinkedIn “connections”
- Requests did not discuss Bankers Life or new employer,
did not suggest review of job description, did not encourage
recipient to leave
• Mobile Mini, Inc. v. Vevea (U.S. District Court in
Minnesota – July 2017)
- Two posts on LinkedIn that included invitations to
customers
- Went beyond status updates
21

22.
Pay History Laws
• Laws that prohibit asking applicants about current or past
compensation before an offer is made, or otherwise
seeking that information.
• Currently some sort of restriction on the books
• California (effective 2018)
• Massachusetts (effective 2018)
• Delaware (effective 12/17)
• Oregon (no suits until 2019)
• Puerto Rico (penalty provisions effective 3/18)
• New York City (effective 10/31/17)
• Philadelphia (enforcement delayed pending court challenge)
• San Francisco (penalty provisions effective 2019)
• Illinois version was vetoed
22

23.
Pay History Laws
• Practical Implications
• What law applies when offers are made over state/city lines?
• Difficulty making initial offer
• Increased negotiation?
• Interplay with anti-trust laws
• Increased need for comp consultants?
23

24.
Medical Marijuana
• Medical marijuana legal in 29 states
plus DC and pending in 12 others
• Still Schedule 1 controlled substance
under federal law
• Early case law suggested right to use
didn’t limit employment action
- 2015 Colorado S. Ct. in Coats v Dish
Network
- Similar rulings in CA, MT, and WA
• But the tide is shifting…
24

25.
Medical Marijuana
• Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics – Rhode Island
Superior Court – May 2017 – refusal to hire medical
marijuana user violates RI Civil Rights Act and med.
marijuana statute
• Barbuto v. Advantage Sales – MA Supreme Court –
July 2017 – finds claim for disability discrimination
under state FEPA
• Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co. – U.S.
District Court in CT – August 2017 - federal law does
not preempt claims under state statutes
25

26.
Questions?
26

27.
Trouble keeping up with legal developments?
Subscribe to our blog at
www.lpemploymentlaw.com
27

28.
Thank You
Laura B. Friedel
Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC
lfriedel@lplegal.com
312.476.7510
28